PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S G Cella

Publications and source records attributed to S G Cella.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The leukocyte expression of CD36 is low in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.

CD36, a scavenger receptor of class B (SR-B), helps mediate microglial and macrophage response to beta-amyloid fibrils (betaA), and seems to play a key role in the proinflammatory events associated with Alzheimer disease (AD) in many tissues. Peripheral leukocytes express many molecules and multiple receptors which undergo the same regulatory mechanisms as those operative in the brain. Thus, these cells, easily obtainable through peripheral blood sampling, may be used as a tool to investigate changes occurring in inaccessible brain areas. Based on these premises, we investigated the leukocyte expression of CD36 in 70 AD patients and in 30 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Results were compared to those of 20 young and 40 age-matched control subjects. Leukocyte expression of CD36 was significantly reduced versus controls in both AD and MCI patients, while in young and old controls there were no age-related changes. Although preliminary, these data indicate that the reduction of CD36 expression in leukocytes is a disease-related phenomenon, occurring since the early stages of AD (MCI). Irrespective of the mechanism(s) underlying such changes, assessment of leukocyte CD36 expression might represent an useful tool to support the diagnosis of AD and to screen MCI patients candidates to develop the disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Abuse of recombinant human growth hormone: studies in two different dog models.

The search for inappropriately high growth hormone (GH) titers in plasma has been widely used to detect GH abuse, despite many shortcomings especially related to the pulsatile nature of GH secretion. Hence, the need for new anti-doping strategies. In the present study dogs were used to evaluate the ability of recombinant human GH (rhGH) to affect canine GH (cGH) release ensuing after somatostatin (SS) infusion withdrawal (SSIW) - a purported stimulus for the release of endogenous GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) - or the cGH response to administration of a GH-releasing peptide (GHRP). In the SSIW experiments, 8 beagle dogs of either gender (4-6 years old) were given a subcutaneous bolus injection of physiological saline (0.1 ml/kg) or, alternatively, rhGH (0.2 IU/kg s.c.) 60 min before the starting a continuous infusion of SS (4 microg/kg g h i.v.) of 1.5 h duration. In the dogs given a saline bolus, SSIW was followed by a 'rebound' rise in plasma cGH levels. In contrast, in dogs which had received the bolus injection of rhGH, the cGH rise elicited by SSIW was completely abrogated. In the set of experiments with a GHRP challenge, 13 dogs of either gender (3-12 years old) received the following treatment schedule at least 15 days apart: (1) a single bolus injection of rhGH (0.2 IU/kg s.c.); (2) rhGH (0.05 IU/kg s.c.) daily for 12 days; (3) rhGH (0.2 IU/kg s.c.) on alternate days for 12 days, and (4) rhGH (0.2 IU/kg s.c.) daily for 12 days. For each treatment schedule, before treatment, during treatment (24 h from the previous rhGH injection) and 1, 5 and 10 days after treatment, all dogs received an intravenous injection of a GHRP, EP51216 (125 microg/kg). In all treatments under baseline conditions, a single injection of EP51216 elicited an abrupt rise in plasma cGH. Twenty-four hours after the injection of an acute bolus of rhGH, the C(max) and AUC(0-90) of the GHRP-stimulated cGH response were significantly lower than the baseline cGH response. Five days later, there was a trend in the C(max) and AUC(0-90) towards complete restoration of the original values. One, 5 and 10 days after the end of the daily treatment with rhGH (0.05 IU/kg s.c.), no significant changes in the GHRP-stimulated cGH responses vs. the baseline GH response were recorded. In contrast, treatment with rhGH at a dose of 0.2 IU/kg s.c., on either alternate or daily administration, markedly reduced the GHRP-stimulated cGH responses evaluated after 3 and 5 rhGH injections. One day after the last rhGH injection, the EP51216-stimulated cGH response was still significantly reduced when compared with that present under baseline conditions. Five and 10 days following termination of rhGH treatment on alternate days, no significant differences in the C(max) and AUC(0-90) of the cGH responses to EP51216 were present. Differently, following the end of daily rhGH treatment, a marked inhibition in the C(max) of the cGH response to EP51216 was still present at 1 and 5 days, though not at 10 days. In conclusion, these studies show that a single administration of rhGH can abrogate the cGH response ensuing SSIW or acute stimulation by a GHRP. The inhibitory effect of rhGH on the cGH response to GHRP is present even 5 days after termination of a short-lived treatment with rhGH at a dose (0.2 IU/kg) which, in the dog, is undoubtedly lower than that used in humans for doping purposes. Extrapolation of these preclinical results to humans may pave the way for the development of a new rhGH anti-doping test.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Maintenance of a normal meal-induced decrease in plasma ghrelin levels in children with Prader-Willi syndrome.

Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid peptide recently identified in the stomach as the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a). Ghrelin is a potent stimulator of GH secretion. It was recently shown that circulating ghrelin levels in humans rise shortly before and fall shortly after every meal, and that ghrelin administration increases voluntary food intake. The hypothesis that ghrelin hypersecretion might contribute to genetic obesity has never been investigated. In this context, Prader-Willi syndrome is the most common form of human syndromic obesity. As ghrelin affects appetite as well as GH secretion and both are abnormal in PWS, it has been surmised that these alterations might be due to ghrelin dysregulation. The aim of the study was to investigate whether ghrelin is suppressed by the meals differently in PWS children than in PWS adults. Overnight circulating fasting ghrelin levels and ghrelin levels 120 min after breakfast were assayed in 7 PWS children (10.2 +/- 1.7 yr), 7 subjects with morbid obesity (10.3 +/- 1.3 yr), and 5 normal controls (8.4 +/- 1.4 yr). Because of the data spread, no statistical difference was observed in fasting ghrelin levels between PWS and control children (p = NS); anyway, fasting ghrelin levels were significantly lower in obese children than in the other groups (p < 0.05 vs. control and PWS children). Ghrelin levels were slightly suppressed by the meal in control subjects (mean fasting ghrelin: 160.2 +/- 82 pg/ml; after the meal, 141.2 +/- 57 pg/ml, p = NS); the meal failed to suppress ghrelin levels in obese children (mean fasting ghrelin: 126.4 +/- 8.5 pg/ml; after the meal, 119.1 +/- 8.3 pg/ml, p = NS). Interestingly, the meal markedly suppressed ghrelin levels in PWS children (mean fasting ghrelin: 229.5 +/- 70.4 pg/ml; after the meal, 155.8 +/- 34.2 pg/ml, p < 0.01). In conclusion, since a lack of decrease in circulating ghrelin induced by the meal was previously reported in PWS adults, the finding of a meal-induced decrease in ghrelin levels in our population of young PWS would imply that the regulation of the ghrelin system involved in the orexigenic effects of the peptide is operative during childhood, although it progressively deteriorates and is absent in adulthood when hyperphagia and obesity progressively worsen.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2003

Moexipril and quinapril inhibition of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in the rat: evidence for direct effects in heart, lung and kidney and stimulation of prostacyclin generation.

The activation of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) may contribute to the development of vascular and myocardial structural changes. The level of ACE is stable in human plasma, and only limited data are available on its regulation at the tissue level. The aim of this study was to characterize the effects of two ACE inhibitors, moexipril and quinapril on tissue ACE activity. Adult male rats were treated intragastrically once daily for 6 days either with 2 mg/kg moexipril or quinapril. After single treatment, moexipril and quinapril effectively inhibited ACE activity in plasma and slightly in heart and aorta, whereas after 6 days of treatment they inhibited ACE activity in plasma (87% and 94%, respectively), lung (92% and 93%), myocardium (26% and 23%), kidney (21% and 20%), and aorta (39% and 40%), but not in skeletal muscle. Interestingly, the two ACE-inhibitors also induced a significant increase in cardiac homogenates of 6-keto-PGF1alpha levels, an important index of PGI2 generation. To test whether the reduced effects of ACE inhibitors in heart and kidney were caused by a limited availability of the drugs, 100 microl of lung, heart and kidney homogenates from control rats were incubated in vitro with moexipril and quinapril immediately before assay. Both drugs were more effective in lung than heart and kidney homogenates, with inhibition values superimposable to those obtained in vivo. These results clearly indicate that inhibition of tissue ACE activity does not depend primarily on the availability of ACE inhibitors in each organ.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗
PubMed2003

The GABAB receptor and recognition memory: possible modulation of its behavioral effects by the nitrergic system.

