Biomedical subjects

S J Rials

Publications and source records attributed to S J Rials.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Left ventricular hypertrophy decreases slowly but not rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium currents of epicardial and endocardial myocytes in rabbits.

BACKGROUND: Delayed rectifier K(+) currents are critical to action potential (AP) repolarization. The present study examines the effects of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on delayed rectifier K(+) currents and their contribution to AP repolarization in both epicardial (Epi) and endocardial (Endo) myocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS: VH was induced in rabbits by a 1-kidney removal, 1-kidney vascular clamping method. Slowly (I(Ks)) and rapidly (I(Kr)) activating delayed rectifier K(+) currents were recorded by the whole-cell patch-clamp technique, and APs were recorded by the microelectrode technique. In normal rabbit left ventricular myocytes, I(Ks) densities were larger in Epi than in Endo (1.1+/-0.1 versus 0.43+/-0.07 pA/pF), whereas I(Kr) density was similar between Epi and Endo (0.31+/-0.05 versus 0.36+/-0.07 pA/pF) at 20 mV. LVH reduced I(Ks) density to a similar extent (approximately 40%) in both Epi and Endo but had no significant effect on I(Kr) in either Epi or Endo. Consequently, I(Kr) was expected to contribute more to AP repolarization in LVH than in control. This was confirmed by specific I(Kr) block with dofetilide, which prolonged AP significantly more in LVH than in control (31+/-3% versus 18+/-2% in Epi; 53+/-6% versus 32+/-4% in Endo at 2 Hz). In contrast, L-768,673 (a specific I(Ks) blocker) prolonged AP less in LVH than in control. The very small I(Ks) density in Endo with LVH is consistent with the greater incidence of early afterdepolarizations induced in this region by dofetilide. CONCLUSIONS: LVH induces a decrease in I(Ks) density and increases the propensity to develop early afterdepolarizations, especially in Endo.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2001

Clinical outcome of patients who develop PAF after CABG surgery.

This was a retrospective analysis of patients who had CABG surgery at our hospital over a 12-month period to determine the intermediate-term prognosis of those who had developed PAF after their operation before hospital discharge. Of 317 patients who were operated by a single surgical group, 116 (37%) had AF postoperatively of whom 112 had the paroxysmal form. Of these, 36 were treated with class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs and rate control drugs (group 1) and 76 were treated with rate control alone (group 2). Group 3 consisted of 151 randomly selected patients who did not have AF. All patients were reevaluated at 6 weeks to determine their rhythm and clinical status. Only one patient each in groups 1 and 2 was in AF 6 weeks after discharge. There was a trend toward a higher mortality and morbidity in group 2 patients. PAF after coronary surgery appears to be a self-limited disease process. In this cohort of patients, the rate of recurrence of AF after discharge was similar in patients receiving class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs together with rate control agents compared to those receiving rate control drugs alone.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2001

Restoration of normal ventricular electrophysiology in renovascular hypertensive rabbits after treatment with losartan.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with abnormal ventricular electrophysiology. We have shown complete regression of LVH and normalization of ventricular electrophysiology in renovascular hypertensive rabbits treated with captopril. To determine if angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) blockade produces the same benefit, we treated hypertensive rabbits with losartan for 3 months. LVH was evaluated by heart-to-body weight ratio (HW/BW). Vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmia was assessed by ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) and dispersion of effective refractory period (ERP). The electrical properties of single left ventricular myocytes were characterized by action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) and inward rectifier K+ current (I(K1)) density. Hypertensive rabbits treated with vehicle (LVH/Vehicle) had higher mean arterial pressure (MAP, 81+/-2 vs. 60+/-2 mm Hg) and HW/BW (2.71+/-0.07 vs. 1.97+/-0.04 g/kg), lower VFT (20+/-1 vs. 39+/-2 mA), larger dispersion of ERP (34+/-3 vs. 14+/-3 ms), longer APD90 (187+/-6 vs. 162+/-6 ms) and lower I(K1) density compared with control rabbits. Hypertensive rabbits treated with losartan (LVH/Losartan) had HW/BW (2.36+/-0.06 g/kg) between those of LVH/Vehicle and control rabbits, whereas MAP (65+/-2 mm Hg), VFT (34+/-2 mA), dispersion of ERP (19+/-1 ms), APD90 (160+/-6 ms), and I(K1) density were significantly different from LVH/Vehicle but similar to control. We conclude that AT1 blockade in renovascular hypertensive rabbits normalizes ventricular electrophysiology.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2001

Ventricular hypertrophy amplifies transmural repolarization dispersion and induces early afterdepolarization.

