PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Chrubasik

Publications and source records attributed to S Chrubasik.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effectiveness of Petasites hybridus preparations in the prophylaxis of migraine: a systematic review.

The objective of this review was to evaluate the strength of evidence of effectiveness for Petasites hybridus in the prophylaxis of migraine. Several databases and other sources were searched to identify randomised-controlled trials investigating P. hybridus preparations. Two trials totalling 293 patients (60 and 233 patients) were included in this review. Both trials investigated the proprietary Petasites root extract Petadolex. The trials were described in narrative way, taking into consideration methodological quality scores. Pooling of data was not carried out due to the heterogeneity of the results. The extract at higher dose (150 mg) showed a greater decreased frequency of migraine attacks and a greater number of responders (improvement>50%) after treatment over 3-4 months than the extract at lower dose (100 mg) and placebo. Moderate evidence of effectiveness is, thus, available for a higher than the recommended dose of the proprietary Petasites root extract Petadolex in the prophylaxis of migraine. Further rigorous studies are required to confirm effectiveness and safety in long-term use before treatment with Petasites root extract can be recommended as an alternative option in the treatment schedule for the prophylaxis of migraine.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

The evidence for clinical efficacy of rose hip and seed: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this review is to evaluate whether clinical research has gained any evidence of effectiveness of Rosa canina preparations. METHODS: Several databases and other sources were searched to identify randomized controlled trials of Rosa canina preparations. RESULTS: Trials were described in a narrative way, taking into consideration methodological quality scores. Four trials were included in this review and two were identified as subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate evidence exists for the use of a powder of the seeds and husks of a Rosa canina subspecies in patients suffering from osteoarthritis.

Arthralgia↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy and tolerability of potato juice in dyspeptic patients: a pilot study.

In Europe, use of potatoes (Solani tuberosi tuberecens) is a traditional remedy for stomach complaints. We performed a pilot study on the effectiveness and tolerability of freshly squeezed potato juice in patients suffering from dyspeptic symptoms. After informed written consent, 44 patients with various dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled, to drink for 1 week twice daily 100ml or more of potato juice (Biotta, if complaints persisted, a further 100ml was recommended. Validated outcome measures included the gastrointestinal symptom (GIS) profile, a disease-specific health assessment questionnaire (QOLRAD) and self-rated treatment success (efficacy, a 5-point Likert Scale). The study was completed by 42 patients. The GIS and QOLRAD scores improved significantly by 41.9+/-40.8% (p=0.001) and 50.7+/-36.1% (p<0.001), respectively (ITT); the absolute values changed from 11.5+/-5.1 to 6.3+/-5.3 (GIS) and 62.0+/-25.7 to 32.0+/-28.8 (QORAD). Sixteen, 18 and 26 patients, respectively, rated the effectiveness of the treatment as very good or good on the GIS, QOLRAD (improvements >60%) and on efficacy, respectively. Poor treatment success was achieved in 13 (GIS), 11 (QOLRAD) and 10 (Efficacy), not necessarily by the same patients. Since about two-thirds of the patients benefited to some extent from the treatment, potato juice in its present formulation may be useful for self-treatment. However, placebo-controlled studies with a longer treatment period are needed to confirm this.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Expressing treatment-associated changes.

The Osteoarthritis Research Society International is attempting to establish a consensus on outcome measures, so as to facilitate comparability between different clinical studies in this area of research. There are no general recommendations on how changes in outcome measure (effect size) should be expressed. We therefore used data from a recently published study to express change as: a) the mean of the change from baseline divided by the individual baseline, b) the median of the change from baseline divided by the individual baseline, c) the mean of the change from baseline divided by the SD of baseline and d) the median of change from baseline divided by the SD of baseline. The results show that the correlations between different ways of expressing effect sizes were poor and the perceived relative magnitudes of various effects depended on how they were expressed. Organisations aiming at consensus ought to recommend the way in which change ought to be expressed. Until they do, authors should justify their choice of expression, particularly if it critically influences their conclusion, and/or present their data as fully as possible on a website.

