PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S D Anderson

Publications and source records attributed to S D Anderson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Response to mannitol in asymptomatic subjects with airway hyper-responsiveness to methacholine.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial provocation using methacholine, a cholinergic agonist, causes airway narrowing directly by contraction of bronchial smooth muscle. While methacholine has a high sensitivity for identifying airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR), it does not have a high specificity to diagnose asthma and false-positive responses may be observed in non-asthmatics. Mannitol is an osmotic stimulus that acts indirectly to cause airway narrowing by release of endogenous bronchoconstricting mediators. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that subjects with asymptomatic AHR to methacholine would not have AHR to mannitol. METHODS: Sixteen subjects with a methacholine PD(20) <8 micro mol were challenged with mannitol. A positive response to mannitol was defined as a 15% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) after <635 mg (PD(15)). Expired nitric oxide (eNO) and blood eosinophils were also measured. RESULTS: The GM PD(20) for methacholine was 2.25 micro mol [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.19-5.29], the mean eNO was 14.7 p.p.b. (CI: 10.1-19.4) and the eosinophil count was 0.20 x 10(-9)/L (CI: 0.14-0.27 x 10(-9)/L). Only one subject (a smoker, 10 pack-years, FEV(1) 76% pred, non-allergic rhinitis, normal eNO and eosinophil count) also had a mild positive response to mannitol (PD(15): 451 mg). CONCLUSIONS: The response to mannitol was within the normal range in asymptomatic subjects with AHR to methacholine. Further evidence on the responsiveness to mannitol compared with methacholine in a random population sample is required to elucidate whether mannitol is a more specific test for diagnosing asthma.

Adult↗

Inhibition of mast cell PGD2 release protects against mannitol-induced airway narrowing.

Mannitol inhalation increases urinary excretion of 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 (a metabolite of prostaglandin D2 and marker of mast cell activation) and leukotriene E4. The present study tested the hypothesis that beta2-adrenoreceptor agonists and disodium cromoglycate (SCG) protect against mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction by inhibition of mast cell mediator release. Fourteen asthmatic subjects inhaled mannitol (mean dose 252+/-213 mg) in order to induce a fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 25%. The same dose was given 15 min after inhalation of formoterol fumarate (24 microg), SCG (40 mg) or placebo. Pre- and post-challenge urine samples were analysed by enzyme immunoassay for 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 and leukotriene E4. The maximum fall in FEV1 of 32+/-10% on placebo was reduced by 95% following formoterol and 63% following SCG. Following placebo, there was an increase in median urinary 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 concentration from 61 to 92 ng.mmol creatinine(-1), but no significant increase in 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 concentration in the presence of either formoterol (69 versus 67 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)) or SCG (66 versus 60 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)). The increase in urinary leukotriene E4 following placebo (from 19 to 31 ng.mmol creatinine(-1)) was unaffected by the drugs. These results support the hypothesis that the drug effect on airway response to mannitol is due to inhibition of mast cell prostaglandin D2 release.

Adolescent↗

Visceral leishmaniasis in northern Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) has been well documented by the Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF) VL treatment programmeme in the Tigray region of Ethiopia, but reports are limited from other facilities in this region where this disease continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of VL in a government hospital in Axum, Ethiopia. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 111 patients treated for visceral leishmaniasis. SETTING: Saint Mary's Hospital, Axum, Ethiopia. SUBJECTS: One hundred and Eleven patients treated for visceral leishmaniasis in a government hospital in Axum, Ethiopia. RESULTS: All patients were male and most reported travel history to Humera, a known endemic area. Patients presented with classic signs and symptoms, including fever, weight loss, splenomegaly and anaemia. Almost one third (15/53) of patients who underwent HIV testing had a positive result. Crude death rate at six months was 13.5 per 100 patients (95% CI: 6.7 - 20.3 per 100 patients). Presence of HIV and other co-infections were associated with increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes in this setting were comparable to that of the MSF programmeme in Tigray, Ethiopia and highlight the importance of HIV testing for patients presenting with visceral leishmaniasis.

Adult↗

Relationship between airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and adenosine monophosphate.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli is a useful noninvasive tool in the evaluation of asthma and its treatment. We investigated the putative relationship in AHR between inhaled adenosine monophosphate and mannitol. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate atopic asthmatics were evaluated. On two separate screening days, the threshold AMP concentration and threshold mannitol dose to provoke a given fall in FEV1 were measured. RESULTS: For AMP PC20vs. mannitol PD15, the Pearsons correlation coefficient was 0.80, P < 0.001. For AMP PC15vs. mannitol PD15 and AMP PC10vs. mannitol PD10 corresponding values were 0.83, P < 0.001 and 0.68, P = 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: There was a highly significant association between the threshold concentration of AMP and dose of mannitol causing a given fall in FEV1. Further studies are required to evaluate the relationship between inhaled mannitol and other surrogate inflammatory markers.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Effects of mediator antagonism on mannitol and adenosine monophosphate challenges.