Functional activation of the GABA(B) receptor inhibits learning and memory processes, though discrepant findings, in this context, have also been reported. The present study was designed to investigate the role of the GABA(B) receptor on recognition memory in the rat. For this purpose, the effects induced by the GABA(B) agonist baclofen and the GABA(B) antagonist P-(3-aminopropyl)-P-diethoxymethylphosphinic acid (CGP 35348) on memory were assessed by using the object-recognition task. In addition, the possible involvement of the nitrergic system on GABA(B) receptor's effects was also evaluated by using the same behavioral procedure. This is a working-memory paradigm based on the differential exploration of a new and familiar object. In a first dose-response study, baclofen (0.5, 2, and 4 mg/kg, i.p.), dose-dependently impaired animals' performance in this task, suggesting a modulation of acquisition and storage of information. CGP 35348 (100 and 300 mg/kg, i.p.), counteracted these baclofen-induced performance deficits. The nitric oxide donor molsidomine, at the dose of 4 but not 2 mg/kg, i.p, successfully antagonized the deficits on cognition induced by the highest dose of baclofen (4 mg/kg). These results indicate a) that the GABA(B) receptor is involved in recognition memory and b) that an NO component modulates the effects of the GABA(B) receptor on learning and memory.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Mechanisms of action of GH.

The process of growth, which is common to all multicellular organisms, is complex and involves the interaction of a multiplicity of factors; despite this, the GH/IGF function still maintains its preminence, and, in turn, the same is true for all approaches aimed at reducing the consequences of GH/IGF excess. In this review paper, we will deal briefly with some aspects of GH/IGF mechanism of action which are instrumental to the appreciation of a novel class of a "designer" GH antagonist, for use in conditions characterized by excess GH action and elevated serum IGF-I.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

GH and cortisol rebound rise during and following a somatostatin infusion: studies in dogs with the use of a GH-releasing peptide.

GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs), a class of small synthetic peptide and non-peptide compounds, act on specific receptors at both the pituitary and the hypothalamic level to stimulate GH release in both humans and other animals. GHRPs, like corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), also possess acute ACTH- and cortisol-releasing activity, although the mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effect of GHRPs on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis are still unclear. In recent years, studies in humans and other animals have provided evidence that the rebound GH rise which follows withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (SS) (SSIW) is due, at least in part, to the functional activation of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) neurons of the recipient organism. Unexpectedly, in humans, SS infusion, at a dose inhibiting basal GH secretion, has been associated with an activation of the HPA axis, leading to the hypothesis that this response was mediated, at least in part, by a central nervous system ACTH-releasing mechanism activated by the SS-induced decrease in GH secretion. Interestingly, the rebound GH rise which follows SSIW was magnified by the administration, before SS withdrawal, of a GHRP, implying that the SSIW approach could also be exploited to investigate in vivo the functional interaction in the process of GH and/or ACTH/cortisol secretion between endogenous GHRH (and/or other ACTH-releasing mechanisms) and GHRPs. In the present study, six young beagle dogs were given, on different occasions, at the beginning and at the end of a 3-h i.v. infusion of SS or saline (SAL), a bolus of physiological SAL or a GHRP compound, EP51216. SSIW induced a GH rebound rise without affecting plasma cortisol concentrations, while the withdrawal of SAL infusion was ineffective on either hormone paradigm. Administration of EP51216 at the beginning of SAL infusion evoked release of both GH and cortisol, whereas EP51216 administration at the withdrawal of SAL infusion evoked somatotroph and cortisol responses which were reduced in amplitude and duration. SS infusion significantly reduced the secretion of GH elicited by EP51216 but did not affect the rise of plasma cortisol levels. Interestingly, SSIW resulted in a marked enhancement of the somatotroph and cortisol responses evoked by EP51216. The marked rise of plasma GH levels induced by the GHRP after SSIW recalled that occurring after acute combined administration of recombinant human GHRH and EP51216, implying that exogenously delivered GHRP had synergized with the endogenous GHRH release triggered by SSIW. In contrast, acute combined administration of GHRH and the GHRP induced a cortisol response not different from that induced by GHRP alone, indicating that endogenous GHRH release was not involved in the enhanced cortisol response following EP51216 administration after SSIW. Similarly, the direct involvement of endogenous CRH could be ruled out, since i.v. administration of ovine CRH after SSIW evoked cortisol peak levels not different from those evoked by CRH at the withdrawal of SAL infusion. In conclusion, enhancement of the GH response to EP51216 alone by SSIW, to an extent reminiscent of that following combined administration of GHRH and EP61216, reinforces the view that SSIW elicits release of endogenous GHRH. Further studies are indeed necessary for a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the enhanced cortisol response, since from now on the involvement of endogenous GHRH or CRH can be ruled out.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Effects of molsidomine on scopolamine-induced amnesia and hypermotility in the rat.

