PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S H Taylor

Publications and source records attributed to S H Taylor.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Drug therapy and quality of life in angina pectoris.

Quality of life is impaired in patients with angina pectoris because of their symptoms, impaired activity, and anxiety. These various factors reduce enjoyment of life, but their components and interrelationships are difficult to measure in the individual. There is no consensus on the best methods of measurement of quality of life; many general instruments have been proposed but none that specifically concern angina pectoris. Despite the absence of such quantitative information, there is no doubt that antianginal drugs benefit the majority of patients and, despite their side effects, advantageously change the relationship between the factors that add up to "quality of life." How the relief of symptoms, both organic and psychologic, interact and how far they are offset by the negative aspects of treatment in the patient with angina pectoris remain to be defined. Past and present trials give encouragement that instruments will be developed that are relevant, valid, reproducible, and sufficiently sensitive to convincingly measure the different impacts on quality of life of the patient with angina pectoris.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1987

Haemodynamic dose-response actions of cicloprolol in left ventricular dysfunction due to ischaemic heart disease.

Cicloprolol is a cardioselective beta-1 partial agonist; its haemodynamic and radionuclide (nuclear stethoscope) effects were determined in 22 patients with impaired left ventricular function due to coronary artery disease. Following a 20 min stable control period, the effects of four doses of cicloprolol (0.025, 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg at 10 min intervals) were measured at rest 5-10 min after each intravenous injection. The effects of the cumulative 0.2 mg/kg dosage were assessed during supine bicycle exercise and compared with a control exercise period. At rest there were significant increases in systolic arterial without change in mean blood pressure. The heart rate and cardiac index were unchanged. There was a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction with a reduction in filling pressure and volume. Patients with resting heart rate below 75 beats/min and with ejection fraction greater than 35% showed the greatest improvement. During supine bicycle exercise, ejection fraction was increased compared to control (31 +/- 2 to 36 +/- 2; P less than 0.01), cardiac volume reduced and exercise tachycardia attenuated. These data suggest that cicloprolol may be of value where beta-blockade is considered in the presence of underlying left ventricular dysfunction due to ischaemic heart disease.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1987

Comparative hemodynamic dose-response effects of five slow calcium channel-blocking agents in coronary artery disease.

A prospective, randomized study compared the hemodynamic effects of equivalent doses of five slow calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, nicardipine, nisoldipine, and amlodipine) in 50 patients with ischemia. After a stable control period, dose-response curves were constructed for each drug with hemodynamics measured 10 minutes after intravenous boluses. Each drug reduced mean systemic arterial pressure (P less than 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance index (P less than 0.01). The heart rate increased after nicardipine, nisoldipine, and amlodipine (P less than 0.01) but was unchanged after verapamil and reduced after diltiazem (P less than 0.01). The left ventricular filling pressure increased after amlodipine (P less than 0.05) and verapamil (P less than 0.01) but was unchanged with the other compounds. Cardiac index increased substantially after the dihydropyridines (P less than 0.01), with little change after verapamil or diltiazem. Cardiac double product fell only after verapamil and diltiazem. These studies provide quantitation of the comparative actions of acute intravenous calcium channel blockade in coronary disease.

Amlodipine↗
PubMed1987

Nifedipine following acute myocardial infarction--dependence of response on baseline haemodynamic status.

The haemodynamic effects of nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) were studied in 40 patients with acute myocardial infarction within 18 h of the onset of symptoms. To determine the influence of preload and afterload on the haemodynamic response to nifedipine, patients were prospectively stratified equally into four groups of 10 patients based on systemic blood pressure level (less than or greater than 160/100 mm Hg) and level of left ventricular filling pressure [pulmonary artery-occluded pressure (PAOP) less than or greater than 18 mm Hg]. In all groups, nifedipine reduced systemic arterial pressure (p less than 0.01) and vascular resistance index (p less than 0.01); heart rate (p less than 0.01) and cardiac index (p less than 0.01) were increased. PAOP was reduced by nifedipine only in those hypertensive patients in whom it was initially raised; in these patients cardiac stroke volume index also increased (p less than 0.01). In hypertensive patients with normal PAOP the cardiac stroke work index was reduced. In patients with normal systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, nifedipine had no beneficial effects on cardiac function. These data suggested that haemodynamic criteria may allow selection of patients for nifedipine therapy following myocardial infarction; clear advantages were evident only in hypertensive patients in both the presence and the absence of left ventricular failure.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

