PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S H Sindrup

Publications and source records attributed to S H Sindrup.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

The effect of tramadol in painful polyneuropathy in relation to serum drug and metabolite levels.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Tramadol is a racemic drug that may act through a monoaminergic effect of (+)- and (-)-tramadol and through an opioid effect of its metabolite (+)-Ml. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between relief of pain and serum concentrations of tramadol and Ml in tramadol treatment of painful polyneuropathy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 200 to 400 mg/day tramadol, serum concentrations of (+)- and (-)-tramadol and (+)- and (-)-Ml were determined in 28 of 34 patients. Ongoing and touch-evoked pain was rated daily by the patients by use of 0- to 10-point numeric rating scales during two 4-week treatment periods. RESULTS: Tramadol significantly reduced both on-going (P = .002) and touch-evoked pain (P < .001). There was no relation between relief of on-going and touch-evoked pain and serum concentrations of (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol, (+)-M1, or (-)-M1 (P = .11 to P = .89). Seventeen of the patients were categorized as responders for on-going pain and 16 for touch-evoked pain. Responders for on-going pain tended to have higher serum concentrations of (+)-Ml than nonresponders (median, 27 nmol/L versus 16 nmol/L; P = .08). Isobolograms showed that the fraction of nonresponders was higher among patients with low concentrations of both tramadol and (+)-Ml both for on-going (P = .009) and touch-evoked (P = .02) pain. CONCLUSION: The opioid effect of (+)-Ml may be of importance for tramadol relief of on-going neuropathic pain but, in general, relief of neuropathic pain seems to depend on both the monoaminergic effect of (+)- and (-)-tramadol and the opioid effect of (+)-Ml.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Codeine in post-operative pain. Study of the influence of sparteine phenotype and serum concentrations of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide.

OBJECTIVE: Within the past decade, human experimental pain studies have supported the 50-year-old hypothesis that codeine is a prodrug, which has to be converted to morphine to exert an analgesic effect. This study aimed at evaluating the impact of sparteine phenotype and serum concentrations of morphine on the efficacy of codeine in post-operative pain. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with a pain rating of 3 or more on a 0-10 numerical rating scale 0.5 h after surgery were included in the study. The patients were given an oral dose of 100 mg codeine and rated pain with the numerical rating scale 0.5 h and 1 h after medication. Blood for determination of serum concentration of codeine and its metabolites was collected 1 h after medication, and a 12-h urine sample after administration of 100 mg sparteine was used to determine the sparteine phenotype. RESULTS: Eight patients were poor metabolizers and 66 were extensive metabolizers of sparteine, while the urine samples for the remaining seven patients were lost. In 22 patients, including the eight poor metabolizers, the serum concentrations of both morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were below the limit of determination of the assay, i.e. 1.5 nmol x l(-1) and 2 nmol x l(-1), respectively. A sum of the concentration of these two substances below 10 nmol x l(-1) was found in an additional eight patients. The sum of differences between pre- and post-operative pain ratings did not differ between the two phenotypes (P = 0.60), whereas the 30 patients with serum concentrations of morphine plus M6G below 10 nmol x l(-1) had a marginally significant lower sum than the 51 patients with higher levels of these substances (median 1.5 vs 2.5, P = 0.058). CONCLUSION: A low serum concentration of morphine and M6G seems to be common in patients treated with codeine for post-operative pain, and low concentrations of these active substances may be related to decreased efficacy of codeine.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Impact of quinidine on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of codeine and morphine after codeine intake.