Nitric oxide (NO) is hypothesized to be a novel intracellular messenger in the central nervous system. Recently, NO involvement in learning and memory processes has been proposed. Compounds that inhibit nitric oxide synthase, the key synthesizing enzyme, may block cognition, while NO donors may facilitate it. The aim of this study was to assess in the rat the effects of the NO donor molsidomine (2 and 4 mg/kg, i.p.) on memory deficits caused by scopolamine. For this purpose, the object recognition task and the step-through passive avoidance procedure were chosen. In addition, the effects of molsidomine in antagonizing the scopolamine-induced hypermotility were also examined. Scopolamine at 0.2 mg/kg (object recognition) and 0.75 mg/kg (passive avoidance) disrupted acquisition in both the tasks and induced locomotor hyperactivity at the dose of 0.2 mg/kg. Molsidomine at either dose reversed the scopolamine-induced deficits in the object recognition paradigm but did not counteract the hypermotility and the deficits occurred in the passive avoidance test. These results suggest that to some extent, the NO donor molsidomine is involved in memory processing.

Amnesia↗
PubMed2001

Contrasting effects of nitric oxide on food intake and GH secretion stimulated by a GH-releasing peptide.

OBJECTIVE: Among the many actions of nitric oxide (NO) are those on endocrine and feeding behaviour. Based on NO involvement in the GH-releasing effect of the GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) and the reported orexigenic activity of these compounds, we sought to evaluate the effect of the combined administration of a long-acting NO donor, molsidomine, and the newly synthesized GHRP EP92632 on food intake and GH secretion in rats. Moreover, to verify the specificity of a potential NO involvement, we evaluated whether or not the effects of GHRPs were abolished by a pre-treatment with an inhibitor of NO synthase, N-nitro-arginine-methyl-ester (NAME). METHODS: In the food intake experiments, adult Sprague-Dawley male rats underwent acute administration of: (1) EP92632 (160 microg/kg, s.c.); (2) molsidomine (100 mg/kg, i.p.); (3) EP92632+molsidomine; (4) l-NAME (40 and 60 mg/kg, i.p.); (5) EP92632+l-NAME (60 mg/kg, i.p.); (6) EP92632+molsidomine+l-NAME (60 mg/kg, i.p.); and (7) 0.9% saline (0.1 ml/kg, i.p.). After treatments, the cumulative food intake in the 6 post-treatment hours was carefully evaluated. In the neuroendocrine experiments, rats were given the same compounds according to the above reported schedule, except for the use of one dose of NAME (60 mg/kg, i.p.) and a lower EP92632 dose (80 microg/kg, s.c.), and were sampled via atrial cannula. RESULTS: EP92632 significantly stimulated food intake, an effect which was further enhanced by molsidomine, though the latter did not elicit per se any orexigenic effect. l-NAME given alone significantly decreased food intake and abolished the orexigenic effect of the GHRP and the enhancing effect of molsidomine. Plasma GH levels increased significantly following administration of EP92632 but, in contrast to the food intake experiments, molsidomine significantly inhibited both basal and EP92632-stimulated GH secretion; moreover, NAME had a biphasic effect on the EP92632-stimulated GH release: initially inhibitory and then, from 45 min on, stimulatory. NAME did not affect basal GH levels but, surprisingly, combined administration of molsidomine and NAME induced a striking inhibition of both basal and the peptide-stimulated GH release. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, these data indicate that NO in the rat is physiologically involved in a stimulatory way in the GHRP-mediated effect on food intake, but exerts a dual action, probably stimulatory at hypothalamic and inhibitory at pituitary levels, on basal and GHRP-stimulated GH secretion.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Growth hormone (GH) rebound rise following somatostatin infusion withdrawal: studies in dogs with the use of GH-releasing hormone and a GH-releasing peptide.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence has been presented that in both animals and humans the rebound secretion of growth hormone (GH) following withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (SS) is due to the functional activation of the hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) neurons of the recipient organism. Based on this premise, this study has sought to assess the existence of functional interactions between endogenous GHRH released by a SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) and growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs), a class of compounds allegedly acting via GHRH. METHODS: Five young dogs (3 to 4 years old, 2 male and 3 female) were administered, on different occasions, three consecutive intravenous boli of physiological saline (0.1 ml/kg), or GHRH (2 microg/kg), or EP92632 (125 microg/kg), a GHRP compound, or GHRH plus EP92632 at the end of three cycles