BACKGROUND: Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to indirect stimuli is a useful non-invasive surrogate inflammatory marker in the evaluation of asthma, while histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes are important inflammatory mediators. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate AHR to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli and time taken to recover following single doses of montelukast 10 mg and desloratadine 5 mg in combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo. METHODS: Fifteen mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatics completed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Patients received encapsulated montelukast 10 mg/desloratadine 5 mg combination, montelukast 10 mg alone and placebo, 10-14 h prior to challenge on two separate occasions. The mannitol threshold dose, AMP threshold concentration and recovery times after challenge were measured along with lung function. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, montelukast/desloratadine conferred improvements (P < 0.05) in adenosine monophosphate (AMP) threshold concentration and mannitol threshold dose: a 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.2-4.6) and 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.7-3.3) difference, respectively, while compared to montelukast this amounted to a 2.0-fold (95% CI 1.2-3.4) and 1.5-fold (95% CI 1.1-2.4) improvement, respectively. Montelukast was not significantly different from placebo. Both montelukast/desloratadine and montelukast compared to placebo, shortened recovery following both challenges (P < 0.05): a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 29-min (95% CI 20-36) reduction, respectively, for AMP, and a 27-min (95% CI 17-37) and 26-min (95% CI 17-35) reduction, respectively for mannitol. CONCLUSION: The dissociated effects of single doses of montelukast alone but not montelukast/desloratadine combination on AHR and recovery time, highlights the relative roles of histamine in initiating the bronchoconstrictor response and cysteinyl leukotrienes in sustaining it. Similar improvements in AHR and recovery time were observed following both indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli.

Acetates↗

Indirect airway challenges.

Indirect challenges act by causing the release of endogenous mediators that cause the airway smooth muscle to contract. This is in contrast to the direct challenges where agonists such as methacholine or histamine cause airflow limitation predominantly via a direct effect on airway smooth muscle. Direct airway challenges have been used widely and are well standardised. They are highly sensitive, but not specific to asthma and can be used to exclude current asthma in a clinic population. Indirect bronchial stimuli, in particular exercise, hyperventilation, hypertonic aerosols, as well as adenosine, may reflect more directly the ongoing airway inflammation and are therefore more specific to identify active asthma. They are increasingly used to evaluate the prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and to assess specific problems in patients with known asthma, e.g. exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, evaluation before scuba diving. Direct bronchial responsiveness is only slowly and to a modest extent, influenced by repeated administration of inhaled steroids. Indirect challenges may reflect more closely acute changes in airway inflammation and a change in responsiveness to an indirect stimulus may be a clinically relevant marker to assess the clinical course of asthma. Moreover, some of the indirect challenges, e.g. hypertonic saline and mannitol, can be combined with the assessment of inflammatory cells by induction of sputum.

Asthma↗

Evidence of mast cell activation and leukotriene release after mannitol inhalation.

The aim of this study was to investigate if mannitol inhalation, as a model of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), causes mast cell activation and release of mediators of bronchoconstriction. Urinary excretion of previously identified mediators of EIB was investigated in association with mannitol-induced bronchoconstriction. Twelve asthmatic and nine nonasthmatic subjects inhaled mannitol and urine was collected 60 min before and for 90 min after challenge. The urinary concentrations of leukotriene (LT)E4, the prostaglandin (PG)D2 metabolite and the mast cell marker 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 were measured by enzyme immunoassay. N(tau)-methylhistamine was measured by radioimmunoassay. In asthmatic subjects, inhalation of a mean+/-SEM dose of 272+/-56 mg mannitol induced a reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 34.5+/-2.1%. This was associated with increases in urinary 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (91.9+/-8.2 versus 66.9+/-6.6 ng x mmol creatinine(-1), peak versus baseline) and LTE4 (51.3+/-7.5 versus 32.9+/-4.7). In nonasthmatic subjects, the reduction in FEV1 was 1.0+/-0.5% after inhaling 635 mg of mannitol. Although smaller than in the asthmatics, significant increases of urinary 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (68.4+/-6.9 versus 56.0+/-5.8 ng x mmol creatinine(-1)) and LTE4 (58.5+/-5.3 versus 43.0+/-3.3 ng x mmol creatinine(-1)) were observed in the nonasthmatic subjects. There was also a small increase in urinary excretion of N(tau)-methylhistamine in the nonasthmatics, but not in the asthmatics. The increased urinary levels of 9alpha,11beta-prostaglandin F2 support mast cell activation with release of mediators following inhalation of mannitol. Increased bronchial responsiveness to the released mediators could explain the exclusive bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects.

