PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S F Vatner

Publications and source records attributed to S F Vatner.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1971

The peripheral vascular response to severe exercise in untethered dogs before and after complete heart block.

The peripheral vascular response to severe exercise was studied in 11 healthy conscious dogs instrumented with Doppler ultrasonic flow probes on the mesenteric, renal, and iliac arteries, and miniature pressure gauges in the aorta. The response to severe exercise was restudied in six of these dogs after recovery from a second operation producing complete heart block by the injection of formalin into the atrioventricular (AV) node. Three of these dogs also exercised while their ventricles were paced at rates of 100/min and 200/min. The untethered normal dogs ran at speeds of 15-25 miles/hr behind a mobile recording unit for a distance averaging 1.5 miles, while continuous measurements of arterial blood pressure and blood flow were telemetered and recorded on magnetic tape. Severe exercise in normal dogs increased heart rate from 84 to 259/min, arterial pressure from 89 to 140 mm Hg, flow resistance in the mesenteric and renal beds by 59 and 52% respectively, and iliac blood flow 479% above control, while mesenteric and renal blood flows remained constant and iliac resistance decreased by 73%. In dogs with complete AV block, severe exercise at speeds of 10-18 miles/hr increased heart rate from 47 to 78/min, mean arterial pressure from 81 to 89 mm Hg, iliac flow 224%, resistance in the renal bed by 273%, and mesenteric bed by 222% while it decreased blood flow in mesenteric and renal beds by 61 and 65% respectively, and iliac resistance by 62%. A similar response occurred during exercise with pacing at 100/min, but when paced at 200/min a more normal exercise response reappeared. Thus, in normal dogs the peripheral vascular response to severe exercise involved increases in heart rate, arterial pressure and visceral resistance but visceral blood flow did not decrease. In dogs with heart block, where the ability to increase heart rate is severely compromised, compensatory reduction of mesenteric and renal blood flows occurred.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1971

Effects of cardiac depression and of anesthesia on the myocardial action of a cardiac glycoside.

The effects of ouabain (G-strophanthin) 20 mug/kg, on left ventricular (LV) pressure (P), diameter (D), velocity of contraction (dD/dt), and dP/dt were studied in conscious dogs instrumented with ultrasonic diameter gauges and miniature pressure gauges. The effects of ouabain were compared on separate occasions in the same dogs after cardiac depression with propranolol, 3.0 mg/kg, and also after general anesthesia with Na pentobarbital, 30 mg/kg. Maximal pressor effects were observed in the first 10 min, but maximal effects on the contractile state occurred at 30 min after ouabain. At this time, in conscious dogs, ouabain had increased LV isolength systolic pressure by 5%, LV isolength velocity by only 9%, and LV (dP/dt)/P by 21%, while end systolic diameter (ESD) decreased slightly and end diastolic diameter (EDD) and heart rate (HR) were unchanged. After anesthesia, ouabain increased LV systolic pressure by 8%, velocity 32%, (dP/dt)/P by 47%, and ESD decreased by 1.2 mm while EDD rose slightly and HR fell by 26 beats/min. Returning HR to control with atrial pacing decreased EDD 0.9 mm below control. After cardiac depression with propranolol, ouabain caused responses similar to those observed in the anesthetized dogs. Thus, the cardiac glycoside was found to exert only minor inotropic effects on the nonfailing heart of conscious dogs but far more striking inotropic responses in the anesthetized state.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Inotropic reserve and histological appearance of hibernating myocardium in conscious pigs with ameroid-induced coronary stenosis.

Inotropic reserve, demonstrated with administration of sympathomimetic amines, is characteristic of hibernating myocardium. The goal of this study was to determine whether inotropic reserve was present following chronic coronary artery constriction in the pig, which is one potential model of hibernating myocardium. The effects of isoproterenol were examined in five conscious pigs 21 +/- 2.1 days after ameroid implantation on the left circumflex coronary artery on measurements of left ventricular (LV) pressure, LV dP/dt, and regional wall thickening in the ameroid-dependent zone (posterior wall) and contralateral non-ischemic zone (anterior wall). Isoproterenol, 0.1 microgram/kg/min, increased LV dP/dt by 96 +/- 11%, heart rate by 43 +/- 13 beats/min, and normalized systolic wall thickening, slightly, but not significantly more in the ameroid-dependent zone (+1.57 +/- 0.31 mm) than in the contralateral non-ischemic zone (+1.04 +/- 0.31 mm), although the baseline wall thickening was reduced significantly in the ameroid-dependent zone. This occurred at a time when baseline myocardial blood flow was preserved and myocardial perfusion in the ameroid-dependent zone was derived in part from the native coronary circulation and also through collateral channels. Two weeks later histological evidence of lesions characteristic of hibernating myocardium, i.e., myofibrolysis and increased glycogen deposition, were observed. Thus, these histological changes and the confluence of chronically depressed regional function and residual inotropic reserve in the conscious pig with chronic ameroid-induced coronary constriction support this model for further study of hibernating myocardium.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ubiquity of myocardial stunning.

The prolonged depression of myocardial function following episodes of myocardial ischemia now known as myocardial stunning, appears ubiquitous in both the experimental and clinical settings. With recent therapies designed to ameliorate ischemic myocardium, e.g., coronary artery bypass, coronary thrombolysis, coronary angioplasty, the inexorable progression from ischemia to necrosis has been averted more successfully and frequently, which permits appearance of myocardial stunning to become clearer. Myocardial stunning occurs in the presence of a multitude of inciting stimuli to myocardial ischemia, including a fixed stenosis, relief from stenosis or even in the presence of reduced coronary reserve, without a coronary stenosis. It will be potentially most interesting to determine if myocardial stunning also belies the hibernating myocardium and is, in fact, its actual mechanism.

Animals↗