of 1-h SS infusions (8 microg/(kg x h)) or during a 6-h infusion of saline. RESULTS: Under saline infusion (SALI), plasma GH levels were unaltered, whereas each SSIW cycle was followed by similar GH secretory episodes. Administration of the first GHRH bolus under SALI induced a rise in plasma GH concentrations slightly higher than that induced by the first cycle of SSIW, but the GH response to the second and third GHRH boli was similar to that after SSIW. Following SSIW, the response to the first bolus of GHRH was higher than that during SALI, but the second and third cycles of SSIW induced GH responses similar to those evoked by the GHRH bolus. During SALI, administration of the first bolus of EP92632 induced a rise in plasma GH which was higher than that induced by the first GHRH bolus, the second bolus elicited a GH peak of lesser amplitude and there was a partial restoration of the GH response to the third peptide bolus. SSIW strikingly enhanced the GH release to the first EP92632 bolus, a pattern also present, although to a lesser extent, with the second and third cycles of SSIW. Under SALI, combined administration of GHRH and EP92632 had a synergistic effect on GH release, but a progressive reduction was present in the GH response to the second and third GHRH plus EP92632 boli. SSIW increased only weakly the GH response to the first co-administration of the peptides over that present after administration of EP92632 alone, and did not induce a GH response higher than that present during SALI when the second bolus of the peptides was administered; after the third SSIW a GH rise higher than that present during SALI was elicited by the combined administration of the peptides. CONCLUSIONS: (i) the uniformity of the GH rebound responses to multiple cycles of SSIW may indicate that the latter activate a physiological mechanism which mimics that normally controlling GH pulse generation; (ii) EP92632 elicits, under our experimental conditions, a plasma GH rise higher than that induced by GHRH; (iii) SSIW enhances the GH response to EP92639 alone, to an extent reminiscent of that following combined administration of GHRH and EP92632. This pattern reinforces the view that SSIW elicits release of endogenous GHRH, and infers that the GHRP challenge after SSIW may be exploited in humans to distinguish between healthy and GH-deficient adults.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Nitric oxide modulation of the growth hormone-releasing activity of Hexarelin in young and old dogs.

The growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity of Hexarelin, a potent GH-releasing peptide (GHRP) analog, was evaluated in eight young (aged 1 to 6 years) and five old (10 to 16 years) beagle dogs pretreated with erythrityl tetranitrate, a liposoluble nitric oxide (NO) donor, and/or indomethacin, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase enzymes, and N-nitro-L- or N-nitro-D-arginine methylester (L-NAME and D-NAME), active and inactive NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors, respectively. Erythrityl tetranitrate (0.3 mg x kg(-1) oral [p.o.]) strikingly potentiated Hexarelin-stimulated GH secretion (31.25 microg x kg(-1) intravenous [i.v.]) in both young (area under the time-concentration curve at 0 to 90 minutes AUC(0-90)] 878.50 +/- 267.02 v 1,994.04 +/- 434.20 ng x mL(-1) x h, P < .01) and aged animals (314.82 +/- 117.11 v 1,314.12 +/- 484.75 ng x mL(-1) x h, P < .01). The NO donor alone did not modify baseline GH levels in either young dogs (188.68 +/- 85.24 ng x mL(-1) x h) or old dogs (120.49 +/- 22.03 ng x mL(-1) x h). L-NAME (5 mg x kg(-1) x 2 i.v.) suppressed GH release induced by the peptide in young dogs (1,367.68 +/- 251.87 v 411.12 +/- 68.49 ng x mL(-1) x h, P < .01), but potentiated it in old dogs (314.73 +/- 117.10 v 1,103.97 +/- 374.11 ng x mL(-1) x h, P < .01). D-NAME (5 mg x kg(-1) x 2 i.v.) did not affect the GH response to Hexarelin in either young (1,328.68 +/- 433.54 ng x mL(-1) x h) or aged (342.32 +/- 84.82 ng x mL(-1) x h) dogs. Indomethacin (1.5 mg x kg(-1) i.m.) abolished the NO-donor potentiation of the GH response induced by Hexarelin in both young dogs (1,627.25 +/- 260.90 v 1,163.37 +/- 334.84 ng x mL(-1) x h, P < .05) and old dogs (1,061.47 +/- 210.38 v 365.69 +/- 79.27 ng x mL(-1) x h, P < .01) without affecting the plasma GH peak evoked by the peptide alone (young dogs, 786.04 +/- 153.44 v 960.04 +/- 444.44 ng x mL(-1) x h, P = NS; old dogs, 474.55 +/- 47.30 v 490.82 +/- 144.86 ng x mL(-1) x h, P = NS). In conclusion, (1) NO donors are capable to further increase the strong GH-releasing activity of Hexarelin in both young and old dogs, although the site(s) and mechanism(s) of action of NO is still obscure; (2) the different GH response to the peptide after NOS inhibition in young and old dogs signifies in the latter an alteration of the somatotrope function; and (3) prostaglandins are the downstream effectors of the chain of events triggered by activation of the NO-ergic system.

