PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Buscaglia

Publications and source records attributed to S Buscaglia.

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Deflazacort protects against late-phase but not early-phase reactions induced by the allergen-specific conjunctival provocation test.

The protective effects of deflazacort against the inflammation that follows the conjunctival provocation test (CPT) by specific allergen were assessed in 24 patients with rhinoconjunctivitis caused by Parietaria judaica in a double-blind study. After a screening CPT, patients were randomized into four treatment groups, each being given deflazacort (oral tablets) at 6, 30, and 60 mg once daily, or matching placebo, for 3 d, outside the pollen season. Clinical evaluation (itching, hyperemia, lacrimation, and swelling of eyelids) and cytologic assessment (number of inflammatory cells in conjunctival scraping and evaluation of ICAM (intercellular adhesion molecule)-1/CD54 expression on epithelial cells) were performed at base line, 30 min (early-phase reaction (EPR), 6 h and 24 h (late-phase reaction (LPR)) after specific CPT, and before and after treatment. Neither the EPR clinical reactions nor the EPR total number of inflammatory cells was modified by deflazacort. However, the LPR clinical effects were significantly reduced by deflazacort at 30 or 60 mg/d (P < 0.01), as compared with placebo. The total number of inflammatory cells during LPR was significantly reduced by deflazacort at 30 or 60 mg/d (P < 0.01), as compared with placebo. Furthermore, CD54 expression was significantly reduced by deflazacort at 30 or 60 mg/d both in the EPR (P < 0.01) and LPR (P < 0.01), as compared with placebo. None of the studied indicators were modified at the 6 mg/d dose. This study shows that deflazacort has a highly protective action against clinical and cellular LPR effects induced by the specific CPT. In addition, deflazacort markedly reduces CD54 expression on the conjunctival epithelium during both EPR and LPR.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Protective effect of loratadine on late phase reaction induced by conjunctival provocation test.

The protective effect of Loratadine, a new generation, non-sedating antihistamine, on clinical and cellular events during the early phase reaction (EPR) and late phase reaction (LPR) of the allergen-specific conjunctival provocation test (CPT) was assessed out of the pollen season in 20 seasonally allergic rhino-conjunctivitis patients. After a screening CPT, selected patients were randomized to Loratadine (10 mg OD) or matching placebo for 7 days. CPT was repeated following treatment. Clinical and cellular responses were evaluated by a symptom score and cell counting in conjunctival scrapings before, and 30 min and 6 h after challenge with allergen (one eye) or placebo (control eye). Conjunctival symptom severity following CPT was reduced at 30 min (EPR) and 6 h (LPR) after CPT in the Loratadine group compared to placebo group (p < 0.01), as was the total number of inflammatory cells (p < 0.001). In conclusion, Loratadine protects against the clinical and cellular EPR and LPR events consequent to CPT, showing antiallergic properties.

Allergens↗
PubMed1992

Protective effect of different doses of terfenadine on the conjunctival provocation test.

The protective effect of terfenadine on inflammatory processes following the early phase of conjunctival provocation tests by specific allergen was assessed in 24 patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, in a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups, each being given terfenadine 60, 120, 180 mg daily, or placebo, respectively, for 7 days, out of the pollen season. Clinical severity (burning, itching, lacrimation and hyperemia), and number of inflammatory cells obtained by conjunctival scraping (neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes) were evaluated before and after treatment. Pre-treatment with terfenadine resulted in a significantly higher allergen threshold dose than placebo (p less than 0.01), regardless of drug dose. Patients given terfenadine experienced a significant reduction (p less than 0.03) in conjunctival symptom severity, as compared with placebo, following conjunctival challenge. Accordingly, the number of inflammatory cells in terfenadine-treated patients was significantly lower (p less than 0.01) than in the placebo-treated after the conjunctival provocation test. The results of this study suggest that terfenadine has a significant protective effect on the early-phase cellular and clinical events of conjunctival reaction induced by allergen challenge in atopic patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Drug treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. A review of the evidence.

Allergic conjunctivitis, unlike several other ocular diseases, is seldom followed by permanent visual impairment; nevertheless, it is important because of both its frequency and its severity. Two major forms, seasonal and perennial, are considered in this review. To recognise the hallmarks of allergic conjunctivitis, clinicians have need of a thorough knowledge of its pathophysiological aspects and clinical features, enabling them to choose the best and most suitable therapy among the alternatives. The aims of treatment vary according to the symptoms, severity and characteristics of the allergic reactions; in general, treatment is based mainly on environmental control, pharmacotherapy and (sometimes) specific immunotherapy. Topical vasoconstrictors, decongestant compounds, standard antihistamines or combinations of these drugs have been used for a number of years to treat the acute and/or persistent symptomatology, and in order to prevent the side effects of a prolonged treatment with topical glucocorticosteroids. Nevertheless, the latter represent the most powerful anti-inflammatory drugs, and are particularly recommended in short term treatment (5 to 7 days) in severe acute symptomatology. Orally administered 'classic' antihistamines, i.e. histamine H1-receptor antagonists, are effective and very convenient in either short or long term treatment, largely because the new compounds also act on the inflammatory process secondary to the allergic events. Recently, other topical compounds such as sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium), nedocromil and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [i.e. piroxicam, aspirin] have become available. Sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil act as prophylactic compounds, able to prevent the allergic reaction; NSAIDs represent a valid and effective alternative to glucocorticosteroids in several situations.

