Neuropathy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The significance of symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical evaluation of significance of symptoms suggestive of neuropathy in non-insulin-dependent diabetics in general practice. DESIGN: Case control study. Interviewer-administered questionnaire. Physical examination by general practitioner researcher. SETTING: Government family practice clinic in Singapore. SUBJECTS: 55 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) aged 35-84 years (51% males), and 53 non-diabetic controls matched for age (+/- 5 years) and gender. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of subjects with presence of symptoms and physical signs. RESULTS: More patients than controls experienced symptoms suggestive of distal neuropathy (paraesthesiae: 13 vs. 4%), and lower extremity proximal myopathy (weakness climbing stairs: 42 vs. 19%, getting up from squatting position: 31 vs. 11%). No difference in proportions of patients and controls experiencing symptoms suggestive of autonomic neuropathy. More patients than controls had absent tendon reflexes (35 vs. 13%) and weaker hip muscles (24 vs. 6%). Of all who experienced symptoms indicating peripheral neuropathy, 36% of patients had absent tendon reflexes, compared with 8% of controls; and of those who experienced weakness of hip muscles, 31% of patients and 12% of controls had diminished power in the hip muscles. CONCLUSION: Symptoms suggestive of diabetic neuropathy are common and should be asked about in the routine follow-up of patients with diabetes. Up to a third of patients with symptoms will have clinical signs of diabetic neuropathy.