PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Hennekinne

Publications and source records attributed to S Hennekinne.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: For complicated diverticulitis Hartmann's procedure remains the favored option in patients with acute complicated sigmoid disease, but there has been increasing interest in primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage. This study compared primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage and Hartmann's procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and November 2001, 60 patients underwent emergency laparotomy for diverticular peritonitis (Hinchey stages III and IV). Primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage was performed in 27 patients and Hartmann's procedure in 33. All data were collected prospectively on a standardized form. RESULTS: Mortality with intraoperative colonic lavage was 11% and with Hartmann's procedure 12%. The incidence of postoperative complication was significantly higher after Hartmann's procedure. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer after Hartmann's procedure than after primary resection with intraoperative colic lavage. CONCLUSION: Primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage compares favorably with Hartmann's procedure for diffuse purulent peritonitis in complicated diverticulitis. It should be an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in stercoral peritonitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis.

BACKGROUND: We performed this study to assess the outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic gallbladder and suspected duct stones. METHODS: We performed prospective study of 310 patients with symptomatic gallstones and suspected choledocholithiasis managed by preoperative ERC with endoscopic extraction (ESE) and LC. The presence of one or more of the following criteria at hospital admission led to preoperative ERC because of suspected choledocholithiasis: jaundice for more than 72 h, ultrasonography measurement of the common bile duct > 8 mm, cholestasis, and acute biliary pancreatitis. RESULTS: ERC for suspected choledocholithiasis was performed in 310 patients. The rate of successful cannulation for ERC was 96.8%. Duct stones were found in 86%. Twelve patients had impacted duct stones cleared at open common duct exploration. The failure rate of ERC was 4.5%, and the rate of unnecessary ERC was 13.5%. LC was performed in 298 of 310 patients. Morbidity rates were 2.2% and 1.5% after ESE and LC, respectively. CONCLUSION: A total of 95.5% of patients with symptomatic gallbladder and ductal stones could be successfully managed by ERC prior to LC with a low morbidity rate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2000, all patients (n = 77) undergoing an elective colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 29) consisted of healthy, normal-weight patients (BMI, 18-24.9); group 2 (n = 27) consisted of overweight patients (BMI, 25.0-29.9); group 3 (n = 21) consisted of obese patients (BMI, 30.0-39.9). Groups 2 and 3 were compared with group 1. RESULTS: Group 1 was comprised of 13 women and 16 men with a mean age of 58.4 years (range, 37-78); group 2, was comprised of 13 women and 14 men with a mean age of 55.2 years (range, 31-83); group 3, was comprised of 13 women and 14 men with a mean age of 54.1 years (range, 33-86). There was no difference among the three groups in ASA classification, postoperative length of hospital stay, or inpatient rehabilitation. The operating time did not differ for groups 1 and 2 (187 vs 210 min, p = 0.6), but it was shorter in group 1 than in group 3 (187 vs 247 min, p = 0.003). The conversion rate was similar for all three groups: 17.2% in group 1, 14.8% in group 2, and 19% in group 3. The postoperative period during which parenteral analgesics were required did not differ between groups 1 and 2 (5.7 vs 7.7 days, p = 0.1), but it was longer for group 3 (8.5 days, p = 0.03). The morbidity rate was similar for all three groups: 17.2% in group 7, 14.8% in group 2, and 19% in group 3. There were no perioperative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the present study suggest that laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis can be applied safely in overweight and obese patients

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Impact of obesity on postoperative results of elective laparoscopic colectomy in sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study].

STUDY AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in normal weighted, overweighted and obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From January 1995 to December 2000, all patients (n = 77) undergoing an elective colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis were included in the study. The patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 29): normal weighted patients (BMI: 18-24.9); group 2 (n = 27): overweighted patients (BMI: 25.0-29.9); group 3 (n = 21): obese patients (BMI: 30.0-39.9). Comparison between these three groups was only made during the per and postoperative period. RESULTS: There were no differences in the three groups with regard to age, sex and ASA classification. Duration of operation did not differ between group 1 and 2 (187 vs 210 min, P = 0.6) but was shorter in group 1 than in group 3 (187 vs 247 min, P = 0.003). Conversion rate did not differ and was respectively in group 1, 2 and 3: 13.8, 14.8 and 14.3%. The postoperative period during which parenteral analgesics were required was not different for group 1 and 2 but was longer in group 3 than in group 1 (8.5 vs 5.7 days, p = 0.03). Morbidity rate was similar in group 1, 2 and 3: 15, 14 and 17%. There was no perioperative mortality. Duration of hospital stay was similar in the three groups. CONCLUSION: Data from the present study suggest that laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis can be applied safely to overweighted and obese patients.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study in the elderly.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the feasibility and the complications or benefits of laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in patients aged 75 years or more. METHODOLOGY: From January 1993 to December 1999, 85 patients underwent an elective colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis. Twenty-two patients over 75-years old (group 1) were compared to 63 younger patients (group 2). RESULTS: In group 1, there were 12 women and 10 men, with a mean age of 77.2 years (range: 75-82); In group 2, there were 35 women and 28 men, with a mean age of 53.7 years (range: 38-74) (P = 1.10-14). The operative time was shorter in group 2 (183 vs. 234 min). There was no difference between the 2 groups with regard to the postoperative period during which parenteral analgesics were required (5.4 vs. 5.2 days, P = 0.48) and the postoperative morbidity (18% vs. 14%, P = 0.06). Postoperative length of hospital stay (13.1 vs. 8.8 days, P = 0.003) was shorter in group 2 than in group 1. There was no perioperative mortality. Conversion rate was 9% (group 1) and 6% (group 2) (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, data from the present study suggest that laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis can be applied safely to older patients with fewer complications, less pain, shorter hospital stay and a rapid return to preoperative activity levels.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intraoperative colonic lavage with primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure for perforated diverticular disease of the colon: a consecutive study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The ideal treatment for complicated diverticulitis is still controversial. The Hartmann's procedure remains the favored option in patients with acute complicated sigmoid disease but there has been increasing interest in primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage. A prospective study was carried out on 71 patients with peritonitis, comparing primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage, and Hartmann's procedure. METHODOLOGY: Between January 1994 and September 1999, 71 patients underwent emergency laparotomy for diverticular peritonitis. Primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage was performed in 29 patients (group I) and Hartmann's procedure in 42 patients (group II). All data were collected on standardized forms. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups according to clinical features, biology, severity of disease and operative delay. The mortality rate in group I and group II was, respectively, 7 and 10% (P = 0.6). The incidence of postoperative complication was higher after Hartmann's procedure (P < 0.05). The mean hospital stay was significantly longer for the Hartmann's procedure compared to primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage. CONCLUSIONS: Primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage compares favorably with Hartmann's procedure for local or diffuse purulent peritonitis in complicated diverticulitis. It should be an alternative to the Hartmann's procedure in stercoral peritonitis.

Adult↗