First-line treatment of left ventricular failure complicating acute myocardial infarction: a randomised evaluation of immediate effects of diuretic, venodilator, arteriodilator, and positive inotropic drugs on left ventricular function.

A prospective randomised trial compared the immediate haemodynamic effects of intravenous diuretic (frusemide), venodilator (isosorbide dinitrate), arteriolar dilator (hydralazine), and positive inotropic stimulation (prenalterol) as first-line therapy for acute left ventricular (LV) failure following myocardial infarction. Forty-eight patients with transmural myocardial infarction and a pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) of greater than 20 mm Hg were studied within 18 h of admission to a coronary care unit. Both frusemide (-4 mm Hg; p less than 0.01) and isosorbide dinitrate (-6 mm Hg; p less than 0.01) reduced LV filling pressure without change in cardiac index and heart rate. Although both hydralazine and prenalterol increased cardiac index (p less than 0.01), the reduction in LV filling pressure (-2 mm Hg; p less than 0.05) was less than with frusemide and isosorbide dinitrate, and was associated with an increased heart rate (+8 and +13 beats min-1; p less than 0.01). These data suggest that in acute heart failure following myocardial infarction the four treatment modalities could be ranked in descending order of potential benefit as follows: venodilatation (isosorbide dinitrate)--decrease of LV pressure/work; diuretic therapy (frusemide)--decrease of LV pressure/work offset by a transient pressor effect; arteriolar dilatation (hydralazine)--decrease of LV pressure/work and of PAOP, but offset by tachycardia; and positive inotropic therapy (beta 1-agonist prenalterol)--tachycardia and augmented LV afterload. Combination of the former and latter agents, because of their differing modes of action, should offer haemodynamic advantages over monotherapy and deserves further evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

A haemodynamic and radionuclide assessment of diltiazem in coronary heart disease.

To obtain multiple dose-response haemodynamic and radionuclide data on i.v. diltiazem, 12 ischaemic patients were studied during routine catheterization. At rest, following a 20 min stable control period, the effects of four doses (0.0625, 0.0625, 0.125 and 0.25 mg kg-1 diltiazem at 5 min intervals) were measured in the 3-5 min following i.v. injection. The exercise effects of the cumulative 0.5 mg kg-1 dosage were assessed by comparing a control and post drug period of supine bicycle exercise. The increase in plasma diltiazem levels correlated linearly with the administered dose and achieved therapeutic levels. There were significant dose-related reductions in systemic arterial blood pressure and vascular resistance index; the heart rate fell and cardiac stroke index increased. The calculated double-product (heart rate X systolic blood pressure) was significantly reduced. The left ventricular filling pressures, ejection fraction and cardiac volumes were unaltered. During supine bicycle exercise, the systemic diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and calculated double-product were reduced without change in other parameters. Over the dose range 0.0625-0.5 mg kg-1, diltiazem acutely increased cardiac stroke index and reduced resting heart rate. These haemodynamic data, taken together with its described coronary vasodilator activity suggest that its role in acute vasospastic angina and during angiographic procedures ought to be explored further.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

Immediate effects of bumetanide on systemic haemodynamics and left ventricular volume in acute and chronic heart failure.

