PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S G Eckhardt

Publications and source records attributed to S G Eckhardt.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Enhanced antitumor activity of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in the HT29 human colon tumor xenograft model.

6-Hydroxymethylacylfulvene (MGI-114) is a semisynthetic analogue of the toxin illudin S, a product of the Omphalotus mushroom. MGI-114 induces cytotoxicity in a variety of solid tumors in vivo, including the refractory HT29 human colon cancer xenograft. In this study, the potential application of MGI-114 in the treatment of colon cancer was further explored by evaluating the activity of MGI-114 in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Groups of 9 nude mice bearing HT29 xenografts were treated with either single agent MGI-114, CPT-11, or 5FU, or MGI-114 in combination with CPT-11 or 5FU. MGI-114 was administered at doses of 3.5 and 7 mg/kg i.p. daily on days 1 through 5, and CPT-11 and 5FU were administered at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg i.p. on days 1, 12, and 19. In the single agent studies, MGI-114, CPT-11, and 5FU all resulted in decreased final tumor weights compared with vehicle-treated controls (P<0.05), but only MGI-114 at 7 mg/kg produced partial responses. When MGI-114 at 3.5 mg/kg was combined with CPT-11, significant decrements in final tumor weights occurred compared with monotherapy with the same doses of MGI-114 and CPT-11 (P< or =0.001). Also, administration of the low-dose combination (MGI-114 at 35 mg/kg and CPT-11 at 50 mg/kg) resulted in final tumor weights similar to those achieved after administration of high-dose MGI-114 as a single agent. Moreover, the combination of MGI-114 and CPT-11 produced partial responses in nearly all of the animals, with some animals achieving complete responses. The outcome with the combination of MGI-114 and 5FU was less striking, with fewer partial responses and no complete responses. These results suggest enhanced activity when MGI-114 is combined with CPT-11, and clinical trials to further evaluate this combination regimen are planned.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Angiogenesis inhibitors as cancer therapy.

Angiogenesis inhibitors target a tumor's need to obtain nourishment from the host. In general, they are predicted to be chiefly cytostatic--that is, they stabilize tumors and perhaps prevent metastasis rather than being curative. Nevertheless, it remains conceivable that these agents may trigger tumor cell death. Novel evaluative strategies will be essential to define their potential roles.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of losoxantrone and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

A Phase I and pharmacological study was performed to evaluate the feasibility, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetics of the anthrapyrazole losoxantrone in combination with paclitaxel in adult patients with advanced solid malignancies. Losoxantrone was administered as a 10-min infusion in combination with paclitaxel on either a 24- or 3-h schedule. The starting dose level was 40 mg/m2 losoxantrone and 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel (as a 24- or 3-h i.v. infusion) without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Administration of these agents at the starting dose level and dose escalation was feasible only with G-CSF support. The following dose levels (losoxantrone/paclitaxel, in mg/m2) of losoxantrone and paclitaxel as a 3-h infusion were also evaluated: 50/135, 50/175, 50/200, 50/225, and 60/225. The sequence-dependent toxicological and pharmacological effects of losoxantrone and paclitaxel on the 24- and 3-h schedules of paclitaxel were also assessed. The MTD was defined as the dose at which >50% of the patients experienced DLT during the first two courses of therapy. DLTs, mainly myelosuppression, occurring during the first course of therapy were noted in four of six and five of eight patients treated with 40 mg/m2 losoxantrone and 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel over 24 and 3 h, respectively, without G-CSF. DLTs during the first two courses of therapy were observed in one of six patients at the 50/175 (losoxantrone/paclitaxel) mg/m2 dose level, two of four patients at the 50/200 mg/m2 dose level, one of four patients at the 50/225 mg/m2 dose level, and two of five patients at the 60/225 mg/m2 dose level. The degree of thrombocytopenia was worse, albeit not statistically significant, when 24-h paclitaxel preceded losoxantrone, with a mean percentage decrement in platelet count during course 1 of 80.7%, compared to 43.8% with the reverse sequence (P = 0.19). Losoxantrone clearance was not significantly altered by the sequence or schedule of paclitaxel. Cardiac toxicity was observed; however, it was not related to total cumulative dose of losoxantrone. An unacceptably high rate of DLTs at the first dose level of 40 mg/m2 losoxantrone and 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel administered as either a 24- or 3-h i.v. infusion precluded dose escalation without G-CSF support. The addition of G-CSF to the regimen permitted further dose escalation without reaching the MTD. Losoxantrone at 50 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel (3-h i.v. infusion) at 175 mg/m2 with G-CSF support is recommended for further clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Activity of pivaloyloxymethyl butyrate, a novel anticancer agent, on primary human tumor colony-forming units.

