Laparoscopic vs open colon surgery. Costs and outcome.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Activities of Daily Living↗
Biomedical subjects
S D Wexner
Publications and source records attributed to S D Wexner.
Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis versus stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anastomosis, Surgical↗
Surgical therapy for ulcerative colitis.
Ulcerative colitis is a curable disease. Despite newer medications, many patients either fail medical therapy or develop dysplasia or carcinoma requiring surgery. Surgical techniques have improved, and complication rates have declined. The functional results of ileoanal reservoir surgery are excellent in most patients, and most patients agree that a pouch is better than the disease. One must balance poor function secondary to disease, cancer risk, need for medication, and side effects of medication against surgical morbidity and postoperative function.
Carcinoma↗
Colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic colectomy.
One of the technical difficulties during laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted resection of the right, transverse, and left colon is the mobilization of the splenic and hepatic flexures. We present a simple technique of colonoscopic traction of the splenic or hepatic flexure. This technique enables good exposure and facilitates dissection while laparoscopic mobilization of these segments of the colon is performed.
Colectomy↗
Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization?
Previous data have suggested that laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery may shorten the length of hospitalization. These claims have been attributed to a reduction of the length of ileus. The definition of "ileus" is variable and in all cases is subjective. In this study it was defined as the length of time until the patient passed flatus or stool without nausea, vomiting or abdominal distention. This prospective study was undertaken to compare the duration of ileus and of hospitalization after laparoscopic-assisted (LAC) and standard laparotomy (SC). After restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in both sets of patients. Twenty-two patients underwent LAC and 20 age, sex, and diagnosis-matched controls underwent SC. Mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) was the diagnosis in 16 LAC and in 15 SC patients while polyposis was the diagnosis in 6 LAC and in 5 SC patients. The mean time to resolution of postoperative ileus was 4.2 (4-11) days in the LAC group and 3.3 (2-5) days in the SC group. Hospital discharge was similar in each group occurring at a mean of 8.7 (7-13) days after LAC and 8.9 (6-18) days after SC. Neither the length of time for ileus resolution nor the length of hospitalization were reduced in the LAC group. Laparoscopic-assisted IPAA conferred none of the theoretical advantages associated with other laparoscopic procedures.
Adolescent↗
The diagnosis of anal ulcers in AIDS patients.
Recent reports have suggested that routine microscopic evaluation of anal ulcer tissue from AIDS patients is not the most accurate way to diagnose viral infection. This study was undertaken to determine if either viral culture (VC) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) can improve the diagnostic accuracy as compared with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Specifically, we sought to identify inclusion bodies of cytomegalovirus (CMV) or herpes simplex virus (HSV) to assist in the diagnosis of CMV or HSV. All patients had clinical evidence of an anal ulcer or a nonhealing anal fissure. Duration of symptoms ranged from 1 week to 3 months with a mean of 6 weeks. All specimens were submitted for viral culture in addition to routine H&E staining; immunohistochemistry was also performed. Twenty-five paraffin-embedded anal ulcer biopsies from 23 male patients (age range 27-73; mean 37.4 years) with the diagnosis of AIDS or AIDS-related complex (ARC) were reviewed over a 4 year period (1988-1992). Routine H&E staining revealed 6 (22%) specimens with CMV inclusions. Four of these 6 reacted positively with IHC (67%) and one was positive on viral culture (17%). In the remaining 19 specimens that did not reveal infection with CMV (78%), IHC was positive in 2 patients (10%) and viral culture was positive in 1 patient (5%). Although HSV was not seen in any of the specimens on H&E staining, IHC was positive in one patient (3.5%) and viral culture reacted positively in 8 (29%) specimens. Thus IHC is a good confirmatory test for CMV inclusions and can be used to achieve a definitive diagnosis in equivocal cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
An initial comparative study of two techniques of laparoscopic colonic anastomosis and mesenteric defect closure.
Laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery is still in its nascent stages of development. The ease, efficacy, and safety of intracorporeal mechanical colonic anastomosis are contingent upon expensive stapling devices. Although mobilization and mesenteric division are feasible, a method of inexpensive rapid anastomosis is not. A single inexpensive multifire stapler which could be used both to fashion the anastomosis and to close the mesenteric defect would be ideal. Therefore, this prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare the clinical and functional results of laparoscopic colotomy closure performed using the Endopath EMS hernia stapler (EMS; Ethicon Endosurgery Inc., Cincinnati, OH) to results of using standard two-layer hand suturing (HS). Both the colotomy itself and the mesenteric defect closure sites were included in the randomization and analysis. The abdominal cavity was assessed for evidence of anastomotic leakage, abscess, and adhesion formation. In addition, radiographic luminal diameter, bursting strength, and histology were evaluated. Eight healthy pigs were randomized to either the EMS (N = 4) or HS (N = 4). There was no evidence of leakage, abscesses, or adhesion formation in either group; however, the mesenteric defect revealed more scarring in the HS than in the EMS animals. There were no significant differences in either luminal diameter (HS: mean = 0.92 cm; EMS: mean = 0.91 cm) or bursting strength (HS: mean = 171 mm Hg; EMS: mean = 157 mm Hg) (P > 0.05). Histologic analysis also demonstrated no difference in inflammation, necrosis, or fibrosis. This study suggests that this technique can be safely applied to both colotomy closure and mesenteric defect repair.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Anastomosis, Surgical↗
Anal pressure vectography is of no apparent benefit for sphincter evaluation.
Anal pressure vectography is an attractive study which can provide colorful 3-dimensional video images to assess radial asymmetry. However, the value of this test is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the correlation among APV and other anorectal physiological tests, such as anal manometry, anal sphincter electromyography (EMG), and anal ultrasonography. Fifty consecutive patients with faecal incontinence were evaluated. All 50 patients had APV and anal manometry during the same visit. APV revealed mean maximal resting and mean maximal squeeze pressures of 83.1 +/- 28.4 mmHg and 106.3 +/- 34.5 mmHg, respectively. Anal manometry showed mean maximal resting and mean maximal squeeze pressures of 55.9 +/- 19.4 mmHg and 57.7 +/- 29.4 mmHg, respectively. The difference between APV and manometry for both mean maximal resting and mean maximal squeeze pressures were significant (P < 0.05). Thirty-four of the 50 patients (68%) showed global defects of the sphincters on cross-sectional vectogram. Forty-six patients also had anal sphincter mapping with electromyography; 38 patients had isolated decreased EMG activity in a single quadrant. However, only five of the 38 patients (13.2%) had the same defect localized by APV. Lastly, 33 patients had anal ultrasonography; 27 patients had anal sphincter defects. However, only 3 of the 27 patients (11.1%) had the same defects localized by APV. In conclusion, APV had poor correlation with other anorectal physiological tests, including anal manometry, anal sphincter EMG, and anal ultrasonography. Therefore, APV has no apparent advantages, so its use cannot be supported.
Anal Canal↗
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is preoperative anal manometry predictive of postoperative functional outcome?
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the value of preoperative anal manometry in predicting post-operative continence. METHODS: Anal manometry was performed in 73 consecutive patients before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery (m1), before loop ileostomy closure (m2), and at a follow-up of one (m3) and two (m4) years. Mean and maximum resting and squeezing pressures were documented at each occasion. One year after surgery, pressures were correlated (r) with an incontinence score. RESULTS: A significant (P < 0.05) decrease in mean resting pressures was observed after IPAA (m1 = 66 mmHg; m2 = 42.8 mmHg), followed by a significant (P < 0.05) improvement of mean resting pressure after loop ileostomy closure (m3 = 53.8 mmHg; m4 = 54.7 mmHg). Mean squeezing pressures did not change (P > 0.05) at any time during the study (m1 = 114 mmHg; m2 = 102.9 mmHg; m3 = 103.4 mmHg; m4 = 95.8 mmHg). There was no correlation between preoperative mean resting pressure and postoperative (mI) incontinence score. CONCLUSION: Anal manometry showed a characteristic trend in internal anal sphincter injury after IPAA followed by recovery after ileostomy closure. However, it failed to prove helpful in the prediction of clinical outcome. Thus, although this study supports the continued use of manometry in a research setting, it challenges the value of routine manometry in a clinical context.
