PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S H Sicherer

Publications and source records attributed to S H Sicherer.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The impact of childhood food allergy on quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy affects >6% of children, but the impact of this disease on health-related quality of life has not been well studied. METHODS: Parental perceptions of physical and psychosocial functioning were measured with the Children's Health Questionnaire (CHQ-PF50). This tool and an additional allergy-related questionnaire were sent to 400 members of the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network with children aged 5 to 18, an age group on which the tool has been validated. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 253 parents (63%). The mean age of the food-allergic children was 10.8 years (range, 5 to 18 yrs); 59% were male. Sixty-eight percent were allergic to one or two foods, the remainder to more than two foods. Concomitant chronic atopic diseases included: asthma with atopic dermatitis (33%), atopic dermatitis alone (13%), asthma alone (33%), and 21% had neither asthma nor atopic dermatitis. In comparison to previously established norms, the families scored significantly lower (more than 10 scale score points lower and P < 0.0001) for general health perception (GH), emotional impact on the parent (PE), and limitation on family activities (FA). Associated atopic disease, influenced primarily by those with both asthma and atopic dermatitis, accounted for a significant reduction in the GH scale (analysis of variance, P = 0.0001), but not for measures of PE and FA. Within the study group, food-allergic individuals with several (more than two) food allergies had significantly lower (P < 0.05) scores for 7 of 12 scales compared with individuals with few (one or two) food allergies. However, those with one or two food allergies scored significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than established norms on scales for GH, PE, and FA. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood food allergy has a significant impact on GH, PE, and FA. Factors that influence reductions in these scales include associated atopic disease and the number of foods being avoided.

Adolescent↗

Diagnosis and management of childhood food allergy.

The pediatrician plays a pivotal role in the initial diagnosis of food allergy. Alternative diagnoses are considered as a careful history, physical examination, and directed laboratory tests determine the type of adverse reaction and the responsible food. Through elimination diets in infants, appropriately selected tests for specific IgE, and, in some cases, supervised oral food challenges, a diagnosis is secured. Treatment consists of strict dietary elimination with provisions for emergency management of accidental ingestions. Referral to an allergist and dietitian is made as warranted by the severity and type of allergy and for follow-up for possible resolution of the allergy. The pediatrician also provides information to the family for the prevention of allergy in at-risk newborns. Future diagnostic tests and treatment modalities are likely to simplify the management of the food allergic child.

Child↗

A voluntary registry for peanut and tree nut allergy: characteristics of the first 5149 registrants.

BACKGROUND: A voluntary registry of individuals with peanut and/or tree nut allergy was established in 1997 to learn more about these food allergies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to elucidate a variety of features of peanut and tree nut allergy among the first 5149 registry participants. METHODS: The registry was established through use of a structured questionnaire distributed to all members of the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network and to patients by allergists. Parental surrogates completed the forms for children under the age of 18 years. RESULTS: Registrants were primarily children (89% of registrants were younger than 18 years of age; the median age was 5 years), reflecting the membership of the Network. Isolated peanut allergy was reported by 3482 registrants (68%), isolated tree nut allergy by 464 (9%), and allergy to both foods by 1203 (23%). Registrants were more likely to have been born in October, November, or December (odds ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.18-1.23; P <.0001). The median age of reaction to peanut was 14 months, and the median age of reaction to tree nuts was 36 months; these represented the first known exposure for 74% and 68% of registrants, respectively. One half of the reactions involved more than 1 organ system, and more than 75% required treatment, frequently from medical personnel. Registrants with asthma were more likely than those without asthma to have severe reactions (33% vs 21%; P <.0001). In comparison with initial reactions, subsequent reactions due to accidental ingestion were more severe, more common outside the home, and more likely to be treated with epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: Allergic reactions to peanut and tree nut are frequently severe, often occur on the first known exposure, and can become more severe over time.

Adolescent↗

Clinical implications of cross-reactive food allergens.

