PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Jeffcoate

Publications and source records attributed to S Jeffcoate.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change.

Habitat degradation and climate change are thought to be altering the distributions and abundances of animals and plants throughout the world, but their combined impacts have not been assessed for any species assemblage. Here we evaluated changes in the distribution sizes and abundances of 46 species of butterflies that approach their northern climatic range margins in Britain-where changes in climate and habitat are opposing forces. These insects might be expected to have responded positively to climate warming over the past 30 years, yet three-quarters of them declined: negative responses to habitat loss have outweighed positive responses to climate warming. Half of the species that were mobile and habitat generalists increased their distribution sites over this period (consistent with a climate explanation), whereas the other generalists and 89% of the habitat specialists declined in distribution size (consistent with habitat limitation). Changes in population abundances closely matched changes in distributions. The dual forces of habitat modification and climate change are likely to cause specialists to decline, leaving biological communities with reduced numbers of species and dominated by mobile and widespread habitat generalists.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

The role of bioassays in the development, licensing and batch control of biotherapeutics.

The role of bioassays in ensuring the safety and efficacy of medicines produced by biotechnology intended for human use is under continuous review. It is a complex area, in which the rapid scientific and technological advances have been accompanied, more or less synchronously, by novel clinical applications. The need to match the rapidity of these developments with the necessarily more cautious regulatory procedures for licensing and controlling medicines in the pharmaceutical marketplace has produced an area of active debate. This article reviews the debate and its practical consequences, while maintaining the pre-eminence of the underlying scientific values.

Biological Assay↗

Hydrocortisone alone vs hydrocortisone plus aminoglutethimide: a comparison of the endocrine effects in postmenopausal breast cancer.

The endocrine effects of replacement doses of hydrocortisone in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were compared with the same doses of hydrocortisone plus aminoglutethimide. Fifteen patients received aminoglutethimide (AG) 250 mg three times a day plus hydrocortisone (HC) 20 mg twice a day for 2 weeks, then AG was increased to 250 mg four times a day. Another 13 patients received HC alone for 2 weeks, then AG was added. HC alone significantly suppressed oestrone (75% of baseline) and oestradiol (50% of baseline). Addition of AG to these patients produced further oestrone suppression (50% of baseline) significantly greater than HC alone. HC alone suppressed dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate as much as AG + HC. delta 4-androstenedione (delta 4A) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHA) were suppressed by HC alone. Addition of AG produced a rise of delta 4A to basal levels. These results show that 3-beta-ol de hydrogenase is not induced by AG. AG plus HC together from day 1 produced significantly greater oestrone suppression (50% of baseline) than HC alone. Because high-dose steroids may induce aromatase and replacement doses produced marked peripheral endocrine effects, the use of replacement hydrocortisone should be reassessed in advanced breast cancer.

Aminoglutethimide↗

Aminoglutethimide induced hormone suppression and response to therapy in advanced postmenopausal breast cancer.

Eighty-one postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were studied for the effects of treatment with aminoglutethimide (AG) plus hydrocortisone on peripheral hormones and response to therapy. There were 40 responders (R) and 41 non-responders (NR) at 3 months from the start of treatment. Plasma oestrone concentrations were higher in non-responders at 1 and 2 months after starting AG (Means: NR 106 +/- 50, R 84 +/- 26 pmol l-1, P less than 0.05; highest value NR 121 +/- 51, R 99 +/- 24 pmol l-1, P less than 0.05). High oestrone levels were correlated with bulky liver secondaries, but not with age, tumour-free interval, time from last menstrual period, time from relapse to start of AG or body weight. Non-responders had higher mean prolactin levels on treatment (prolactin less than 500 mIUl-1 in 14/40 NR, 2/35 R, P less than 0.01). High oestrone or prolactin levels were present in 28/41 NR and 6/40 R (P less than 0.001). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate suppression did not differ between R and NR. The differences in peripheral endocrine environment in non-responding patients suggest that oestrogen metabolism may differ in non-responding patients and that sub-groups could be selected for rational endocrine therapy.

Adult↗

Distribution of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in the central nervous system as revealed with immunohistochemistry.

With the indirect immunofluorescence technique TRH-containing nerve terminals were found in the medial part of the external layer of the median eminence, the dorsomedial nucleus and the perifornical area, in extrahypothalmic nuclei such as nucleus accumbens, the lateral septal nucleus and in several motor nuclei of the brain stem and spinal cord. These findings suggest that TRH may act both as a hormone, released into the portal vessels, as well as a neurotransmitter or modulator, released at synapses in discrete regions of the brain and spinal cord.

Animals↗