PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Gerosa

Publications and source records attributed to S Gerosa.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Beta-blockers for the treatment of angina pectoris: indications in relation to pathophysiological mechanisms.

In patients with ischaemic heart disease, therapeutic options should be selected on the basis of pathophysiological considerations. Classically, whereas calcium channel blockers and nitrates should be used in patients whose symptoms are more likely to result from coronary vasoconstriction, beta-blockers and revascularisation procedures should be considered when coronary flow reserve is severely limited by "fixed" atheroma. However, recent studies from our laboratory indicate that in patients with "mixed" angina whose symptoms are thought to be at least partially consequent to coronary vasoconstriction superimposed on atheromatous lesions of different severity, beta-blockers can also be effective in preventing episodes of myocardial ischaemia which occur during everyday life. Although most of these episodes are not apparently caused by an excessive increase in cardiac work, their number, severity, and duration are markedly reduced by beta-blocking agents. From these observations it is argued that, in patients with "mixed" angina, most ischaemic events are likely to be caused by transient reduction of regional myocardial perfusion, occurring for different levels of cardiac metabolic demand. The higher the latter, the more likely the former will be to precipitate clinical ischaemia.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Antihistaminic treatment of allergic rhinitis: a double-blind study with terfenadine versus dexchlorpheniramine.

A double-blind study was carried out in 65 patients with seasonal rhinitis to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of terfenadine and dexchlorpheniramine. Patients were allocated at random to receive treatment for 1 week with either 60 mg terfenadine twice daily or 2 mg dexchlorpheniramine maleate 3-times daily. Before and after treatment, patients underwent RAST and skin prick tests for reactivity to pollen and those who were positive also had rhinomanometric measurements made of nasal resistance. Diary cards were used by patients to record the severity of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, watery, irritated and red eyes, itching of the nose, throat and eyes, and cough. Details were also kept of the frequency and severity of any side-effects. Pollen counts were taken daily during the treatment period. The results showed that both terfenadine and dexchlorpheniramine produced good or excellent relief of the main symptoms in 78% and 73% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the pollen count and reduced symptom severity. Both drugs produced a reduction in total nasal resistance but this was not significantly different from initial values, neither was there a significant difference between treatment. Terfenadine was well tolerated and side-effects incidence was significantly lower (p less than 0.01) than in patients treated with dexchlorpheniramine, particularly so with reference to drowsiness.

Adolescent↗