PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Doehrman

Publications and source records attributed to S Doehrman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1979

The generalizability of verbal IQ as an estimate of full scale IQ on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale.

To assess the validity of the Verbal IQ as a short form for the WAIS, 231 high-IQ outpatient test protocols were analyzed. Correlations between Verbal and Full Scale IQ were positive and significant for both males and females. The average Verbal IQ exceeded the average Full Scale IQ for both sexes as well, but these differences were small. A high percentage of Full Scale IQ classifications were changed when Verbal IQ was used. Thus, Verbal IQ appears partially valid as a WAIS short form for this higher IQ outpatient population. Results are interpreted in terms of Resnick and Entin's short form validity criteria.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

The Stroop phenomenon: perceptual conflict or response competition?

The Stroop phenomenon has recently been explained by two contrasting approaches, the perceptual conflict and the response competition. This experiment was designed to evaluate the two different explanations. 24 undergraduates were tested on the three sets of Stroop stimuli while hearing their verbal responses under delayed auditory feedback and under normal feedback. Delayed feedback produced differential response decrements across Stroop conditions. The findings supported predictions of the response-competition hypothesis and disconfirmed those of the perceptual-conflict hypothesis.

Auditory Perception↗
PubMed1975

Superiority of recognition over detection in judgments of visual orientation.

2 human subjects were tested in two separate visual psychophysical tasks--detection and recognition. Using tachistoscopic presentation, single lines were shown at five different exposure durations. It was determined that it is easier to judge which of two lines, differing only in orientation, was flashed than to judge whether or not a given line was presented. The statistically significant superiority of recognition over detection occurred along a wide performance range, roughly from 60% to 95% correct. The data indicate that the effect is not peculiar to a simultaneous detection-recognition task or to a midrange performance level, both of which were used in a previous study. Other relevant data and theoretical explanations of the effect are discussed.

Female↗