OBJECTIVE: The analgesic effect of codeine depends on its O-demethylation to morphine via sparteine oxygenase (CYP2D6) in the liver and presumably also via this enzyme in the CNS. We studied the ability of quinidine, which is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, to penetrate the blood brain barrier and its possible impact on codeine O-demethylation in CNS. METHODS: The study comprised 16 extensive and one poor metaboliser of sparteine, who underwent spinal anaesthesia for urinary tract surgery or examination. Eight patients were given an oral dose of 125 mg codeine and 9 patients (including the poor metaboliser) were given 200 mg quinidine 2 h before the same dose of codeine. Plasma and spinal fluid samples were collected 2 h after codeine intake. RESULTS: Free concentrations of quinidine were 11-times lower in cerebrospinal fluid than in plasma, and ranged from 9-15 nmol.l-1. Morphine concentrations were significantly lower in patients pre-treated with quinidine, both in plasma (median 1.45 nmol.l-1, range 0.74-1.95 nmol.l-1 vs 9.86 nmol.l-1, range 4.59-28.4 nmol.l-1) and in cerebrospinal fluid (0.23, 0.16-0.61 nmol.l-1 vs 3.63, 0.6-8.09 nmol.l-1). The morphine/codeine concentration ratio in plasma (3.07 x 10 (-3), 1.68-3.68 x 10 (-3) vs 19.87 x 10 (-3), 9.87-66.22 x 10 (-3) and in cerebrospinal fluid (0.83 d 10 (-3), 0.58-1.45 x 10 (-3) vs 7.19 x 10 (-3), 2.03-17.7 x 10 (-3) was also lower. The morphine/codeine concentration ratios were significantly lower in cerebrospinal fluid both without and with quinidine, but the difference between the plasma and spinal fluid ratio was significantly smaller with quinidine than without (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Quinidine penetrates the blood brain barrier poorly, but quinidine pre-treatment leads to pronounced lowering of the cerebrospinal fluid concentration of morphine after codeine intake. However, the O-demethylation of codeine in CNS may not be totally blocked by quinidine.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Is overuse of sumatriptan a problem? A population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Sumatriptan is highly efficacious in aborting acute attacks of migraine. Owing to recent reports of misuse of sumatriptan, we performed a study of its use in a Danish population. METHODS: Data were retrieved from a prescription database covering a period of 27 months after release of the drug. Consumption was described by the defined daily dose (DDD) unit and total individual consumption during the period was calculated. Those who received more than one prescription for sumatriptan were classified according to peak use of sumatriptan into high (> or = 60 DDD/31 days) (n = 45), intermediate (30-59 DDD/31 days) (n = 127) and low (< 30 DDD/31 days) (n = 1423) consumption groups. Individual usage of other medication was described. RESULTS: We identified 2,878 users of sumatriptan, of whom 1,283 (45%) only redeemed one prescription. The use of sumatriptan was highly skewed. The 1% heaviest users accounted for 20% of the total consumption. The median total individual consumption of sumatriptan was 500 DDD, 192 DDD, and 24 DDD in the three groups of multiple redeemers, respectively. Pronounced differences in the total amounts of opioids and ergot alkaloids used were also found, with the high peak consumption group being the heaviest consumers of all drug categories, although half of them had only received large doses of sumatriptan. Fifty seven % of high peak users redeemed more than 29 DDD of sumatriptan within one month of initiation of treatment. The 45 high peak users had received the bulk of their medication, largely in tablet formulation, from 31 prescribers. The data points to rebound headache as a plausible underlying mechanism, but incorrect use of sumatriptan for migraine prophylaxis is also a possibility. Overuse of sumatriptan has serious economic consequences and its long-term health effects are not known.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Codeine and morphine in extensive and poor metabolizers of sparteine: pharmacokinetics, analgesic effect and side effects.