Arthralgia↗
PubMed2005

A 1-year follow-up after a pilot study with Doloteffin for low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To complete a year's follow-up on patients from a 6-week double-blind pilot comparison between 44 Doloteffin patients and 44 rofecoxib patients being treated for acute exacerbations of chronic low back pain. METHODS: 38 "ex-Doloteffin" (ex-D) and 35 "ex-rofecoxib" (ex-R) received Doloteffin containing 60 mg harpagoside per day for up to 54 weeks. Pain, additional analgesics, mobility, general health and adverse events were assessed from diary records and at 6-week visits. RESULTS: 53 patients remained in the follow-up at 24 weeks and 43 at 54 weeks. There was never any convincing difference between ex-D and ex-R patients in the number of patients remaining in follow-up, diary pain scores, additional analgesics, Arhus Index and health assessment questionnaire scores (HAQ). Individual fluctuations notwithstanding, the follow-up showed a slight overall improvement on the improvements in Arhus and HAQ scores achieved in the pilot study (MANOVA p = 0.016). Of the 21761 patient-days, the respective percentages with no, mild, moderate, severe and excruciating pain were 28%, 39%, 22%, 8.5% and 1.5%, respectively. Few patients requested additional treatments for their pain. Three patients suffered from minor adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with Doloteffin was well tolerated. Ex-R and ex-D patients behaved similarly during the follow-up.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2005

Zingiberis rhizoma: a comprehensive review on the ginger effect and efficacy profiles.

Zingiberis rhizoma is used as a broadspectrum antiemetic. We, therefore, conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to summarize the pharmacological and clinical effects of this popular plant material. Although clinical and experimental studies suggest that ginger has some antiemetic properties, clinical evidence beyond doubt is only available for pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting. Meta-analyses could not demonstrate the postoperative antiemetic effectiveness, and effect in motion sickness or nausea/vomiting of other ethiology. It also remains to be confirmed that proprietary ginger preparations are clinically useful to alleviate osteoarthritic or other pain, although there is no doubt that ginger constituents interfere with the inflammatory cascade and the vanilloid nociceptor. Ginger exerts in vitro antioxidative, antitumorigenic and immunomodulatory effects and is an effective antimicrobial and antiviral agent. Animal studies demonstrate effects on the gastrointestinal tract, the cardiovascular system, on experimental pain and fever, antioxidative, antilipidemic and antitumor effects, as well as central and other effects. The most relevant human pharmacological studies require a confirmatory study to exclude interaction of ginger preparations with platelet aggregation. Pharmacokinetic data are only available for [6]-gingerol and zingiberene. Preclinical safety data do not rule out potential toxicity, which should be monitored especially following ginger consumption over longer periods.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2004

[Devil's claw extract as an example of the effectiveness of herbal analgesics].

Preparations from devil's claw differ in their content of active ingredients as assessed by the quantity of harpagoside present. The harpagoside content in the daily dose of Doloteffin (extraction solvent water) is double that of preparations extracted with 60% ethanol. Only preparations with proven effectiveness for painful lower back or arthrotic pain are an attractive alternative to synthetic analgesics, and are of substantial benefit in the treatment of chronic pain. From an evidence based view, extract with at least 50 mg harpagoside in the daily dose should be recommended for the treatment of pain. Treatment with devil's claw extract is associated with a lower risk of adverse events than treatment with synthetic analgesics, and may contribute in the majority of patients to the relief of pain.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2004

Effects of an ethanolic salix extract on the release of selected inflammatory mediators in vitro.

Salix extracts are in current use for the treatment of pain and inflammation. In order to obtain an insight into the mechanism(s) of action of the ethanolic Salix extract 1520L--which is essentially similar to an extract for which clinical studies have demonstrated analgesic effectiveness--its effects were evaluated in an established in vitro assay test system using primary human monocytes. The IC50-values obtained for the inhibition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced release of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) reflecting cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-mediated PGE2 release were 47 microg/ml and 0.6 microg/ml, for the Salix extract 1520L and rofecoxib-like research compound L745337, respectively. There was no effect on COX-1 and COX-2 activity. The Salix extract inhibited the LPS-induced release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta and interleukin-6 with IC50-values of 180.0, 33.0 and 86.0 microg/ml, respectively. Both, salicin and salicylate, had no effect in any of the parameters. Our results indicate that Salix extract 1520L inhibits COX-2-mediated PGE2 release through compounds other than salicin or salicylate. Our data further suggest that the proprietary Salix extract is a weak inhibitor of proinflammatory cytokines.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2003

The quality of clinical trials with Harpagophytum procumbens.