The anti-proliferative effects of pivaloyloxymethyl butyrate (AN-9), a butyric acid (BA) derivative with potent tumor-differentiating properties both in vitro and in vivo, was evaluated against colorectal, breast, lung, ovarian, renal cell, bladder, and other types of tumor colony-forming units in a human tumor cloning assay. A total of 76 evaluable specimens were exposed to AN-9 continuously, 48 of these were also exposed to BA continuously for direct comparison of the two agents, and 20 specimens were exposed to AN-9 for two hours. An in vitro inhibitory response was defined as a > or = 50% decrease in tumor colony formation in treated cells compared to untreated controls. Superior anti-tumor activity was observed with the continuous exposure to AN-9 (39% in vitro response at 100 microM and 70% at 200 microM) than with the two-hour exposure (20% at 100 microM and 25% at 200 microM). At a continuous concentration of 200 microM, AN-9 demonstrated greater tumor-specific activity than BA against melanoma (100% vs. 67%), ovarian (67% vs. 40%), breast (63% vs. 0%), non-small cell lung (60% vs. 10%), and colorectal tumor colony-forming units (62% vs. 20%). AN-9 is a novel differentiating agent with activity against colony-forming units derived from a variety of primary human tumors, including those that are considered relatively chemoresistant, and may thus provide a therapeutic alternative or addition to standard cytotoxic agents, if appropriate drug concentrations can be achieved in patients.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1998

