PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

S H Hirsch

Publications and source records attributed to S H Hirsch.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Value of functional status as a predictor of mortality: results of a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of functional status questions in predicting mortality, we conducted a 4-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study of functionally impaired community-dwelling elderly persons. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 282 elderly (aged 64 years or older) patients of 76 community-based physicians who were UCLA clinical faculty members were assessed at baseline and at an average of 51 months later using scales from the Functional Status Questionnaire. RESULTS: By the end of the study, 24% of the sample had died. By means of a multivariate model, the following baseline characteristics were independently predictive of death: greater dysfunction on a scale of intermediate activities of daily living, male gender, living alone, white race, better quality of social interactions, and age. Initial baseline functional measures were also predictive of follow-up health status perceptions. CONCLUSION: The assessment of information on physical functioning and the quality of social interactions provides prognostic information regarding mortality. Furthermore, of the independent predictors of death identified in this sample, only functional impairment and living alone are remediable. Whether improving functional status can reduce the risk of mortality remains to be determined.

Activities of Daily Living

Geriatrics faculty in the United States: who are they and what are they doing?

Despite increases in geriatrics training at all levels of medical education, there is a nationwide shortage of geriatrics faculty. This shortage may be due in part to demands for clinical responsibilities that preclude adequate time for teaching and research. To learn about the professional activities of geriatrics faculty, we conducted a national survey of a 50% sample of all medical schools and their affiliated residency programs that focused on physician and non-physician geriatrics faculty in internal medicine, family practice, psychiatry, neurology, and physical medicine and rehabilitation. Although we found minor differences across specialties, in general, approximately one-third of physician faculty time is spent in teaching, the majority of which is clinical teaching. Less than 15% of physician faculty time is spent in research, and fewer than 10% of physician geriatrics faculty devote over half of their time to research. The percentage of time that non-physician faculty (other than "Research Only" faculty) spend in research is only slightly higher. These findings suggest that efforts to increase geriatrics education at all levels and promote research advances will be limited unless geriatricians devote substantially more of their time to these responsibilities.

Clinical Medicine

Geriatrics in residency programs.

To determine how well geriatrics has been integrated into residency training, the authors surveyed a random 33% sample of all the 378 family practice (n = 126) and 420 internal medicine (n = 140) training programs in the United States in 1988. All the programs responded. On average, the internal medicine programs had more geriatrics faculty than did the family practice faculty, but these numbers were insufficient to meet current or future needs. Fewer than half of the residencies had geriatrics inpatient or ambulatory-care evaluation units, geriatrics consult services, geropsychiatry wards, or geriatrics clinics available as training sites. In contrast, nursing homes were available for 93% of the family practice programs and 58% of the internal medicine programs. A total of 80% of the family practice programs but only 36% of the internal medicine programs had geriatrics curricula in place. The authors conclude that integration of geriatrics content into residency training is far from universal, largely because of a shortage of faculty and clinical training sites.

Curriculum

Candidates for the Certificate of Added Qualifications in Geriatric Medicine. Who, why, and when?

We surveyed physicians who took the examination for certification for Added Qualifications in Geriatric Medicine, physicians who only inquired about the examination, and physicians who expressed no interest in the examination to learn about practice characteristics of those who took the examination and their reasons for taking it. Based on a 72% response rate, we were able to demonstrate that those who took the examination took care of an older population of patients and disproportionately more of the oldest-old. These physicians were more likely to report the care of older people to be a professional focus and, in internal medicine, were more likely to have had formal training in geriatrics. Their reasons for taking the examination were primarily to obtain credentials but also frequently to improve their ability to care for older people. Nearly two-thirds of those who had inquired about the exam but did not take it in 1988 plan to do so at a later date.

Certification

Participation of volunteer faculty members in education research projects.

Physicians in private practice who are also volunteer clinical faculty members are a recognized resource for teaching and patient care at teaching hospitals. Clinical faculty members have seldom been included in education research despite the frequent complaint from community practitioners that the results from studies at teaching hospitals are not applicable to community practice. The authors report on a study involving volunteer clinical faculty members in a randomized education trial to improve patients' everyday functioning. Seventy-six clinical faculty physicians in office practice of internal medicine participated. At the end of the study the physician participants were asked to complete an evaluation questionnaire concerning the appropriateness of clinical faculty members' participation in such research projects. Ninety-five percent said the experiment was appropriate, and 88 percent would participate again.

Activities of Daily Living

Enrolling community physicians and their patients in a study of prevention in the elderly.

Enrollment of senior citizens in a community Medicare demonstration project to explore the efficacy of preventive health screening and health education was accomplished by using a two-stage process. This process consisted of initial communication with community physicians through the University of California at Los Angeles Clinical Faculty Association to establish credibility for the program. Physicians who agreed to participate then selected potential participants to receive, by mail, a description of the study and an introductory letter from their own physician. Followup and actual enrollment of participants was then handled by the study team. A total of 57.6 percent of the elderly people approached agreed to participate in the study.

Aged