PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S J Sorensen

Publications and source records attributed to S J Sorensen.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Nelfinavir desensitization.

OBJECTIVE: To report the first case of nelfinavir desensitization in an HIV patient who was intolerant to protease inhibitors. CASE SUMMARY: A 43-year-old HIV-positive white man was treated with several protease inhibitors. The patient developed rashes in response to all protease inhibitors. His viral load was controlled only in the presence of a protease inhibitor. The patient tolerated nelfinavir longer than the other agents; therefore, the decision was made to attempt to desensitize him to nelfinavir. A six-hour inpatient protocol was used, and he tolerated the procedure without event. His disease is now well managed without recurrence of the rash. DISCUSSION: The use of protease inhibitors has had a major impact on the morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected patients, Despite their benefits, this class of drugs is not without adverse effects. Allergic reactions in the form of rashes may develop, which can severely limit treatment options in HIV patients. We report the first case of rapid desensitization of nelfinavir in a patient who developed rashes to several protease inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Intolerance to protease inhibitors due to rash is a well-documented phenomenon. In HIV patients, this can limit treatment options severely. This case demonstrates how desensitization to nefinavir can be performed successfully.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Hydroxyurea in the treatment of HIV-1.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the role of hydroxyurea in the treatment of HIV-1. DATA SOURCES: Published clinical studies using hydroxyurea in HIV treatment were accessed through MEDLINE (January 1994-March 1999) and conference abstracts. All relevant studies were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Adherence, expense, and resistance limit the pharmacotherapeutic options in the management of patients with HIV. Hydroxyurea may be an alternative to conventional HIV treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Several potential advantages of adding hydroxyurea to antiretroviral treatment regimens include the drug's well-documented toxicity, convenient dosing, good tolerability and low cost, and its unique mechanism of action. Hydroxyurea may have synergistic effects that prove promising in initial and salvage therapy antiretroviral regimens. Larger, well-controlled clinical studies are needed to adequately define the role of hydroxyurea in the treatment of HIV.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1999

Therapeutic failure of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of failure of treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) in a patient with HIV infection, despite an adequate serum SMX concentration. CASE SUMMARY: A 52-year-old white man was treated with TMP/SMX for PCP. After discharge he returned to the hospital with worsening of the PCP despite a serum SMX concentration of 60 micrograms/mL 18 hours after his last dose of TMP/SMX. DISCUSSION: PCP is one of the most common complications of HIV infection. TMP/SMX is the drug of choice for prophylaxis and treatment. The causes of therapeutic failure with this agent are not well documented. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative therapies to TMP/SMX should be seriously considered if the serum concentrations are therapeutic and the patient is not clinically improved.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1998

Prevention of experimental Haemophilus ducreyi infection: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Human subjects were infected with Haemophilus ducreyi. All subjects developed papules and were randomized to treatment with a single dose of azithromycin (1 g) or ciprofloxacin (500 mg). At weekly intervals, volunteers were reinoculated with H. ducreyi, and drug concentrations were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). When papules developed, the subjects were treated with antibiotics and dismissed from the study. Eight of the ciprofloxacin-treated subjects developed papules 1 week after the initial treatment, and the ninth subject developed disease 2 weeks after treatment. The 9 azithromycin-treated subjects developed papules 4-10 weeks (mean, 6.8) after the initial treatment (P < .001). Azithromycin was detected in PBMC for 3-6 weeks (mean, 4). Pre- and posttreatment lesions had histology typical of experimental chancroid or were culture positive. Azithromycin prevents experimental chancroid for nearly 2 months. These findings have implications for strategies to prevent chancroid.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Successful vancomycin desensitization in a patient with end-stage renal disease and anaphylactic shock to vancomycin.

OBJECTIVE: To report successful desensitization in a patient with a history of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and anaphylactic shock after receiving vancomycin. CASE SUMMARY: A 47-year-old white woman with a history of ESRD was admitted to the hospital reporting persistent nausea, vomiting, and diffuse abdominal pain. She had developed anaphylactic shock after exposure to vancomycin 3 years prior to this hospitalization. The patient's hospital course was complicated by septic shock and positive blood cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. The patient tolerated vancomycin desensitization and received intravenous vancomycin 100 mg/d for 21 days. DISCUSSION: The desensitization protocol used in this report allows for gradual increases in vancomycin serum concentrations, avoiding peak and trough concentrations that occur with intravenous boluses. Maintaining the desensitized state is dependent on the continuous presence of the antigen with a return of clinical sensitivity after drug discontinuation. The vancomycin desensitization protocol and subsequent dosing strategy was used to ensure the continuous presence of vancomycin at steady-state concentrations to prevent the return of anaphylactic sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization was successful in a patient with ESRD and history of anaphylactic shock to vancomycin.