Phase I trial of paclitaxel and gemcitabine administered every two weeks in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine possess broad spectra of clinical activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity, and are differentially affected by mutations in cell-cycle regulatory proteins, such as bcl-2. This phase I trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of paclitaxel and gemcitabine when both drugs were given together on a once-every-two-week schedule in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 37 patients were treated at nine different dose levels ranging from paclitaxel 75-175 mg/m2 administered over three hours followed by gemcitabinc 1500-3500 mg/m2 administered over 30-60 minutes. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Dose escalation was performed in a stepwise manner in which the dose of one drug was escalated while the dose of the other drug was kept constant. RESULTS: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at dose level 9: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2 in the form of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for > or = 5 days (one patient) and grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (AST/SGPT) (one patient). An analysis of delivered dose intensity (DI) over the first three cycles revealed that higher dosages of both drugs were delivered at dose level 7, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2 dose level, than at the MTD, dose level 8, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2. Partial responses were confirmed in two patients with transitional cell carcinoma (one of the bladder, one of the renal pelvis) and in one patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is a promising drug combination that can be administered safely and repetitively on an every-other-week schedule. Using this drug administration schedule, the recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the water-soluble dolastatin 15 analog LU103793 in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic profile of the dolastatin 15 analog LU103793 when administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six courses of LU103793 at doses of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/m2 were administered to 26 patients with advanced solid malignancies. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 1 and 5 of course one. Pharmacokinetic variables were related to the principal toxicities. RESULTS: Neutropenia, peripheral edema, and liver function test abnormalities were dose-limiting at doses greater than 2.5 mg/m2 per day. Four of six patients developed DLT at 3.0 mg/m2 per day, whereas two of 12 patients treated at 2.5 mg/m2 per day developed DLT. Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent of dose and similar on days 1 and 5. Volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) was 7.6 +/- 2.0 L/m2, clearance 0.49 +/- 0.18 L/h/m2, and elimination half-life (t1/2) 12.3 +/- 3.8 hours. Peak concentrations (Cmax) on day 1 related to mean percentage decrement in neutrophils (sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model). Patients who experienced dose-limiting neutropenia had significantly higher Cmax values than patients who did not, whereas nonhematologic DLTs were more related to dose. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for phase II evaluations of LU103793 daily for 5 days every 3 weeks is 2.5 mg/m2 per day. The lack of prohibitive cardiovascular effects and the generally acceptable toxicity profile support the rationale for performing disease-directed evaluations of LU103793 on the schedule evaluated in this study.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel in combination with biricodar, a novel agent that reverses multidrug resistance conferred by overexpression of both MDR1 and MRP.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering biricodar (VX-710; Incel, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, MA), an agent that modulates multidrug resistance (MDR) conferred by overexpression of both the multidrug resistance gene product (MDR1) P-glycoprotein and the MDR-associated protein (MRP) in vitro, in combination with paclitaxel. The study also sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel that could be administered with biologically relevant concentrations of VX-710 and characterize the toxicologic and pharmacologic profiles of the VX-710/ paclitaxel regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid malignancies were initially treated with VX-710 as a 24-hour infusion at doses that ranged from 10 to 120 mg/m2 per hour. After a 2-day washout period, patients were re-treated with VX-710 on an identical dose schedule followed 8 hours later by paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion at doses that ranged from 20 to 80 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of both VX-710 and paclitaxel were studied during treatment with VX-710 alone and VX-710 and paclitaxel. Thereafter, patients received VX-710 and paclitaxel every 3 weeks. RESULTS: VX-710 alone produced minimal toxicity. The toxicologic profile of the VX-710/paclitaxel regimen was similar to that reported with paclitaxel alone; neutropenia that was noncumulative was the principal dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The MTD levels of VX-710/ paclitaxel were 120 mg/m2 per hour and 60 mg/m2, respectively, in heavily pretreated patients and 120/60 to 80 mg/m2 per hour in less heavily pretreated patients. At these dose levels, VX-710 steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) ranged from 2.68 to 4.89 microg/mL, which exceeded optimal VX-710 concentrations required for MDR reversal in vitro. The pharmacokinetics of VX-710 were dose independent and not influenced by paclitaxel. In contrast, VX-710 reduced paclitaxel clearance. At the two highest dose levels, which consisted of VX-710 120 mg/m2 per hour and paclitaxel 60 and 80 mg/m2, pertinent pharacokinetic determinants of paclitaxel effect were similar to those achieved with paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion at doses of 135 and 175 mg/m2, respectively. CONCLUSION: VX-710 alone is associated with minimal toxicity. In combination with paclitaxel, biologically relevant VX-710 plasma concentrations are achieved and sustained for 24 hours, which simulates optimal pharmacologic conditions required for MDR reversal in vitro. The acceptable toxicity profile of the VX-710/ paclitaxel combination and the demonstration that optimal pharmacologic conditions for MDR reversal are achievable support a rationale for further trials of VX710/paclitaxel in patients with malignancies that are associated with de novo or acquired resistance to paclitaxel caused by overexpression of MDR1 and/or MRP.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed1998

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of GI147211, a water-soluble camptothecin analogue, administered for five consecutive days every three weeks.