The effects of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on the generation of phase 2 early afterdepolarization (EAD) and transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) were assessed using arterially perfused rabbit ventricular wedge preparations. Transmembrane action potentials from epicardium, subendocardium, and endocardium were simultaneously recorded together with a transmural ECG. Transmural action potential duration (APD) was also mapped. LVH (renovascular hypertension model) produced significant prolongation in ventricular APD and QT interval. Preferential APD prolongation in subendocardium and endocardium was associated with a marked increase in TDR. Phase 2 EADs were generated from subendocardium or endocardium in all LVH rabbits (15 of 15) in the absence of APD prolonging agents at basic cycle lengths of 2,000-4,000 ms. Phase 2 EAD could produce "R on T" extrasystoles, initiating polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). This study provides the first direct evidence from intracellular recordings that phase 2 EAD could be generated from rabbit intact hypertrophied LV wall in the absence of APD prolonging agents, resulting in R on T extrasystoles capable of initiating polymorphic VT under enhanced TDR.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2000

Electropharmacologic effect of a standard dose of intravenous procainamide in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) sometimes receive intravenous procainamide during electrophysiologic testing. Unfortunately, the responses to intravenous and subsequent oral drug therapy are variable and may be discordant. HYPOTHESIS: It was the aim of this study to determine whether this variability might be explained by heterogeneity in the electropharmacologic response, even in a homogeneous population. METHODS: We studied 42 patients who had spontaneous malignant ventricular arrhythmia and were inducible to sustained monomorphous VT during electrophysiologic testing. Each received 15 mg/kg of intravenous procainamide followed by a 2 mg/min infusion. Serum levels were drawn immediately following programmed stimulation. The mean procainamide level was 6.7 +/- 1.4 mcg/ml with an N-acetyl procainamide level of 1.0 +/- 0.5 mcg/ml. The 14 procainamide responders (5 of whom were noninducible and 9 whose VT cycle length increased > 100 ms) and the 28 nonresponders had similar procainamide and NAPA levels (6.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.7 +/- 1.4 mcg/ml). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline clinical parameters, His to ventricular electrogram (HV) interval, effective refractory period, or VT cycle length. Prolongation of the effective refractory period and infra His conduction time occurred to a similar extent in responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSION: We conclude that procainamide has a consistent dose-response relationship with respect to refractoriness and conduction in patients with malignant arrhythmias. However, acute antiarrhythmic efficacy of procainamide cannot be predicted by clinical factors, drug levels, or drug-induced changes in common electrophysiologic parameters.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Classification and pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Despite the emergence of several forms of nonpharmacologic therapy for cardiac arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs continue to play an important role in the management of patients with this common clinical problem. The key to the proper use of antiarrhythmic drugs is a thorough knowledge of their mode of action and pharmacology. The pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs is particularly important because patients with cardiac arrhythmias frequently have multiorgan disease, which may influence the metabolism and elimination of antiarrhythmic drugs. The accumulation of toxic amounts of these agents can lead to dire effects including, but not limited to, ventricular proarrhythmia and malignant bradycardia. The goals of pharmacologic therapy of cardiac arrhythmia are to provide the maximum benefit in terms of arrhythmia suppression while maintaining patient safety. To accomplish these goals, a knowledge of the pharmacology of several antiarrhythmic drugs is mandatory.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Effects of captopril treatment of renovascular hypertension on beta-adrenergic modulation of L-type Ca(2+) current.