OBJECTIVE: To examine systematically the quality of the clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of Harpagophytum products. METHODS: Literature searches and enquiries to experts identified 20 studies of treatment with various Harpagophytum products (powder, aqueous and ethanolic extracts) for exacerbations of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Eight were open uncontrolled observational studies, one comparing progress under treatment for pain in back, knee and hip pain. Two were open comparisons with conventional treatment, only one of which was randomised. Ten were double-blinded, randomised controlled comparisons, 8 with placebo and 2 with NSAID comparator treatments. Indices of the internal and external validities were examined by reference to a checklist to see how well the studies answered the questions: do Harpagophytum products work and do they work as well as more conventional comparator treatments? RESULTS: The uncontrolled trials, though providing useful preliminary estimates of the possible effect of treating various conditions, could not separate the effects of the Harpagophytum product from whatever placebo effect might have been exerted in the circumstances of the study. The 2 open comparisons were open to performance, detection and/or selection bias. Of the 8 randomised double blinded controlled comparisons with placebo, 6 were marred by lack of transparency, one could not provide definitive evidence from its pre-selected principal outcome measure, and one provided good quality evidence of a dose dependent superiority of effect over placebo, though this was with a product that is not generally available for clinical practice. One of the randomised controlled comparisons with comparator (Doloteffin versus rofecoxib) was intended only as a pilot and studied too few patients for definitive conclusions whereas the other did provide good evidence that the powder, Harpadol is not importantly less effective than the weak NSAID diacerhein. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of effectiveness of Harpagophytum products is not transferrable from product to product. The results of some studies suggest some effectiveness for some products, but for none of the clinically available products is the quality of evidence totally satisfactory. It is better so far with products that contain at least 50 mg of harpagoside in the daily dosage than with products (which happen to be of ethanolic extraction) that contain less.

Harpagophytum↗
PubMed2003

A randomized double-blind pilot study comparing Doloteffin and Vioxx in the treatment of low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-dummy, double-blind pilot study of acutely exacerbated low back pain was aimed to inform a definitive comparison between Doloteffin, a proprietary extract of Harpagophytum, and rofecoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2). METHODS: Forty-four patients (phyto-anti-inflammatory drug-PAID-group) received a daily dose of Doloteffin containing, inter alia, 60 mg of harpagoside for 6 weeks and 44 (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-NSAID-group) received 12.5 mg/day of rofecoxib. All were allowed rescue medication of up to 400 mg/day of tramadol. Several outcome measures were examined at various intervals to obtain estimates of effect size and variability that might be used to decide the most suitable principal outcome measure and corresponding numbers required for a definitive study. RESULTS: Forty-three PAID and 36 NSAID patients completed the study. Ten PAID and 5 NSAID patients reported no pain without rescue medication for at least 5 days of the 6th week of treatment. Eighteen PAID and 12 NSAID patients had more than a 50% reduction in the week's average of their pain scores between the 1st and 6th weeks. The mean percentage decrease from baseline in the pain component of the Arhus Index was 23 (S.D. 52) in PAID and 26 (S.D. 43) in NSAID. The corresponding measures for the overall Arhus Index were 11 (31) and 16 (24) and, for the Health Assessment Questionnaire, 7 (8) and 6 (7). Tramadol was used by 21 PAID patients and 13 NSAID patients. Fourteen patients in each group experienced 39 adverse effects, of which 28 (13 in PAID) were judged to some degree attributable to the study medications. CONCLUSION: Though no significant intergroup differences were demonstrable, large numbers will be needed to show equivalence.

Acute Disease↗