PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Joanna Cowell

Publications and source records attributed to S Joanna Cowell.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Calcific aortic stenosis has many characteristics in common with atherosclerosis, including hypercholesterolemia. We hypothesized that intensive lipid-lowering therapy would halt the progression of calcific aortic stenosis or induce its regression. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with calcific aortic stenosis were randomly assigned to receive either 80 mg of atorvastatin daily or a matched placebo. Aortic-valve stenosis and calcification were assessed with the use of Doppler echocardiography and helical computed tomography, respectively. The primary end points were change in aortic-jet velocity and aortic-valve calcium score. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were assigned to atorvastatin and 78 to placebo, with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 7 to 36). Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations remained at 130+/-30 mg per deciliter in the placebo group and fell to 63+/-23 mg per deciliter in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001). Increases in aortic-jet velocity were 0.199+/-0.210 m per second per year in the atorvastatin group and 0.203+/-0.208 m per second per year in the placebo group (P=0.95; adjusted mean difference, 0.002; 95 percent confidence interval, -0.066 to 0.070 m per second per year). Progression in valvular calcification was 22.3+/-21.0 percent per year in the atorvastatin group, and 21.7+/-19.8 percent per year in the placebo group (P=0.93; ratio of post-treatment aortic-valve calcium score, 0.998; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.947 to 1.050). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy does not halt the progression of calcific aortic stenosis or induce its regression. This study cannot exclude a small reduction in the rate of disease progression or a significant reduction in major clinical end points. Long-term, large-scale, randomized, controlled trials are needed to establish the role of statin therapy in patients with calcific aortic stenosis.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

Calcific aortic stenosis: same old story?

Calcific aortic stenosis is the commonest adult valvular heart condition seen in the western world. Its prevalence is continuing to rise, with predominance in older patients who are frequently undergoing successful aortic valve replacement. This review discusses the natural history of calcific aortic stenosis, highlights recent insights into its pathogenesis, and outlines current medical and surgical management. The potential role of novel therapeutic interventional strategies is discussed.

Age Factors↗

Contrast agent increases Doppler velocities and improves reproducibility of aortic valve area measurements in patients with aortic stenosis.

Observer variability may limit assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography. This study aimed to assess whether echocardiographic contrast agent improves reproducibility of aortic valve area (AVA) measurements for patients with aortic stenosis. In all, 20 patients with aortic stenosis (67 +/- 10 years old) underwent noncontrast and contrast Doppler echocardiography on 2 occasions, 3 weeks apart. Intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of reproducibility were 0.36 and 0.20 cm for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter, and 0.38 and 0.24 cm(2) for AVA, respectively. Although intraobserver reproducibility was unaffected, contrast improved interobserver reproducibility for LVOT diameter (mean of differences -0.02 +/- 0.07 cm vs 0.01 +/- 0.10 cm, P <.05) and AVA (mean of differences 0.02 +/- 0.10 cm(2) vs 0.07 +/- 0.12 cm(2), P <.05). Prevalve and postvalve velocities were increased with contrast compared with noncontrast imaging (prevalve, 1.07 +/- 0.20 vs 0.94 +/- 0.19 m/s, P <.01; postvalve, 3.76 +/- 0.87 vs 3.47 +/- 0.78 m/s, P <.01). We conclude that contrast significantly increases Doppler velocities and produces modest improvements in reproducibility of LVOT diameter and AVA. We suggest that, when assessing patients with aortic stenosis, contrast agents should be considered in patients who are difficult to image with poor baseline LVOT images or Doppler studies, or where there is poor interobserver reproducibility.

Aged↗