beta-Adrenergic stimulation of cardiac L-type Ca(2+) channels is severely impaired in hypertrophied and failing hearts of both experimental animals and humans. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that chronic treatment of renovascular hypertension with captopril restores normal beta-adrenergic responsiveness of L-type Ca(2+) channels in cardiac myocytes. Left ventricular hypertrophy was induced in rabbits by unilateral renal artery banding and contralateral nephrectomy. Beginning at 3 months after banding, hypertensive rabbits were treated with captopril for 3 months. The responsiveness of L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca,L)) to (+/-)-isoproterenol was investigated with the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. (+/-)-Isoproterenol (1 microM) induced an increase of I(Ca,L) at 0 mV of 126 +/- 20% (n = 13) in control myocytes versus 69 +/- 11% (n = 18) in hypertrophied myocytes from rabbits 3 months after banding. The half-maximal activation concentration of (+/-)-isoproterenol was similar between control and hypertrophied myocytes. Forskolin (10 microM) induced a similar percentage of increase of I(Ca,L) in control and hypertrophied myocytes, 109 +/- 13% (n = 12) versus 120 +/- 14% (n = 11) at 0 mV. The responsiveness of I(Ca,L) to (+/-)-isoproterenol remained depressed in untreated hypertensive rabbits. (+/-)-Isoproterenol (1 microM) increased I(Ca, L) at 0 mV by 64 +/- 8% (n = 14) in myocytes isolated from rabbits 6 months after banding versus 111 +/- 15% (n = 16) in age-matched controls. In captopril-treated rabbits, 1 microM (+/-)-isoproterenol increased I(Ca,L) by 110 +/- 11% (n = 17). We conclude that the maximal response of I(Ca,L) to (+/-)-isoproterenol was severely depressed in hypertrophied myocytes. Chronic treatment of renovascular hypertension with captopril can restore normal responsiveness of I(Ca,L) to (+/-)-isoproterenol in cardiac myocytes.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Intravenous antiarrhythmic therapy in the acute control of in-hospital destabilizing ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation.

Ventricular tachycardia, which causes hemodynamic instability, and ventricular fibrillation do not occur frequently in any hospital. However, they usually occur in patients who have severe underlying cardiovascular disease such as myocardial ischemia/infarction or congestive heart failure, and they are associated with high mortality. Most of those deaths are due to an intractable arrhythmia, not suppressible with even the most potent antiarrhythmic drugs. Fortunately, during the last few years, our ability to suppress highly lethal ventricular arrhythmia has been enhanced by the approval of intravenous amiodarone. When used in appropriate patient populations, intravenous amiodarone has been successful in suppressing the most malignant arrhythmia, thus permitting aggressive and successful treatment of severe underlying cardiac conditions. This article reviews data on the use of parenteral antiarrhythmic drugs for the control of ventricular arrhythmia in patients in hospital, and will attempt to provide some guidance as to how these antiarrhythmic drugs may be used in specific patient populations to maximize their efficacy and safety. We will also make recommendations on the sequence of therapy for specific arrhythmias to optimize the chances of patient survival.

Amiodarone↗

PubMed1999

The properties of the inward rectifier potassium currents in rabbit coronary arterial smooth muscle cells.

In freshly-isolated, single, smooth muscle cells of rabbit coronary arteries, an inward rectifier K+ current [IK(IR)] was identified using the whole-cell voltage-clamp technique. The current/voltage (I/V) relationship of IK(IR) showed strong inward rectification with a very small outward current when the smooth muscle cells were dialyzed with a pipette solution containing Mg2+. However, dialyzing the cells with a nominally Mg2+-free pipette solution revealed a significant outward current hump in the I/V relation of IK(IR), suggesting that the strong inward rectification of IK(IR) is partly due to the inhibitory effects of internal Mg2+. IK(IR) was unaffected by tetraethylammonium (1 mM), 4-aminopyridine (1 mM), or glibenclamide (1 microM), but was inhibited by extracellular Ba2+ with a concentration of 0.87 microM eliciting half-maximal inhibition at -120 mV. IK(IR) induced in rabbit coronary smooth muscle cells declined during very negative hyperpolarizing steps, due largely to a block by external Na+. IK(IR) was inhibited by alpha1-adrenergic stimuli. Methoxamine, an alpha1-adrenergic agonist, concentration dependently inhibited IK(IR) in the presence of the beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol. The methoxamine concentration required for half-maximal inhibition was 205 microM. We conclude that inward rectifier K+ current is present in rabbit coronary smooth muscle cells and that it shares many properties with the inward rectifier K+ current described for other cell types.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

