PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Fassler

Publications and source records attributed to S Fassler.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Lemonade from lemons: a program response to RRC-determined probation.

To assess resident satisfaction as a result of changes made to an integrated surgical residency in response to probation.The University of Connecticut Integrated General Surgery Residency (UCIGSR), which consists of 5 hospitals, 18 rotations, and has a complement of 44 residents, was placed on probation by the Residency Review Committee (RRC) in Surgery in November 1998. Among the deficiencies cited by the RRC were inadequate evaluation of the program, rotations, residents, and the faculty by the residents, along with inadequate documentation issues. Lack of organized educational conferences, lack of faculty involvement, excessive service responsibilities and work hours, and hospital environmental issues were also cited. It was also apparent that morale of the residents and faculty had significantly eroded. Rather than trying patchwork "fixes" of deficiencies, we used this opportunity to reengineer the program, rededicating ourselves to educating and developing future surgeons. Task forces, including joint faculty and resident participation, were set up to develop solutions, based on the answer to the question: "Do we want a residency or not?" This focus was especially helpful to create hospital administration and faculty support.A survey was created to assess the changes made in the program. The survey included 65 questions pertaining to the learning environment, hospital and departmental support, and balance between clinical and educational responsibilities and overall working environment. Each resident was asked to fill out 3 identical surveys, 1 just before the RRC report, and the other 2 at 6-month intervals after the probation announcement. A 4-point grading scale was used.Our results were reflective of resident perceptions of improvement and increased satisfaction. These data demonstrated that the changes implemented as a result of the RRC findings had a positive effect on the residency program, and they corresponded to the areas where changes were implemented. This survey also gave us a method to evaluate ongoing changes in our residency.Probation can be a potent stimulus for improvement of a surgical residency. (Curr Surg 57:373-376. Copyright 2000 by the Association of Program Directors in Surgery.)

Journal Article↗

Analgesic effect of intraarticular morphine, bupivacaine, and morphine/bupivacaine after arthroscopic knee surgery.

In a double-blind randomized fashion, 38 patients were divided into four groups according to the intraarticular injection received after arthroscopic surgery. Patients in group I (n = 7) received saline, group II (n = 10) morphine, group III bupivacaine, and group IV (n = 11) morphine and bupivacaine. Before surgery and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 6, and 24 h postoperatively, pain levels were recorded. In addition, postoperative supplemental i.v. morphine requested by the patient was tabulated. Results showed that the mean consumption of supplemental analgesia was lowest in the morphine/bupivacaine group. Although there was a statistically significant difference in pain scores between the saline group and the other three groups during the early postoperative period, there was no significant difference in pain scores between the morphine, bupivacaine, and morphine/bupivacaine groups. We conclude that postoperative, intraarticular injection of analgesics is beneficial in reducing pain levels. The combination of morphine/bupivacaine appears to be the most beneficial analgesic due to its low supplemental analgesic requirements postoperatively.

Adult↗

Cisapride and metoclopramide in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

In a double-blind, randomized study, the clinical effects of 5 mg and 10 mg of cisapride three times daily were compared with those of 10 mg of metoclopramide three times daily in 114 patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, mainly diurnal and nocturnal heartburn and regurgitation. The symptoms significantly (P less than 0.001) improved in the three groups; the mean severity score decreased by at least 78% after four weeks of treatment. Initial symptoms were more severe in the cisapride-treated patients, especially in those receiving 10 mg three times daily; however, the patients' condition after four weeks was similar in the three groups. Central nervous system side effects were reported by one patient from each of the cisapride-treated groups and by nine of the 43 metoclopramide-treated patients (P less than 0.02). Six metoclopramide-treated patients and one cisapride-treated patient dropped out of the study because of side effects. These findings favor the use of cisapride when prokinetic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux is considered.

Adult↗