Adult↗

Use of aerosols for bronchial provocation testing in the laboratory: where we have been and where we are going.

Bronchial provocation testing with pharmacological agents that act directly on airway smooth muscle has important limitations. These include the inability to identify exercise-induced asthma (EIA), to differentiate the airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) of airway remodelling from the AHR of active inflammation and to differentiate between doses of steroids. Recent studies show that tests that act indirectly to narrow airways are more sensitive than pharmacological agents for identifying airway inflammation and response to treatment. Adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is an indirect challenge that acts on mast cells to cause release of mediators. Hypertonic saline is another and, since its development in the 1980s, has become widely used in Australia. Hypertonic (4.5%) saline is used to identify those with active asthma, those with EIA and those who wish to enter certain occupations or sports (e.g., diving). The recent development, again in Australia, of a test that uses dry powder mannitol has promise for use in the laboratory, the office, or for testing in the field. AHR to mannitol identifies people with EIA and is an estimate of its severity. The mannitol response is modified by drugs used to prevent EIA, implying that similar mediators are involved. A mannitol test can be used to monitor response to steroids and is more sensitive than histamine for identifying persistent airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatics well controlled on steroids. These findings suggest that indirect challenges give more useful clinical information about currently active asthma and the response to treatment than direct challenge and they will become more widely used.

Aerosols↗

Effects of terbutaline in combination with mannitol on mucociliary clearance.

Beta2-agonists and osmotic agents stimulate mucociliary clearance (MCC) via different mechanisms which could potentially interact. The effects of inhaling terbutaline in combination with mannitol on MCC were investigated in nine healthy (aged 19+/-1 yrs) and 11 mild (aged 21+/-4 yrs) asthmatic subjects. Using 99mTc-sulphur colloid radioaerosol and a gamma camera, MCC was studied on four separate days with each of the following interventions: 1) terbutaline or its placebo inhaled 10 min before mannitol (in random, double blind); 2) terbutaline inhaled 5 min after mannitol; and 3) terbutaline inhaled 10 min before the control for mannitol. Lung images were collected over a period of 120 min postintervention and over 150 min in total. The mannitol-induced increase in clearance was transiently inhibited by terbutaline pretreatment and transiently enhanced when terbutaline was administered after mannitol both in asthmatic and healthy subjects. The order of administration of mannitol and terbutaline did not affect the total clearance of radioactive mucus over 140 min from the start of intervention in both groups. The pathways through which terbutaline and mannitol increase mucociliary clearance may transiently interact in an inhibitory or synergistic way, depending on the order of administration. However, this did not affect the overall increase in mucociliary clearance over 140 min.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Inhaled mannitol shifts exhaled nitric oxide in opposite directions in asthmatics and healthy subjects.

We investigated if healthy subjects could release NO upon hyperosmolar challenge as a defence mechanism, and whether asthmatics with atopy showed an altered response. A plot of NO output versus flow rate was used to calculate the alveolar level and the NO-flux from the airways. The asthmatics had a higher NO output and this was due to an increased NO-flux from the airways, 86+/-30 nl min(-1) compared with control 21+/-2 nl min(-1) (P<0.05). The alveolar NO levels showed no difference. In response to a dry powder of mannitol the exhaled NO concentration decreased in asthmatics by 37+/-7%, but increased in the control by 9+/-4% (P<0.001). The FEV(1.0) decreased 13+/-2% and airway conductance 42+/-7% in asthmatics and in the controls 2+/-1% and 0+/-7%, respectively (P<0.001). We conclude that asthmatics have an altered response to mannitol challenge in regards to exhaled NO. This may result from down regulation of constitutive NO production as a result of high levels of NO flux from the airways.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Laboratory protocol for exercise asthma to evaluate salbutamol given by two devices.

