Biomedical subjects

S Holmseth

Publications and source records attributed to S Holmseth.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Changes in glial glutamate transporters in human epileptogenic hippocampus: inadequate explanation for high extracellular glutamate during seizures.

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with hippocampal sclerosis is associated with high extracellular glutamate levels, which could trigger seizures. Down-regulation of glial glutamate transporters GLAST (EAAT1) and GLT-1 (EAAT2) in sclerotic hippocampi may account for such increases. Their distribution was compared immunohistochemically in non-sclerotic and sclerotic hippocampi and localized only in astrocytes, with weaker immunoreactivity for both transporters in areas associated with pronounced neuronal loss, especially in CA1, but no decrease or even an increase in areas with less neuronal loss, like CA2 and the subiculum in the sclerotic group. Such compensatory changes in immunoreactivity may account for the lack of differences between the groups in immunoblot studies as blots show the average concentrations in the samples. These data suggest that differences in glial glutamate transporter distribution between the two groups of hippocampi may be an insufficient explanation for the high levels of extracellular glutamate in sclerotic seizure foci observed through in vivo dialysis studies.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Specificity controls for immunocytochemistry.

Antibodies have been in widespread use for more than three decades as invaluable tools for the specific detection of proteins or other molecules in biological samples. In spite of such a long experience, the field of immunocytochemistry is still troubled by spurious results due to insufficient specificity of antibodies or procedures used. The importance of keeping a high standard is increasing because massive sequencing of entire genomes leads to the identification of numerous new proteins. All the identified proteins and their variants will have to be localized precisely and quantitatively at high resolution throughout the development of all species. Consequently, antibody generation and immunocytochemical investigations will be done on a large scale. It will be economically important to secure an optimal balance between the risk of publishing erroneous data (which are expensive to correct) and the costs of specificity testing. Because proofs of specificity are never absolute, but rather represent failures to detect crossreactivity, there is no limit to the number of control experiments that can be performed. The aims of the present paper are to increase the awareness of the difficulties in proving the specificity of immunocytochemical labeling and to initiate a discussion on optimized standards. The main points are: (1) antibodies should be described properly, (2) the labeling obtained with an antibody to a single epitope needs additional verification and (3) the investigators should be required to outline in detail how they arrive at the conclusion that the immunocytochemical labeling is specific.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed2005

Specificity of antibodies: unexpected cross-reactivity of antibodies directed against the excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3).

UNLABELLED: Specific antibodies are essential tools for identifying individual proteins in biological samples. While generation of antibodies is often straightforward, determination of the antibody specificity is not. Here we illustrate this by describing the production and characterization of antibodies to excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3). We synthesized 13 peptides corresponding to parts of the EAAT3 sequence and immunized 6 sheep and 30 rabbits. All sera were affinity purified against the relevant immobilized peptide. Antibodies to the peptides were obtained in almost all cases. Immunoblotting with tissue extracts from wild type and EAAT3 knockout animals revealed that most of the antibodies did not recognize the native EAAT3 protein, and that some recognized other proteins. Several immunization protocols were tried, but strong reactions with EAAT3 were only seen with antibodies to the C-terminal peptides. In contrast, good antibodies were obtained to several parts of EAAT2. EAAT3 was only detected in neurons. However, rabbits immunized with an EAAT3-peptide corresponding to residues 479-498 produced antibodies that labeled axoplasm and microtubules therein particularly strongly. On blots, these antibodies recognized both EAAT3 and a slightly smaller, but far more abundant protein that turned out to be tubulin. The antibodies were fractionated on columns with immobilized tubulin. One fraction contained antibodies apparently specific for EAAT3 while another fraction contained antibodies recognizing both EAAT3 and tubulin despite the lack of primary sequence identity between the two proteins. Addition of free peptide to the incubation solution blocked immunostaining of both EAAT3 and tubulin. CONCLUSIONS: Not all antibodies to synthetic peptides recognize the native protein. The peptide sequence is more important than immunization protocol. The specificity of an antibody is hard to predict because cross-reactivity can be specific and to unrelated molecules. The antigen preabsorption test is of little value in testing the specificity of affinity purified antibodies.

Amino Acid Sequence↗