PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S G Holtzman

Publications and source records attributed to S G Holtzman.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Differential effects of delta- and mu-opioid receptor antagonists on the amphetamine-induced increase in extracellular dopamine in striatum and nucleus accumbens.

The specific opioid receptor antagonist naloxone attenuates the behavioral and neurochemical effects of amphetamine. Furthermore, the amphetamine-induced increase in locomotor activity is attenuated by intracisternally administered naltrindole, a selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist, but not by the irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine. Therefore, this research was designed to determine if naltrindole would attenuate the neurochemical response to amphetamine as it did the behavioral response. In vivo microdialysis was used to monitor the change in extracellular concentrations of dopamine in awake rats. Naltrindole (3.0, 10, or 30 micrograms) or vehicle was given 15 min before and beta-funaltrexamine (10 micrograms) or vehicle 24 h before the start of cumulative dosing, intracisternally in a 10-microliters volume, while the rats were lightly anesthetized with methoxyflurane. Cumulative doses of subcutaneous d-amphetamine (0.0, 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, and 6.4 mg/kg) followed pretreatment injections at 30-min intervals. Dialysate samples were collected every 10 min from either the striatum or nucleus accumbens and analyzed for dopamine content by HPLC. Amphetamine dose-dependently increased dopamine content in both the striatum and nucleus accumbens, as reported previously. Naltrindole (3.0, 10, and 30 micrograms) significantly reduced the dopamine response to amphetamine in the striatum. In contrast, 30 micrograms of naltrindole did not modify the dopamine response to amphetamine in the nucleus accumbens. On the other hand, beta-funaltrexamine (10 micrograms) had no effect in the striatum but significantly attenuated the amphetamine-induced increase in extracellular dopamine content in the nucleus accumbens. These data suggest that delta-opioid receptors play a relatively larger role than mu-opioid receptors in mediating the amphetamine-induced increase in extracellular dopamine content in the striatum, whereas mu-opioid receptors play a larger role in mediating these effects in the nucleus accumbens.

Amphetamine↗

Discriminative effects of CGS 15943, a competitive adenosine receptor antagonist, in monkeys: comparison to methylxanthines.

Caffeine and related methylxanthines are competitive antagonists at A1- and A2-adenosine receptors, but have other actions at the cellular level that contribute to their effects on behavior. As an approach toward determining the role of adenosine receptors in the behavioural effects of drugs, four squirrel monkeys were trained to discriminate between injections of CGS 15943 (1.0 mg/kg i.m.), a nonxanthine adenosine receptor antagonist that does not inhibit phosphodiesterase, and its vehicle. All monkeys generalized dose-dependently and completely to six of seven methylxanthines: 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (0.1-1.75 mg/kg), theophylline (0.03-3.0 mg/kg), paraxanthine (0.3-30 mg/kg), 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (0.3-30 mg/kg), theobromine (0.3-30 mg/kg) and caffeine (1.0-30 mg/kg). Three of four monkeys did not generalize to 8-p-sulfophenyl-theophylline (1.0-30 mg/kg), which does not cross the blood-brain barrier. When the training dose of CGS 15943 was administered concurrently with adenosine-receptor agonists, its effects were blocked dose-dependently and completely by CGS 21680 (A2 selective), only partially by cyclohexyladenosine (A1 selective), but were not blocked by 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (nonselective). CGS 21680 did not block responding on the CGS 15943-appropriate lever occasioned by 30 mg/kg of caffeine or 3.0 mg/kg of theophylline. These results suggest that stimulus control of behavior by CGS 15943 derives, in part, from blockade of A2-adenosine receptors located in the central nervous system. However, the potency order of methylxanthines as CGS 15943-like discriminative stimuli did not correlate with their relative affinities at either A2- or A1-adenosine receptors or their potencies for other known effects at the cellular level. Therefore, a novel mechanism of action might account for the CGS 15943-like discriminative effects of some or all of these drugs.

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗

Naloxone reduces the neurochemical and behavioral effects of amphetamine but not those of cocaine.