Anal Canal↗
Recovery of anal sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure in patients over the age of fifty.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to postoperatively assess the progression of anal sphincter function and clinical outcome in patients > or = 50 years old (Group I) compared with those < 50 years old (Group II). METHODS: Clinical data were assessed after ileostomy closure by a questionnaire. These data were compiled to obtain an incontinence score, which ranged from 0 (perfect continence) to 20 (total incontinence). Anorectal manometry was performed preoperatively (MN1) and postoperatively, before (MN2) and after (MN3) ileostomy closure. Wilcoxon and paired t-test were used to compare the clinical and functional results, respectively. RESULTS: Group I consisted of 22 patients (mean age, 56 years) and Group II, 50 patients (mean age, 32 years). No differences were found relative to either preoperative pressures or clinical outcome. However, both the mean and high resting pressures were significantly lower in Group I at the MN2 examination. CONCLUSION: The effect on anal sphincters of ileoanal reservoir in patients over the age of 50 years is similar to that noted in younger patients. Transient impairment of internal anal sphincter function observed after ileoanal reservoir is more severe in older patients (P = 0.01). However, as in younger patients, it does completely recover after ileostomy closure.
Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system.
PURPOSE: A study was undertaken to assess the incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidocele as a finding during cinedefecography. METHODS: All patients who underwent cinedefecography between July 1988 and July 1992 were prospectively evaluated. Clinical data were assessed by a standardized questionnaire. Sigmoidocele was classified based on the degree of descent of the lowest portion of the sigmoid: 1 degree = above the pubococcygeal line; 2 degrees = below the pubococcygeal line and above the ischiococcygeal line; 3 degrees = below the ischiococcygeal line. This classification was then correlated with the patient's symptoms and percentage of redundancy relative to rectal length. RESULTS: Twenty-four sigmoidoceles (5.2 percent) were noted in 463 cinedefecographic studies; 289 of these patients had constipation. These five males and 19 females were of a mean age of 57 (range, 20-77) years. Nine patients had 1 degree sigmoidocele, seven had 2 degrees, and eight had 3 degrees. Percentage of sigmoid redundancy was 51 percent, 65 percent, and 88 percent for 1 degree, 2 degrees, and 3 degrees, respectively (P = 0.0001). Impaired rectal emptying was present in 16 patients (67 percent). Five of eight patients with 3 degrees sigmoidocele underwent colonic resection with or without rectopexy. The other three patients were conservatively managed. One of seven patients with 2 degrees sigmoidocele underwent colectomy, and the other six were conservatively managed as were all nine patients with 1 degree. Posttreatment improvement was noted in 100 percent (6 of 6) of patients operated on but in only 33 percent (6 of 18) of patients conservatively treated. Thus, this proposed classification system yielded excellent correlation among the mean of level of the sigmoidocele, percentage of redundancy, and clinical symptoms. Furthermore, clinical significance of 3 degrees sigmoidocele is supported by the fact that all five of 3 degrees patients who underwent colonic resection reported symptomatic improvement at a mean follow-up of 23 (range, 15-39) months. CONCLUSION: Sigmoidocele may account for symptoms of obstructed defecation, and, therefore, it must be considered in the differential diagnosis and evaluation of constipation. Staging of sigmoidocele is useful in determining both clinical significance and optimal treatment.
Adolescent↗
Discrepancies in anal manometric pressure measurement--important or inconsequential?
PURPOSE: Maximum resting and squeeze pressures have been the most widely employed parameters for manometric assessment of the anal sphincters. However, a single maximum value may not always be the best assessment. METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare mean and maximum resting and mean and maximum squeeze pressures in a large sample population. All manometric pressure profiles were reviewed by a single individual blinded to the patient's age and diagnosis. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-six patients with a measurable high-pressure zone were included in this study. The study population was comprised of 279 females and 186 males. A significant difference was found between mean (56.26 mmHg) and maximum (79.2 mmHg) resting pressures (P < 0.01) and also between mean (81.25 mmHg) and maximum (119.50 mmHg) squeeze pressures (P < 0.01). A significant difference (P < 0.01) was also observed when compared by length of the high-pressure zone. CONCLUSION: The measurement, documentation, and reporting of mean resting and mean squeeze pressures provide a better perspective of anal manometric results, since the two sets of values are significantly different (P < 0.01), regardless of the anal canal length. Therefore, these data support the standardized evaluation of both mean and maximum pressures in individual patients and in published series.
