PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Giard

Publications and source records attributed to S Giard.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

[Sentinel node biopsy without systematic axillary dissection: study about 1000 procedures].

OBJECTIVE: To assess daily practice of 1000 sentinel node (SN) biopsies in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective review of 1000 consecutive sentinel node biopsies between February 2001 and June 2004. Analyses concerned technical aspects of sentinel node detection, pathologic results of the tumor and sentinel node, treatment and follow-up. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventy-eight SN were detected (98.7%). In univariate analyses, age, pathologic tumor size (20 mm) and method of detection (blue dye or isotopic vs. combined) were statistically significant. One hundred and fifty-six cases (16%) underwent immediate axillary dissection (AD), whereas 116 (12%) had a delayed AD. There were 923 invasive or micro-invasive carcinoma with detected SN: 282 SN (30.5%) were involved, either with macrometastases (166) or with micrometastases (116), 34% had positive non-sentinel node. Age and metastasis size were predictive for AD involvement. Sixteen percent of micrometastatic SN had positive AD, there was no predictive factor for axillary involvement. After a median follow-up of 20 months, there were 4 axillary recurrences: 1 (0.1%) after negative SN without AD, 1 (0.1%) after positive SN with positive AD, 1 (4.3%) after micrometatastatic SN without AD, and 1 (8.3%) after macrometastatic SN without AD. There were 55 ductal carcinoma in situ and 54 micro-invasive cancer: positive SN (with negative AD) were detected in only 2 cases (2.3%). There were initially 112 ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by percutaneaous biopsy, 25 of them (22%) had invasive disease on definitive histology. Among there, 12 had involved SN (with 4 positive AD). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: With a high detection rate and low recurrence rate, SN biopsy is considered in our institute as a reliable procedure and is used to evaluate regional nodal status of early breast cancer. Thus, 70% of AD can be omitted.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Analysis of 882 cases].

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the results of "current clinical practice" among 882 women treated in nine French Cancer Centers from 1985 to 1995 for pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. METHOD: Median age was 53 years (range 21-87); 177 (20%) patients underwent mastectomy (M), 190 (22%) conservative surgery alone (CS) and 515 (58%) conservative surgery with radiotherapy (CS + RT). RESULTS: The crude 7-year local relapse (LR) rates were 2%, 31% and 13% among the M, CS and CS+RT subgroups (p<0.0001). All four LR after M were invasive as well as 31 (52%) out of 59 and 40 (61%) out of 66 in the CS and CS+RT groups. Distant metastases occurred in 1%, 3% and 1% of the three treatment groups. No LR factors were found in the M group. Among women treated with CS, the 7-year LR rates were 36%, 31% and 30% among women aged 40 or less, 41 to 60 and 61 or more (NS). For women treated by CS+RT, the LR rates in these age subgroups were 33%, 13% and 8%, respectively (p<0.0001). Patients with negative, positive or uncertain margins had 7-year LR rates of 26%, 56% and 29% respectively if treated with CS (p=0.02) and 11%, 23% and 9% if treated with CS+RT (p=0.0008). RT reduced LR rates by 65% in all histological subgroups, but more particularly in comedocarcinoma and mixed cribriform/papillary subgroups. The 7-year rate of contralateral breast cancer was 7%, identical in all subgroups. CONCLUSION: Mastectomy remains the safest treatment for women with DCIS, with a 98% 7-year control rate. After conservative surgery, RT reduces very significantly LR rates, according to the NSABP B-17 and EORTC 10853 randomized trial results. The RT benefit is present in all clinical/histological subgroups, but its magnitude varies. Young age (<40 years) and incomplete excision are the most important LR risk factors.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Surgical implications of sentinel node with micrometastatic disease in invasive breast cancer.