The specific opioid receptor antagonist naloxone modifies the effects of amphetamine in a wide variety of behavioral paradigms. Naloxone also attenuates the amphetamine-induced increase in extracellular dopamine in the brain of rats. Therefore, these experiments were designed to replicate the neurochemical and behavioral interactions between naloxone and amphetamine, and to extend these observations to interactions between naloxone and cocaine. Microdialysis was performed on adult male rats of Sprague-Dawley descent. Rats were pretreated with a subcutaneous injection of 5.0 mg/kg naloxone or vehicle, which was followed 30 min later by cumulative doses of subcutaneous d-amphetamine (0.0, 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.4 mg/kg) or intraperitoneal cocaine (0, 3, 10, 30, 56 mg/kg) at 30 min intervals. The microdialysis probes were perfused at a flow rate of 0.6 microliter/min with artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Dialysate samples were collected every 10 min from either the nucleus accumbens or striatum and analyzed for dopamine content by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Locomotor activity (photobeam breaks) was monitored simultaneously with the collection of dialysate samples. Amphetamine and cocaine dose-dependently increased extracellular dopamine in both the nucleus accumbens and striatum. Naloxone pretreatment significantly reduced the amphetamine-induced increase in extracellular dopamine in both brain regions and also attenuated the increase in locomotor activity elicited by amphetamine. Naloxone pretreatment had no effect, however, on the cocaine-induced increase in extracellular dopamine or locomotor activity. These findings suggest that endogenous opioid systems play a role in mediating the neurochemical and behavioral effects of amphetamine, but not those of cocaine.

Amphetamine↗

Rat strain differences in the potentiation of morphine-induced analgesia by stress.

Restraint stress has been shown to increase the magnitude and duration of morphine-induced analgesia; however, this phenomenon has only been investigated using the Sprague-Dawley rat strain. The purpose of this study was to determine if other rat strains would also exhibit a potentiated analgesic response to morphine compared to their unrestrained controls. Dose-response and time course curves for the analgesic effect of morphine (1.0, 3.0, 5.6, 10 mg/kg) were generated in adult, male Wistar, Lewis, Fischer 344, Long-Evans Hooded, and Sprague-Dawley rats either unrestrained or restrained in Plexiglas cylinders, using the tail flick assay. Morphine produced dose-dependent increases in tail flick latencies, and this effect was potentiated by restraint stress in the Sprague-Dawley, Wistar, Lewis, and Fischer 344 strains, but not in the Long-Evans Hooded rats. Because Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats displayed the most robust stress effect, the use of either of these rat strains is appropriate in studying the mechanisms of stress-induced potentiation of analgesia. The differences among rat strains demonstrated in this study may serve as a basis for correlation with opioid function.

Analgesics↗

Effects of acute and chronic morphine on rotational behavior in nigral-lesioned rats.

Stimulation of mu-opioid receptors located on dopaminergic neurons in the striatum and the nucleus accumbens increases dopamine release, which may account for some of the behavioral effects of morphine. In this study, we examined the effects of acute and chronic morphine treatment on rotational behavior in rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine dopamine (6-OHDA)-induced lesions of the nigrostriatal pathway. Rats receiving morphine acutely (0.3-10 mg/kg) did not show a significant bias toward contralateral or ipsilateral turning. Mini osmotic pumps dispensing morphine continuously (20-24 mg/kg/day) were implanted s.c. in these animals. This treatment induced tolerance to the behavioral depression produced by the highest dose of morphine (10 mg/kg) when it was given acutely. A slight but significant increase in ipsilateral turning occurred over the range of morphine doses examined. The effects of morphine on rotational behavior are slight, and do not correlate well with the reported increase in locomotor activity or extraneural dopamine in the striatum that are produced by doses of morphine similar to the ones tested in this study.

Animals↗

Does adenosine receptor blockade mediate caffeine-induced rotational behavior?

