PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S J Landry

Publications and source records attributed to S J Landry.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 A resolution.

The GroES heptamer forms a dome, approximately 75 A in diameter and 30 A high, with an 8 A orifice in the centre of its roof. The 'mobile loop' segment, previously identified as a GroEL binding determinant, is disordered in the crystal structure in six subunits; the single well-ordered copy extends from the bottom outer rim of the GroES dome, suggesting that the cavity within the dome is continuous with the polypeptide binding chamber of GroEL in the chaperonin complex.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES.

Although genetic and biochemical evidence has established that GroES is required for the full function of the molecular chaperone, GroEL, little is known about the molecular details of their interaction. GroES enhances the cooperativity of ATP binding and hydrolysis by GroEL (refs 4, 5) and is necessary for release and folding of several GroEL substrates. Here we report that native GroES has a highly mobile and accessible polypeptide loop whose mobility and accessibility are lost upon formation of the GroES/GroEL complex. In addition, lesions present in eight independently isolated mutant groES alleles map in the mobile loop. Studies with synthetic peptides suggest that the loop binds in a hairpin conformation at a site on GroEL that is distinct from the substrate-binding site. Flexibility may be required in the mobile loops on the GroES seven-mer to allow them to bind simultaneously to sites on seven GroEL subunits, which may themselves be able to adopt different arrangements, and thus to modulate allosterically GroEL/substrate affinity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL.

The proteins DnaK (hsp70) and GroEL (cpn60) from Escherichia coli are prototypes of two classes of molecular chaperones conserved throughout evolution. The analysis of transferred nuclear Overhauser effects in two-dimensional NMR spectra is ideally suited to determine chaperone-bound conformations of peptides. The peptide vsv-C (amino-acid sequence KLIGVLSSLFRPK) stimulates the ATPase of BiP and Hsc70 (ref. 3) and the intrinsic ATPase of DnaK. The affinity of the vsv-C peptide for DnaK is greatly reduced in the presence of ATP. Here we analyse transferred nuclear Overhauser effects and show that the peptide is in an extended conformation while bound to DnaK but is helical when bound to GroEL. NMR also indicates that the mobility of the peptide backbone is reduced more by binding to DnaK than by binding to GroEL, whereas the side chains are less mobile when bound to GroEL.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Renaturation of citrate synthase: influence of denaturant and folding assistants.

Citrate synthase (CS), which has been denatured in either guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) or urea can be assisted in its renaturation in a variety of ways. The addition of each of the assistants--bovine serum albumin (BSA), oxaloacetate (OAA), and glycerol--promotes renaturation. In combination, the effect of these substances is additive with respect to the yield of folded CS. The report of Buchner et al. (Buchner, J., Schmidt, M., Fuchs, M., Jaenicke, R., Rudolph, R., Schmid, F.X., & Kiefhaber, T., 1991, Biochemistry 30, 1586-1591) that refolding of CS is facilitated by the GroE system (an Escherichia coli chaperonin [cpn] that is composed of GroEL [cpn60] and GroES [cpn10]) has been confirmed. However, we observed substantially higher yield of reactivated CS, 82%, and almost no reactivation in the absence of GroES, < 5%, whereas Buchner et al. reported 28% and 16%, respectively. In addition, we find that GroE-assisted refolding is more efficient for CS denatured in GdnHCl than for CS denatured in urea. This result is discussed in light of the known difference in the denatured states generated in GdnHCl and urea. Because GroEL inhibits the BSA/glycerol/OAA-assisted refolding, this system will be useful in future studies on the mechanism of GroE-facilitated refolding.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1991

The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation.

Chaperones facilitate folding and assembly of nascent polypeptides in vivo and prevent aggregation in refolding assays in vitro. A given chaperone acts on a number of different proteins. Thus, chaperones must recognize features present in incompletely folded polypeptide chains and not strictly dependent on primary structural information. We have used transferred nuclear Overhauser effects to demonstrate that the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL binds to a peptide corresponding to the N-terminal alpha-helix in rhodanese, a mitochondrial protein whose in vitro refolding is facilitated by addition of GroEL, GroES, and ATP. Furthermore, the peptide, which is unstructured when free in aqueous solution, adopts an alpha-helical conformation upon binding to GroEL. Modification of the peptide to reduce its intrinsic propensity to take up alpha-helical structure lowered its affinity for GroEL, but, nonetheless, it could be bound and took up a helical conformation when bound. We propose that GroEL interacts with sequences in an incompletely folded chain that have the potential to adopt an amphipathic alpha-helix and that the chaperonin binding site promotes formation of a helix.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1991

Recognition of nascent polypeptides for targeting and folding.

A major difference between the refolding of proteins in vitro and the in vivo folding process, in which we include localization and assembly, is the need for additional factors in vivo, apart from the protein product itself. Thus, the amino acid sequence of a naturally selected protein contains not only the information specifying its three-dimensional structure, but also the information that enables these factors to recognize the nascent polypeptide. In this review, we consider how this latter information may be encoded and, in turn, interpreted by binding species.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1989

The small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and its precursor expressed in Escherichia coli are associated with groEL protein.

The small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase is synthesized in the cytoplasm as a precursor which is transported into the chloroplast. During or after transport the precursor is processed to its mature size by removal of an amino-terminal transit peptide. Eight small subunits and eight large subunits (synthesized in the chloroplast) assemble to form the holoenzyme. We have expressed the precursor of the small subunit in Escherichia coli as a fusion to the carboxyl terminus of staphylococcal protein A'. The fusion protein was recovered from the bacterial lysate by chromatography on IgG-agarose. A 58-kDa protein copurified with the fusion protein in approximately equal amounts. Much less of the 58-kDa protein copurified with a fusion in which the transit peptide was deleted, and it did not copurify with protein A'. The 58-kDa protein was identified as the E. coli groEL gene product with antibodies directed against a homologous mitochondrial heat shock protein. This finding is particularly interesting because a chloroplast protein involved in the assembly of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase also is homologous to the groEL protein. These homologs could modulate protein-protein interactions during folding and assembly of subunits into native complexes.

Bacterial Proteins↗