S E Speidel | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Weaning weight inheritance in environments classified by maternal body weight change.

In good environments, cow intake is sufficient for their own growth and for milk production to support their calf. In poor environments, cows lose BW or may reduce milk supply to maintain themselves. Heritability for direct genetic and maternal components of weaning weight as well as the correlations between these components might be expected to vary according to these circumstances. The purpose of this study was to estimate heritability and genetic correlations for the direct genetic and maternal components of weaning weight classified in 2 environments according to maternal BW gain and to identify whether a single heritability estimate is appropriate for the differing environments experienced by cows from year to year. Data used in this analysis was obtained from the Red Angus Association of America and consisted of 96,064 cow BW observations and 27,534 calf weaning weight observations. A dam's change in BW from one year to the next was used to classify each calf's weaning weight into 1 of 2 environmental groups, those being good or poor. Best linear unbiased estimates of the change in cow BW with age were obtained from analysis of cow BW using a repeatability model. If the phenotypic change in cow BW exceeded this average BW change, the calf's weaning weight associated with the end of this time frame was classified as having been observed in a good environment. If not, the calf's corresponding weaning weight was classified as having occurred in a poorer than average environment. Heritability estimates of 0.24 +/- 0.03, 0.24 +/- 0.03, 0.13 +/- 0.02, and 0.14 +/- 0.02 were obtained for weaning weight good direct, poor direct, good maternal, and poor maternal, respectively. Correlations between direct genetic and maternal weaning weight components in the good and poor environments were -0.47 +/- 0.08 and -0.20 +/- 0.09, respectively. These variance components are not sufficiently distinct to warrant accounting for dam nutritional environment in national cattle evaluation.

Aging↗

PubMed2006

Maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle.

The objective of this study was to quantify the role of maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle. Docility scores were obtained at weaning while animals were restrained in a squeeze chute. Scores 1 through 6 represented a docile to aggressive temperament, respectively, and were provided by the North American Limousin Foundation. Observations with unknown age of dam, contemporary groups containing less than 10 observations, contemporary groups with no variation, and single-sire contemporary groups were removed, leaving 21,932 observations. A 2-generation pedigree file compiled from animals with observations contained 49,459 animals. Fixed effects were weaning contemporary group and age of dam (2, > or =3 yr). Six animal models encompassed combinations of random factors: direct genetic, maternal genetic, and maternal permanent environmental effects. The model D was the most basic, containing direct genetic and residual effects, and it resembled the method currently used by the North American Limousin Foundation for genetic evaluation of docility. Maternal genetic or permanent environmental effects were separately added to the model D, denoted as models DM and DC, respectively. Model DMC contained all random factors. Models DM-Zero and DMC-Zero were equivalent to models DM and DMC, respectively, but with zero direct-maternal genetic covariance. Direct heritability estimates were moderate for all models (0.29 +/- 0.02 to 0.38 +/- 0.03). Maternal heritability estimates were low, ranging from 0.01 +/- 0.01 (DM-Zero) to 0.05 +/- 0.02 (DM). Negative direct-maternal genetic correlations of -0.41 +/- 0.09 and -0.55 +/- 0.09 were estimated for models DM and DMC, respectively. The proportion of phenotypic variance accounted for by maternal permanent environmental effects was 0.03 +/- 0.01, 0.04 +/- 0.01, and 0.02 +/- 0.01 for models DC, DMC, and DMC-Zero, respectively. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that model DMC best fit the data. Although maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects were significant, they accounted for only 8% (model DMC) of the phenotypic variance, and a Spearman rank correlation of 0.99 between models D and DMC showed sires did not rank differently with or without inclusion of these effects. Given these results, inclusion of maternal effects to the genetic evaluation of docility in Limousin cattle does not seem warranted.

Aggression↗