Aging↗
PubMed1999

Somatostatin infusion withdrawal: studies in normal children and in children with growth hormone deficiency.

Withdrawal of a somatostatin infusion (SSIW) is followed by a rebound rise of GH in both animals and normal adult men, a phenomenon likely mediated by endogenous GHRH function. In the present study, we have evaluated the GH response to SSIW in a group of 28 prepubertal children (18 boys and 10 girls; aged 3.7-11.1 yr). Six children had GH deficiency [GHD; GH responses to pyridostigmine (PD)+GHRH and to clonidine <20 and <7 microg/L, respectively], 4 children had GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHND; GH responses to PD+GHRH and to clonidine > or =20 and >7 microg/L, respectively; mean integrated nighttime GH concentrations <3 microg/L), and 18 children were short normal children [normal controls (NC)]. All children received a constant infusion of SS at the dose of 3 microg/Kg x h for 90 min. SSIW elicited a clear-cut GH rise in NC children (13.7+/-1.0 microg/L), but not in GH-deficient children, regardless of the underlying etiology (GHD, 1.6+/-0.4 microg/L; GHND, 2.4+/-0.3 microg/L). The GH response to SSIW was similar between GHD and GHND children. There was no overlapping of the maximum SSIW-stimulated GH peaks between NC and GHD or GHND children. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that SSIW elicits a significant GH rise in NC children, but not in GH-deficient children, regardless of the underlying etiology (GHD or GHND). This resulted in complete discrimination of NC from GHD or GHND children. Were these present findings confirmed on a larger number of children, SSIW, because of its testing efficaciousness and safety, procedural simplicity, and economy holds promise of being a useful diagnostic tool for GH-dependent growth disorders.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1999

Six-week treatment with hexarelin in young dogs: evaluation of the GH responsiveness to acute hexarelin or GHRH administration, and of the orexigenic effect of hexarelin.

In this study we evaluated, in six young (5-7 year-old) beagle dogs, the effects of a 6-week administration of hexarelin (250 microg/kg s. c. twice daily) on the GH response to an acute challenge with hexarelin or GHRH (2 microg/kg i.v.), delivered before and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. The GH peak response to acute hexarelin or GHRH initially increased, with a maximum observed at the 3rd week, and then decreased to basal values (GHRH) or less (hexarelin) at the 6th week. These data would indicate that hexarelin initially primed the pituitary to acute administration of further hexarelin or of GHRH, followed by downregulation of the GH response to hexarelin and preservation of the response to GHRH. We then studied the rebound increase in GH secretion after withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (4 microg/kg per h for 1.5 h), a likely stimulus of endogenous GHRH function. The pattern obtained was similar to, though not superimposable upon, that ensuing after acute hexarelin or GHRH administration. Parallel evaluation of the acute orexigenic effect of hexarelin evinced a different time-course of the behavioural response, namely an acute feeding response to hexarelin that was abolished at the 3rd week and returned to normal at the 6th week. The differing timing of the neuroendocrine or behavioural response to hexarelin would suggest the existence of different subtypes of central nervous system GH-releasing peptide receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Unexpected activation of pituitary-adrenal axis in healthy young and elderly subjects during somatostatin infusion.

