PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Garcia-Acosta

Publications and source records attributed to S Garcia-Acosta.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficacy of oral ketoprofen in acute migraine: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. The authors report a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized cross-over trial of a dual-release formulation of oral ketoprofen in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. METHODS: The authors compared the efficacy of two doses of ketoprofen (75 or 150 mg) with that of placebo (primary analysis) and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (secondary analysis) on one to four consecutive attacks in 235 intent-to-treat patients (out of 257 randomized patients) with migraine with or without aura. The principal efficacy outcome was headache relief (reduction in headache severity from severe or moderate to mild or absent at 2 hours). RESULTS: Results are based on 838 attacks with a severe or moderate headache that were evaluable at 2 hours. Relief was reported for 62.6% of headaches treated with ketoprofen 75 mg, 61.6% with ketoprofen 150 mg, and 66.8% with zolmitriptan. The difference between the three active treatments and placebo (27.8% relief) was highly significant, both tests of ketoprofen vs placebo being globally controlled at a 5% level for the type I error (primary analysis). Headaches at 2 hours disappeared more frequently for the active treatments than for placebo. The authors also demonstrated efficacy on most other secondary outcomes. The tolerance of ketoprofen was good (similar to that of placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Oral ketoprofen (75 mg or 150 mg) in a dual-release formulation is an effective and well-tolerated drug in the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

Acute Disease↗

[Study of the real situation of improvement by Zopiclone in treatment of insomnia among persons working during night shifts].

UNLABELLED: We investigated the effect of adapted management of sleep on the duration and quality of sleep in shift workers working the night shift. Twenty-nine shift workers suffering from insomnia were included and treated with zopiclone (7.5mg/day) or placebo according to a random double-blind protocol. Patients completed a sleep diary and a wrist actigraph was used to evaluate episodes of rest/activity. A self-administered subjective sleep questionnaire was filled out just after awakening. Zopicone was found to increase the duration of sleep significantly (p<0.05) over the baseline duration after the first and second night on duty. Subjective estimation of sleep was better in patients taking zopiclone who exhibited a smaller number of shorter awakening episodes. IN CONCLUSION: zopiclone improves the quality and duration of sleep in shift workers suffering from insomnia.

Adult↗

[Dealing with missing, abnormal and incoherent data in E3N cohort study].

BACKGROUND: The E3N Study, 'Etude Epidémiologique auprès de femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale', is a cohort study, aiming at studying cancer risk factors on 100,000 women. Even if the incidence of problematic (missing, incoherent, etc.) data is low, any multivariate analysis which would be based only on complete subjects would rely on a too small sample, which would not necessarily be representative of the studied population. Results could thus be biased. METHODS: Our dealing with problematic data includes RESULTS: We looked at the number of individuals on which an analysis on 19 variables could be undertaken. The management of missing data made exploitable one fourth of the cohort, i.e.74.6% of individuals instead of 50.5%. Moreover, for 89.0% of subjects, one variable at most (out of the 19 studied) has missing datum. CONCLUSIONS: The main difficulty does not stand so much in the choice and implementation of methods to deal with problematic data than in the identification of their process of existence. Most of what was gained was due to the simplest methods: cold-deck and deductive method.

Cohort Studies↗