As a consequence of the general increase in allergic sensitization, the prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions to multiple foods that share homologous proteins has become a significant clinical problem. A variety of these allergens conserved among plants (eg, profilin and lipid transfer proteins) and animals (eg, tropomyosin and caseins) have been characterized. Although studies with molecular biologic techniques have elucidated the nature of these ubiquitous allergens, clinical studies have lagged behind. The physician is called on to determine the risk of reaction to related foods among legumes, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, cereal grains, mammalian and avian food products, and a variety of other plant-derived foods that may share proteins with pollens, latex, and each other. Clinical evaluations require a careful history, laboratory evaluation, and in some cases oral food challenges. The pitfalls in the evaluation of food allergy-unreliable histories and limitations in laboratory assessment primarily caused by false-positive skin prick test responses/RAST results are magnified when dealing with cross-reactive proteins. This review focuses on the clinical data regarding cross-reacting food allergens with the goal of providing a background for improved risk assessment and a framework on which to approach these difficult clinical questions.

Allergens↗

Peanut and tree nut allergic reactions in restaurants and other food establishments.

BACKGROUND: The clinical features of food-allergic reactions in restaurants and other food establishments have not been studied. Of the registrants in the United States Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy Registry (PAR), 13.7% have reported reactions associated with such establishments. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the features of allergic reactions to peanut and tree nut in restaurant foods and foods purchased at other private establishments (eg, ice cream shops and bakeries). METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted through use of a structured questionnaire. Subjects/parental surrogates were randomly selected from among the 706 PAR registrants who reported a reaction in a restaurant or other food establishment. RESULTS: Details were obtained for 156 episodes (29 first-time reactions) from 129 subjects/parental surrogates. Most reactions were caused by peanut (67%) or tree nut (24%); for some reactions (9%), the cause was a combination of peanut and another nut or was unknown. Symptoms began at a median of 5 minutes after exposure and were severe in 27% of reactions. Overall, 86% of reactions were treated (antihistamines, 86%; epinephrine, 40%). Establishments commonly cited were Asian food restaurants (19%), ice cream shops (14%), and bakeries/doughnut shops (13%). Among meal courses, desserts were a common cause (43%). Of 106 registrants with previously diagnosed allergy who ordered food specifically for ingestion by the allergic individual, only 45% gave prior notification about the allergy to the establishment. For 83 (78%) of these 106 reactions, someone in the establishment knew that the food contained peanut or tree nut as an ingredient; in 50% of these incidents, the food item was "hidden" (in sauces, dressings, egg rolls, etc), visual identification being prevented. In 23 (22%) of the 106 cases, exposures were reported from contamination caused primarily by shared cooking/serving supplies. In the remaining 21 subjects with previously diagnosed allergy, reactions resulted from ingestion of food not intended for them, ingestion of food selected from buffet/food bars, or skin contact/inhalation (residual food on tables, 2; peanut shells covering floors, 2; being within 2 feet of the cooking of the food, 1). CONCLUSIONS: Restaurants and other food establishments pose a number of dangers for peanut- and tree nut-allergic individuals, particularly with respect to cross-contamination and unexpected ingredients in desserts and Asian food. Failure to establish a clear line of communication between patron and establishment is a frequent cause of errors.

Humans↗

The US Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy Registry: characteristics of reactions in schools and day care.

OBJECTIVE: Severe food-allergic reactions occur in schools, but the features have not been described. STUDY DESIGN: Participants in the US Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy Registry (PAR) who indicated that their child experienced an allergic reaction in school or day care were randomly selected for a telephone interview conducted with a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 4586 participants in the PAR, 750 (16%) indicated a reaction in school or day care, and 100 subjects or parental surrogates described 124 reactions to peanut (115) or tree nuts (9); 64% of the reactions occurred in day care or preschool, and the remainder in elementary school or higher grades. Reactions were reported from ingestion (60%), skin contact/possible ingestion (24%), and inhalation/possible skin contact or ingestion (16%). In the majority of reactions caused by inhalation, concomitant ingestion/skin contact could not be ruled out. Various foods caused reactions by ingestion, but peanut butter craft projects were commonly responsible for the skin contact (44%) or inhalation (41%) reactions. For 90% of reactions, medications were given (86% antihistamines, 28% epinephrine). Epinephrine was given in school by teachers in 4 cases, nurses in 7, and parents or others in the remainder. Treatment delays were attributed to delayed recognition of reactions, calling parents, not following emergency plans, and an unsuccessful attempt to administer epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: School personnel must be educated to recognize and treat food-allergic reactions. Awareness must be increased to avoid accidental exposures, including exposure from peanut butter craft projects.