Conjunctivitis, Allergic↗
PubMed1992

Cetirizine does not influence the immune response.

Antihistamines are frequently employed in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria-angioedema syndrome. We analyzed the in vitro effects of cetirizine on the immune response. To this end the proliferation of peripheral mononuclear cells induced by mitogen and by -CD3, -CD2, or -CD28 monoclonal antibodies has been studied. Since the plasma peak of cetirizine following ingestion of 10 mg is about 1 microgram/mL, the drug was tested in the cultures at the concentration of 0.1, 1, or 10 micrograms/mL. No influence of cetirizine on T cell proliferation was detected. We also evaluated the effect of cetirizine on the expression of the following markers expressed by T cells upon activation: lymphocyte markers ICAM-1, HLA-DR, and CD25 surface expression, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein has been also studied. There was no effect of cetirizine on the investigated immunologic parameters; these data acquire clinical relevance when related to previous reports showing a depression of the immunologic response exerted by other compounds such as ketotifen and theophylline and when related to the recent data about the modulation of ICAM-1 expression on eosinophils by cetirizine. Cetirizine does not affect ICAM-1 expression of lymphocyte membrane.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Protective effect of loratadine on specific conjunctival provocation test.

The protective effect of loratadine (anti-H1 antagonist) on clinical and cellular processes following the early phase of specific conjunctival provocation test was assessed in 20 patients affected by seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, each being given a single daily dose of loratadine 10 mg or placebo, for 7 days, out of pollen season. Pretreatment with Loratadine resulted in a significant higher allergen threshold dose than placebo (p less than 0.01). Patients treated with loratadine experienced a significant reduction (p less than 0.01) in conjunctival symptom severity as compared with placebo, following conjunctival challenge. Finally, the number of inflammatory cells was lower in the loratadine-treated patients compared to the placebo group (p less than 0.01). In conclusion, loratadine exerts a significant protective effect on the early phase cellular and clinical events of conjunctival reaction induced by allergen challenge in atopic patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Comparative effects of terfenadine and loratadine in the treatment of hay fever.

This double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was undertaken in 40 patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis during the 1990 hay fever season. The patients were randomized and treated for seven days with either 120 mg terfenadine or 10 mg loratadine, each drug taken once daily in the morning. The severity of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasopharyngeal itching, and itchy, watery, red eyes was evaluated before and at the end of treatment. The global severity of symptoms was ranked daily by the patient on a diary card. Both treatment groups experienced a significant improvement of symptoms after treatment (p < 0.01), without any significant difference between the two study drugs. Terfenadine and loratadine significantly improved symptom severity by 69 and 55% compared with the baseline values, respectively. Headache and fatigue were reported in three loratadine-treated patients, and sedation in one patient. No side effects were observed in patients receiving terfenadine. This study confirmed that terfenadine 120 mg once daily is a safe and effective treatment for hay fever.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

ICAM-1 on epithelial cells in allergic subjects: a hallmark of allergic inflammation.

Allergen-specific challenge was first shown to induce ICAM-1 expression on epithelial cells (ECs) of conjunctiva in allergic patients. The data have also been confirmed in the nose. We then checked for the presence of ICAM-1 consequent to natural exposure to allergens. For both conjunctivitis and rhinitis due to pollen we confirmed, during the pollen season, the presence of ICAM-1 on ECs. We demonstrated the endogenous source of ICAM-1 by in situ hybridization both in vitro and in vivo. ICAM-1 could be an activation marker on ECs, or could, enhanced EC susceptibility to bind offending cells such as eosinophils (LFA-1+). ICAM-1 is also a receptor for the vast majority of rhinoviruses, which are known to provoke, mainly in children, asthma attacks. Since we found that mite allergens can induce ICAM-1 on ECs, even during clinical latency, allergy may be considered as a primary event leading to asthma (through rhinovirus infection) and non-specific hyperreactivity.

Allergens↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Topical acetylsalicylic acid in the treatment of allergic pollinosic conjunctivitis.

