Distal mesial plaque index. A technique for assessing dental plaque about the gingiva.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S Fischman.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Interview and dental examination data were gathered on 584 males with cancer of the oral cavity and on 1,222 control patients with nonneoplastic diseases at Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, New York. No dietary characteristics distinguished cancer patients from controls. However, a higher risk of developing oral cancer was associated with heavy smoking, heavy drinking, and poor dentition. When controlled for the other factors, each factor carried a higher risk. Moreover, heavy smokers and heavy drinkers with poor dentition and males with all three traits had a substantially higher risk than would have been expected, if the traits were considered additively. The risk for males with all three traits was 7.7 times that of men with none of these traits.
The end point methodology did not indicate a difference between the agents. The prophylaxis effect was only demonstrable through 8 weeks, although the analysis of variance indicated a prophylaxis effect on gingival index throughout the study. An agent effect was not demonstrable in the study. The "positive control," chlorhexidine, did not give the same results in this brushing study as in previous no-brushing studies reported by Loe and by our group. One might conclude that the effectiveness of brushing in reducing gingivitis is greater than the effect of chlorhexidine. Decreasing plaque and gingivitis scores are seen with increasing time, probably reflecting increased subject interest and involvement in the study. Mere involvement in the study apparently produced a beneficial effect on gingival health. This "placebo effect" also has been noted in an earlier study. A similar decrease in plaque scores in a placebo group attributable to a general improvement of oral hygiene was reported by Gjermo and Rolla. The subjects who began the study with no calculus (prophylaxis group) had consistently lower calculus scores than those not given a prophylaxis. This difference became less distinct at later exams, as the treated group developed calculus. The agents, although ineffective under the test regimen produced no adverse effects.
Examiners in clinical control programs customarily undergo an intensive period of training to standardize their interpretation of diagnostic criteria. Data are presented summarizing examiner error rates in calibration examinations and reversal rates in a field study.
One hundred and eighty-seven patients participated in a six-month study to evaluate the calculus-inhibiting effect of a zinc citrate dentifrice compared to Crest Tartar Control and a placebo, Crest Regular. The findings demonstrate a statistically significant calculus prevention benefit over Crest Regular for both Crest Tartar Control and a 2% zinc citrate/silica product. Compared to the control, the zinc citrate product reduced calculus formation by 32.3%, and Crest Tartar Control reduced it by 21.4%. These findings also demonstrate no statistically significant difference in stain or soft tissue status among the three dentifrices. All products were found to be safe to oral tissues and acceptable for taste.