PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S K Clark

Publications and source records attributed to S K Clark.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

The significance of cone biopsy resection margins.

This 12-year retrospective study examines the significance of margin involvement with dysplasia at cone biopsy in relation to follow-up. Of 300 cone biopsies, 123 (41%) had margin involvement. These cases of margin involvement were associated with more severe dysplasia (P less than 0.0001) and a higher chance of subsequent abnormal cytological follow-up (P less than 0.0001) and residual dysplasia at subsequent surgery (P less than 0.0001). Involvement of the endocervical margin at the initial cone biopsy was a sensitive predictor of future abnormality, with an incidence of subsequent abnormal cytology of 29% and residual disease of 82% in those undergoing further surgery. In those cases where the margins had been clear, the incidence of abnormal cytological follow-up was 8%, with 12% residual disease in those undergoing subsequent surgery. Margin involvement was a better predictor of residual disease at repeat surgery than abnormal follow-up cytology (positive predictive value, 79% vs 60%, respectively).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Prevalence of hepatitis C in tropical communities: the importance of confirmatory assays.

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) was estimated in 3 tropical populations using 2 screening ELISAs to detect antibody to the c100-3 antigen and 2 supplementary assays designed to test the specificity of these tests. Two hundred and eighty-six of 385 (74.2%) sera from Kiribati, 17 of 138 (12.3%) sera from Vanuatu, and 39 of 173 (22.5%) sera from Zaire were reactive in the initial screening assay. The proportion of reactive sera which were also reactive in the second screening ELISA varied between populations (55.1% in Kiribati, 85.1% in Vanuatu, and 39.2% from Zaire). Reactive sera were selected at random for confirmatory testing. Only 3 of 49 (6.12%) of sera from Kiribati and 1 of 14 (4.76%) of sera from Vanuatu positive in the initial ELISA were reactive in the confirmatory assays. The proportion of confirmed positive sera from Zaire was higher 8 of 28 (28.5%). Based on the results of these supplementary assays the estimated prevalence of anti-HCV in these populations is 4.8% in Kiribati, less than 1% in Vanuatu, and 6.4% in Zaire. Reliance on a single screening ELISA to estimate the prevalence of anti-HCV in stored sera from tropical communities may lead to a gross over-estimate of the true prevalence in these populations.

Antibody Specificity↗
PubMed1977

Posttraumatic endolymphatic hydrops.

A case of posttraumatic endolymphatic hydrops that was confirmed by a positive glycerin test is reported. Although head trauma has been implicated as a cause of hydrops, few such cases are reported in the literature. Careful consideration of perilymphatic fistula must be accorded before a diagnosis of posttraumatic hydrops is made.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A risk-specific anesthesia consent form may hinder the informed consent process.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a preprinted, risk-specific consent form on the amount of anesthetic risk information patients retain from the preoperative interview. DESIGN: Postoperative survey of consecutive inpatients to determine risk information retained before and after implementation of a preprinted anesthesia consent form, using standard preoperative risk discussions. SETTING: Inpatient units of a university medical center. PATIENTS: Two groups of patients, both of whom received a standard oral discussion of anesthetic risk information, were compared. Patients in the control group (125 consecutive inpatients) received this information only orally and were interviewed two weeks prior to implementation of a preprinted anesthesia consent form. Patients in the study group (92 consecutive inpatients) received this information orally and via a preprinted consent form and were interviewed between the fourth and sixth weeks after implementation of a preprinted anesthesia consent form. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia residents discussed five standard anesthetic risks with elective, adult inpatients (n = 233) during a two-week period immediately before and between the fourth and sixth weeks after instituting the mandatory use of a risk-specific anesthesia consent form. These patients were interviewed postoperatively by one of the authors to determine the amount of anesthesia risk information they retained. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Results of the postoperative survey showed that patients in the control group retained more information concerning anesthetic risks than did those in the study group (33% vs 19%, p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: To improve the informed consent process, either a better method of presenting the preprinted, risk-specific consent form or another method of simultaneously conveying and documenting risk information is needed.

Anesthesiology↗