PubMed1998

Atrial fibrillation trials: will they teach us what we need to know?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has captured the imagination of clinical investigators who have initiated trials to examine several aspects of this multifaceted arrhythmia. We will review the protocol designs of ongoing trials that are examining the relative value of rhythm versus rate control, new methods for pharmacologic restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm (including prophylaxis after cardiac surgery), and nonpharmacologic interventions such as pacing and atrial defibrillation. We antic ipate that the results of these studies will have a major impact on the care of patients with AF in the new millennium.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed1998

A broken heart.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Acute treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is a common clinical entity, responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, but it also accounts for a large percentage of healthcare dollar expenditures. Efforts to treat this arrhythmia in the past have focused on subacute antithrombotic therapy and eventually use of antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance of sinus rhythm. However, there has been a growing interest in the concept of acute electrical and pharmacologic conversion. This treatment strategy has a number of benefits, including immediate alleviation of patient symptoms, avoidance of antithrombotic therapy, and prevention of electrophysiologic remodeling, which is thought to contribute to the perpetuation of the arrhythmia. There is also increasing evidence that this is a cost-effective strategy in that it may obviate admission to the hospital and the cost of long-term therapy. This article represents a summary of the treatments that may be used acutely to control the ventricular response to AFib, prevent thromboembolic events, and provide for acute conversion either pharmacologically or electrically. It includes information on modalities that are currently available and those that are under active development. We anticipate that an active, acute treatment approach to AFib and atrial flutter will become the therapeutic norm in the next few years, especially as the benefits of these interventions are demonstrated in clinical trials.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed1998

Regression of LV hypertrophy with captopril normalizes membrane currents in rabbits.

Recent studies indicate that regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) normalizes the in situ electrophysiological abnormalities of the left ventricle. This study was designed to determine whether regression of LVH also normalizes the abnormalities of individual membrane currents. LVH was induced in rabbits by renal artery banding. Single ventricular myocytes from rabbits with LVH at 3 mo after renal artery banding demonstrated increased cell membrane capacitance, prolonged action potential duration, decreased inward rectifier K+ current density, and increased transient outward K+ current density compared with myocytes from age-matched controls. Additional rabbits were randomized at 3 mo after banding to treatment with either vehicle or captopril for an additional 3 mo. Myocytes from LVH rabbits treated with vehicle showed persistent membrane current abnormalities. However, myocytes isolated from LVH rabbits treated with captopril had normal cell membrane capacitance, action potential duration, and membrane current densities. Captopril had no direct effect on membrane currents of either control or LVH myocytes. These data support the hypothesis that the action potential prolongation and membrane current abnormalities of LVH are reversed by regression. Normalization of membrane currents probably explains the reduced vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmia observed in this LVH model after treatment with captopril.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1997

Pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic profile of class III antiarrhythmic drugs.

Cardiac arrhythmias frequently respond only to drugs that have as their predominant electrophysiologic effect the prolongation of repolarization and refractoriness. According to the Singh-Vaughan Williams classification, these drugs are known as class III agents. In the last few years, interest has increased in the development of class III antiarrhythmic drugs as alternatives to sodium channel blocking agents, which mainly affect cardiac conduction. Much of this interest results from a perceived danger of using drugs with sodium channel blocking properties, particularly in patients with ischemic heart disease, based on the results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) and several other trials. This article is a review of the pharmacology, including the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, of the most commonly used and investigated class III antiarrhythmic drugs. As will be seen from the discussion, each of these drugs has novel pharmacology that makes it applicable in specific clinical situations. Their putative effects on various arrhythmogenic mechanisms and their efficacy in treating specific target arrhythmias will be addressed.