GI1147211 is a 7-substituted 10,11-ethylenedioxy-20(S)-camptothecin analogue that inhibits the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. In this Phase I and pharmacological study, 24 patients with advanced solid malignancies received a total of 72 courses of GI147211 as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 consecutive days, at doses ranging from 0.3 to 1.75 mg/m2/day. Severe neutropenia precluded dose escalation above 1.5 mg/m2/day in minimally pretreated patients, and both severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting in heavily pretreated patients at doses above 1.0 mg/m2/day. These doses are, therefore, recommended for subsequent Phase II evaluations of GI147211 in patients with comparable prior therapy. Nonhematological toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and anorexia, were mild to moderate. The disposition of GI147211 in blood was described by a linear three-compartment model, with renal elimination accounting for only 11% of drug distribution. No relationship was observed between the pharmacological exposure to GI147211 and effects on neutrophils; however, patients who developed dose-limiting myelosuppression did experience greater exposure to both the lactone and total forms of the drug. The hydrolysis kinetics of GI147211 revealed not only a shift of the drug to the inactive carboxylate form in human serum albumin but also stabilization of the lactone in erythrocytes, perhaps accounting for the observed lactone:total area under the concentration-time curve ratio of 0.27. These results indicate that GI147211 exhibits predictable toxicities and that further studies are warranted to determine the distinct role of this compound among currently available camptothecin analogues.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A phase I and translational study of sequential administration of the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors topotecan and etoposide.

Because topoisomerase (topo) I- and topo II-targeting agents exert their principal effects on the two major classes of enzymes involved in regulating DNA topology in the cell, there has been considerable interest in evaluating combinations of these classes of agents. In preclinical studies of inhibitors of topo I and topo II in combination, drug scheduling and sequencing have been critical determinants of antitumor activity, with a greater magnitude of cytotoxicity generally occurring when treatment with the topo I inhibitor precedes treatment with the topo II-targeting agent. The underlying mechanism that has been proposed to explain this schedule dependency is compensatory up-regulation of topo II and, therefore, enhanced cytotoxicity of topo II inhibitors in cells treated initially with topo I inhibitors. The feasibility of sequentially administering the topo I inhibitor topotecan (TPT) followed by the topo II inhibitor etoposide to patients with advanced solid malignancies was evaluated in this Phase I and translational laboratory study. Fifty patients with solid neoplasms were treated with TPT doses ranging from 0.17 to 1.05 mg/m2/day as a 72-h continuous (i.v.) infusion on days 1-3 followed by etoposide, 75 or 100 mg/m2/day as a 2-h i.v. infusion daily on days 8-10. The combined rate of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was unacceptably high above the TPT (mg/m2/day)/etoposide (mg/m2/day) dose levels of 0.68/100 and 0.68/75 in minimally and heavily pretreated patients, respectively, and these dose levels are recommended for further disease-directed evaluations of TPT/etoposide on this administration schedule. Successive biopsies of accessible tumors were obtained for quantitation of topo I and II levels prior to and immediately after treatment with TPT and prior to and immediately after treatment with etoposide in seven patients. The results of these limited studies in tumors did not fully support the proposed mechanistic rationale favoring the development of this particular sequential TPT/etoposide regimen, because only two of the six patients' tumors in whom topo I was successively measured had either modest or substantial decrements in topo I levels following treatment with TPT, and the principal effect of interest, up-regulation of topo II following treatment with TPT, was clearly documented in the tumors of only one of six subjects in whom successive measurements of topo I were performed. Even in view of the notable objective antitumor activity in three subjects, including a complete response in a patient with colorectal carcinoma and partial responses in one patient each with non-small cell lung and gastric carcinomas, the toxicity and ancillary laboratory results do not provide substantial evidence that sequential treatment with TPT and etoposide might be more advantageous than either TPT or etoposide administered as a single agent.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Irinotecan: a review of the initial phase I trials.