OBJECTIVE: Codeine O-demethylation to morphine is catalysed by the genetic polymorphic sparteine oxygenase (CYP2D6). The objective of the present study was to assess the analgesic effect of codeine on different types of experimental pain in relation to sparteine phenotype. METHODS: Fourteen extensive (EMs) and 14 poor metabolizers (PMs) of sparteine completed a randomized, double-blind, three-way, cross-over study with a single oral dose of codeine (75 or 100 mg) against morphine (20 or 30 mg) and placebo. Pain tests performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after medication included the cold pressor test and pain thresholds for heat and pressure stimulation. Adverse effects were rated by a structured interview. RESULTS: After morphine, morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide were present in equal amounts in plasma of PMs and EMs. After codeine, neither morphine nor morphine-6-glucuronide could be detected in 13 of the 14 PMs, whereas at least one of the compounds could be detected in all EMs. Peak pain and discomfort rated on a VAS scale during the cold pressor test were significantly reduced by morphine in both EMs and PMs, with a median peak change of 8.5 and 7.0 mm, respectively, for peak pain, and 11.5 and 15.5 mm, respectively, for discomfort. Codeine only reduced these pain measures significantly in EMs, with a median peak change of 5.5 mm for peak pain and 10.5 mm for discomfort. Pain detection and tolerance thresholds to heat and pressure were not consistently altered by either morphine or codeine. In PMs, adverse effects were significantly more pronounced on morphine than on codeine and only showed a slight difference between codeine and placebo. In EMs, there was no difference between codeine and morphine and more pronounced adverse effects on both drugs as compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that codeine O-demethylation depends on CYP2D6; it shows that the 6-glucuronidation of morphine is independent of CYP2D6; it supports the theory that the analgesic effect of codeine depends on its O-demethylation; and it indicates that this is probably also the case for the adverse effects. The results lend no support to the suggestion of a non-opioid analgesic effect of codeine.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The hypoalgesic effect of tramadol in relation to CYP2D6.

Tramadol inhibits norepinephrine reuptake, stimulates serotonin release, and acts with mu-opioid receptors by way of its metabolite (+)-M1. Formation of M1 seems to depend on the genetic polymorphic CYP2D6. The analgesic effect of 2 mg/kg tramadol was evaluated in 15 extensive and 12 poor metabolizers of sparteine in two parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover studies that used experimental pain models. In extensive metabolizers, tramadol increased pressure pain detection (p = 0.03) and tolerance (p = 0.06) thresholds, as well as thresholds for eliciting nociceptive reflexes, after single (p = 0.0002) and repeated (p = 0.06) stimulation of the sural nerve. Peak pain and pain area in the cold pressor test were reduced (p = 0.0006 and 0.0009). In poor metabolizers, only thresholds to pressure pain tolerance (p = 0.02) and nociceptive reflexes after single stimulation (p = 0.04) were increased and the reflex threshold was less increased in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers (p = 0.02). The serum concentration of (+)-M1 2 to 10 hours after tramadol ranged from 10 to 100 ng/L in extensive metabolizers, whereas in poor metabolizers serum concentrations of (+)-M1 were below or around the detection limit of 3 ng/ml. It is concluded that formation of (+)-M1 by way of CYP2D6 is important for the effect of tramadol on experimental pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The hypoalgesic effect of imipramine in different human experimental pain models.

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study, the hypoalgesic effect of a single oral dose of 100 mg imipramine was investigated in 12 healthy volunteers. Test procedures performed before, 3, 6, and 9 h after medication included determination of (1) pain detection and tolerance thresholds to heat and pressure; (2) the thresholds of quadriceps femoris muscle withdrawal reflex to single and repeated electric stimulation of the sural nerve; (3) amplitude of the reflex evoked by 1.5 times the premedication reflex threshold; and (4) continuous pain rating during the cold pressor test. Imipramine significantly increased pain tolerance thresholds to heat (P = 0.03) and pressure (P = 0.01), and both the psychophysical pain tolerance threshold and the reflex threshold to single electric stimulation (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). On the repeated stimuli, which consisted of 4 pulses given at 3 Hz, imipramine induced a significant increase in the threshold at which the pain summated through the stimulation series (P = 0.03), whereas the increase in the threshold at which the reflex summated was not significant (P = 0.09). Pain detection thresholds to heat and pressure, the amplitude of the reflex to single suprathreshold stimulation, and pain ratings during the cold pressor test were unaltered by imipramine. It is concluded that imipramine has a differential hypoalgesic effect on different human experimental pain tests. This provides new possibilities of assessing the differential effect of different tricyclic antidepressants on different pain modalities and intensities.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

The pharmacogenetics of codeine hypoalgesia.

