Italy: national health service intact but charges rise.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S Garattini.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The effects of d-fenfluramine (1.5 mg/kg) and sertraline (10 mg/kg), administered intraperitoneally once daily for seven days were studied on feeding parameters of rats over various periods. On the first day of treatment both drugs markedly reduced meal size and meal duration during the first hour and, to a lesser extent, the first 4 h. No effects were seen later. The size and duration of eating bouts were also markedly reduced by both drugs in the first hour. There was no significant effect of either drug on meal frequency in any period. Only d-fenfluramine significantly reduced the rate of eating within 4 h from the start of testing. Sertraline, but not d-fenfluramine, markedly increased locomotor activity in the first 4 h after the start of testing. The d-fenfluramine effect on eating rate disappeared by the second day whereas total intake and meal size were still reduced on day five. By days six and seven however the d-fenfluramine-treated rats did not differ from the controls. During the seven-day treatment sertraline always reduced total food eaten and meal size but caused only transient changes of locomotor activity and eating rate. Since the effects of d-fenfluramine and sertraline on meal size and food intake could be separated from the effects on eating rate and arousal, it appears that at appropriate doses these drugs specifically increase the satiating effect of food. Tolerance to this effect appears to develop more rapidly for d-fenfluramine than for sertraline.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Rat hippocampal synaptosomes preloaded with [3H]serotonin and maintained in a superfusion apparatus were exposed for 3 min to d-fenfluramine or fluoxetine. Both drugs evoked a tritium overflow which was reserpine-sensitive requiring the presence of intact synaptic vesicles. However the two drugs displayed different characteristics: 1) the overflow was immediate with d-fenfluramine whereas the releasing activity of fluoxetine showed a delay of about 2 min; 2) d-fenfluramine-induced overflow was already apparent at 0.15 mumol/l whereas the minimal effective concentration of fluoxetine was 2.5 mumol/l. Their concentration-effect curves were differently shaped, the effect of d-fenfluramine being saturable at 5-20 mumol/l (EC50 about 1 mumol/l) while no saturation was observed with fluoxetine up to 10 mumol/l; 3) only 19% of the tritium overflow evoked by fluoxetine (2.5-10 mumol/l) consisted of true [3H]serotonin, compared with 70% when 0.5 mumol/l d-fenfluramine was used; 4) the releasing action of 0.5 mumol/l d-fenfluramine was completely Ca(++)-dependent, while at higher d-fenfluramine concentrations the Ca(++)-independent overflow became more important. The fluoxetine induced overflow was mainly (70%) Ca(++)-independent; 5) the releasing activity of d-fenfluramine was mainly (80%) blocked by the serotonin uptake blockers indalpine, midalcipram and also fluoxetine whereas fluoxetine-induced overflow was insensitive to inhibition of the serotonin carrier. In conclusion, the releasing activity of d-fenfluramine is already present at a very low concentration (0.5 mumol/l) and at this concentration its mechanism of action was Ca(++)-dependent, together with the requirement of a functional serotonin carrier.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The effects of repeated doses of fluoxetine over time and dose-responses of the content of indoles and catecholamines and metabolism, were examined in rats in relation to the concentrations of the parent compound and its active metabolite norfluoxetine in brain. Brains were removed for assays of the regional content of monoamines and concentrations of drugs 24 hr after the last dose on days 1, 7 and 21 of a twice-daily schedule of fluoxetine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Measurements were also taken 1 week after the last dose (7.5 and 15 mg/kg, b.i.d.) of the 21-day regimen. On day 1 fluoxetine did not change the content of serotonin (5-HT) but reduced the concentrations of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the hippocampus and cortex, compatible with the action of a blocker of the uptake of 5-HT. Continued injections of fluoxetine, however, significantly reduced 5-HT in the brain of the rat, the depletion being significant on days 7 and 21 in the hippocampus and cortex, respectively. The content of indoles remained significantly decreased for at least a week after the last dose of fluoxetine in the 21-day regimen, although the concentrations of 5-HIAA (but not 5-HT) totally recovered at the smaller dose (7.5 mg/kg) in all regions of the brain (cortex, hippocampus and striatum). In spite of slight changes in the concentrations and metabolism of dopamine (DA) in the striatum, 24 hr after the last dose (15 mg/kg), treatment with drug