Caffeine, a competitive antagonist at adenosine receptors, produces contralateral turning in rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions of the nigrostriatal pathway. Adenosine A2a and dopamine D2 receptors are negatively coupled in the striatum; blockade of these adenosine receptors is a possible mechanism of caffeine-induced rotational behavior. The present study had three objectives: 1) to evaluate the role of adenosine receptor blockade in the rotational behavior elicited by caffeine in rats. This was done by determining the dose-response functions for turning behavior induced by caffeine, by six other methylxanthine adenosine antagonists and by CGS 15943 [9-chloro-2-(2-furanyl)-5,6-dihydro-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5- c]quinazolin-5-imine], a potent nonxanthine adenosine antagonist; 2) to determine if selective dopamine receptor antagonist block caffeine-induced rotational behavior; and 3) to determine if tolerance develops to caffeine-induced rotational behavior as it does to caffeine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity. Theophylline, paraxanthine, caffeine and beta-hydroxytheophylline, in that order of potency, produced contralateral turning, but 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, 8-chlorotheophylline, theobromine and CGS 15943 did not. Caffeine-induced turning was blocked by eticlopride (dopamine D2 antagonist), but not by SCH 23390 [R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H- 3-benzazepine] (dopamine D1 receptor antagonist), suggesting involvement of the dopamine D2 receptor. Rats treated chronically with an p.o. caffeine solution (75 mg/kg/day average intake) were tolerant to turning induced by caffeine and cross-tolerant to turning induced by theophylline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Caffeine cross-tolerance to selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists but not to their synergistic interaction.

This study examined the role of dopamine systems in tolerance to caffeine-induced stimulation of motor activity in the rat. Selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists were tested alone and combined in rats receiving caffeine chronically by a method of scheduled access to a caffeine solution or in control rats receiving no caffeine. Rats treated chronically with oral caffeine were tolerant to the motor stimulant effects of caffeine (3.0-100 mg/kg, i.p.). The partial dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF-77434 (1.0-30 mg/kg, s.c.) and the dopamine D2 receptor agonists quinpirole (0.03-10 mg/kg, s.c.) and R(-)-pro-pylnorapomorphine (NPA, 0.03-1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently increased activity in control rats. Caffeine-treated rats were cross-tolerant to the locomotor stimulant effect of these selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonist. The concurrent administration of the partial dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF-38393 (10 mg/kg, s.c.) with the dopamine D2 receptor agonists quinpirole and R(-)-propylnorapomorphine had a synergistic effect on locomotor activity in both control and caffeine-treated rats. This synergistic effect was also seen when the partial dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF-77434 (1.0 and 10 mg/kg, s.c.) was given in combination with quinpirole. There was little or no cross-tolerance to the concurrent administration of selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists. It appears that tolerance to the locomotor stimulant effect of caffeine is mediated by both dopamine D1 and D2 receptor sub-types. Cross-tolerance occurs to drugs that activate a single type of dopamine receptor but not to drug combinations that concurrently activate more than one type of receptor.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

Influence of naloxone upon motor activity induced by psychomotor stimulant drugs.

Naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, attenuates a wide range of behavioral effects of d-amphetamine, such as the stimulation of motor activity. To investigate the pharmacological selectivity of the naloxone/amphetamine interaction, we assessed the effects of naloxone (5.0 mg/kg SC) upon motor activity induced in rats by a range of psychomotor stimulant drugs with a mechanism of action either similar to or different from that of d-amphetamine. Each of the drugs tested caused dose-dependent increases in both gross and fine activity. Naloxone attenuated the gross but not the fine activity response to d- and l-amphetamine, but had no influence upon the other catecholamine-releasing drugs, methamphetamine and phendimetrazine. In contrast, naloxone increased the gross but not the fine activity response to the catecholamine uptake inhibitors cocaine and mazindol, but had no effects upon the motor response to methylphenidate. The responses to other stimulant drugs (apomorphine, caffeine, scopolamine) were unaffected by naloxone pretreatment. The present findings extend the range of conditions under which naloxone and, by inference, endogenous opioid systems, modulate the behavioral response to psychomotor stimulants. However, the differential effects of naloxone upon the motor response to individual stimulant drugs support previous suggestions of fundamental differences in mechanisms of action among these compounds.

Animals↗

Sensitization and tolerance to the discriminative stimulus effects of mu-opioid agonists.