Codeine is an old drug that is still widely used to treat mild and moderate pain. It is mainly metabolised by glucuronidation, but minor pathways are N-demethylation to norcodeine and O-demethylation to morphine. The latter pathway depends on the genetically polymorphic CYP2D6 which is absent in 7% of the white population (PM) and present in the remainder (EM). Lack of influence of codeine on experimental pain in PM as well as in EM treated with the CYP2D6 blocker quinidine, who are both practically unable to convert codeine to morphine, has supported an old hypothesis that codeine acts through metabolically formed morphine. Possibly, local codeine O-demethylation in the CNS is of major importance for its hypoalgesic effect. Such a local morphine formation from codeine, which supposedly is also catalysed by CYP2D6, could explain why the hypoalgesic effect of codeine stems from morphine despite relatively low plasma levels of morphine after standard hypoalgesic doses of codeine. Dependence of codeine hypoalgesia on morphine formation via CYP2D6 makes this effect liable to interaction with drugs that are inhibitors of CYP2D6. Examples of potent inhibitors of CYP2D6 are quinidine, some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and some neuroleptics. Less potent inhibitors, such as tricyclic antidepressants, will probably also reduce the pain relieving effect of codeine, since codeine has a low affinity for CYP2D6. Biosynthesis of morphine in humans may also include steps catalyse by CYP2D6. Experimental studies in large groups of EM and PM indicate that this may lead to interphenotype differences in pain tolerance.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1994

Inter-observer variation in the evaluation of neurological signs: patient-related factors.

The influence of patient-related factors on inter-observer variability in the evaluation of neurological signs was investigated. Two hundred and two consecutive unselected inpatients were examined by two senior neurologists who were unaware of the neurological case history. Eight signs were evaluated: anisocoria, jerky eye movements, facial palsy, difference in elbow extension force, abnormal finger-nose test, Barré sign, difference in knee jerk, and extensor plantar reflex. Agreement rates were calculated in order to compare the inter-observer variability with reference to the patients' sex, age, mode of admission, and diagnosis at discharge. Observed agreement rates for the eight examined signs only sporadically showed statistically significant differences between the chosen patient-related factors. In general, inter-observer variation does not appear to be influenced by the sex, age, mode of admission or diagnosis at discharge of the patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Interobserver variation in the evaluation of neurological signs: observer dependent factors.

Interobserver variation among four observers in evaluation of eight selected neurological signs was investigated. MATERIAL & METHODS--Two hundred and two consecutive unselected inpatients were examined by two senior neurologists and two trainees, all without knowledge of the neurological case history. The signs examined were: anisocoria, jerky eye movements, facial palsy, elbow extension force, finger-nose test, Barré sign, knee jerk, and extensor plantar reflex. Observed agreement rates and kappa coefficients were calculated in order to compare the interobserver variability among neurologists and trainees, and to evaluate differences in the interobserver variability between signs. RESULTS--Observed agreement rates varied from 0.80 to 0.95 for neurologists and from 0.65 to 0.98 for trainees. For neurologists kappa coefficients ranged from 0.40 to 0.67 and for trainees from 0.22 to 0.81. The neurologists had higher kappa values than the trainees in 5 signs, but this difference was only statistically significant for jerky eye movements. For the individual signs the observed agreement rates were between 0.50 and 0.93 for all four examiners combined, and overall kappa values varied from 0.32 to 0.71 with highest agreement for facial palsy and lowest for knee jerk. CONCLUSION--The magnitude of the interobserver and intersign variation indicates that the interpretation of the neurological signs tested, without knowledge of the case history, should be done with some caution.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Inhibition by paroxetine of desipramine metabolism in extensive but not in poor metabolizers of sparteine.

Nine extensive metabolizers (EMs) and eight poor metabolizers (PMs) of sparteine took a single oral dose of 100 mg of desipramine HCI before and while taking paroxetine 20 mg per day. Before paroxetine, the median of the total desipramine clearance was 7 times higher in EMs than in PMs (102 and 15 l.h-1 respectively). This confirms that desipramine is extensively metabolized via the sparteine/debrisoquine oxidation polymorphism i.e. by CYP2D6. During paroxetine, the median clearances were 22 l.h-1 and 18 l.h-1 in EMs and PMs respectively. The 5-fold decrease in clearance in EMs when desipramine was co-administered with paroxetine confirms that paroxetine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6. The lack of effect on clearance in PMs shows that paroxetine is a selective inhibitor of CYP2D6, which is absent from the livers of PMs. Before paroxetine, the median of desipramine clearance via 2-hydroxylation was 40-times higher in EMs than in PMs (56 and 1.4 l.h-1 respectively), but during paroxetine, it was only 2-times higher (6 and 2.9 l.h-1 respectively). The increase in this clearance in PMs suggests that paroxetine is an inducer of the alternative, unidentified P450(s) which catalyze(s) the formation of 2-OH-desipramine in this phenotype. Before paroxetine, the median amounts of 2-OH-desipramine glucuronide recovered in urine were 69% and 68% of the total recovery of 2-OH-desipramine in urine in EMs and PMs respectively. During paroxetine, the corresponding values were 77% and 84%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