1 The haemodynamic and radionuclide effects of i.v. bumetanide (25 micrograms kg-1) were prospectively studied in 24 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and either acute exercise-induced (Group I, n = 12) or chronic (Group II, n = 12) heart failure. 2 Bumetanide at rest increased systemic arterial blood pressure and vascular resistance index; cardiac index and pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) were reduced at an unchanged heart rate in all patients. The left ventricular ejection fraction fell in patients with normal resting left ventricular filling pressure without change in those with chronic heart failure. The cardiac volumes were unchanged in either group. 3 During constant-load supine bicycle exercise, there were similar effects on systemic arterial pressures, vascular resistance index and PAOP; however the cardiac index was maintained at a reduced left ventricular filling pressure and unchanged ejection fraction and volumes. 4 These data demonstrate immediate mild pressor and vasoconstrictor actions of bumetanide which appear independent of the state of cardiac function; they suggest that any immediate improvement in patient symptomatology following bumetanide may be consequent on the reduction in PAOP; short-term reductions in volume may not occur.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1987

Comparative haemodynamic dose-response effects of dobutamine and amrinone in left ventricular failure complicating acute myocardial infarction.

The comparative haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous (i.v.) amrinone and dobutamine were evaluated in 20 male patients with haemodynamic (pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP) greater than 20 mm Hg) and radiographic left heart failure following a recent myocardial infarction. Following a 1-h control period, 10 patients were each randomised to amrinone (800, 1,600, or 3,200 micrograms/kg/h) or dobutamine (200, 400, or 800 micrograms/kg/h) sequentially infused for 30 min at each dose level; haemodynamic parameters were recorded at the end of each infusion period. Amrinone reduced systemic arterial blood pressure and vascular resistance index with a moderately increased heart rate; PAOP (-10 mm Hg; p less than 0.01) fell substantially without change in cardiac or stroke work indices. Dobutamine increased systemic arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and stroke work index at an unchanged PAOP; cardiac index (+0.7 L/min/m2; 25%; p less than 0.01) increased. Systemic vascular resistance index was significantly reduced by both drugs. Thus, dobutamine increased cardiac index at an unchanged PAOP; myocardial stroke work increased. Amrinone had lesser effect on cardiac pumping but reduced PAOP (preload) at an unchanged stroke work. The implications of these differential actions for the clinical therapy of myocardial infarction deserves further evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Influence of drug therapy on myocardial hypertrophy in left ventricular failure.

The terminal phases of volume-overload heart failure are characterised by eccentric ventricular hypertrophy. Relatively little attention has been directed to exploring the mechanisms involved in this development. The increase in diastolic wall stress leads to replication of the sarcomeres in series. The hypertrophied myocytes has a defective contractile ability that is due to an intrinsic depression of contractility; this is restored when failure is reversed. The development of appropriate hypertrophy is dependent upon adequacy of the coronary blood supply to the failing myocytes. Reduction of preload and afterload can be expected to be more effective in reducing systolic wall stress, and hence myocardial oxygen demands, in eccentric hypertrophy than in the nonfailing heart with concentric hypertrophy. However, there is no information available on the influence of anti-heart-failure drugs on the myocardial hypertrophy associated with severe volume-overload failure. The presence of such hypertrophy carries an ominous prognosis and may be associated with the high incidence of arrhythmic sudden deaths. The detection of myocardial hypertrophy in the patient with failure emphasises the urgency of adequate reduction of the elevated preload and afterload without impairment of the coronary perfusion gradient.

Cardiomegaly↗
PubMed1986

Pharmacokinetic, haemodynamic and radionuclide studies with nicardipine in coronary artery disease.

