PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S C Wei

Publications and source records attributed to S C Wei.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1981

Immunochemical studies of human placental-type variants of alkaline phosphatase. Structural differences between the "Nagao isoenzyme" and the placental "D-variant".

Hyperimmune antisera raised against the rare FD and SD phenotypes of human placental alkaline phosphatase and the related cancer-associated Nagao isoenzyme were exhaustively absorbed with the common SS and FF phenotype enzymes conjugated to Sepharose. The antibodies so obtained had one of three specificities, determined by testing all the common phenotypes of placental alkaline phosphatase, the rare FD, SD and S-17 phenotypes, and five samples of purified cancer patient enzymes: (I) antibodies reactive with the S, D and I variant enzymes, but not with the F, 17 or Nagao enzymes; (II) antibodies reactive with the F, 17 and Nagao enzymes, but not with the S, D, and I variant enzymes; and (III) antibodies reactive with the D, 17 and Nagao enzymes and not with the S, F or I variant enzymes. Based on these data, and on the information obtained from biochemical characterization, it is argued that the Nagao isoenzyme and the D-variant are closely related but distinct enzymes. We propose a hypothetical scheme for the divergence of these two enzymes from a common ancestral gene product. In this scheme, an ancestral gene duplication resulted in two isoenzymes, one of which is completely specific to the placenta, and one of which (the "Nagao isoenzyme") has an unknown normal tissue localization, but is found in some cases of cancer. We use the term "syn-placental" to describe this latter isoenzyme, reflecting its close structural relationship to the placental isoenzyme.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed1980

Specificity of allozyme-absorbed antisera to human placental alkaline phosphatase for individual phenotypes.

Antisera raised against the rare FD phenotype enzyme were exhaustively absorbed with SS and FF phenotype enzyme immobilized on agarose gels. When it was absorbed with the FF phenotype enzyme, the antiserum no longer reacted with the F-variant enzyme, but did with the S-, D-, and I-variants, as determined by electrophoretic retardation experiments and precipitation of antigen-antibody complexes using staphylococcal protein A. When the antiserum was absorbed with SS phenotype enzyme, it no longer reacted with S-, D-, or I-variant enzyme, but did have some reactivity with the F-variant, as seen in the protein A assay. Based upon the IgG concentration, which bound 40% of the appropriate enzyme, 1/20 of the antiserum preparation was specific for the S-, D-, and I-variant shared specificity, and 1/400 was specific for the F-variant alone.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The occurrence of submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract is not infrequent. According to endoscopic pictures, submucosal tumors can usually be diagnosed without difficulty. However, even with the aid of endoscopic ultrasound, a definite diagnosis is not possible without histological results. Before endoscopy became available, the treatment strategy for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors was either surgery or observation. Due to advances in scientific technology, endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors has become increasingly popular. In reviewing the literature, we found that only case reports or small series reports detailing specific tumors in specific locations existed previously. METHODOLOGY: Endoscopic resection for 12 gastrointestinal submucosal tumors in 11 patients has been successfully performed in our hospital during the past three years. RESULTS: The group included 5 men and 6 women, ranging in age from 28 to 78 years. The locations of the tumors consisted of 1 in the esophagus, 2 in the stomach, 1 in the jejunum, 5 in the colon and 3 in the rectum. Histological results showed 3 lipomas, 3 carcinoids, 2 leiomyomas, 1 ganglioneuromatous polyp, 1 hemangioma, 1 inflammatory fibroid polyp and 1 myomatous hyperplasia. Bleeding complications occurred in only 2 cases. One stopped spontaneously and the other stopped after epinephrine and sclerosant injection. Only 1 case required a two-step resection in order to avoid perforation. No tumor recurrence was noted during the follow-up period, which ranged from 2 months to 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: In suitable cases, endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors can be a safe and valuable method for treating symptomatic tumors and obtaining histological diagnosis of the submucosal tumors.

Adult↗