AIM: To assess the rate of positive axillary clearance (AC) when the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) contains micrometastatic disease in invasive breast cancer and to evaluate the factors that could predict positivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study carried out on 542 successive women undergoing SNB for unifocal T0-T1 N0 invasive breast cancer without previous treatment. RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty-five sentinel nodes (SN) were found, 142 contained metastases. Fifty-five of the positive SN contained micrometastatic disease only. Of them, 40 patients underwent completion of AC. Six out of 40 patients who had micrometastatic SN had a positive AC, five for micrometastasis between 0.2 and 2 mm (5/34), one for isolated cells in the SN (1/6). None of the studied factors (age, histological tumour size, histological grade, estradiol receptor (ER), histological tumour type, size and method of micrometastasis detection) could significantly predict the status of the AC. CONCLUSION: As long as the results of ongoing prospective randomised studies are unknown, it remains necessary to perform AC when the SNB contains micrometastatic disease, whatever the size or the detection mode of the metastasis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Partial breast irradiation: high dose rate peroperative brachytherapy technique using the MammoSite].

In the conservative management of breast cancer, radiation therapy delivering 45 to 50 Gy to the whole breast, in 4.5 to 5 weeks, followed by a booster dose of 10 to 20 Gy is the standard of care. Based on the numerous studies which have reported that the local recurrences occurs within and surrounding the primary tumor site and in order to decrease the treatment duration and its morbidity, partial breast irradiation using several techniques has been developed. Partial irradiation may be considered as an alternative local adjuvant treatment for selected patients with favorable prognostic factors. Using external beam radiation therapy, the 3D-conformal technique is appropriate to deliver the whole dose to a limited volume. In UK, an intraoperative technique using a miniature beam of low energy of x-ray (50 Kv) has been developed (Targit). Milan's team have developed an intraoperative electrons beam radiotherapy using a dedicated linear accelerator in the operative room. In USA and Canada the MammoSite has been advised for clinical use in per-operative brachytherapy of the breast. These two last techniques are currently compared in phase III randomised studies to the standard whole breast irradiation followed by a tumour bed booster dose. In this review we will focus on the MammoSite technique and will describe the per-operative implantation procedure, radiological controls ad dosimetric aspects.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

["Standards, Options and Recommendations 2001" for radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic infiltrating breast cancer. Update. National Federation of Cancer Campaign Centers (FNCLCC)].

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of french cancer centers (FNCLCC), the 20 french cancer centers, and specialists from french public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for non metastatic breast cancer patients according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 148 independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article presents the chapter radiotherapy resulting from the 2001 update of the version first published in 1996. The modified 2001 version of the standards, options and recommendations takes into account new information published. The main recommendations are: (1) Breast irradiation after conservative surgery significantly decrease the risk of local recurrence (level of evidence A) and the decrease in the risk of local recidive after chest wall irradiation is greater as the number of risk factors for local recurrence increases (level of evidence A). (2) After conservative surgery, a whole breast irradiation should be performed at a minimum dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (standard, level of evidence A). (3) A boost in the tumour bed should be performed in women under 50 years, even if the surgical margins are free (standard, level of evidence B). (4) Internal mammary chain irradiation is indicated for internal or central tumours in the absence of axillary lymph node involvement (expert agreement) and in the presence of lymph node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1). (5) Sub- and supra-claviculr lymph node irradiation is indicated in patients with axillary node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1).

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast results of conservative and radical treatments in 716 patients.

Until now, less than 5% of the patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been enrolled in clinical trials. Consequently, we have analysed the results of "current practice" among 716 women treated in eight French Cancer Centres from 1985 to 1992: 441 cases (61.6%) corresponded to impalpable lesions, 92 had a clinical size of less than or equal to 2 cm and 70 from 2 to 5 cm; in 113 cases, the size was unspecified. Median age was 53.2 years (range: 21-87 years). 145 patients underwent mastectomy (RS) and 571 conservative surgery (CS) without (136) or with (435) radiotherapy (CS+RT). The mean histological tumour sizes in these three groups were 25.6, 8.2, 14.8 mm, respectively (P<0.0001). After a 91-month median follow-up, local recurrence (LR) rates were 2.1, 30.1 and 13.8% in the RS, CS and CS +RT groups, respectively (P=0.001); LR were invasive in 59 and 60% in the CS and CS+RT groups, respectively. In these groups, the 8-year LR rates were 31.3 and 13.9%, respectively (P=0.0001). Nodal recurrence occurred in 3.7 and 1.8% in the CS and CS+RT groups. Metastases rates were 1.4, 4.4 and 1.4% in the RS, CS and CS+RT groups. Among the 60 cases of invasive LR, in CS and CS+RT groups 19% developed metastases. After multivariate analysis, we did not identify any significant LR risk factor in the CS group, whereas young age (<40 years) and incomplete excision were significant in the CS+RT group (P=0.012 and P=0.02, respectively).

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR) for endocrine therapy in patients with non metastatic breast cancer. FNCLCC].

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature systematic review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for endocrine therapy in patients with non metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using Medline, Embase, Cancerlit and Cochrane databases - until july 1999 - and the personal reference lists of the expert group. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 125 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the endocrine therapy of patients with non metastatic breast cancer are: 1) Endocrine therapy modalities depend on menopausal status or age of women: ovarian suppression for premenopausal women, antiestrogen drug therapy for postmenopausal women (standard). 2) Tamoxifen (20 mg/d - 5 years) is beneficial to women with positive estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). There is no indication of tamoxifen treatment for women with negative estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). 3) For postmenopausal women with positive estrogen receptor tumor, tamoxifen is the standard adjuvant treatment (level of evidence A). For postmenopausal women with negative estrogen receptor, adjuvant chemotherapy has to be considered (option, level of evidence A). No adjuvant treatment has to be considered for women with poor health condition (option). 4) For premenopausal women with estrogen receptor tumor, results of clinical trials of chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy, suggest a benefit for endocrine therapy. However, there is no sufficient evidence to consider endocrine therapy alone as a standard adjuvant treatment. 5) For premenopausal women, chemotherapy + ovarian suppression or chemotherapy + tamoxifen are not better than chemotherapy alone (level of evidence A). 6) For postmenopausal women, administration of chemotherapy plus adjuvant tamoxifen versus the same tamoxifen alone, is of additional benefit in reducing recurrences but not in prolonging overall survival (standard, level of evidence A). 7) Balance of known benefits (delay to recurrence and death) and risks (side-effects of therapy) for adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy has to be taken into consideration before decision making. Chemoendocrine therapy can be indicated for women at high risk of developing metastatic disease (recommendation, experts agreement).

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1998

Iatrogenic risks of endometrial carcinoma after treatment for breast cancer in a large French case-control study. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC).

Since tamoxifen is widely used in breast cancer treatment and has been proposed for the prevention of breast cancer, its endometrial iatrogenic effects must be carefully examined. We have investigated the association between endometrial cancer and tamoxifen use or other treatments in women treated for breast cancer in a case-control study. Cases of endometrial cancer diagnosed after breast cancer (n = 135) and 467 controls matched for age, year of diagnosis of breast cancer and hospital and survival time with an intact uterus were included. Women who had received tamoxifen were significantly more likely to have endometrial cancer diagnosed than those who had not (crude relative risk = 4.9, p = 0.0001). Univariate and adjusted analyses showed that the risk increased with the length of treatment (p = 0.0001) or the cumulative dose of tamoxifen received (p = 0.0001), irrespective of the daily dose. Women who had undergone pelvic radiotherapy also had a higher risk (crude relative risk = 7.8, p = 0.0001). After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk was higher for tamoxifen users (p = 0.0012), treatment for more than 3 years (all p < 0.03) and pelvic radiotherapy (p = 0.012). Women who had endometrial cancer and had received tamoxifen had more advanced disease and poorer prognosis than those with endometrial cancer who had not received this treatment. Our results suggest a causal role of tamoxifen in endometrial cancer, particularly when used as currently proposed for breast cancer prevention. Pelvic radiotherapy may be an additional iatrogenic factor for women with breast cancer. Endometrial cancers diagnosed in women treated with tamoxifen have poorer prognosis. Women who receive tamoxifen for breast cancer should be offered gynaecological surveillance during and after treatment. A long-term evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio of tamoxifen as a preventive treatment for breast cancer is clearly warranted.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

[Axillary lymphadenectomy prepared by fat aspiration versus functional axillary lymphadenectomy: preliminary results of a randomized prospective study].

The objective of this study is to compare morbidity between 2 surgical procedures of axillary clearance: functional lymphadenectomy by classical dissection versus axillary dissection prepared by liposuction (Suzanne's procedure). Two hundred consecutive patients treated for breast cancer were included in a prospective randomized trial between 1st January, 1995 and 31st January, 1996 (Huriet's law). The assessment (number of nodes, postoperative stay, drainage duration, rate of seromas, number of complications, evaluation of mobility and sensitive disorders) was done on the first, fifth, tenth and thirty postoperative days. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups. The rate of seromas decreased significantly only for fat patients (8/25 versus 21/34, p < 0.05) and for the patients treated with radical mastectomy (17/37 versus 28/39, p < 0.05). In this preliminary study, liposuction does not change postoperative effects of axillary clearance, except for fat patients or after total mastectomy. The liposuction seems to facilitate a better anatomical dissection and a better preservation of the nervous and vascular elements.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Conservative surgical treatment of retro-areolar breast tumors. Local control and esthetic results].

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study of local faiture and cosmetic results after conservative surgery for retroareolar breast cancer. PATIENTS AND RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients underwent a conservative surgical procedure between 1983 and 1994. Median follow-up was 37,5 months. Fourteen patients experienced a recurrence (5 local, 2 local and distant, 7 distant). Only two probably interrelated factors were associated with a risk of local recurrence: nipple-areola complex removed or not, and pathological margins. Cosmetic results were evaluated with patient's questionnaires: 40/47 patients (85%) stated they were satisfied. CONCLUSION: In spite of the short follow-up, conservative surgery is a safe procedure for local control only in cases with negative margins. Procedure for nipple areola complex is now questionable. Cosmetic results are achieved if indication of central lumpectomy are confined to small and limited tumors. For other tumors, plastic remodelling is necessary.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Attitudes towards screening and prevention of breast and ovarian cancers with hereditary predisposition. Survey by female gynecologists in the north of France].

Search for mutations of BRCA1 in women at hereditary risk for cancer is now possible. We asked the female gynaecologists of our county (north of France) their opinion about the search of a mutation of BRCA1 if they had a familial risk of breast cancer. Our aim was to obtain the opinion of informed women about their willingness to do the test for themselves and about the consequences they should accept. One hundred and eighty-three women received a questionnaire by post. The response rate was 56.3%. Twenty-four percent of the responders had a first degree relative with breast cancer. Most of the responders (87.4%; IC 95%: 81-93.8) would ask for the search of a mutation of BRCA1. The percentage of women who would accept the test is smaller for the women who have a first degree relative with breast cancer (72.0% vs 92.3%; P = 0.02). The reasons given to do the test were a better screening or prevention (69.7%) and the knowledge of a personal risk (49.4%). For breast cancer, 93.2% (95% CI: 88.4-98) would accept a screening protocol, 30.1% (CI: 21.3-38.9) would accept a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. For ovarian cancer, 93.2% (CI: 88.4-98) would accept the screening, 52.4% (CI: 42.8-62) would accept a prophylactic ovariectomy. In conclusion, most of the informed women would ask for the test and the surgical options for reducing the risk of cancer are not absolutely rejected. Of course, only future studies will state precisely the choice of truly implicated women.

Adult↗