The unique mechanism of action of irinotecan (CPT-11 [Camptosar]), topoisomerase I inhibition, together with the results of preclinical studies, suggest that the drug's antitumor and toxicologic effects may be schedule-dependent. To further explore this possibility, we reviewed the initial phase I studies of various administration schedules that have been conducted in Japan, France, and the United States. This review showed toxicities to be fairly consistent across dosing schedules, although the severity and extent of diarrhea and neutropenia differed somewhat. The institution of intensive loperamide therapy and perhaps myeloid growth factors may have allowed for further dose escalation on some schedules, although it is unclear whether dosing intensity should be pursued without regard to dosing frequency. Preliminary antitumor activity of irinotecan noted in a study of leukemia and lymphoma supports the theory that the drug may exhibit schedule-dependent antitumor activity. The results of these early studies of irinotecan should be taken into account when designing subsequent trials of the agent alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutics in specific tumor types.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1998

Alternative dosing schedules for irinotecan.

Most of the clinical experience with irinotecan (CPT-11 [Camptosar]) has been with either a weekly or an every-3-week schedule. Recent phase I trials have explored new routes and schedules of administration. One approach attempts to maximize dose frequency and intensity by giving irinotecan every 2 weeks. A phase I trial of this approach is now complete and has led to a phase II trial in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. Data suggest that smaller doses of a topoisomerase I inhibitor administered repeatedly may result in greater antitumor activity than large doses administered intermittently. A phase I trial has been performed in adults in which irinotecan was administered daily for 5 consecutive days, followed by 2 days off, for 2 weeks out of 3. Similar trials are under way in children. Oral administration, another strategy that has undergone phase I testing, has several theoretical advantages:(1) The acidic pH of the stomach favors maintenance of irinotecan in the active lactone ring form. (2) Irinotecan is more rapidly and extensively converted to SN-38 by tissue carboxylesterases found in high concentrations in the gut and liver. (3) Low doses can be delivered over a protracted period. (4) The oral route enhances patient convenience. These alternative dosing schedules may facilitate integration of irinotecan into combination chemotherapy and combined-modality treatment regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

During the 1980s, platinum-based regimens were yielding response rates typically less than 25%, median survival durations of about 25 weeks, and 1-year survival rates less than 25% in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, results from single institution phase II trials of agents introduced in the 1990s show a doubling of these numbers, and results from multiinstitutional trials are demonstrating response rates ranging from 30% to 40%, median survival durations of 40 weeks, and 1 year survivals of 40%. Single agent irinotecan shows significant activity against NSCLC in preclinical and early phase I/II clinical studies, with activity similar to that for other new agents. Therapeutic synergy is observed in preclinical tumor models when irinotecan and cisplatin are combined, and phase I/II trials of this combination have demonstrated response rates > or = 50%. Herein the author provides an overview of data from phase II trials of irinotecan and focuses on preliminary results of a large US multicenter phase II trial of weekly irinotecan plus monthly cisplatin in 52 patients with advanced NSCLC. A response rate of 28.9% (95% CI, 16.5%-41.2%) and a median survival of 9.9 months were observed in this trial. US studies to design a more optimal irinotecan/cisplatin regimen in the same patient population are ongoing, and early results are encouraging.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

Development of angiogenesis inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Abundant literature exists demonstrating that tumors are dependent on angiogenesis for both tumor growth and invasion. The extent of angiogenesis in primary tumors has been demonstrated to be associated with a negative prognosis in several tumors including non-small cell lung carcinoma, prostate cancer, and in node-negative breast cancer, where angiogenesis is an independent negative prognostic factor. These data demonstrate the significance of angiogenesis in tumor biology and indicate that it can be utilized as a target for novel therapeutic strategies. The recent expansion of knowledge into the specific pathways of tumor angiogenesis has provided reagents which can now be utilized to provide markers of efficacy of antiangiogenic agents in cancer patients. A critical part of the development of angiogenesis inhibitors for cancer therapy is the clinical trial strategy. Since these agents are primarily thought to be cytostatic, carefully designed trials must be conducted which focus on appropriate endpoints and integrate relevant biologic markers to support efficacy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1996

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the angiogenesis inhibitor, tecogalan sodium.