Pharmacokinetic, haemodynamic and radionuclide studies explored the acute pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic actions of nicardipine in patients with coronary heart disease. Nicardipine infusion resulted in dose-related reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and an increased heart rate. Pharmacodynamic activity was evident between 12 and 24 min following 5 and 10 mg i.v. nicardipine but by 3-6 min following the higher doses of 15 and 20 mg; hypotensive activity persisted for up to 2 h. Post-infusion nicardipine concentrations declined biexponentially; however the limited data precluded formal compartmental analysis. Plasma clearance ranged from 5-12 ml/min/kg, and appeared lower than previously reported volunteer data. The haemodynamic actions of nicardipine (10 mg infusion over 10 min) in 6 patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization were reductions in systolic, diastolic and mean systemic arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance index. Heart rate and stroke volume index increased, and there was a small but statistically significant increase in pulmonary artery occluded pressure. Radionuclide parameters were measured in 20 patients with stable angina, at rest and during supine bicycle exercise, before and 3-5 min after nicardipine 10 mg intravenously. The left ventricular ejection fraction increased by 4% at rest but not during exercise. The left ventricular rest and exercise ejection and filling rates both increased with a concurrently reduced left ventricular ejection time. There was a highly significant inverse relationship between baseline exercise ejection fraction and the response to nicardipine; ejection fraction increased with low initial values but was either unchanged or fell with higher initial values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Differences in haemodynamic response to beta-blocking drugs between stable coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction.

Theoretically the increased sympathoadrenal activity following acute myocardial infarction might augment the haemodynamic impact of beta-adrenoceptor blockade. To evaluate this question 32 haemodynamic studies were performed to compare the effects of equivalent beta-blocking doses of propranolol (8 mg i.v.) and pindolol (0.8 mg i.v.) in patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction (A.M.I.) or stable coronary artery disease (and a presumptive low sympathetic state). In stable coronary artery disease there were clear differences between the haemodynamic impact of propranolol and pindolol. Propranolol decreased both heart rate (delta HR -7 beat/min) and cardiac index (delta CI -0.4 l/min/m2), with an increased pulmonary artery occluded pressure (delta PAOP +4 mmHg) and systemic vascular resistance index (delta SVRI +358 dyn X s X cm-5 m2). However an equivalent beta-blocking dose of pindolol increased PAOP (delta PAOP +3 mmHg) leaving other variables unchanged. These differential actions of propranolol and pindolol have previously been ascribed to the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (I.S.A.) of pindolol maintaining cardiac pumping function in a low sympathetic state. In contrast following myocardial infarction, both drugs reduced cardiac index to a significantly greater extent compared with stable coronary artery disease (delta CI propranolol -0.81/min/m2; pindolol -0.4 l/min/m2; p less than 0.05); propranolol also reduced the systemic arterial blood pressure (delta systolic -10 mmHg; delta mean -5 mmHg; p less than 0.05). The haemodynamic relevance of the I.S.A. of pindolol appeared attenuated following A.M.I. These data are compatible with experimental evidence of sympathetic nervous activation following coronary occlusion; the resulting hyperadrenergic state appears to condition an augmented haemodynamic response to beta-blocking drugs irrespective of their ancillary pharmacological properties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1986

The role of transdermal nitroglycerin in the treatment of coronary heart disease.

Nitroglycerin has long been a mainstay of the treatment of ischemic cardiac pain. The introduction of transdermal formulations and in particular the development of controlled methods of delivery have been responsible for the renaissance of clinical interest in this simple and effective treatment. The pathophysiologic abnormality accompanying myocardial ischemia affords a natural theater for the exhibition of the therapeutic utility of these preparations and methods. The means whereby nitrates induce relaxation of vascular smooth muscle are not entirely clear, but their pharmacodynamic activities are perfectly plain. In the doses used in clinical practice, nitrates exert their predominant hemodynamic effects and therapeutic benefits through their peripheral vasodilator activities. This is particularly marked in veins, although in higher doses nitrates also dilate the larger systemic and coronary arteries. Criticisms of the efficacy of transdermal formulations of nitrates in the treatment of angina pectoris have arisen largely from uncritical acceptance of a small number of studies of questionable methodologic validity. Large-scale general practice studies have invariably found that transdermal nitrate delivery systems improve the quality of life in ambulant patients: anginal attacks are reduced with a minimum of side effects. The widespread acceptance of this novel form of drug delivery has stimulated its application in other therapeutic avenues. The efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin in the suppression of silent ischemic attacks has been demonstrated. The maintenance of benefit initiated by intravenous nitroglycerin in patients with unstable angina also broadens the use of this method of nitrate delivery. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, whether complicated by left ventricular failure or not, the nitrates, and transdermal nitroglycerin in particular, appear to hold considerable promise. Improvement of hemodynamic abnormalities may cause reduction in infarct size and fewer life-threatening arrhythmias. Even survival may be extended. The utility of transdermal nitrates in the treatment of severe chronic heart failure is less certain. But the use of higher doses and an interval regimen of administration may hold promise for such patients. Naturally, more information is required before the overall therapeutic profile of this new method of controlled nitroglycerin delivery across the whole spectrum of coronary heart disease can be fully described. Fortunately, the high level of efficacy and safety of transdermal nitroglycerin demonstrated in the majority of reported studies encourages the pursuit of such an important therapeutic target.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1986

