PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Deveridge

Publications and source records attributed to S Deveridge.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Prospective randomised trial of amifostine cytoprotection in myeloma patients undergoing high-dose melphalan conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation.

In this prospective multicentre trial, 90 patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were randomised to receive (n=43) or not receive (n=47) amifostine 910 mg/m(2) prior to melphalan 200 mg/m(2). Patients were monitored for regimen-related toxicity, engraftment, supportive care, response and survival. Both groups underwent ASCT at a median of 8 months from diagnosis and were matched for disease characteristics, prior therapy and pre-ASCT disease responsiveness. Amifostine infusional side-effects were frequent, occurring in 65% of patients, but of mild severity. Amifostine use was associated with a reduction in the median grade of oral mucositis (1 vs 2, P=0.01) and the frequency of severe (WHO grades 3 or 4) mucositis (12 vs 33%, P=0.02), but no reduction in the requirement for parenteral nutrition or analgesic use. Conversion to complete remission post-ASCT occurred in 30 and 14% of the amifostine and control groups, respectively (P=0.09). With a median follow-up of 35 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the median progression-free or overall survival times for the two groups. We conclude that amifostine can be safely administered prior to high-dose melphalan and significantly reduces the frequency and severity of therapy-induced oral mucositis.

Adult↗

Collection and analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells during haemopoietic recovery following PBSCT for CML: autografting as an in vivo purging manoeuvre?

A 47-year-old man with a 2-year history of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) underwent autologous PBSCT. During the period of haemopoietic reconstitution he underwent five leucapheretic (LP) harvests yielding a total of 2.6 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells. Cytogenetic analyses revealed 94, 83, 83, 96 and 85% Ph negativity respectively for the five harvests. RT-PCR analyses for BCR-ABL performed on randomly picked CFU-GM from the five LP products were negative in all cases. These observations suggest that the majority of harvested cells, including the more primitive clonogenic cells, were BCR-ABL (Ph) negative and presumably were not part of the leukaemic clone. These findings support the notion that autologous PBSCT in CML whilst serving as a therapeutic manoeuvre may also facilitate the collection of non-leukaemic progenitor cells for further transplantation procedures.

Hematopoiesis↗

Remote electronic blood release system.

BACKGROUND: The Hunter Area Pathology Service provides transfusion services to 4 metropolitan and 11 rural hospitals in Australia. To improve blood availability, conserve blood stocks, and reduce crossmatch-to-transfusion ratios, a networked electronic blood release system (EBRS) has been developed for computer cross-matching within the laboratory and at sites remote from the transfusion laboratory. It is innovative, in that non-laboratory staffs have been trained to release computer-matched blood at remote hospitals without transfusion laboratories. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The EBRS software was tested and validated according to the Australian software standards AS 3563.1 and 3563.2 (1991). Over 7000 units were released by the EBRS in a laboratory trial conducted in conjunction with the conventional immediate-spin crossmatch. A further, 12-month study was conducted within the laboratory before the staged implementation of the EBRS at the remote hospitals. RESULTS: The EBRS has resulted in 1) a 25-percent reduction in the number of units requested by the medical staff, resulting from the reduction in time needed to provide compatible blood due to the elimination of the serologic crossmatch; 2) better blood stock management (reducing outdated red cell units by 30%); and 3) significant savings in laboratory workload (savings of approximately 100 hours/month). In addition, the rapid availability of computer-crossmatched red cells in emergency situations has enhanced patient safety. CONCLUSION: The EBRS is a safe and efficient means of providing red cells within the laboratory and at remote hospitals without laboratory services.

Blood Banks↗