A short history of genetic counseling.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S C Reed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Plain radiographs of the shoulder can demonstrate a vacuum arthrogram delineating the articular surfaces. In a review of 122 consecutive arthrograms with radiographic contrast injections, there were 25 vacuum arthrograms on the preceding plain films. We have found the presence of a vacuum arthrogram to be an accurate predictor of an intact rotator cuff, with a specificity of 0.98 and a positive predictive value of 0.96.
We performed a biomechanical comparison of two rotator cuff repair techniques using fresh-frozen human cadavers. Nine pairs of cadaveric shoulders had standardized full-thickness tears made at the supraspinatus tendon insertion. One of each pair of the cadaveric shoulders was repaired by pulling the tendon into a bone trough in the humeral head using standard sutures. The remaining half of the pairs was repaired using anchor sutures. The repairs were tested using a servohydraulically operated material testing system. The anchor suture repair was significantly stronger than the standard suture technique irrespective of bone quality. Failure occurred predominantly through bone in the suture repairs and as a result of suture breakage in the anchor repairs. The anchors should be placed into the edge of the subchondral bone adjacent to the articular surface. The surgeon should direct the anchor so that the direction of the pull is approximately 90 degrees to the anchor, with the humerus at 30 degrees of abduction.
PURPOSE: The provision of preventive services holds a central place in primary care. Achievement of prevention standards offers a challenge. The authors address the efficacy of an office systems approach to improving cancer prevention and early detection services, provide a guide to assessing the appropriateness of office systems dissemination in practices targeted for improvement, and describe the range of dissemination strategies available. OVERVIEW: Preventive service office systems depend on establishing practice routines, using tools such as flow sheets, and sharing responsibilities among practice clinicians, staff, and patients. Systems have been shown to be efficacious in a variety of settings. Computers provide a significant enhancement to paper-based tools. Some practices develop office systems themselves, whereas others require external support. Before attempting to disseminate preventive services offices systems, disseminators should ensure that adequate assistance can be provided, that assistance follows a format that is acceptable to target practices, and that target practices are receptive to assistance and able to cooperate. Dissemination strategies include journal articles, continuing education programs, manuals and tool kits, facilitation, and academic detailing. The relative expense and efficacy of these approaches require further assessment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Office systems hold promise in enhancing provision of cancer prevention services in primary care. The practice should be approached as a team, and should include practice clinicians as well as nonclinical staff members. Current research should provide answers over the next few years about the cost-effectiveness of various approaches and the most feasible ways to promote dissemination to practices that need it.