PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S D Turnipseed

Publications and source records attributed to S D Turnipseed.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of chest pain suspicious for acute coronary syndrome: use of an accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain evaluation unit.

Management of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a continuing challenge. A low threshold for admission has been traditional because of concern for patient welfare and the litigation potential associated with the inadvertent discharge of patients with ischemic events. Because of this approach, < 30% of patients admitted for chest pain ultimately are found to have an acute coronary syndrome. To reduce unnecessary admissions, maintain patient safety, and enhance cost-effectiveness, innovative strategies have been applied to the management of patients with chest pain. It is now recognized that a low-risk group can be identified by the clinical presentation and initial electrocardiogram. Chest-pain centers have been developed to provide further risk stratification and systematic management of these patients. We employ an accelerated diagnostic protocol based on immediate exercise treadmill testing to evaluate low-risk patients. Moderate-risk patients are assessed over a 6-hour observation period with serial electrocardiograms and evaluation of cardiac-injury markers. Patients with positive evaluations are admitted. Those with negative results undergo either exercise echocardiography or rest myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing technetium-99m sestamibi. Patients with positive functional tests are admitted. Those with negative studies are discharged with outpatient follow-up. These strategies have provided a safe and accurate means of patient disposition from the emergency department with the potential for vital cost savings.

Algorithms↗

Interpretation of immediate exercise treadmill test: interreader reliability between cardiologist and noncardiologist in a chest pain evaluation unit.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether attending physicians in a chest pain evaluation unit (CPEU) can perform and interpret exercise testing with the same accuracy as cardiologists. METHODS: Between January 1996 and November 1998, immediate exercise tests were performed and interpreted by internists with additional training in exercise testing who serve as attending physicians in a CPEU at a large university medical center. For quality assurance, all tests were overread by a cardiologist. Test results were compared for each reader, and all tests with discrepant readings were reinterpreted by an independent cardiologist who was blinded to the previous results. Patients' clinical course was monitored for at least 30 days after exercise testing. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 645 patients (347 men, 298 women). Discrepant interpretations were found in 11 (1. 7%) patients. The agreement was 98.4% (kappa value 0.9618). The majority of discrepancies were insignificant and were based on subtle differences in the definition of a nondiagnostic test or the degree of ST-segment shift. Of the 11 discordant readings, the blinded cardiologist concurred with 5 (45%) of the CPEU interpretations and 4 (36%) of the cardiologist interpretations. In 2 cases, there was disagreement by all 3 interpreters. There was no cardiac morbidity or mortality of any patient with a discrepant reading. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that noncardiologists serving as attending physicians in a CPEU can accurately interpret exercise tests and overreading by cardiologists for quality assurance is unnecessary.

Adult↗

Methamphetamine abuse and emergency department utilization.

Methamphetamine (MAP) abuse continues to increase worldwide, based on morbidity, mortality, drug treatment, and epidemiologic studies and surveys. MAP abuse has become a significant health care, environmental, and law enforcement problem. Acute intoxication often results in agitation, violence, and death. Chronic use may lead to infection, heart failure, malnutrition, and permanent psychiatric illness. MAP users frequently use the emergency department (ED) for their medical care. Over a 6-month period we studied the demographics, type, and frequency of medical and traumatic problems in 461 MAP patients presenting to our ED, which serves an area noted for high levels of MAP production and consumption. Comparison was made to the general ED population to assess use patterns. MAP patients were most commonly Caucasian males who lacked health insurance. Compared to other ED patients during this time, MAP patients used ambulance transport more and were more likely to be admitted to the hospital. There was a significant association between trauma and MAP use in this patient population. Our data suggest MAP users utilize prehospital and hospital resources at levels higher than the average ED population. Based on current trends, we can expect more ED visits by MAP users in the future.

Adult↗