had no significant long-term effects on the content of catecholamines in these regions of the brain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The neurochemical effects of a large dose challenge (5 mg/kg, i.p.) of d-fenfluramine (d-F) in rats, given saline or gradually escalating doses of d-F (0.1-2.5 mg/kg, i.p.), were examined with regard to regional sensitivity and the time-course of recovery. The indole-depleting effect after the large dose of d-F to saline-pretreated animals appeared to differ, depending on the areas of brain considered (cortex greater than hippocampus greater than striatum), despite the fact that the drug and its main metabolite, d-norfenfluramine (d-NF) distributed almost uniformly in the regions of brain examined. The depletion in all these regions of the brain was reversible within 6 weeks, serotonin (5-HT) and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) being back to control levels in the hippocampus and striatum but not 5-HT in the cortex. However, when rats were exposed to gradually escalating doses of d-F the recovery of indoles in the brain, after injection of the large dose challenge, appeared to be faster. Indoles were markedly less reduced 1 week later in the cortex, hippocampus and striatum, with content of indole in the striatum showing complete recovery and the long-term depletion of 5-HT and 5-HIAA, by the subsequent large dose challenge was almost completely reversed in all regions. Analysis of the concentrations of d-F and its main metabolite d-fenfluramine (d-NF) in brain excluded any pharmacokinetic tolerance. These results suggest that during therapeutic treatment with d-F, the use of escalating doses may attenuate the potential for the long-lasting decrease of 5-HT in brain.
The effect of various doses of tianeptine on the extracellular concentrations of dopamine was studied in the striatum and nucleus accumbens of the rat. At 5 (but not 2.5) mg/kg intraperitoneally, tianeptine increased the extracellular dopamine only in the nucleus accumbens. At 10 mg/kg, the effect was also seen in the striatum but it was less marked and shorter-lasting. At 10 mg/kg (i.p.), tianeptine significantly raised the extracellular concentrations of dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) in both regions. The effect of 10 mg/kg tianeptine on dopamine and its metabolites was not significantly changed in animals which had received this dose twice daily for 15 days. Intracerebroventricular administration of 150 micrograms/20 microliters 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine, which markedly depleted serotonin in the brain, did not modify the effect of 10 mg/kg tianeptine on the extracellular concentrations of dopamine and HVA in the nucleus accumbens but reduced the effect on DOPAC. Various doses of tianeptine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.) did not change the synthesis of serotonin and dopamine in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. The results show that tianeptine increased the extracellular concentrations of dopamine more in the nucleus accumbens than in striatum. The effect on the output of DA in the nucleus accumbens could be involved in the antidepressant activity of tianeptine.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Glucocorticoids have a major role in the treatment of glomerular diseases. Despite recent advances in understanding of their mechanism of action, very few studies have addressed the relative advantage of the wide range of different dose regimens employed in clinical practice. We studied the effects of methylprednisolone given intravenously for three consecutive days at the doses of 1 mg/kg (group 1, N = 7; group 2, N = 5), 5 mg/kg (group 3, N = 5) or 15 mg/kg (group 4, N = 6) on total blood peripheral leukocytes and on lymphocyte subsets in patients with glomerular diseases, and investigated whether such effects were a function of the drug concentration in the blood. Since glucocorticoids have an inhibitory effect on the formation of eicosanoids in different cells, we also investigated in the same patients the effect of 1 and 15 mg/kg methylprednisolone on systemic and renal eicosanoid synthesis. Results of pharmacokinetic study showed that the three different doses of methylprednisolone we used resulted in major differences in patient's exposure to the drug, and within the same dose there was a great individual variability. By contrast the three different doses of methylprednisolone induced a comparable drop in the absolute number of lymphocytes six hours after the first injection of methylprednisolone, while 24 hours later blood lymphocyte counts returned to the pre-injection values in all patients. Analysis of lymphocyte subsets showed a selective decrease in the number of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ cells six hours after methylprednisolone which was comparable in the four groups of patients studied. As for the effect of methylprednisolone on