Anal Canal↗
Must early postoperative oral intake be limited to laparoscopy?
PURPOSE: This prospective, randomized study was designed to evaluate whether or not early postoperative feeding (claimed as a unique benefit of laparoscopic surgery) is possible after laparotomy and colorectal resection. METHODS: The trial was performed between July 1, 1992 and October 31, 1992 and included all 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparotomy with either a colonic or an ileal resection. In all cases the nasogastric tube was removed immediately after the operation. Group 1 consisted of 32 patients (age range, 15-81 years; mean, 52 years) who received a regular diet on the first postoperative morning. Group 2 consisted of 32 patients (age range, 15-87 years; mean, 52 years) who were fed in a traditional manner. Regular food was permitted after resolution of ileus as defined by resumption of bowel movements in the absence of abdominal distention, nausea, or vomiting. RESULTS: The rate of nasogastric tube reinsertion for distention with persistent vomiting was 18.7 percent (six patients) in Group 1 and 12.5 percent (four patients) in Group 2. Although vomiting was experienced more frequently by patients in Group 1 (44 percent vs. 25 percent, respectively), there was no difference between the two groups with regard to the duration of postoperative ileus (3.6 vs. 3.4 days, respectively). In the 26 patients from Group 1 who did not require nasogastric tube reinsertion, there was a trend toward shorter hospitalization (6.7 vs. 8.0 days, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early oral intake is possible after laparotomy and colorectal resection. Thus, the laparoscopic surgeon's claim of early tolerated oral intake may not be unique to laparoscopy.
Adolescent↗
Current surgical therapy for mucosal ulcerative colitis.
PURPOSE: There are numerous surgical options for the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This article reviews the currently available options for the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis. Separate discussions will explore both the options in the emergency and elective settings. RESULTS: Patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis may undergo surgery either as an emergency or in the elective setting. Emergency surgery is usually performed for one of the life-threatening complications of ulcerative colitis: fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, or massive hemorrhage. The most commonly performed procedure under these conditions is a subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy. The rectal stump may be handled in a variety of ways. This procedure avoids proctectomy or anastomosis. Thus, patients will still have all necessary anatomic structures to allow for any of the definitive elective procedures. Elective surgery is performed for intractable disease, complications of medical therapy, dysplasia, or, occasionally, extraintestinal manifestations. In the elective setting, a definitive operation can be done to remove most or all of the disease-bearing colorectum and leave the patient with a means to control fecal elimination. Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis leaves the patient with diseased bowel but obviates the need for pelvic dissection. Although total proctocolectomy removes all potentially diseased mucosa, these patients have a permanent ileostomy. The stoma can either be a standard Brooke's ileostomy or a continent Kock pouch. The most common definitive procedure currently performed is the near-total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This option can be completed either with a rectal mucosectomy and hand-sewn anastomosis or with a double-stapled anastomosis, preserving the anal transition zone. This procedure is successful in eradicating almost all diseased mucosa while allowing the patient per anal defecation. Bowel movement frequency, degree of anal continence, and return to social and professional commitments have met with a great deal of satisfaction in most patients. A newer alternative to this procedure employs laparoscopy to facilitate a smaller incision. A one-stage procedure which omits the protective ileostomy and thus saves the patient one operation has also been used with some success in selected cases. CONCLUSION: There are several surgical options for the treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis. Each one has a role and should be discussed with the patient.
Colitis, Ulcerative↗
Patient position during cinedefecography. Influence on perineal descent and other measurements.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the reproducibility of cinedefecography measurements and abnormal findings between the left lateral decubitus and seated positions. METHODS: Prospective patient evaluation included all patients who had lateral radiographs of the pelvis taken at rest, during squeezing, and pushing in both positions. Anorectal angle, perineal descent, and puborectalis length measurements were calculated for each set of radiographs. Pelvic floor dynamics during evacuation were measured as the changes between rest and pushing. Abnormal findings included both increased dynamic and fixed perineal descent, nonrelaxing puborectalis, and premature evacuation. RESULTS: One hundred five consecutive patients underwent cinedefecography. There were statistically significant differences between the positions with regard to anorectal angle (P < 0.0001), perineal descent (P = 0.0001), and puborectalis length (P = 0.0001). Dynamic changes of the anorectal angle, perineal descent, and puborectalis length were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, 6 of 22 (27 percent) patients with fecal incontinence had premature evacuation severe enough to impede measurement only when seated (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Because of the statistically significant differences between the two positions, centers should always employ the same position for a given diagnostic group.