Amiodarone↗

PubMed1997

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy with captopril restores normal ventricular action potential duration, dispersion of refractoriness, and vulnerability to inducible ventricular fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with multiple cellular electrophysiological abnormalities, susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias, and an increased risk of sudden death. Several pharmacological therapies have been shown to produce regression of hypertrophy, but the value of regression is unclear. The present study examines whether pharmacological regression of LVH has effects on the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia or the cellular electrophysiological abnormalities of LVH. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rabbits underwent unilateral renal artery banding and contralateral nephrectomy to induce LVH or were placed in the control group. Both groups were studied 3 months later by in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological techniques. Banded rabbits had increased mean arterial pressure, increased left ventricular weight and wall thickness, increased dispersion of refractoriness, and lower ventricular fibrillation thresholds than control rabbits. Action potential duration and cell capacitance were also greater in the banded group. Additional rabbits were treated beginning 3 months after banding with either captopril (5 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) or vehicle added to their diet for an additional 3 months. These rabbits and age-matched controls were then studied by in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological techniques. In banded rabbits that received vehicle and were studied 6 months after banding, increased dispersion of refractoriness, a lower ventricular fibrillation threshold, and action potential prolongation persisted and were unchanged from animals studied 3 months after banding. Captopril, started 3 months after banding, caused regression of hypertrophy and normalization of the in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological abnormalities. Addition of captopril to the tissue bath during in vitro electrophysiological study showed no effect on cells from control or banded rabbits. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological regression of LVH with captopril normalizes the in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological abnormalities of ventricular hypertrophy and reduces the vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation in a renovascular model of LVH.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1997

Effectiveness of digitalis with or without acebutolol in preventing atrial arrhythmias after coronary artery surgery.

In this study, a beta-adrenergic blocker in combination with digoxin provided marginal protection against atrial fibrillation/flutter after coronary artery surgery. The economic comparison of patients who did and did not develop atrial fibrillation/flutter indicates that prevention of these arrhythmias can have a significant impact on length of hospital stay and cost of this common surgical procedure.

Acebutolol↗

PubMed1997

Intravenous amiodarone.

Intravenous amiodarone was approved in 1995 for the treatment of malignant and resistant ventricular arrhythmia. Although it is an "old drug," much has been learned recently about this complex drug and its application in a variety of cardiac arrhythmias. The objectives of this review were to summarize what is known about intravenous amiodarone, including its pharmacologic and electrophysiologic effects, to review its efficacy for the treatment of patients with highly malignant ventricular arrhythmia and to provide specific information about its clinical use for this and other indications. The studies that were reviewed were selected on the basis of time published (from 1983 to 1995) and the completeness of information provided regarding patient clinical characteristics, drug dosing and methods of evaluation, efficacy analyses, long-term follow-up and complications. The full data from the three controlled trials that formed the basis of the drug's approval are contained in published reports that were also extensively reviewed. Intravenous amiodarone has demonstrable efficacy for the treatment of frequently recurrent destabilizing ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, with suppression rates of 63% to 91% in uncontrolled trials. The three pivotal trials confirmed these findings and demonstrated a dose-response relation, with at least comparable efficacy to bretylium, a drug with a similar indication. The safety profile has also been well described; cardiovascular adverse effects are the most frequent, especially hypotension. Intravenous amiodarone is a useful addition to the drugs available for the treatment of patients with very severe ventricular arrhythmia. Its use in patients with other rhythm disorders appears promising, but final recommendations must await development of definitive data from ongoing clinical trials.

Amiodarone↗

PubMed1997

Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in patients with hypertensive heart disease. In addition, the presence of hypertension in patients with AF constitutes an important risk factor for the development of thromboembolic events and probably also selects out those individuals who may be resistant to drug therapy. AF in patients with hypertensive heart disease may lead to a number of serious clinical sequelae including stroke, left atrial myopathy, left ventricular dysfunction, and congestive heart failure. This needs to be treated aggressively since many patients may become quite symptomatic when AF develops in the setting of diastolic and systolic dysfunction, regular features of hypertensive heart disease. There are several treatment approaches that may be considered in such patients ranging from interventions to prevent thromboembolic events, drugs and procedures for control of the ventricular response, and drug and non-pharmacologic therapy specifically designed to prevent AF or to restore normal sinus rhythm. This review article will cover each of these components of therapy of AF and will attempt to focus on those therapies that might be best suited for patients with hypertensive heart disease.

Anticoagulants↗