systemic and renal eicosanoid synthesis in patients with glomerular diseases, 1 and 15 mg/kg were equally unable to reduce thromboxane A2 (TxA2) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release by circulating polimorphonuclear cells (PMNs). By contrast, methylprednisolone partially inhibited eicosanoid synthesis by PMNs in vitro. Consistent with the data on PMNs, urinary excretion of TxA2 and prostacyclin (PGI2) metabolites were unaltered by the different doses of methylprednisolone. By contrast urinary PGE2 was markedly and significantly reduced in patients given 15 but not 1 mg/kg. We conclude that 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone given to patients with glomerular diseases has the same effect on peripheral total blood leukocyte count and lymphocyte subsets than 5 and 15 mg/kg. The same is true for eicosanoid synthesis by PMNs. Renal synthesis of PGE2 is inhibited by 15 mg/kg but not by 1 mg/kg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Some agents that increase serotoninergic transmission in the brain show anorectic activity at doses that do not interfere with the behavior of rats and other animal species. These agents reduce food intake by a mechanism that clearly differs from that involved in the anorectic activity of d-amphetamine. d-Fenfluramine, fluoxetine, and sertraline are three drugs that have already been tested and are used in man. These compounds accumulate in the brain and are metabolized through N-dealkylation. They affect the uptake and release of serotonin at different concentrations, with mechanisms that do not completely overlap. There is pharmacological evidence that d-fenfluramine and sertraline exert their anorectic activity by enhancing the stimulation of 5-HT1nonA receptors whereas fluoxetine seems to affect at anorectic doses both serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems. The role of serotonin in controlling food intake will be discussed, and the effects of agents that reduce serotoninergic transmission will also be considered.
The present study was aimed at establishing the importance of brain monoamine uptake and release mechanisms in the anorectic activity of fluoxetine, relating them to the actual brain concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolite norfluoxetine after anorectic doses in rats. Both compounds showed anorectic activity when administered intraperitoneally, norfluoxetine being slightly more active (ED50 = 22.9 mumol kg-1) than fluoxetine (ED50 = 35.0 mumol kg-1) despite the fact that the metabolite is about ten times less potent than the parent drug in inhibiting 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake. Comparing the brain concentrations of norfluoxetine, in terms of maximum concentrations (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC), after the ED50 of fluoxetine or synthetic norfluoxetine, it also appeared that the metabolite plays a major role in the anorectic effect of the parent drug in rats. Brain Cmax of fluoxetine (48.7 microM) and norfluoxetine (21.7 and 27.3 microM after metabolite and drug, respectively) were several times those blocking 5-HT uptake in-vitro (0.5 microM), making it unlikely that fluoxetine (directly or through its metabolite) reduces food intake by specifically blocking 5-HT neuronal uptake. Brain Cmax of fluoxetine but particularly norfluoxetine were more compatible with those capable in-vitro of affecting catecholaminergic mechanisms, such as inhibition of dopamine and noradrenaline uptake and enhancement of dopamine release. These results together with recent in-vitro findings that the parent compound and its active metabolite induce tritium release from hippocampal synaptosomes previously loaded with [3H]5-HT suggest that mechanisms other than inhibition of 5-HT uptake are involved in the anorectic action of these compounds in rats.
The present study aimed to establish the role of the metabolite norfluoxetine in the anorectic activity of fluoxetine, and to relate the anorectic doses (ED50) to the brain concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolite. Fluoxetine showed anorectic activity at increasing intraperitoneal doses (ED50 = 39.1, 34.7 and 21.7 mumol kg-1 in mouse, rat and guinea-pig, respectively) and norfluoxetine was slightly more active (24.3, 22.9 and 19.1 mumol kg-1, respectively) in all three species. In terms of maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) within the experimental period (0-90 min), brain concentrations varied widely and were poorly related to the dose; guinea-pig appeared to be much more sensitive to fluoxetine than was mouse or rat. Administered norfluoxetine was present in the brain of the three species in approximately the same order as fluoxetine, i.e. lower in guinea-pig than in mouse or rat. The Cmax and AUC of norfluoxetine after fluoxetine administration was 50-60% of the values after an equiactive dose of norfluoxetine in mouse and guinea-pig, and more than 80% in rat.