The discriminative stimulus effects of several mu-opioid agonists were examined under conditions of opioid sensitization or tolerance, i.e., before and after 1-week SC infusions of naloxone or mu-opioid agonists. Rats were trained to discriminate 3.0 mg/kg morphine from saline using a two-lever, discrete trial, shock-avoidance/escape procedure. The rats generalized completely to morphine, fentanyl, meperidine, buprenorphine, and etorphine, and partially to pentazocine. A 7-day infusion of naloxone (0.3 mg/kg per h) potentiated the discriminative stimulus effects of all of these drugs. The magnitude of the increased potency varied indirectly with the efficacy of the mu-opioid agonists; potency ratios (pre-infusion ED50/post-infusion ED50) ranged from 1.58 (etorphine) to 3.58 (pentazocine). Stimulus generalization to morphine, fentanyl, and meperidine also was examined following infusions of equieffective doses of each of these three drugs. Differences among drugs were generally small, and failed to reach statistical significance. Nonetheless, the induction of mu-opioid tolerance did seem to vary with the efficacy of the three mu-opioid agonists. Thus, meperidine (6.25 mg/kg per h), which has the lowest efficacy of the drugs infused, produced the greatest shift to the right of the stimulus-generalization curves of these three drugs; the post-meperidine PR ranged between 0.40 and 0.61. Fentanyl (0.1 mg/kg per h), a drug with a higher efficacy at mu-opioid receptors, did not produce tolerance to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine, fentanyl, or meperidine; potency ratios ranged from 0.50 to 0.75. Potency ratios for buprenorphine, etorphine, fentanyl, meperidine, and morphine after 7-day morphine infusions (0.75 mg/kg per h) ranged from 0.38 (buprenorphine) to 0.80 (etorphine). Morphine induced significant tolerance only to the discriminative stimulus effects of fentanyl. Our results suggest that different cellular mechanisms underlie the development of tolerance and sensitization to the discriminative stimulus effects of mu-opioid agonists.

Animals↗

Individual differences in behavior following amphetamine, GBR-12909, or apomorphine but not SKF-38393 or quinpirole.

Subjects that respond more to a novel environment show a greater locomotor response to drugs of abuse such as cocaine and amphetamine. The current study was performed to examine differences between high (HR) and low (LR) responding rats to a novel environment following administration of amphetamine, a selective dopamine uptake blocker (GBR-12909), a nonselective dopamine agonist (apomorphine), and selective dopamine D1 and D2/D3 agonists. A behavioral checklist and a rating scale were used to determine the behavioral arousal caused by administration of amphetamine (0, 0.5, 2.0, and 8.0 mg/kg), GBR-12909 (0, 1.25, 5.0, and 20.0 mg/kg), apomorphine (0, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg), SKF 39393 (0, 2.5, 10, and 40 mg/kg), or quinpirole (0, 0.05, 0.5, and 5.0 mg/kg). The five drugs produced behavioral activation profiles distinct from each other. Following amphetamine administration, both HR and LR subjects showed dose dependent increases in behavioral arousal. The behaviors primarily affected were sniffing, locomotor activity, rearing, and oral activity. HR rats showed a greater overall behavioral response to amphetamine administration compared with LR rats and there were differences in specific behaviors between the two groups. Following GBR-12909 administration, all subjects showed dose dependent increases in sniffing, locomotor activity, and rearing. Differences between HR and LR were observed in sniffing, locomotor activity, and rearing behaviors. HR and LR both showed dose dependent increases in behavior following apomorphine administration. HR showed greater behavioral activation after apomorphine than LR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

Antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of the kappa-opioid agonist spiradoline.

This study compared the potency of mixed-action opioids (i.e., agonist-antagonists) and pure antagonists to block the discriminative stimulus effects of spiradoline, a kappa-opioid agonist. Rats were trained to discriminate between 3.0 mg/kg spiradoline and saline (SC) in a two-choice discrete-trial procedure. Graded doses of test drugs were administered in combination with 3.0 mg/kg spiradoline and the dose that reduced selection of the spiradoline-appropriate choice lever by 50% (AD50) was calculated. Ten drugs blocked the discriminative effects of spiradoline in an orderly dose-dependent manner. They spanned a 150-fold potency range from diprenorphine (5 times as potent as naloxone) to nalbuphine (0.03 times as potent as naloxone). Antagonism was stereoselective: 0.1-1.0 mg/kg (-)-N-allylnormetazocine (NANM) reduced spiradoline-appropriate responding by 50% whereas 3.0 mg/kg (+)-NANM did not. (-)-Pentazocine (0.1-10 mg/kg) and butorphanol (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) also did not block the discriminative effects of spiradoline. Antagonism was surmountable when graded doses of spiradoline were tested with a fixed dose of diprenorphine, naloxone, or levallorphan. Apparent pKB values derived from the interactions between those three drugs and spiradoline were in accord with relative antagonist potencies based upon the AD50s. Because the potency of a competitive antagonist is determined by its receptor affinity, the relative potencies of mixed-action opioids and pure antagonists in blocking the discriminative stimulus effects of spiradoline can provide an estimate of the relative in vivo affinities of these drugs for the kappa-opioid receptor.