The pharmacological treatment of allergic conjunctivitis includes the use of topical antiinflammatory drugs, i.e. steroids and NSAIDs (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs), such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). However, steroids are not suitable in prolonged treatment, as well as in pollinosis in the Mediterranean area, because of their side effects. The present double-blind study evaluates the topical use of acetylsalicylic acid eye drops (1% solution) compared to placebo in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis during the period June-July 1990. The patients were randomized and treated with ASA eye drops or placebo eye drops, both applied as one drop in each eye q.i.d. for 14 days. The severity of symptoms was evaluated before and after treatment by the investigator and the patient. An overall judgement of therapeutic response was expressed independently by the patient and the investigator at the end of the treatment. The ASA-treated group improved significantly compared to the placebo-treated group. No serious side effects were observed. The results confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of topical ASA in the treatment of pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Topical anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of allergic pollinosic conjunctivitis: a comparative double-blind study.

Anti-inflammatory drugs, i.e. glucocorticosteroids and NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), are often included in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. The present study compares the clinical efficacy and safety of topical hydrocortisone, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and piroxicam compared to placebo. The trial, designed as a double-blind, randomized and parallel-group treatment, was carried out in a group of 40 patients suffering from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis due to Parietaria pollen, during the pollen season (June-July, 1990). Patients received hydrocortisone 0.1% solution, ASA 1% solution, piroxicam 0.5% solution or placebo as eye drops, all one drop in each eye q.i.d. for 14 days. The symptoms were evaluated at baseline and at the end of treatment by the clinician and by patients on a diary card. The hydrocortisone group showed a rapid and significant improvement during the first week of treatment, while ASA and piroxicam reduced symptomatology during the second week of treatment; this difference was statistically significant. At the end of the trial, the active drugs were comparable with regard to clinical efficacy. A statistically significant difference was observed between the active drugs and placebo, while no statistically significant difference was observed among the three drugs. No serious side-effects were observed. The results demonstrate the clinical efficacy of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis; they also suggest the use of NSAIDs in long-term treatment, as their efficacy has been shown to be closely comparable to that of steroids, while avoiding the well-known side-effects of the latter in prolonged treatment.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Nedocromil sodium and the immune response.

Chromones are frequently employed in the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. Following our recent investigations concerning the influence of some antiallergic drugs, such as cromoglycate sodium, steroids, oxatomide and ketotifen (H1 antihistamines), and theophylline, on the immune response, in the present study we analyzed the in vitro effects of a new chromone derivative, nedocromil, on the immune response. To this end, the proliferation of peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNCs) induced by mitogen (PHA) and by CD3, CD2 or CD28 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has been studied. Since the effects of nedocromil on immunological parameters are achieved at 10(-7) mol/l, in the experiments herein reported the drug was tested in the cultures at concentrations of 10(-8), 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/l. Furthermore, the effect of nedocromil was evaluated on the surface expression of the following markers expressed by PMNCs upon activation: ICAM-1 (CD54), LFA-1 and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (alpha 1-AGP). The results of the present investigation showed no effect of nedocromil on these immunological parameters. These data acquire clinical relevance when related to previous reports showing a depression of the immunological response exerted by other compounds, such as ketotifen, theophylline and steroids.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Clobetasone treatment of allergic conjunctivitis: a comparative double blind study.

Glucocorticosteroids are often included in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. The present study compares the efficacy on clinical and cytological parameters and safety of topical clobetasone butyrate compared to placebo. The trial, designed as double blind, randomized and parallel group treatment, was carried out in 30 patients, suffering from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis due to Grass pollen, during the pollen season (June 1992). Patients received clobetasone butyrate 0.1% eye drops or placebo eye drops, two drops each eye, t.i.d. for 10 days. The clinical and cytological evidences were investigated on admission and at the end of treatment by clinicians and by patients on a dairy card. The steroid group showed a rapid and significant clinical improvement and at the end of the trial a statistically significant difference was evidenced between the active drug treated group and placebo treated group. No serious side effects were observed. The results show the clinical efficacy of clobetasone butyrate in the treatment of pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Deflazacort in the treatment of uveitis: a comparative study versus prednisone.

Since corticosteroids represent a fundamental tool in the treatment of uveitis, we evaluate the clinical efficacy and possible appearance of side effects of deflazacort, a new corticosteroid of third generation, versus prednisone at equiactive dosages. Sixty six patients suffering from recurring acute anterior uveitis (RAAU) and/or chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) were treated with deflazacort or alternatively prednisone in an "open" study. Clinical efficacy, ophthalmological parameters and haemato-bioassays were evaluated on admission and during the treatment period. All patients showed a complete remission of clinical signs and symptoms with both treatment and no statistically significant difference was evidenced between the studied groups. Concerning the possible appearance of side effects, the comparison between deflazacort and prednisone a statistically significant difference. These preliminary results are strongly encouraging and suggest further controlled studies on the employment of deflazacort in the treatment of uveitis.

Acute Disease↗