Pharmacokinetics of citalopram in relation to the sparteine and the mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms.

The relationship between the metabolism of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram and the sparteine and mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms was studied in 24 healthy male volunteers, constituting panels of extensive metabolizers of sparteine and mephenytoin (n = 10), poor metabolizers of sparteine (n = 8), and poor metabolizers of mephenytoin (n = 6). Each subject was given 40 mg/day citalopram for 10 days and citalopram, and its des- and didesmethylmetabolites were assayed in serum and urine. Using a nonenantioselective analytical method (high-performance liquid chromatography), it was shown that the citalopram elimination partially depends on the mephenytoin oxygenase, since steady-state serum concentration, half-life, and area under the serum concentration/time curve for citalopram were significantly higher in poor metabolizers of mephenytoin than in extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin. Both citalopram total clearance and demethylation clearance (formation of desmethylcitalopram) were significantly lower in poor metabolizers of mephenytoin compared to extensive metabolizers (median 15.2 vs. 27.3 and 2.6 vs. 5.9 L/h, respectively). It was further indicated that the demethylation of desmethylcitalopram to didesmethylcitalopram depends on the sparteine oxygenase CYP2D6. Didesmethylcitalopram could virtually not be detected in any poor metabolizers of sparteine, contrasting measurable serum levels in all sparteine/mephenytoin extensive metabolizers. The demethylation clearance of desmethylcitalopram was significantly lower in sparteine poor metabolizers compared to extensive metabolizers (0.3 vs. 2.4 L/h, respectively). During administration of citalopram, there was a modest increase in sparteine metabolic ratio from median 0.31 to 0.80 in extensive metabolizers of sparteine, whereas the mephenytoin S/R ratio was unaltered during citalopram treatment. Both the sparteine and the mephenytoin oxidation polymorphism thus appear to contribute partially to the total pharmacokinetic variability of citalopram.

Citalopram↗
PubMed1993

Citalopram: interaction studies with levomepromazine, imipramine, and lithium.

The pharmacokinetic interactions between the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram, given as an oral dose of 40 mg/day for 10 days, and (1) levomepromazine (50 mg single oral dose), (2) imipramine (100 mg single oral dose), and (3) lithium (30 mmol/day orally for 5 days) were examined in three panels each of 8 healthy young male volunteers (age 20-31). All volunteers were classified as extensive metabolizers of sparteine and mephenytoin. Each subject completed three study phases--one with citalopram alone, one with one of the three other drugs, alone, and one with citalopram combined with the corresponding other drug. For citalopram and its metabolites, a non-enantioselective analytical method (high-performance liquid chromatography) was used. Only two statistically significant interactions were indicated. First, levomepromazine caused a 10-20% increase from the initial steady-state levels of the primary citalopram metabolite, desmethylcitalopram. Second, citalopram caused approximately 50% increase in the single-dose area under the serum concentration/time curve of desipramine (primary metabolite or imipramine) and a corresponding reduction in the level of the subsequently formed metabolite 2-hydroxydesipramine. These findings are in agreement with the recent observations that (1) the demethylation of desmethylcitalopram (to didesmethylcytalopram) is partly mediated via the sparteine/debrisoquine oxygenase (CYP2D6) and that levomepromazine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, and (2) that desmethylcitalopram has a somewhat stronger affinity for CYP2D6 than desipramine, and therefore may inhibit the hydroxylation of desipramine, which is also a substrate of CYP2D6.

Adult↗