Adolescent↗

Hypoallergenicity and efficacy of an amino acid-based formula in children with cow's milk and multiple food hypersensitivities.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the hypoallergenicity and efficacy of a pediatric amino acid-based formula (AAF), EleCare, for children with cow's milk allergy (CMA) and multiple food allergies (MFA). STUDY DESIGN: Hypoallergenicity was determined by performing blinded oral food challenges in 31 consecutive children with documented CMA. Growth, tolerance, and biochemical response were evaluated during a nonrandomized feeding study with each child serving as his or her own control. RESULTS: Thirty-one children (median age, 23.3 months; range, 6 months to 17.5 years) were recruited; 29 had MFA, 17 had acute reactions and cow's milk-specific IgE antibody, and 14 had allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis. At study entry, 23 were receiving another AAF; 13 had not tolerated extensively hydrolyzed formula. Eighteen subjects with allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis and/or MFA were followed up while receiving AAF for a median of 21 months (range, 7 to 40 months), with biochemical analysis performed at 4 months. No statistically significant differences were observed in the change in weight or height National Center for Health Statistics z scores from entry; the percent of expected growth exceeded 90%. There was a small decline in percent eosinophils and increase in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and serum ferritin level (P < .05). Except for small increases in plasma leucine and valine levels (P < or = .006), the remaining biochemical markers were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The AAF was hypoallergenic and effective in maintaining normal growth for children with CMA and MFA.

Adolescent↗

Dose-response in double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges (DBPCFCs) are considered the "gold standard" for diagnosing food hypersensitivity, but the dose that elicits positive challenges, or determinants that may predict dose-response relationships, have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the quantity of food that elicits reactions during DBPCFCs and to evaluate parameters that may predict the provocative dose and severity of reaction. METHODS: We reviewed challenge data for all positive challenges to 6 common allergenic foods in children with atopic dermatitis evaluated for food allergy over a 13-year period. Challenge food was generally administered in 6 doses at 10- to 15-minute intervals beginning with 400 to 500 mg and completing with a total of 8 to 10 g of food. An open feeding of a larger portion followed negative challenges. At the physician's discretion, a lower starting dose was occasionally used (100 mg, 250 mg). Food-specific IgE antibody concentrations (radioallergosorbent test [RAST]) were determined on stored sera of 20% of the challenges selected randomly and 99.6% had prick skin tests (PSTs) performed to the challenged food. RESULTS: A total of 196 children (45% male; median age 5 y 9 mo; atopic dermatitis 98%, asthma 62%) had 513 positive challenges distributed as follows: egg 267, milk 117, soy 53, wheat 40, peanut 24, fish 12. The percentage of children reacting at the first dose (500 mg or less) was as follows: egg 49%, milk 55%, soy 28%, wheat 25%, peanut 26%, and fish 17%. Twenty-six milk challenges and 22 egg challenges were positive at a first dose of 250 mg; 3 milk challenges and 7 egg challenges were positive at a first dose of 100 mg. Eleven percent of the reactions that occurred on the first dose were severe. The percentage reacting after the final dose of the DBPCFC (or during open challenge) were egg 11%, milk 12%, soy 19%, wheat 12.5%, peanut 8.7%, and fish 25%. There was not a strong correlation between PST absolute wheal size or score (adjusted for histamine controls) and dose at reaction or severity of reaction (R(s) range -0.22 to 0.39 for particular foods). Serum concentration of food-specific IgE did not correlate well with the dose causing a reaction or with severity (R(s) range -0.40 to 0.55 for particular foods). CONCLUSIONS: This food-allergic population may react to as little as 100 mg of food, possibly less, and the dose causing a reaction and the severity of reaction is not predicted by PST or RAST. Lower doses (100 mg or less) should be investigated for their appropriateness in initiating DBPCFCs.

Administration, Oral↗

Quantitative IgE antibody assays in allergic diseases.