Anaphylaxis↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of the ocular beta-blockers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the similarities and differences among the ocular beta-blockers. Important considerations when comparing these agents are the differences in systemic adverse effects, local tolerability, and cost. DATA SOURCE: Information was retrieved from a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature and bibliographic reviews of review articles. Index terms included beta-blockers, glaucoma, timolol, levobunolol, betaxolol, metipranolol, and carteolol. STUDY SELECTION: Emphasis was placed on eyedrop studies, as well as properly designed and executed clinical trials that assessed dosage, dosing interval, therapeutic response, adverse effects, and cost. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from several studies were evaluated according to the study design, therapeutic response, and adverse effects. DATA SYNTHESIS: Timolol maleate, levobunolol, metipranolol, and carteolol have similar effectiveness in lowering intraocular pressure; however, levobunolol and timolol gel forming solution may have an advantage of once-daily dosing. Studies have not been published comparing the clinical efficacy of timolol hemihydrate with that of other ocular beta-blockers. Metipranolol is cost effective in treating primary open-angle glaucoma; however, it has been associated with more ocular burning, stinging, and granulomatous anterior uveitis than other agents. The intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of carteolol has not yet displayed a definite advantage over the other agents in terms of optic disk perfusion and systemic adverse effects. The control of intraocular pressure with betaxolol has not always been as good as with timolol; however, betaxolol has some advantages over timolol and the other topical beta-blockers in terms of systemic adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Considering cost, efficacy, and safety, timolol maleate is the recommended formulary agent because the other agents cannot consistently show an outstanding advantage.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1996

Effects of barley variety and processing methods on feedlot steer performance and carcass characteristics.

An experiment was conducted to evaluate ammoniation and temper processing of two barley varieties of diverse types on feedlot cattle performance and diet digestibility. Steptoe (feed variety) and Klages (malting variety) barleys were processed as dry-rolled (DR); tempered and rolled (TR); tempered, ammoniated, and rolled (AR); and tempered, ammoniated, and fed whole (AW). Crossbred steers (n = 240, initial weight 266 kg) were blocked by weight and randomly assigned to one of eight treatments in a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement. Diets contained 30% barley (DM basis) for the growing phase and 85% (DM basis) for the finishing phase. Growing phase ADG and gain to feed (G/F) were less (P < .05) for AW than for DR, TR, and AR. Average daily gain was less (P < .05) for AW than for TR and AR in the finishing phase. There were no differences (P > .05) in ADG or G/F between DR, TR, and AR during growing or finishing phases. Gain to feed was greater (P < .05) for TR and AR than for AW but not for DR for the total trial. Hot carcass weight, longissimus muscle area, and kidney-pelvic-heart fat were greater (P < .05) for TR and AR than for AW. Total finishing diet ADF digestibility was greater (P < .05) for Steptoe than for Klages (40.5 vs 31.4%, respectively). The DR treatment had the lowest ADF digestibility, whereas AR had the greatest (P < .05). Results suggest that there were no differences in feedlot steer performance due to barley varieties of the same bulk density and that barley grain must be mechanically processed for optimal performance response rather than ammoniated and fed as whole grain.

Ammonia↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Decrease in expenditures and selected nosocomial infections following implementation of an antimicrobial-prescribing improvement program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in antimicrobial use and expenditures and the rates of selected nosocomial infections due to resistant organisms associated with implementation of an antimicrobial-prescribing improvement program. DESIGN: Before-after trial comparing 1992 (pre-program), 1993 (a transition year), and 1994 (after full implementation of the program). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Academic medical center, all patients and physicians. INTERVENTION: An antimicrobial-prescribing improvement program with prior approval requirement for use of restricted agents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antimicrobial use and expenditures, rates of selected nosocomial infection marker events. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1994, there were substantial decreases in antimicrobial use, from 158,107 to 137,364 defined daily doses, and in expenditures from $2,486,902 ($24.01 per patient day) to $1,701,522 ($18.49 per patient day). After adjusting for changes in purchase prices and census days, we estimated savings attributable to the program of $279,573 in 1993 and $389,814 in 1994. In addition, we found significant decreases between 1992 and 1994 in the rates of enterococcal bacteremia (.34 vs .16 events per 1,000 patient days; P = .016), selected gram-negative bacteremia (.26 vs .11; P = .015), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection (.66 vs .20; P < .0001), and Stenotrophomonas colonization or infection (.35 vs .17; P = .019). No significant change occurred in rates of nosocomial candidemia or Clostridium difficile toxin-positive diarrhea. Values for 1993 were intermediate between those of 1992 and 1994. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an antimicrobial-prescribing improvement program was associated with substantial savings in antimicrobial use and expenditures and significant decreases in rates of selected nosocomial infections due to resistant organisms.

Anti-Infective Agents↗