Biomedical subjects

S Cosway

Publications and source records attributed to S Cosway.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

The risk of dementia and death after delirium.

BACKGROUND: delirium is common and is associated with many adverse short-term consequences. OBJECTIVES: to examine the relationship between an episode of delirium and subsequent dementia and death over 3 years. DESIGN: prospective cohort study. SETTING: patients (n = 203) were aged 65 years or older at baseline and survivors of the index admission. METHODS: Using a standard assessment of cognitive function, we followed 38 inpatients diagnosed with delirium (22 with delirium and dementia, 16 with delirium only) and 148 patients with no delirium or dementia, for a median of 32.5 months. Follow-up was by personal interviews, supplemented by standardized clinical examinations. We calculated the incidence and odds of dementia and the incidence and hazard ratio for death, with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: The incidence of dementia was 5.6% per year over 3 years for those without delirium and 18.1% per year for those with delirium. The unadjusted relative risk of dementia for those with delirium was 3.23 (95% confidence interval 1.86-5.63). The adjusted relative risk of death also increased (1.80; 1.11-2.92), while the median survival time was significantly shorter in those with (510 days; 433-587) than in those without delirium (1122 days; 922-1322). CONCLUSION: delirium appears to be an important marker of risk for dementia and death, even in older people without prior cognitive or functional impairment.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Illness presentation in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Atypical disease presentations, such as delirium, are associated with adverse health outcomes. They are also markers of frailty in elderly people, which is itself associated with adverse hospital outcomes. We investigated the relationship between frailty and atypical disease presentation in predicting adverse hospital outcomes and complications of the hospital course of elderly patients admitted to general medical services. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study in a large (800 beds) tertiary care university hospital. The prevalence of atypical disease presentations and the incidence of adverse hospital outcomes (death, nursing home admission, prolonged hospital stay, and failure to regain premorbid functional status) were studied in previously well and previously frail elderly patients. RESULTS: Patients were classified as being well or frail on the basis of the premorbid Barthel Index (well, score of > or = 95 [n = 76]; frail, score of < 95 [n = 117]). Frail elderly were older (80 vs 76 years), more often female (62% vs 46%), and less likely to be community dwelling (89% vs 99%). Atypical disease presentation was more common in the frail elderly (59% vs 25%; P < .001). Of those who presented atypically, the frail most often presented with delirium (61%) and the well presented with falls (37%) and delirium (32%). Of the frail elderly with atypical symptoms, 60% had adverse hospital outcomes compared with 32% of the well elderly who presented typically (P < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed that premorbid functional dependence (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 5.22), atypical disease presentation (odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 4.67), and functional decline at admission (odds ratio, 5.64; 95% confidence interval, 2.37 to 13.44) were all independently predictive of poor hospital outcomes. By contrast, severity of disease, age, and sex did not confer an increased risk of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Premorbid functional dependency, atypical disease presentation, and functional decline on admission have independent impacts on adverse hospital outcomes. Assessment of each should be incorporated into the routine care of elderly patients.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1994

Increasing the recognition of delirium in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an educational intervention aimed at house staff will increase knowledge about and recognition of delirium. DESIGN: Before/after study, with blinding of participants to the intent of the study. SETTING: University hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-seven control patients, seen as consecutive admissions of elderly patients (65 + years) to the General Medicine services of the Victoria General Hospital prior to the educational intervention, and 247 patients seen thereafter. INTERVENTION: Educational intervention at grand rounds, housestaff rounds, sign-in rounds, and bedside teaching. MEASUREMENTS: Recognition of delirium in the admitting history or progress notes, Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) as recorded by nurses, diagnosis of delirium by independent study physicians using DSM-IIIR criteria and the Trzepacz Delirium Symptom Rating Scale. RESULTS: Prior to the intervention, delirium or acute confusion was diagnosed in 3% of patients; after the intervention, delirium or acute confusion was diagnosed in 9% of patients (P < 0.01). Other abnormalities in mental state were noted in 8.5% of admissions prior to the intervention, and 15.6% of admissions after the intervention. After the intervention there was a significant difference in the proportion of patients in whom a mental status questionnaire had been carried out and in whom there was formal comment on various aspects of the mental state. The nursing CAM had a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: A simple educational intervention aimed at house staff appears to be effective in changing house staff behavior. Improved recognition of delirium may lead to better patient outcomes.

Aged↗