BACKGROUND: Tecogalan sodium is an angiogenesis inhibitor isolated from a sulfated polysaccharide produced by the bacterium Arthrobacter. The antiangiogenic effect of tecogalan sodium is thought to be mediated by the inhibition of binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to cellular receptors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase I study was conducted in thirty-three patients with refractory malignancies, including AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma. Patients received a single i.v. infusion every three weeks with the infusion duration ranging from one to twenty-four hours. Seven different dosage levels were studied (125, 185, 240, 300, 390, 445, and 500 mg/m2). RESULTS: The primary dose-limiting toxicity was prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time with peak times being between 1.0-4.0 times the upper limit of normal. This toxicity was ameliorated at a given dose level by prolonging the infusion time. Other common toxicities included fever (40%) and rigors (31%) which were well controlled with acetominophen and meperidine. The serum half-life of tecogalan sodium was between 1-1.5 hours and < 25% of unchanged drug was excreted in the urine. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose of tecogalan sodium on this schedule is 390 mg/m2 over 24 hours. Other schedules including continuous administration should be investigated to maximize the efficacy of this novel angiogenesis inhibitor.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with progressive or rapidly recurrent colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate irinotecan (CPT-11; Yakult Honsha, Tokyo, Japan) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that had recurred or progressed following fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with irinotecan 125 to 150 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every week for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. Forty-eight patients were entered onto the study and all were assessable for toxicity. Forty-three patients completed one full course of therapy and were assessable for response. RESULTS: One complete and nine partial responses were observed (response rate, 23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 36%). The median response duration was 6 months (range, 2 to 13). The median survival time was 10.4 months and the 1-year survival rate was 46% (95% CI, 39% to 53%). Grade 4 diarrhea occurred in four of the first nine patients (44%) treated on this study at the 150-mg/m2 dose level. The study was amended to reduce the starting dose of irinotecan to 125 mg/m2. At this dose, nine of 39 patients (23%) developed grade 4 diarrhea. Aggressive administration of loperamide also reduced the incidence of grade 4 diarrhea. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in eight of 48 patients (17%), but was associated with bacteremia and sepsis in only case. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan has significant single-agent activity against colorectal cancer that has progressed during or shortly after treatment with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. The incidence of severe diarrhea is reduced by using a starting dose of irinotecan 125 mg/m2 and by initiating loperamide at the earliest signs of diarrhea. These results warrant further clinical evaluation to define the role of irinotecan in the treatment of individuals with colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1994

Induction of differentiation in HL60 cells by the reduction of extrachromosomally amplified c-myc.

Oncogene amplification in tumor cells results in the overexpression of proteins that confer a growth advantage in vitro and in vivo. Amplified oncogenes can reside intrachromosomally, within homogeneously staining regions (HSRs), or extrachromosomally, within double minute chromosomes (DMs). Since previous studies have shown that low concentrations of hydroxyurea (HU) can eliminate DMs, we studied the use of HU as a gene-targeting agent in tumor cells containing extrachromosomally amplified oncogenes. In a neuroendocrine cell line (COLO 320), we have shown that HU can eliminate amplified copies of c-myc located on DMs, leading to a reduction in tumorigenicity in vitro and in vivo. To determine whether the observed reduction in tumorigenicity was due to differentiation, we next investigated whether HU could induce differentiation in HL60 cells containing extrachromosomally amplified c-myc. We compared the effects of HU, as well as two other known differentiating agents (dimethyl sulfoxide and retinoic acid), on c-myc gene copy number, c-myc expression, and differentiation in HL60 cells containing amplified c-myc genes either on DMs or HSRs. We discovered that HU and dimethyl sulfoxide reduced both c-myc gene copy number and expression and induced differentiation in cells containing c-myc amplified on DMs. These agents failed to have similar effects on HL60 cells with amplified c-myc in HSRs. By contrast, retinoic acid induced differentiation independent of the localization of amplified c-myc. These data illustrate the utility of targeting extrachromosomal DNA to modulate tumor phenotype and reveal that both HU and dimethyl sulfoxide induce differentiation in HL60 cells through DM elimination.

Cell Differentiation↗