Analgesics↗

Discriminative stimulus effects of dextromethorphan in the rat.

This study was performed to characterize pharmacologically the discriminative stimulus effects of dextromethorphan, an antitussive that binds with high affinity to a subtype of sigma site in the brain. Dextrorphan, a metabolite of dextromethorphan, has phencyclidine (PCP)-like effects. Therefore, training was conducted with dextromethorphan injected by the SC route, which minimizes dextrorphan formation compared to the IP route. The training dose used, 30 mg/kg, by the SC route did not occasion selection of the PCP-appropriate choice lever in rats discriminating IP injections of 2.0 mg/kg PCP from saline. (In contrast, by the IP route the ED50 of dextromethorphan for PCP-appropriate lever selection was 21.7 mg/kg). In rats discriminating 30 mg/kg (SC) of dextromethorphan from distilled water, dextromethorphan was slightly more potent SC than it was IP (ED50s for dextromethorphan-appropriate lever selection: 8.5 and 14.9 mg/kg, respectively). These animals generalized dose-dependently and completely to PCP and to other PCP-receptor ligands, but selected the vehicle-appropriate choice lever when tested with sigma-site ligands, mu-opioid agonists, and naltrexone. Concurrent administration of naltrexone or sigma-site ligands with 30 mg/kg dextromethorphan did not block dextromethorphan-appropriate responding. These results show that the discriminative effects of SC dextromethorphan are PCP-like and are not mediated by the high-affinity dextromethorphan binding site or by the mu-opioid receptor. Because little dextrorphan is formed when dextromethorphan is given SC and because dextromethorphan itself has low affinity for the PCP receptor, the discriminative effects of SC dextromethorphan probably are mediated by a recognition site related closely to but different from the PCP receptor.

Animals↗

D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists block caffeine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity in rats.

The mechanism of action for the behavioral stimulant effects of caffeine has been extensively studied, but results have been ambiguous and inconsistent. The present study examined the role of dopamine in caffeine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity in rats. d-Amphetamine was also tested for comparison. Locomotor activity of male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-350 g) was measured using two-channel electronic activity monitors. Activity counts were recorded for 30 min following a 30-min pretreatment with either caffeine (3.0-100 mg/kg, IP) or d-amphetamine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, IP) alone and in combination with the D1 dopamine antagonist SCH23390 (0.01 and 0.003 mg/kg, SC) or the D2 dopamine antagonists sulpiride (30 mg/kg, SC) or eticlopride (0.03 mg/kg, SC). Caffeine and d-amphetamine dose dependently increased locomotor activity. This effect of both caffeine and d-amphetamine was blocked by SCH23390 as well as by eticlopride. Sulpiride blocked the stimulatory effects of caffeine but not d-amphetamine. These results suggest that the locomotor stimulant effect of caffeine, like that of d-amphetamine, is mediated through dopaminergic systems; both D1 and D2 receptors appear to be involved.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

Behavioral effects of systemically administered mu and kappa opioid agonists in the squirrel monkey: peptides versus alkaloids.

This study compared the effects of receptor-selective peptide and nonpeptide opioid agonists administered intramuscularly to squirrel monkeys responding under a fixed-interval 3-min schedule of stimulus termination. The mu opioid receptor agonist morphine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) increased response rate at low doses and decreased it and quarter-life at higher doses. [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol]Enkephalin (DAMGO; 0.3-3.0 mg/kg) reduced quarter-life at the highest dose. The kappa dose. The kappa opioid receptor agonist U50,488H (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) elevated response rate transiently and dose-dependently decreased quarter-life. Dynorphin A(1-13) (0.3-10 mg/kg), a purported endogenous ligand of the kappa opioid receptor, decreased response rate slightly but significantly at 3.0 mg/kg and had no effect on quarter-life. Thus, the behavior of squirrel monkeys was affected by systemically administered peptide as well as by nonpeptide opioid drugs. The two alkaloids were much more effective than the two peptides, presumably because of greater ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Quarter-life was often a more sensitive measure of drug effects than was response rate.

