The debate over physician-assisted suicide: empirical data and convergent views.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S D Block.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare attitudes and perceptions of primary care among faculty, students, and residents oriented toward family medicine (FM) and general internal medicine (GIM). DESIGN: Descriptive study using confidential telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: National stratified probability sample of FM and GIM faculty (n = 68), residents (n = 196), and students (n = 81). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We created indicators for attitudes toward primary care among the faculty that included perceptions of medical practice, experiences within the academic environment, and support for primary-care-oriented change. For the students and residents, we explored their perceptions of faculty and resident attitudes toward primary care, their perception of encouragement to enter primary care, and their satisfaction with training. Family medicine faculty showed more enthusiasm for primary care as manifested by their greater likelihood to endorse a primary care physician to manage a serious illness (FM 81.3% vs GIM 41.1%; p < .01), their strong encouragement of students to enter primary care (FM 86.2% vs GIM 36.3%; p < .01), and their greater support for primary-care-oriented changes in medical education (FM 56.8% vs GIM 14.7%; p < .01). Family medicine students and residents were more likely to perceive the primary care faculty as very satisfied with their work (FM 69.2% vs GIM 51.5%; p < .05), to feel strongly encouraged by peers toward primary care (FM 59.5% vs GIM 16.1%; p < .0001), and to have a primary care role model (FM 84.3% vs GIM 61.3%; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine faculty, students, and residents showed a consistent pattern of greater enthusiasm for primary care than their GIM counterparts. This may be a reflection of the different cultures of the two disciplines.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the attitudes toward and perceptions of primary care education and practice among academic health center constituents. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Descriptive study using confidential telephone interviews (October 1993 to March 1994) of national stratified probability samples of first- and fourth-year medical students, residents, clinical faculty, internal medicine and pediatrics residency training directors and chairs, and deans (N=2293). RESULTS: Five areas were examined: respondents' specialty orientation, attitudes toward the competence of primary care physicians, encouragement and positive regard for primary care, exposure to primary care-related educational experiences, and socioemotional orientation. The response rate was 84%. Respondents generally perceive primary care tasks as not requiring high levels of expertise; nearly half believe that generalists are not the best physicians to manage patients with serious illness and that the quality of primary care research is inferior to that in other fields. Attitudes are more positive toward the quality of primary care teaching. Learners perceive little encouragement for generalist careers and negative attitudes toward generalists among faculty, and view the quality of their primary care training as inferior to that for specialty practice. Those who have progressed further in the academic medicine hierarchy generally report lower levels of socioemotional orientation than individuals at earlier phases of career development. CONCLUSIONS: Despite changes in the health care system and in education, students and residents encounter an atmosphere that is chilly toward primary care. If medical educators seek to optimize enthusiasm and preparation for primary care careers, they must develop approaches to changing the attitudes, values and composition of their faculties.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Terminally ill patients often hope that death will come quickly. They may broach this wish with their physicians, and even request assistance in hastening death. Thoughts about accelerating death usually do not reflect a sustained desire for suicide or euthanasia, but have other important meanings that require exploration. When patients ask for death to be hastened, the following areas should be explored: the adequacy of symptom control; difficulties in the patient's relationships with family, friends, and health workers; psychological disturbances, especially grief, depression, anxiety, organic mental disorders, and personality disorders; and the patient's personal orientation to the meaning of life and suffering. Appreciation of the clinical determinants and meanings of requests to hasten death can broaden therapeutic options. In all cases, patient requests for accelerated death require ongoing discussion and active efforts to palliate physical and psychological distress. In those infrequent instances when a patient with persistent, irremediable suffering seeks a prompt and comfortable death, the physician must confront the moral, legal, and professional ramifications of his or her response. Rarely, acceding to the patient's request for hastening death may be the least terrible therapeutic alternative.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of a radically redesigned curriculum at Harvard Medical School on preclinical students' knowledge, skills, personal characteristics, approaches to learning, and educational experiences. METHOD: Multiple measures were used to collect data from 121 students from the entering classes of 1989 and 1990 who had been randomly assigned to the New Pathway or traditional curricula; all had applied to be in the new curriculum. RESULTS: The New Pathway students reported that they learned in a more reflective manner and memorized less than their control counterparts in the traditional curriculum during the preclinical years. The New Pathway group preferred active learning and demonstrated greater psychosocial knowledge, better relational skills, and more humanistic attitudes. They felt more challenged, had closer relationships with faculty, and were somewhat more anxious than those in the traditional program. There was no difference in problem-solving skills or biomedical knowledge base. CONCLUSION: Students in the new curriculum learned differently, acquired distinctive knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and underwent a more satisfying and challenging preclinical medical school experience without loss of biomedical competence. These findings should encourage other schools to consider such a curriculum.
Psychosocial assessment and treatment are critical elements of care for terminally ill patients who desire hastened death. Most patients, in saying that they want to die, are asking for assistance in living--for help in dealing with depression, anxiety about the future, grief, lack of control, dependence, physical suffering, and spiritual despair. In this article, the authors review current understandings of the psychiatric aspects of requests by terminally ill patients for assisted suicide and euthanasia; describe an approach to the common problems of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual suffering encountered in managing dying patients; and elaborate the functions of the psychiatrist in addressing these problems.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.