During the past several years, immunoassays for specific IgE antibodies have been refined to permit reporting results in mass units. Thus quantitative immunoassays for IgE antibodies may be an adjunct to skin tests. In cases of food allergy among children with atopic dermatitis, cutoff values for IgE antibody concentrations to egg, milk, peanut, and fish have been derived to provide 95% positive and 90% negative predictive values. Food-specific IgE antibody determinations can also be used to predict which food allergies are resolving spontaneously. Elevated egg-specific IgE antibody levels in infancy are associated with significantly increased risk for development of inhalant allergies later in childhood. In cases of inhalant allergy, specific IgE antibody levels correlate closely with results of inhalation challenge studies in cat-sensitive persons. Also, mite-specific IgE antibody levels correlate significantly with the mite allergen contents of reservoir dust in the homes of mite-sensitive persons. Immunoassays for quantitation of specific IgE antibodies may be used to document allergen sensitization over time and to evaluate the risk of reaction on allergen exposure. However, immunoassays and skin tests are not entirely interchangeable, and neither will replace the other in appropriate circumstances.

Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic↗

Genetics of peanut allergy: a twin study.

BACKGROUND: The role of genetics in the etiology of peanut allergy is unknown. For complex genetic traits, twin studies can provide information on the relative contribution of genetic factors to a disease, as the relative confounding effects of environmental factors are markedly decreased. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to search for evidence that genetic factors influence peanut allergy by comparing the concordance rate for this allergy among monozygotic and dizygotic twins. METHODS: Twin pairs with at least one member with peanut allergy were ascertained through the Food Allergy Network by advertisements in the organization's newsletters and Web site. Individuals with peanut allergy or parental surrogates were interviewed by telephone. A full atopic history was obtained, and peanut allergy and zygosity were determined using previously validated questionnaires. Heritability of peanut allergy was determined using univariate genetic model fitting by maximum likelihood with the Mx statistical modeling software package. RESULTS: Seventy-five twin pairs were recruited. Seventeen pairs were excluded because of unconvincing peanut allergy histories (9 pairs, including 4 of uncertain zygosity) or because one twin had reportedly never ingested peanut (8 pairs). The median age of the 58 remaining twin pairs was 5 years (range 1 to 58 years). Seventy individuals had peanut allergy. In addition to convincing histories of peanut allergy, 52 (74%) had been tested (skin prick testing with or without radioallergosorbent assay) and all had positive reactions to peanut. Twenty-nine of the 70 had experienced >1 reaction to peanut; 29 of 70 had multisystem reactions. Among the monozygotic pairs (n = 14), 9 were concordant for peanut allergy (pairwise concordance, 64.3%) and among dizygotic pairs (n = 44), 3 were concordant for peanut allergy (pairwise concordance, 6.8%; chi(2) = 21.38, P <.0001). Heritability of peanut allergy was estimated at 81. 6% (95% confidence interval 41.6% to 99.7%) with model fitting using a population prevalence of peanut allergy of 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly higher concordance rate of peanut allergy among monozygotic twins suggests strongly that there is a significant genetic influence on peanut allergy.

Adolescent↗

Determinants of systemic manifestations of food allergy.

The myriad of systemic manifestations induced by food hypersensitivity responses is testament to the ability of localized exposure to foods in the gastrointestinal tract to result in symptoms in distal target organs. Cow's milk protein, for example, may induce hives (urticaria), atopic dermatitis, isolated gastrointestinal symptoms, or severe generalized anaphylaxis in different individuals or in the same person at different times. These diverse manifestations are the result of complex interactions among the causal food protein, gut, immune system, and target organs. The dynamic state of these interactions is demonstrated by the development of food tolerance in most subjects and by the ability to experience the development of new allergies in some subjects. This review explores the variety of clinical manifestations of food hypersensitivity disorders in the context of the question: What determines the local or systemic expression of food allergy in a given individual at a particular time? Evidence is provided for both systemic and local immune activation. The role of food-protein chemistry, absorption and processing of ingested allergen, immune responses (type, degree, and specificity), and target organ hyperreactivity are considered as determinants in the expression of food allergic disorders.

Animals↗