1. High parenteral doses of a twice-daily schedule of d,l-fenfluramine (d,l-F) may cause long-lasting decrease of functional indices of brain serotoninergic neurones in rats. The single- and multiple-dose (b.i.d. x 4 days) kinetics of low (1.25 mg/kg) and high (12.5 mg/kg) subcutaneous (s.c.) doses of d-F, which accounts of the anorectic effects of the racemate, and its deethylated metabolite d-norfenfluramine (d-NF), were therefore examined and compared with those of pharmacologically effective oral doses (0.3-1.25 mg/kg) in rats. 2. There were dose-dependent alterations of kinetic parameters after s.c. and oral dosing, indicating that hepatic clearance of d-F in the rat can be saturated either by increasing the size of the single dose or during repeated dosing. Nonlinearity was also observed for d-NF. Consequently at high doses exposure of rat to the drug, as measured by the sum of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of d-F and d-NF considerably exceeded that expected from simple dosage considerations, particularly with repeated administration of d-F. 3. Total exposure at the high doses considerably exceeded that at pharmacological doses, however, indicating an ample margin in favour of anorectic activity. The possibility that the long-term depletion of brain 5-HT by d-F and/or its metabolite d-NF may have relevance at the usual therapeutic dose, is discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This progress report on the anorectic effect of serotoninergic indirect antagonists compares the action of D-fenfluramine, fluoxetine and sertraline and their N-dealkylated metabolites. Brain levels of drugs and their metabolites were measured after equi-active anorectic doses. Fluoxetine and sertraline inhibit 5-HT uptake in vitro with a potency which is at least one order of magnitude higher than for D-fenfluramine while all three drugs release 5-HT from synaptosomes and the active concentrations are closer to the brain concentrations reached after anorectic doses. However, a number of differences have been observed between D-fenfluramine and fluoxetine regarding the mechanisms of 5-HT release. Furthermore fluoxetine affected storage of 5-HT in vesicles much more than D-fenfluramine did. The anorectic effect induced by fluoxetine was not antagonized by antiserotoninergic drugs. No evidence of an involvement of CCK in the anorectic effect of D-fenfluramine was found when food intake was determined in rats previously submitted to food deprivation.
D-Fenfluramine, fluoxetine and sertraline are considered to be serotoninergic appetite-suppressive drugs. These three agents have been compared in fasted mice, rats and guinea pigs for their activity as food intake inhibitors. D-Fenfluramine is the most effective drug in the three animal species followed by fluoxetine and then sertraline. All three compounds are metabolized to N-dealkylated metabolites which accumulate in the brain and are themselves effective in reducing food intake. At anorectic doses the brain levels of the drugs and their metabolites are compatible with the concentrations able to block serotonin (5-HT) uptake and to release brain 5-HT from brain synaptosomes. However only the anorectic activity of D-fenfluramine is antagonized by the previous administration of 5-HT antagonists. These results cast some doubts on the role of brain 5-HT in explaining the anorectic activity of fluoxetine and sertraline.
In ex vivo experiments, tianeptine increased serotonin uptake in the hippocampus and the cortex acutely and after 72 hours following chronic administration for 15 days. This effect results from an increased maximal rate of uptake without changes in the number or affinity to binding sites for I'3H-imipramine or I'3H-paroxetin. In addition, tianeptine increased extracellular levels of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA) in hippocampus and hypothalamus measured with in vivo voltametry. It can thus be concluded that tianeptine also raises 5-hydrotryptamine (5HT) uptake in vivo. The effects of tianeptine on the serotoninergic system, especially the increase in serotonin uptake, are discussed in relation with its effects on behaviour and the dopaminergic and cholinergic systems.