In this study we explored, in man, the effect of acute attenuation of growth hormone (GH) release induced by somatostatin (SRIH) on ACTH and cortisol plasma levels. Sixteen young (8 women, aged 23-32 years, and 8 men, aged 18-27 years) and 14 elderly (8 women, aged 65-82 years, and 6 men, aged 65-70 years) healthy subjects volunteered to participate in this investigation. Each subject was tested on two separate occasions by: (1) a 90-min i.v. infusion of SRIH given in 50 ml 0.9% saline delivered at a rate of 9 microg/kg/h, and (2) a 90-min i.v. infusion of isovolumetric amounts of 0.9% saline. Plasma GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose concentrations were determined prior and up to 180 min after SRIH or saline infusion. SRIH induced a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in plasma GH levels from basal values of 0.6 +/- 0.15 and 0.5 +/- 0.15 microg/l to nadir values 0.25 +/- 0.1 and 0.2 +/- 0.1 microg/l in young and elderly subjects, respectively. The administration of SRIH was associated with a clear-cut increase in plasma ACTH levels both in young (peak, 10.6 +/- 1.6 pmol/l; AUC, 558.6 +/- 147.5 pmol/l/h) and in elderly (peak, 21.3 +/- 5.6 pmol/l; AUC, 841.9 +/- 153.8 pmol/l/h) subjects with a significant (p < 0.01) difference as compared to saline infusion. Consistent with these results, SRIH infusion resulted in an unequivocal rise in plasma cortisol levels both in young (peak, 394.8 +/- 36.4 nmol/l; AUC, 18,591.62 +/- 1,372.45 nmol/l/h) and in elderly (peak, 585.6 +/- 51.5 nmol/l; AUC, 24,871.05 +/- 1,837.03 nmol/l/h) subjects. The ACTH and cortisol responses to SRIH were significantly (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) higher in elderly than in young subjects. No sex-related differences occurred in the SRIH-induced activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis. We conclude that (1) infusion of SRIH, at a dose that inhibited basal GH secretion, was associated with an activation of HPA axis, and (2) this response was higher in elderly individuals compared with younger adults. The reason for this novel and unexpected SRIH effect is presently unclear; however, the latter may be mediated, at least in part, by some central nervous system ACTH-releasing mechanisms activated by SRIH-induced decrease in GH secretion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone and hexarelin in fed and fasted dogs: effect of somatostatin infusion or pretreatment with pirenzepine.

Using unanesthetized young male and female beagle dogs, before and after a 2-day fast, we studied the effect of an i.v. infusion of 0.9% saline (5 ml/h), somatostatin (SS, 4 or 8 micrograms/kg/h), or pretreatment with pirenzepine (PZ, 0.6 mg/kg i.v.), a muscarinic cholinergic antagonist which allegedly releases SS, on the GH release evoked by acute administration of GHRH (2 micrograms/kg i.v.), hexarelin (HEXA), a member of the GH-releasing peptide family (250 micrograms/kg i.v.) or GHRH plus HEXA. In fasted dogs, GHRH delivered during saline infusion induced a clear-cut rise in plasma GH levels, significantly higher than that which it induced in fed dogs. In contrast, HEXA, although very effective in causing the release of GH, only slightly increased GH secretion in fasted dogs over that which it induced in fed dogs. Co-administration of GHRH plus HEXA into fed dogs induced a synergic GH response that further increased with fasting. The action of GHRH in fed dogs was abolished by the lower dose of SS, whereas SS at either dose was ineffective in suppressing the GH-releasing effect during fasting. Infusion of the lower dose of SS failed to counter the action of HEXA, either before or during fasting, whilst the higher SS dose partially reduced it in both conditions. In contrast to SS, PZ reduced the GH-releasing effect of GHRH and HEXA, both in the fed state and, though to a lesser extent, during fasting. Pirenzepine only slightly reduced the robust GH rise elicited by GHRH plus HEXA in fed dogs. The suppressive effect of PZ on the GH response to combined administration of the peptides was lowest in fasted dogs. These data show that: (1) fasting augmented the GH response to GHRH and (to a lesser degree) to HEXA; (2) SS inhibited the GH response to GHRH in the fed state, but not in the fasted state; (3) only the higher dose of SS partially reduced the GH stimulation by HEXA in either the fed or the fasted state; (4) PZ lowered the GH response to GHRH and to HEXA in both the fed and (to a lesser degree) the fasted state; (5) PZ did not modify the GH release due to the combined administration of GHRH and HEXA. It is suggested that: (1) during fasting the greatly enhanced GH response to GHRH alone or GHRH plus HEXA probably reflects an augmented GHRH secretion; (2) somatotrope refractoriness to SS may contribute to the enhanced GH secretion in states of calorie deprivation; (3) in contrast to a general belief, muscarinic cholinergic antagonists, e.g. PZ, do not act exclusively via release of SS, but probably also through inhibition of GHRH function.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1997