A haemodynamic study of the effects of combined slow-calcium channel blockade (nisoldipine) and beta-blockade (metoprolol) in coronary heart disease.

The interaction of a new slow-calcium blocker (nisoldipine) and the beta-blocker metoprolol was evaluated in 16 patients with stable angina. Haemodynamic parameters were determined in a control rest and exercise period. Patients were then randomised equally to nisoldipine (4-8 micrograms/kg) or metoprolol (10 mg) and the haemodynamics of monotherapy assessed; finally the second drug was administered and the effects of combination determined. At rest nisoldipine reduced systemic blood pressure and vascular resistance (P less than 0.01); heart rate, cardiac and stroke volume indices increased (P less than 0.01) at an unchanged pulmonary artery occluded pressure. Metoprolol alone reduced heart rate (P less than 0.05) and increased the pulmonary artery occluded pressure (P less than 0.05). Combination therapy reduced systemic blood pressure and vascular resistance (P less than 0.01); cardiac index and pulmonary artery occluded pressure increased (P less than 0.01) at an unchanged heart rate. The effect of combination was influenced by the order of administration; an improvement in cardiac performance was particularly evident when nisoldipine was added to metoprolol. The interaction during dynamic exercise was similar to that at rest. Thus these data indicated the haemodynamic safety of concurrent nisoldipine/metoprolol therapy; the addition of nisoldipine to metoprolol appeared to offset in part the cardiodepressant properties of beta-blockade.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Comparative effects of metoprolol and celiprolol on cardiac hemodynamics and left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise-induced angina.

Celiprolol is a cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with attributed cardiostimulant properties. Its hemodynamic profile was compared in a dose-response study with that of metoprolol, which is also cardioselective but lacks cardiostimulatory activity. In 24 patients with angiographically proved coronary artery disease, simultaneous hemodynamic and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) values were determined at rest in the control (drug-free) state and repeated 3 to 5 minutes after each of four intravenous boluses of celiprolol, 1, 1, 2, and 4 mg, or equivalent beta-blocking doses of metoprolol, 1.25, 1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mg. The effects of each drug on hemodynamics during exercise-induced angina were determined by exercise testing in the control state and after the maximum cumulative dose of each drug. At rest, metoprolol reduced heart rate, cardiac index, and the left ventricular EF and increased pulmonary artery occluded pressure (PAOP), systemic vascular resistance, and left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes. Celiprolol increased cardiac and stroke volume indices and the EF; the PAOP was reduced without change in other measured variables. During exercise, metoprolol significantly increased the PAOP, which was unchanged by celiprolol. At exercise both drugs reduced cardiac index and heart rate, but neither altered the EF. The cardiac function curve demonstrated greater depression at rest after metoprolol than after celiprolol; these differences were attenuated during dynamic exercise. The lesser adverse impact of celiprolol on cardiac function may be attributable to ancillary cardiac stimulatory properties offsetting the cardiac depression after beta-adrenoceptor blockade.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1986

Late intervention studies with beta-blocking drugs in myocardial infarction: a critical appraisal.