PURPOSE: As new delivery devices and formulations are being introduced for drugs given by inhalation, there is a need to evaluate their equivalence with old preparations. One way to do this is to investigate their equivalence in protecting from exercise-induced asthma (EIA). METHODS: We used a protocol for EIA to compare the protective effect of salbutamol delivered by the pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and the new Diskus dry powder device. Twenty-seven asthmatic subjects with moderately severe EIA completed an exercise test on four separate days at two study centers. Exercise was performed by cycling for 8 min while inhaling dry air (0% RH, 20-24 degrees C). The target workload in W was predicted as (53.76 x predicted FEV1) - 11.07 and 95% of this target was achieved at 4 min of exercise. This target was chosen in order to achieve ventilation between 50 and 60% of predicted maximum in the last 4 min. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the workload, ventilation, or heart rate achieved on the study days. The severity of EIA was measured as the % fall in FEV1. EIA severity was similar on the placebo and control day and the coefficient of variation was 19.4%. The mean +/- SD % fall on the control, placebo, salbutamol by Diskus, and pMDI were 42.0% +/- 15, 39.4% +/-17.6, 13.4% +/- 13.2, and 8.5% +/- 13.8, respectively. Salbutamol significantly inhibited the % fall in FEV1 after exercise, and there was no difference between the preparations. CONCLUSION: The protocol described here is suitable for evaluating equivalence of salbutamol preparations in protecting against EIA and could be used to evaluate the protective effect of other medications.

Administration, Inhalation↗

Provocation by eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea to identify exercise induced bronchoconstriction.

The International Olympic Committee Medical Commission (IOC-MC) requires notification for use of a beta(2) agonist at the Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City. This notification will be required seven days before the event and must be accompanied by objective evidence that justifies the need to use one. The IOC-MC has expressed the viewpoint that, at present, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) is the optimal laboratory challenge to confirm that an athlete has exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). The EVH test recommended was specifically designed to identify EIB. EVH has been performed in thousands of subjects in both the laboratory and the field. The test requires the subject to hyperventilate dry air containing 5% carbon dioxide at room temperature for six minutes at a target ventilation of 30 times the subject's forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)). The test conditions can be modified to simulate the conditions that give the athlete their symptoms with exercise. A reduction in FEV(1) of 10% or more of the value before the test is considered positive.

Asthma, Exercise-Induced↗

Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids.

To determine predictors for failed reduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in 50 subjects with well-controlled asthma (age 43.7 [18-69]; 22 males) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg ICS/d (100-3,600 microg/d), ICS were halved every 8 wk. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to a bronchial provocation test (BPT) with histamine was measured at baseline. AHR to BPT with mannitol, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and, in 31 subjects, sputum inflammatory cells were measured at baseline and at monthly intervals. Thirty-nine subjects suffered an asthma exacerbation. Seven subjects were successfully weaned off ICS. Using a Kaplan- Meier survival analysis, the significant predictors of a failure of ICS reduction were being hyperresponsive to both histamine and mannitol at baseline (p = 0.039), and being hyperresponsive to mannitol during the dose-reduction phase of the study (p = 0.02). Subjects older than 40 yr of age tended to be at greater risk of ICS reduction failure (p = 0.059). Response to mannitol and percentage sputum eosinophils were significantly greater before a failed ICS reduction than before the last successful ICS reduction, whereas there were no significant differences in symptoms, spirometry, or eNO. These findings suggest that documentation of patient's AHR or sputum eosinophils may be useful in guiding the reduction of ICS doses.

Adolescent↗

Fexofenadine decreases sensitivity to and montelukast improves recovery from inhaled mannitol.

We studied, separately, the effects of the histamine antagonist, fexofenadine hydrochloride, and the leukotriene antagonist, montelukast sodium, and their placebos on airway sensitivity to and recovery from inhaled mannitol in subjects with asthma. Two 180-mg doses of fexofenadine were taken over 14 h, and three 10-mg doses of montelukast over 36 h, with the last dose 5 h before challenge. Fexofenadine reduced sensitivity to mannitol and the PD(15) was (mean [95% confidence interval] 138 [95, 201]) mg versus placebo (51 [25, 106] mg) (p < 0.001). The final percent reduction in FEV(1) with fexofenadine was 20.8 +/- 5.4% and not different from placebo (20.1 +/- 5.3%) (p = 0.7); however, recovery was slower with fexofenadine compared with placebo (p < 0.001). By contrast, montelukast had no effect on sensitivity to mannitol and the PD(15) was 71 [36, 144] mg versus placebo (87 [51, 148] mg (p = 0.35). The total dose of mannitol delivered and the final percent reduction in FEV(1) with montelukast were 171 +/- 142 mg and 21 +/- 4% and for placebo were 182 +/- 144 mg and 20 +/- 5% (p = 0.35, p = 0.59, respectively). However, recovery of FEV(1) to baseline was faster with montelukast, with the area under the percent reduction FEV(1)-versus-time curve reduced (220 +/- 121% change.min) compared with placebo (513 +/- 182% change.min) (p < 0.001). We conclude that whereas histamine is important for the initial airway response, leukotrienes are important in sustaining the airway response to inhaled mannitol.

