Biomedical subjects
S Kalla
Publications and source records attributed to S Kalla.
A phase I-II, dose-escalating trial of ZD9331 in combination with irinotecan (CPT11) in previously pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: To establish the recommended dose (RD) of the thymidylate-synthase inhibitor ZD9331 administered with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer, and to assess toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity in a phase I/II open, multicenter, intrapatient chemotherapy dose escalating trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients who failed first-line therapy (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin +/- oxaliplatin) received every 2 weeks CPT-11 180 mg/m2 D1, followed by ZD9331 30-minute infusion D2 at three dose levels: 90, 120 and 150 mg/m2. RESULTS: RD of ZD9331 was established at 90 mg/m2 for the first two cycles, with possibility to escalate at 120 mg/m2 according to safety evaluation. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (67% of patients), grade 3 vomiting (14%), grade 3 nausea (10%) and grade 3 diarrhea (5%). ZD9331 dose level does not affect the PK of CPT-11 or SN-38. Tumor growth control (PR + SD) was achieved for 14 (66.7%) patients. Median time to progression was 6 months, and median survival was 8.4 months. CONCLUSION: ZD9331 90 mg/m2 combined with CPT-11 180 mg/m2 may be a viable option for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, with possible escalation to 120 mg/m2 of ZD9331 according to safety evaluation.
Single-agent gemcitabine is active in previously treated metastatic breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: This phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with an anthracycline- or anthracenedione-containing regimen as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with MBC were enrolled in five French centers. Patients were eligible if they had received one prior chemotherapy regimen with an anthracycline or anthracenedione for metastatic disease, if they had responded to that prior regimen, and if they had relapsed at least 6 months after the first response. Fifteen patients received more than one prior anthracycline regimen; thus, gemcitabine was third-line therapy for 30% of patients. Gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for a maximum of eight cycles after the best response was obtained. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in 12 of 41 assessable patients (4 complete responses and 8 partial responses), for an objective response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval, 16-46%). The median response duration was 8.1 months (range: 2.5-27.4 months). