PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Grampp

Publications and source records attributed to S Grampp.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus. A tool for assessing bone status in patients with chronic renal failure.

PURPOSE: To evaluate broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) for the assessment of bone status and to correlate this to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in haemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 60 patients, BUA (dB/MHz) was determined for the calcaneus. The results were expressed as Z-scores and T-scores, i.e. units of standard deviations respectively from age- and sex-matched normal values and from sex-matched normal mean values in healthy young adults. Ultrasound data were correlated to relevant clinical, biochemical and DXA data (g/cm2), which were examined at the femoral neck and at the lumbar spine in 50 patients. RESULTS: The BUA Z-score was < -1 in 53% of the patients and < -2 in 22%. The BUA T-score was < -1 in 88% and < -2 in 62%. Moderate correlation was found for calcaneal BUA to DXA in men (r = 0.47-0.48, p < 0.01) and to DXA of the lumbar spine in women (r = 0.51, p < 0.05). The best correlation was observed for BUA to DXA of the femoral neck in women (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Calcaneal BUA is an additional tool for the surveillance of bone density in haemodialysed patients.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Influence of osteophytic size on bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

PURPOSE: To quantify the relationship between individual osteophytic size and measured bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Further, to evaluate the possible consequences of this relationship for the management of DXA measurements in postmenopausal patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 142 postmenopausal women (mean age 61.8 +/- 8.9 years), plain radiographs of the lumbar spine were evaluated and graded according to evidence and size of osteophytes. The BMD (g/cm2) and Z-score (deviation of BMD from an age-matched population, %) of each vertebral body was determined by DXA. The effects of the individual osteophytic size on BMD measurements were analyzed by using analysis of variance followed by a multiple test procedure. RESULTS: The presence of osteophytes resulted in a significant increase in BMD of L1 through L4. The increase in relation to an osteophytic size of about 10 mm was: in L1 5.7%, in L2 6.8%, in L3 4.4% and in L4 3.5%. Increases were significantly higher for an osteophytic size of 10-20 mm (L1 23.1%, L2 13.0%, L3 13.4%, and L4 16.3%) and of > 20 mm (L1 21.4%, L2 22.4%, L3 21.1% and L4 4.1%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a nonlinear increase of measured BMD with increasing osteophytic size. These effects should be considered in routine examination and patient management.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Assessment of osteoporosis: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the radius and lumbar spine.

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiographic absorptiometry (RA) of the phalanges in healthy women and in women with osteoporosis and to compare the results of RA with those of dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the radius and spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two healthy premenopausal women, 39 healthy postmenopausal women, and 35 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis underwent RA of the phalanges and DXA of the radius and lumbar spine. Pairwise comparisons, age-related bone losses, and percentage decrements and Student t values for intergroup discrimination were calculated. The ability to identify patients with osteoporotic fractures was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic and age-adjusted logistic regression analyses. The diagnostic agreement for osteoporosis was assessed with kappa statistics. RESULTS: Findings from RA were correlated with those from spinal DXA (r = .56). The annual bone losses in healthy women, as measured with RA, radial DXA, and spinal DXA, were 0.47%, 0.47%, and 0.32%, respectively. Intergroup percentage decrements and t values obtained with RA were comparable to those obtained with radial and with spinal DXA. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed no statistically significant differences. The odds ratios for RA, radial DXA, and spinal DXA were 2.1, 1.9, and 2.4, respectively. The kappa scores were 0.44 for both RA versus radial DXA and RA versus spinal DXA, and the score was 0.22 for radial DXA versus spinal DXA. CONCLUSION: RA appears to be a useful technique for assessing age- and menopause-related bone loss and for identifying women with osteoporosis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

High resolution magnetic resonance (MR) images of the distal radius were obtained at 1.5 Tesla in premenopausal normal, postmenopausal normal, and postmenopausal osteoporotic women. The image resolution was 156 microm in plane and 700 microm in the slice direction; the total imaging time was approximately 16 minutes. An intensity-based thresholding technique was used to segment the images into trabecular bone and marrow, respectively. Extensions of standard stereological techniques were used to derive measures of trabecular bone structure from these segmented images. The parameters calculated included apparent measures of trabecular bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, trabecular spacing, and trabecular number. Fractal-based texture parameters, such as the box-counting dimension, were also derived. Trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) and cortical bone mineral content (BMC) were measured in the distal radius using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). In a subset of patients, spinal trabecular BMD was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Correlations between the indices of trabecular bone structure measured from these high-resolution MR images, age, BMD, and osteoporotic fracture status were examined. Cortical BMC and trabecular BMD at the distal radius, spinal BMD, trabecular bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, and fractal dimension all decreased with age. Trabecular spacing showed the greatest percentage change and increased with age. In addition, significant differences were evident in spinal BMD, radial trabecular BMD, trabecular bone volume fraction, trabecular spacing, and trabecular number between the postmenopausal nonfracture and the postmenopausal osteoporotic subjects. Trabecular spacing and trabecular number showed moderate correlation with radial trabecular BMD but correlated poorly with radial cortical BMC. High resolution MR imaging, a potentially useful tool for quantifying trabecular structure in vivo, may have applications for understanding and evaluating skeletal changes related to age and osteoporosis.

Adult↗

Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.

The purpose of this study was to examine the commonly available methods of noninvasively assessing bone mineral status across three defined female populations to examine their interrelationships, compare their respective abilities to reflect age- and menopause-related bone loss, discriminate osteoporotic fractures, and classify patients diagnostically. A total of 47 healthy premenopausal (age 33 +/- 7 years), 41 healthy postmenopausal (age 64 +/- 9 years), and 36 osteoporotic postmenopausal (age 70 +/- 6 years) women were examined with the following techniques: (1) quantitative computed tomography of the L1-L4 lumbar spine for trabecular (QCT TRAB BMD) and integral (QCT INTG BMD) bone mineral density (BMD); (2) dual X-ray absorptiometry of the L1-L4 posterior-anterior (DXA PA BMD) and L2-L4 lateral (DXA LAT BMD) lumbar spine, of the femoral neck (DXA NECK BMD) and trochanter (DXA TROC BMD), and of the ultradistal radius (DXA UD BMD) for integral BMD; (3) peripheral QCT of the distal radius for trabecular BMD (pQCT TRAB BMD) and cortical bone mineral content (BMC) (pQCT CORT BMC); (4) two radiographic absorptiometric techniques of the metacarpal (RA METC BMD) and phalanges (RA PHAL BMD) for integral BMD; and (5) two quantitative ultrasound devices (QUS) of the calcaneus for speed of sound (SOS CALC) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA CALC). In general, correlations ranged from (r = 0.10-0.93) among different sites and techniques. We found that pQCT TRAB BMD correlated poorly (r < or = 0.46) with all other measurements except DXA UD BMD (r = 0.62,p < or = 0.0001) and RA PHAL BMD (r = 0.52, p < or = 0.0001). The strongest correlation across techniques was between QCT INT BMD and DXA LAT BMD (r = 0.87, p < or = 0.0001), and the weakest correlation within a technique was between pQCT TRAB BMD and pQCT CORT BMC (r = 0.25,p < or = 0.05). Techniques showing the highest correlations with age in the healthy groups also showed the greatest differences among groups. They also showed the best discrimination (as measured by the odds ratios) for the distinction between healthy postmenopausal and osteoporotic postmenopausal groups based on age-adjusted logistic regression analysis. For each anatomic site, the techniques providing the best results were: (1) spine, QCT TRAB BMD (annual loss, -1.2% [healthy premenopausal and healthy postmenopausal]); Student's t-value [not the T score], 5.4 [healthy postmenopausal vs. osteoporotic postmenopausal]; odds ratio, 43 [age-adjusted logistic regression for healthy postmenopausal vs. osteoporotic postmenopausal]); (2) hip, DXA TROC BMD (-0.46; 3.5; 2.2); (3) radius, DXA UD BMD (-0.44; 3.3; 1.9) and pQCT, CORT BMC (-0.72; 2.9; 1.7); (4) hand, RA PHAL (-0.51; 3.6; 2.0); and (5) calcaneus, SOS (-0.09; 3.4; 2.1) and BUA (-0.52; 2.6; 1.7). Despite these performance trends, the differences among sites and techniques were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) using age-adjusted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Nevertheless, kappa score analysis (using -2.0 T score as the cut-off value for osteopenia and -2.5 T score for osteoporosis) showed that in general the diagnostic agreement among these measurements in classifying women as osteopenic or osteoporotic was poor, with kappa scores averaging about 0.4 (exceptions were QCT TRAB/INTG BMD, DXA LAT BMD, and RA PHAL BMD, with kappa scores ranging from 0.63 to 0.89). Often different patients were estimated at risk by using different measurement sites or techniques.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

A new trabecular region of interest for femoral dual X-ray absorptiometry: short-term precision, age-related bone loss, and fracture discrimination compared with current femoral regions of interest.

We defined a new region of interest (ROI) for femoral Ward's triangle, centered on the femoral neck axis including comparatively trabecular-rich bone. Forty-seven premenopausal, 39 healthy postmenopausal, and 35 osteoporotic postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures were evaluated comparing the new with the standard femoral ROIs, using a Hologic QDR-2000. Additionally, spinal dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed. The short-term precision error of the new ROI expressed as the root mean square of the coefficient of variations was 1.34% for premenopausal women, 1.69% for healthy postmenopausal women, and 2.46% for osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Bone mineral density (BMD) values of the new ROI correlated highly with those of the standard femoral ROIs (r = 0.91 - 0.96) and the spinal BMD (r = 0.74). Age-related bone loss of the new ROI was 0.75% per year (r = 0.66) in healthy women, which was approximately 1.5 times higher than the bone loss of the standard femoral ROIs, except for Ward's triangle. Regarding the intergroup discrimination, the t-value of the new ROI was similar to the t-value of Ward's triangle, and the intergroup percent decrements in BMD of the new ROI approximated those of Ward's triangle. For discriminating women with vertebral fractures, the new ROI demonstrated odds ratios of 1.6 similar to most ROIs but lower than that of the trochanteric region. The new, substantially trabecular ROI appears to be an alternative to the Ward's ROI traditionally used in femoral DXA having improved short-term precision and comparable sensitivity.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments.

The International Dual-Photon X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Standardization Committee (IDSC) conducted a cross-calibration study among three models of DXA machines from three different manufacturers. In that study, 100 subjects were scanned on all three machines. A set of equations were derived to convert bone mineral density (BMD) on each machine to a "standardized BMD" (sBMD) such that sBMD from the same subject derived from different machines would be approximately the same. In a reanalysis of the cross-calibration data, we showed that the conversion method used in the IDSC study did not achieve several optimal properties desirable in such conversions. We derived new conversion equations to sBMD based on minimizing differences among sBMD from the three machines. More important is that the new conversions have no residual bias that was present in the IDSC conversions. The performance of the methods were compared on the cross-calibration data as well as an external data set. We conclude that the IDSC conversions are adequate for clinical use on other machines worldwide, but that researchers should standardize their own machines in a laboratory using the new method.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Accuracy and precision study in vitro for peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

We evaluated the accuracy and precision of a peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner, the Stratec XCT-960, using 12 human cadaveric forearms. The accuracy was determined by comparing the total bone mineral content (BMC) with the ash weight (AW). We scanned and ashed three consecutive slices (thickness 2.5 mm) at the standard position (s-position) and at 2.5 mm both proximal and distal to the s-position. The correlation coefficient between the AW and total BMC using slices at the s-position was r = 0.87 with an accuracy error (random component) of 15.5%. The correlation coefficient using all slices was r = 0.90 with an accuracy error of 14.3%. The correlation coefficient improved to r = 0.95 with an accuracy error of 9.7% after averaging the results of all three slices for each forearm. The short-term precision error expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV) of bone mineral density (BMD) and BMC was determined by measuring the forearms five times either with repositioning or without repositioning. The CVs with repositioning were 2.77 and 1.15 for total BMD and BMC, 1.85 for trabecular BMD; without repositioning they were 0.29, 0.58 and 0.69 respectively. To further evaluate the influence of positioning, additional scans were performed at 1, 2 and 5 mm proximal, and 1 and 2 mm distal to the s-position. BMD and BMC were greatly influenced by the scan location; for example, the percentage differences in trabecular BMD 1 mm distal and proximal relative to the s-position were 2.5% +/- 5.1% and 0.18% +/- 6.3%, respectively. The Stratec XCT-960 appears to be a moderately accurate and highly precise scanner with potential usefulness for evaluating BMC and BMD of ultradistal radius.

Bone Density↗

Distal radius: in vivo assessment with quantitative MR imaging, peripheral quantitative CT, and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vivo the relationship between magnetic resonance (MR) imaging relaxation time and bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal radius. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 1/T2* MR imaging relaxation rates and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements were evaluated in the trabecular bone of the distal 5 cm of the radius in 14 healthy premenopausal women and 11 healthy postmenopausal women and in 11 women with osteoporosis. Trabecular and total BMD were measured with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: In healthy women, 1/T2* values and trabecular BMD at peripheral quantitative CT were significantly correlated but 1/T2* and total BMD were not. Statistically significant (P = .03) correlations between 1/T2* and DXA were found only in the most distal area covered with DXA. The 1/T2* values were more closely correlated with age and showed higher relative annual decreases (0.47%-0.81%) than peripheral quantitative CT (0.20%-0.59%) or DXA (0.10%-0.39%). Pre- and postmenopausal healthy subjects could be distinguished only with MR imaging, and postmenopausal healthy and osteoporotic subjects only with CT and DXA. CONCLUSION: MR imaging relaxation rates correlate well with trabecular BMD in vivo.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Quantitative CT assessment of the lumbar spine and radius in patients with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to quantify the relationship between bone mineral assessments of the lumbar spine using quantitative CT (QCT) and of the radius using peripheral QCT (pQCT) and to test the sensitivity of both techniques in detecting changes in bone mass that are related to age and osteoporosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two healthy premenopausal, 38 healthy postmenopausal, and 97 osteoporotic postmenopausal women were examined with pQCT of the distal radius and with QCT of the lumbar spine (L1-L4). The bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and a cross-sectional area of cortical bone were assessed at the distal radius. The BMD of trabecular and total bone and the BMC of total bone were assessed at the midvertebral bodies of the lumbar spine. RESULTS: In the healthy women, correlations of radial BMD with spinal trabecular and total BMD were modest (r = .39 and r = .49, respectively) but were higher for total BMC (r = .79). All correlations in osteoporotic women (r = .19 for trabecular BMD, r = .31 for total BMD, and r = .47 for total BMC) were lower than those in healthy women. For measurement of spinal bone mass in healthy women, trabecular BMD showed a higher correlation with age (r = .81) and a larger relative annual decrease (1.2%) than did total BMD (r = .75, .78%) or total BMC (r = .54, .55%). At the radius, the highest correlations with age were found for total BMC (r = .57, .53%), cortical area (r - .52, .67%), and cortical BMC (r = .48, .78%). Age-adjusted odds ratios for prevalent vertebral fractures were highest for total (4.5) and trabecular (4.4) spinal BMD. For radial measurements, odds ratios were highest for both total BMD (2.3) and cortical area (2.3). CONCLUSION: QCT of spinal trabecular bone showed the strongest capability for assessment of age-related bone loss and for discrimination of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In comparison, pQCT of radial trabecular bone showed the weakest capability for these applications, and pQCT of radial cortical or total bone showed intermediate capability.

Aged↗

Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.

In order to assess precision of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), duplicate bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the radius were performed in 20 healthy premenopausal, 20 healthy postmenopausal, and 20 osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a Stratec XCT-960 system. The short-term reproductibility in vivo for the total, trabecular, and cortical regions of interest (ROI) was expressed as the absolute precision error (standard deviation, SD) and as the relative precision error (SD/mean x 100, or coefficient of variation, CV, in %). Reproducibility in vivo was good in all volunteers but was influenced by the study group and the ROI. The precision error for trabecular BMD was 3 mg/cm3, or about 1.6%. This is large relative to the aging decrease of 0.22%/year, or to the difference (12 mg/cm3, or 7%) between osteoporotic women and postmenopausal controls. In order to compare pQCT to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm and at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), 40 premenopausal healthy controls, 40 postmenopausal healthy controls, and 35 postmenopausal osteoporotic women were assessed. DXA measurements performed at the ultradistal, middistal, 1/3, and total ROI of the radius showed only moderate correlations between r = 0.38--0.75, r = 0.27--0.64, and r = 0.38--0.53 for the comparison versus pQCT total BMD, versus pQCT trabecular BMD, and versus pQCT cortical BMD, respectively. Correlations of DXA at the lumbar spine and pQCT were between r = 0.18 and 0.44. DXA at radius and spine was able to discriminate between post- menopausal controls and osteoporotic women (p = 0.001--.004),but BMD measurements by pQCT did not show this ability (p = 0.15--0.52). However, two nonstandard pQCT parameters, namely the surface area of the cortical bone and the cortical BMC were factors that discriminated well between these two groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, respectively). These pQCT parameters also yielded the highest relative annual changes in pre- and post-menopausal control subjects. The measurement of cortical bone in the distal radius proved to be a good predictor of vertebral fracture status and was a good indicator of age-related skeletal change. Our data emphasize the importance of cortical measurements when using pQCT of the radius to assess osteoporosis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Influence of degenerative joint disease on spinal bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal women.