Acetates↗

Markers of airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with well-controlled asthma.

In steroid-naive asthmatics, airway hyperresponsiveness correlates with noninvasive markers of airway inflammation. Whether this is also true in steroid-treated asthmatics, is unknown. In 31 stable asthmatics (mean age 45.4 yrs, range 22-69; 17 females) taking a median dose of 1,000 microg inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) per day (range 100-3,600 microg x day(-1)), airway responsiveness to the "direct" agent histamine and to the "indirect" agent mannitol, lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF)), exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), and number of inflammatory cells in induced sputum as a percentage of total cell count were measured. Of the 31 subjects, 16 were hyperresponsive to mannitol and 11 to histamine. The dose-response ratio (DRR: % fall in FEV1/cumulative dose) to both challenge tests was correlated (r=0.59, p=0.0004). However, DRR for histamine and DRR for mannitol were not related to basic lung function, eNO, per cent sputum eosinophils and ICS dose. In addition, NO was not related to basic lung function and per cent sputum eosinophils. In clinically well-controlled asthmatics taking inhaled corticosteroids, there is no relationship between markers of airway inflammation (such as exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophils) and airway responsiveness to either direct (histamine) or indirect (mannitol) challenge. Airway hyperresponsiveness in clinically well-controlled asthmatics appears to be independent of eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Adult↗

The 24-h effect of mannitol on the clearance of mucus in patients with bronchiectasis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the acute effect of mannitol on the clearance of mucus, and (1) the 24-h mucus retention, and (2) the mucus clearance rate and lung function 24 h after inhalation of a single dose of mannitol. DESIGN: Clearance of mucus was measured on 3 consecutive days using (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid radioaerosol and a gamma camera. INTERVENTIONS: Mannitol, 330 +/- 68 mg (mean+/- SD), was inhaled using a dry powder inhaler only on day 2. PATIENTS: Eight patients with bronchiectasis (age range, 29 to 70 years). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: On each day, lung images were collected over 2 h and at 24 h. Key findings of the study are as follows: (1) the 24-h retention of mucus was reduced the day after mannitol had been inhaled, compared to the day without mannitol (day 1) in the whole right lung (57.6 +/- 6.2% vs 68.1 +/- 5.9%), central (47.5 +/- 6.7% vs 56.9 +/- 6.5%), intermediate (61.7 +/- 5.6% vs 73.8 +/- 5.5%), and peripheral regions (70.9 +/- 4.3% vs 86.6 +/- 4.6%)(p < 0.02); and (2) mannitol helped patients clear mucus within 2 h that might otherwise take up to 24 h, from the whole right lung and defined regions. However, clearance over 60 min measured 24 h after mannitol inhalation was not significantly different to baseline clearance without mannitol (8.7 +/- 1.9% on day 1 vs 9.7 +/- 3.7% 24 h after mannitol; p > 0.8). The patients maintained the same lung function the day before and after mannitol had been inhaled: FEV(1) (percent predicted), 79 +/- 5 on day 1 vs 80 +/- 5 on day 3; and forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase (percent predicted), 50 +/- 6 on day 1 vs 51 +/- 6 on day 3; p > 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Mannitol inhalation acutely increases clearance of mucus, and this effect extends beyond the acute study period, resulting in decreased mucus retention at 24 h.

Adult↗

General practitioners' and practice nurses' knowledge of how much patients should and do drink.

Despite evidence linking high levels of alcohol consumption to ill health, the number of people drinking above the 'sensible' limits is increasing. Clinicians in primary care can influence this trend by appropriate screening and advice. To do this they need to know the recommended sensible limits and also be able to translate commonly reported drinking levels into units of alcohol. A postal survey of 499 general practitioners and 343 practice nurses in Cornwall and South West Devon asked responders to calculate the number of units of alcohol contained in six different drinks and also state what they thought were the current sensible levels of consumption. The response rate was 63%. Less than 40% of responders were able to assess the units of alcohol in five out of the six drinks to within 10%. Over 70% of responders were unable to determine the alcohol content of all six drinks to within 30%. Forty-four per cent of responders now recommend an increased safe level of consumption at 28 units per week for men and 21 units per week for women, against the advice of the Royal Colleges and the BMA but in line with the levels suggested by the Government.

Alcohol Drinking↗