Biomedical subjects

S J Galvin

Publications and source records attributed to S J Galvin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1997

Sharpness overconstancy in peripheral vision.

Although much has been learned about the spatial sampling and filtering properties of peripheral vision, little attention has been paid to the remarkably clear appearance of the peripheral visual field. To study the apparent sharpness of stimuli presented in the periphery, we presented Gaussian blurred horizontal edges at 8.3, 16.6, 24, 32, and 40 deg eccentricity. Observers adjusted the sharpness of a similar edge, viewed foveally, to match the appearance of the peripheral stimulus. All observers matched blurred peripheral stimuli with sharper foveal stimuli. We have called this effect "sharpness overconstancy". For field sizes of 4 deg, there was greater overconstancy at larger eccentricities. Scaling the field size of the peripheral stimuli by a cortical magnification factor produced sharpness overconstancy which was independent of eccentricity. In both cases, there was a slight sharpness underconstancy for peripherally presented edges blurred only slightly. We consider various explanations of peripheral sharpness overconstancy.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

The spatial grain of motion perception in human peripheral vision.

Motion reversal effects (the apparent reversal of the direction of motion of a high frequency sinusoidal grating) have been attributed to aliasing by the cone mosaic [Coletta et al. (1990). Vision Research, 30, 1631-1648] and postreceptoral layers [Anderson & Hess (1990). Vision Research, 30, 1507-1515] in human observers. We present data and a new model which suggest that at least two sampling arrays of different densities affect direction discrimination out to 30 degrees eccentricity. The first sampling layer matches anatomical estimates of the cone density. The second sampling layer is too dense to be the parasol cells alone; midget ganglion cells certainly contribute to this task. This is further evidence that motion perception is not mediated exclusively by the magnocellular stream.

Discrimination, Psychological↗

PubMed1992

No aliasing at edges in normal viewing.

Although spatial aliasing by the extrafoveal retina can occur under natural viewing conditions, it does not commonly disturb our vision. One possible explanation for this is that real scenes do not have sufficient power in the high frequencies to produce aliasing. We examined whether aliasing distorted the appearance of a high contrast edge, which is a common stimulus in the environment. Observers made a two-interval forced-choice discrimination between low-pass filtered and unfiltered edges at 0, 10, 20, and 40 deg eccentricity. This discrimination could be made only when frequency components were removed below both the cone and ganglion cell Nyquist frequencies at each eccentricity. Since supra-Nyquist frequency components could not be detected in edges, they are incapable of producing aliasing.

Contrast Sensitivity↗