PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S D Takekawa

Publications and source records attributed to S D Takekawa.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Combination therapy consisting of arterial infusion chemotherapy (EPF, EAP) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE).

From January 1988 to January 1993, 45 patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were treated with a new combination therapy consisting of arterial infusion chemotherapy and TAE. The combination therapy was performed according to our treatment schedule as follows: two courses of arterial infusion chemotherapy were given first, and then transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) using a mixture of Lipiodol and cisplatin powder was performed. Two arterial infusion chemotherapeutic regimens were employed: EPF (etoposide, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) and EAP (etoposide, Adriamycin or Epi-adriamycin, and cisplatin). The anticancer drugs were infused through a catheter inserted into the proper or common hepatic artery. Assessment was made of the anticancer effect and survival rate of each treatment method. The response to each therapy was evaluated on the basis of CT performed prior to and after the treatment. In the EPF.TAE group, the response rate was about 46%, whereas in the EAP.TAE group it was 48%. Overall, 21 of 45 patients attained a regression rate of 50% or more. Furthermore, daughter nodules decreased in size or disappeared in about 67% of 15 patients. Additionally, tumor thrombi tended to show a similar response. In all of the cases, the average duration of survival was 30.3 months, and the 1-year survival value was 68%, the 2-year survival value was 44%, and the 3-year survival value was 35%. These results were superior to those obtained with TAE therapy alone.

Adolescent↗

Arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using EPF and EAP therapies.

Arterial infusion chemotherapy of EPF (etoposide, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) or EAP (etoposide, Adriamycin, and cisplatin) was carried out in 28 cases of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between January 1988 and December 1990, and assessment was made of the anticancer efficacy of each treatment method. In all, 13 patients were treated with EPF therapy and 15 received EAP therapy. The anticancer agents were infused through a catheter inserted into the proper or common hepatic artery. The catheter was inserted via the axillary artery or common femoral artery using Seldinger's method or the cut-down method. The results of each therapy were analyzed in relation to the tumor regression rate and the side effects encountered. The tumor regression rate was determined on the basis of two-dimensional evidence obtained by computed tomography performed before and after treatment. The treatment results were also compared with the results of chemoembolization therapy using a mixture of cisplatin (CDDP), Adriamycin (ADM) and lipiodol. Of the 28 patients treated with arterial infusion chemotherapy, 14 (50%) attained a regression rate of 50% (PR). In all, 46% of the EPF group and 53% of the EAP group achieved a PR. These results were superior to those obtained using chemoembolization therapy. In general, the side effects were relatively mild and transient.

Adolescent↗

[Recanalization of long segment occlusion of superficial femoral artery by percutaneous transluminal laser angioplasty--report of a case].

Percutaneous Transluminal Laser Angioplasty (PTLA) for 46 cm complete occlusion of right superficial femoral and popliteal artery was successfully carried out. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography five months after the procedure showed almost complete recanalization of the arteries, and good flow of the contrast medium through the femoral and popliteal artery. Only Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) was previously done for the stenosis of right popliteal artery, but restenosis of the artery took place. On this occasion PTLA was carried out to treat stenosis of the popliteal artery as well as the femoral artery lesions. It is speculated that one of the major causes of reocclusion of the femoral and popliteal artery is due to recurrence of a few portions of severe stenosis of superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. This case will illustrate the long term effect of PTLA, because stenotic segments treated only with balloon dilatation recurred, but those stenoses treated with laser did not recur.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗

[MR-angiography with intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA].

We carried out phase contrast MR-angiography of the lower extremities with intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA. Five healthy male volunteers, 25 to 40 years of age, were examined with a 0.5T MRI unit. We used fast scen (gradient echo) technique and it took about 8 minutes for whole procedure. Images were obtained before and after intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA. Injection dose was 0.1 mmol/kg. In two cases, we got images with variable flip angles. However angles of 30 or 40 degrees were thought to be best on the scan with Gd-DTPA. In three cases, we repeated short time procedures for about 4 minutes each time and continued to check the signal intensities of vessels for as long as one hour. The signal intensities greatly increased soon after administration of Gd-DTPA, and then they gradually decreased, but for as long as 60 minutes after administration they remained much higher than those before administration of Gd-DTPA. MR-angiography with Gd-DTPA was found very useful to demonstrate the peripheral femoral vessels clearly. No significant side effect was noticed in any case. Therefore, this method was thought to be very useful clinically.

Adult↗

[Chemoembolization therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma-antitumor effect and side effect].

Chemoembolization therapy with arterial injection of a mixture of various anticancer agents (CDDP, ADR, MMC) and Lipiodol along with gelfoam particles was carried out on 158 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma between January 1985 and July 1987. In two groups using CDDP the tumor regressed 50% or more in higher percentage than in the groups without CDDP. The antitumor effect was more significant in the group using CDDP and ADR than in the group using CDDP alone. No significant side effect was noted in any case.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