We assessed the impact of various forms of spinal degenerative joint disease (DJD) on bone mineral density (BMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a group of postmenopausal women. Lateral (T4-L4) and AP (L1-L4) spinal radiographs were reviewed for fracture and DJD in 209 women (mean age 62.6 +/- 6.7). The severity of DJD findings was graded as 0, 1, or 2 on the lumbar films, except for vertebral osteophytes which were graded from 0 to 3. Vertebral fractures were defined semiquantitatively as approximately 20% reduction in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral height. BMD was measured in all subjects by QCT and DXA, including posteroanterior DXA (PA-DXA), lateral DXA (L-DXA) and midlateral DXA (mL-DXA). When BMD was measured by QCT and mL-DXA in the 168 women without fractures, no significant differences were found between women with and those without DJD. However, BMD by PA-DXA was significantly higher in women with DJD changes, particularly when osteophytes were present at the vertebral bodies or facet joints. BMD by L-DXA was less affected by DJD. For this measurement a significant increase in BMD was only noted in subjects with vertebral osteophytes. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed that BMD by QCT and mL-DXA was not affected by DJD. In contrast, for all women, BMD by PA- and L-DXA was affected more by DJD than by fracture status. Chi-square testing demonstrated no significant relationships between vertebral fractures and any of the DJD changes. We conclude that QCT and mL-DXA are superior to PA-DXA and L-DXA in detecting bone loss in patients with DJD. Thus, for these patients, BMD assessment by QCT or mL-DXA may be advisable.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

We compared quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with respect to their ability to discriminate subjects with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. In 240 post-menopausal women (mean age 63.7 +/- 6.9 years) lateral spine radiographs (T4-L4) were reviewed for the presence of vertebral fracture. Using a semiquantitative technique to grade the severity of vertebral deformities, we classified fractures as mild, moderate or severe (grade 1 to 3, respectively). Postero-anterior DXA (PA-DXA) and lateral DXA (L-DXA) measurements (L2-4) as well as QCT measurements of the lumbar spine (T12-L3 or L1-14) were obtained in all women. Seventy-two women were diagnosed with at least one fracture, and of these 40 were graded as mild. Comparing normal women with fractured women, we found the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to be greatest for QCT (0.81), followed by L-DXA (0.72) and PA-DXA (0.65). The differences among all three techniques were significant. Comparing the normal women with women having only mild fractures, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.79, 0.73 and 0.63 for QCT, L-DXA and PA-DXA, respectively. Significant differences existed between QCT and PA-DXA as well as between L-DXA and PA-DXA. Logistic regression analysis also revealed the highest age-adjusted odds ratios for QCT (3.67; 2.25-5.97) while L-DXA and PA-DXA showed substantially lower odds ratios (2.00; 1.39-2.87, and 1.54; 1.11-2.15, respectively). We conclude that low bone density as measured by QCT, PA-DXA or L-DXA is significantly associated with the prevalence of vertebral fractures. Of the methods studied, QCT of trabecular bone offered the best discriminatory capability. L-DXA proved to be superior to PA-DXA in its diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in women with mild fracture. Mild vertebral fractures are associated with decreased spinal bone density and may be regarded as osteoporotic deformities.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Which vertebrae should be assessed using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

The purpose of this study was to determine precision and diagnostic capability of bone mineral density measurements using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in supine position. Duplicate postero-anterior (PA) and lateral DXA measurements were performed in 60 women. Precision errors of the single vertebral levels using lateral DXA ranged from 3.3% to 4.9%. The combination of all levels improved the precision errors to 2.0%. Paired PA and lateral DXA measurements (Hologic QDR 2000) including the vertebral levels L2 to L4 were performed in 331 postmenopausal women. In 42 women an overlap of L4 by the pelvis was suspected on the lateral DXA images. Vertebral fractures were assessed as a fracture/non-fracture dichotomy. L4 and combinations of vertebrae including L4 showed the best discriminatory capabilities with respect to vertebral fractures in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, t-tests and Z-scores, with smaller variability of the results when multiple vertebral levels were used. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.662 and 0.639 for lateral and PA measurements of L2 to L4, respectively when all women were included. Excluding the women with pelvic overlap on lateral DXA scans improved the ROC area for lateral scans to 0.686 while that for PA scans remained almost constant (0.641). The differences between PA and lateral measurements were not statistically significant. In 162 women of our study cohort an additional quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurement of the vertebral levels L2 to L4 was performed and overlapping bony structures at the three levels were studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorptiometry, Photon↗