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cycloh↗

Assessing spiradoline-like discriminative effects of DuP 747: influence of route of administration.

DuP 747, trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-1,2,3,4- tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl]benzeacetamide methanesfonate, is a recently synthesized analgesic drug that binds with high affinity and selectivity to the kappa-opioid receptor. In order to determine if DuP 747 has kappa-like discriminative effects it was tested for stimulus generalization in rats trained to discriminate between SC injections of saline and 3.0 mg/kg of spiradoline, a potent kappa-opioid agonist. A range of drug doses was administered by each of several routes 30 min before a test session. Spiradoline occasioned orderly dose-dependent increases in spiradoline-appropriate lever selection after SC or IP administration, with ED50s of 0.65 and 1.75 mg/kg, respectively. In contrast, DuP 747 (1.0-30 mg/kg) occasioned little spiradoline-appropriate lever selection when administered SC, but was generalized from spiradoline partially when administered IP (ED50 = 5.9 mg/kg) or PO (ED50 = 59 mg/kg). The 5-hydroxy-desmethoxy metabolite of DuP 747, administered SC (0.3-10 mg/kg), occasioned selection of the saline-appropriate lever only. That DuP 747 had little spiradoline-like activity after SC administration suggests that a metabolite of DuP 747 was responsible for the spiradoline-appropriate responding that followed IP and PO administration of the drug, apparently a metabolite other than 5-hydroxy-desmethoxy-DuP 747.

Analgesics↗

Acute sensitization to opioid antagonists.

Acute morphine pretreatment sensitizes rats to the response rate-decreasing effects of opioid antagonists naloxone and naltrexone. The effect appears to be mu-opioid receptor specific, as pretreatment with non-mu-selective opioid agonists results in less pronounced sensitization. In the present study, food-deprived rats were trained to respond for food reinforcement on a FI 3-min schedule (9.5 min) with multiple trials. Doses of opioid antagonists were administered cumulatively before each trial of a session following 4-h pretreatment with either vehicle or morphine (3.0 mg/kg). Morphine pretreatment sensitized rats to naltrexone, lowering its ED50 from 20 to 0.03 mg/kg. It also sensitized rats to naloxone and to diprenorphine, another pure antagonist. Morphine-induced sensitization was stereoselective among the optical isomers of the benzomorphans, cyclazocine, pentazocine, and N-allylnormetzocine. In addition, acute morphine pretreatment resulted in sensitization to the mixed agonist/antagonist nalorphine, but not to buprenorphine or nalbuphine. The results extend previous findings concerning the importance of the mu-opioid receptor in the development of sensitization to opioid antagonists.

Animals↗

Monoamine systems in the discriminative effects of spiradoline, a kappa-opioid agonist.

The results of studies on mice indicate that the antinociceptive effects of kappa-opioid agonists are due, in part, to activation of the 5-HT2 type of serotonin receptor. One objective of this study was to determine if the discriminative effects of spiradoline, a kappa-opioid agonist, are mediated by 5-HT2 receptors in rats also. A second objective was to confirm findings that dopamine receptor antagonists produce spiradoline-like discriminative effects (Ohno et al., 1992). Rats were trained to discriminate between spiradoline (3.0 mg/kg) and saline in a discrete-trial avoidance/escape procedure. In subsequent tests of stimulus generalization, the discriminative effects of spiradoline were not mimicked by fenfluramine (0.3-10 mg/kg) or fluoxetine (1.0-10 mg/kg), drugs that enhance serotonergically mediated neurotransmission, nor were they blocked by the 5-HT2 antagonists pirenperone (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) and ketanserin (0.1-10 mg/kg), or potentiated by fluoxetine pretreatment. Neither the dopamine receptor antagonists haloperidol (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) and sulpiride (3.0-100 mg/kg) nor the agonists apomorphine (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) engendered spiradoline-like discriminative effects. These results demonstrate further the pharmacological specificity of the discriminative effects of spiradoline, but provide no evidence for mediation by serotonergic or dopaminergic systems.

Analgesics↗