Effects of GH and IGF-I administration on GHRH and somatostatin mRNA levels: I. A study on ad libitum fed and starved adult male rats.

The individual role played by GH and IGF-I in the regulation of hypothalamic GHRH and SRIF gene expression is still object of debate. We have investigated the effect of exogenously administered recombinant hGH (rhGH) and recombinant hIGF-I (rhIGF-I) in ad libitum fed control and starved rats, the latter an animal model which is characterized by low circulating levels of endogenous GH and IGF-I. Adult male rats were fed ad libitum (C) or food-deprived (S) for 72 hours; rats in either C or S groups were treated with systemic administration of rhGH and rhIGF-I for 3 days. GHRH, SRIF and GH mRNA levels were evaluated by Northern and slot blot hybridization. Administration of rhGH (250 micrograms/kg/twice daily, sc) induced a significant inhibition of GHRH and a significant stimulation of SRIF mRNA levels in C rats; GH treatment was, however, ineffective on both neuropeptide mRNA levels in the S group. Continuous infusion of rhIGF-I (300 micrograms/kg/day, sc) induced a significant increase of SRIF levels in both C and S rats but did not modify GHRH mRNA levels in either group. In the pituitary, GH mRNA levels followed a pattern very similar to that of GHRH. These results provide evidence for a direct role of GH in the inhibition of GHRH mRNA levels; IGF-I appears more involved in the direct stimulation of SRIF mRNA levels.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Defective hypothalamic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone activity may contribute to declining GH secretion with age in man.

There is evidence that withdrawal of SRIH infusion in man promotes a rebound GH response that allegedly has been proposed to be related to the function of GHRH-producing neurons. In the present study we have evaluated whether a reduction in endogenous GHRH activity contributes to the decreased GH secretion of the elderly. Sixteen young (8 women, aged 23-32 yr, and 8 men, aged 18-27 yr) and 13 elderly (8 women, aged 65-82 yr, and 5 men, aged 65-70 yr) healthy subjects volunteered to participate in this investigation. Each subject was tested on 2 separate occasions: 1) a 90-min iv infusion of SRIH was given in 50 mL 0.9% saline delivered at a rate of 9 micrograms/kg.h; and 2) a 90-min iv infusion of isovolumetric amounts of 0.9% saline was given. Plasma GH levels were determined before and up to 180 min after SRIH or saline infusion, whereas plasma insulin-like growth factor I, estradiol, and testosterone levels were measured in basal samples. In elderly women, the mean maximum (delta) GH peak (2 +/- 0.7 micrograms/L) after withdrawal of SRIH infusion was significantly (P < 0.02) lower than that in young women (7.3 +/- 2 micrograms/L). In elderly men, the mean delta GH peak (2.9 +/- 0.6 micrograms/L) after withdrawal of SRIH infusion was lower than that in young men (6.3 +/- 1.6 micrograms/L), although the difference failed to achieve statistical significance. Baseline insulin-like growth factor I levels were significantly lower in elderly compared to young subjects in both men and in women. In women, both age and basal plasma estradiol and testosterone levels significantly correlated with delta GH peak after SRIH withdrawal (r = -0.61, r = 0.61, and r = 0.66, respectively), whereas in men they did not. These findings are compatible with the view that an age-related decrease in endogenous GHRH function may contribute to the defective GH secretion of the elderly. Alterations in plasma concentrations of sex steroids may have important implications in the observed changes.

Adolescent↗