Adult↗
Simple technique for pelvic drain placement in laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.
The placement of a pelvic drain after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum is a routine practice. We present a simple technique for laparoscopic placement of such a drain through the abdominal wall following laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.
Abdominal Muscles↗
Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods.
PURPOSE: Recent reports have suggested that precolonoscopy bowel preparation is easier to tolerate if a small volume solution is used. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare three oral solutions for colonoscopy to determine any changes in either patient compliance or cleansing ability. METHODS: Four hundred fifty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a standard 4-liter polyethylene glycol solution, a newer sulfate-free 4-liter polyethylene glycol solution, or a 90-ml oral sodium phosphate preparation. Before and after bowel preparation all patients were weighed, and serum electrolytes as well as phosphate, magnesium, calcium, and osmolarity were measured. In addition, a detailed questionnaire was used to assess side effects and patient satisfaction. Endoscopists blinded to the type and quantity of preparation used scored the type of residual stool and the percentage of bowel wall visualized for each segment of colon and for the overall examination. Nurses recorded all procedure times as well as the quantity of irrigation and aspiration. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-two age-matched and sex-matched patients completed all phases of the trial. There were no clinically significant changes in weight or in any biochemical parameters. There was, however, asymptomatic hyperphosphatemia in the sodium phosphate group (P < 0.01). The length of time to the cecum was similar for all three groups, with a higher volume of fluid suctioned for sodium phosphate (P < 0.01). Overall, endoscopists scored sodium phosphate as "excellent" or "good" in 90 percent vs. 70 percent and 73 percent after the polyethylene glycol or sulfate-free lavage, respectively (P < 0.01). Particulate or solid stool was found in all segments of the colon more frequently after both large volume preparations than after sodium phosphate (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the frequency or intensity of any of the 11 side effects questioned. Eighty-three percent of the patients who received the sodium phosphate preparation stated they would take this same preparation again, vs. only 19 percent and 33 percent for polyethylene glycol and the sulfate-free lavage, respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The smaller volume oral sodium phosphate was not associated with any clinically significant problem, caused no increase in the incidence of side effects, was preferred by patients, and was more effective in colonic cleansing. However, the hyperphosphatemia seen may limit its use in patients with impaired renal function.
Adolescent↗
Optimization of sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure. A prospective, randomized trial.
PURPOSE: Impairment of sphincter function in patients who undergo ileoanal reservoir is usually most severe immediately after ileostomy closure. Therefore, a prospective, randomized trial was undertaken to assess the potential value of preileostomy closure sphincter-strengthening exercises to improve early functional outcome. METHODS: Patients were randomized either to a control group (Group 1) or to undergo a five-week pelvic floor exercise program (Group 2). An incontinence score from 0 to 20 was used to clinically assess the functional results. Anorectal manometric assessment included: high-pressure zone length, mean resting pressure, highest resting pressure, mean squeezing pressure, and highest squeezing pressure. The paired t-test was used to compare the functional results preoperatively and at the time of ileostomy closure. This time corresponded to the conclusion of the exercise program or the equivalent time period for the control group. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients who underwent double-stapled ileoanal reservoir between July 1991 and June 1992 were studied. They included 16 males and 10 females with a mean age of 38 (range, 17-69) years. When both evaluations were compared, the mean incontinence score decreased from 0.2 to 2.8 (delta = 2.6) in Group 1 and from 0.2 to 2.0 (delta = 1.8) in Group 2 (P = 0.07). None of the changes between the preoperative and postoperative clinical and physiologic evaluations were statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sphincter-strengthening exercises before ileostomy closure did not minimize the transient impairment of functional results.
Adolescent↗