Immense therapeutic effort has been devoted to testing the secondary preventative value of beta-blocking drugs in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. The failure to demonstrate a universally statistically significant benefit is ascribable to major inadequacies of design and technical errors in the majority of trials. Moreover, even in the very few trials in which survival benefit has been demonstrated, the ultra-selection of patients eventually included severely limits the general clinical application of their result. The specific subgroups of patients who derive most benefit and as importantly those that are disadvantaged by these drugs are ill-defined. Lack of comparative trials and absence of dose-response information also pose insuperable problems in attempting secondary prevention with beta-blocking drugs in practice. When to start these drugs to achieve maximum benefit and when to stop them to avoid long-term adverse reactions are major outstanding problems. The consequences of missed therapy are also unknown. Lack of a clinically discernible endpoint of success in the individual patient means that the physician's role is relegated to one of faith. Data so for available is insufficient to afford a rational change in therapeutic practice. However, these extensive studies have advanced understanding. They have clearly defined the design faults which must be avoided in future trials. They have made us aware that many post-infarct patients may not need beta-blocking drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1986

Haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous indoramin in acute heart failure complicating myocardial infarction.

The haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous indoramin were evaluated in 12 patients with acute heart failure (pulmonary artery occluded pressure of greater than 20 mm Hg) complicating a recent myocardial infarction. Following a 1-h control period with confirmed stable haemodynamics, the effects of three intravenous bolus doses of indoramin (0.125, 0.125, and 0.25 mg/kg at 15-min intervals) were determined in the 10- to 15-min period following each intravenous injection. Plasma drug concentrations rose with the administered dose and were in the previously established therapeutic range. Ten patients tolerated all three doses of the drug; two patients were withdrawn following the second dose owing to clinically evident hypotension (systolic blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg). Indoramin resulted in progressive falls in systolic, diastolic, and mean systemic arterial pressures (p less than 0.01) without change in cardiac index. There was a dose-related reduction in the heart rate (0.5 mg/kg; -7 beats/min; p less than 0.01). The left ventricular filling pressure showed a significant and quadratic reduction over the dose range (0.5 mg/kg, -5 mm Hg; p less than 0.01). The systemic vascular resistance index was reduced (-333 dynes X s X cm-5 X m2; p less than 0.001) and the stroke volume index increased (+3 ml/m2; p less than 0.05) following the maximum cumulative dosage. These data established the therapeutic safety of indoramin (0.125-0.5 mg/kg) in acute heart failure following myocardial infarction. An improvement in cardiac performance in these patients was compatible with circulatory actions on both cardiac preload and afterload.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1986

Beta-blocking drugs and myocardial function.

Beta-adrenoceptor antagonists do not directly depress myocardial contractile function. The primary pharmacological target of these drugs is to attenuate the increase in myocardial oxygen consumption resulting from sympathoadrenal stimulation of the heart. Pure beta blockade achieves this by modulating the increases in heart rate and myocardial contractility. This brings in its train the unwanted secondary and tertiary consequences of ventricular dilatation, impaired cardiac output response to exercise, and reflex increases in systemic vascular resistance and left ventricular afterload. Together these physiological effects offset much of the primary therapeutic benefit of these drugs. The ancillary pharmacological properties possessed by newer generations of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists have reduced some of the undesirable hemodynamic consequences of pure beta blockade. In this respect, positive inotropic activity and vasodilator effects, however achieved, are desirable properties in a drug with beta-blocking activity. Such additional pharmacodynamic activities afford direct support of cardiac contractile activity and reduce the undesirable increase in peripheral vasoconstriction that results from beta blockade alone. Celiprolol is a new dimension in beta-blocking therapy in that it achieves these additional hemodynamic benefits by widespread modulation of sympathoadrenal activity.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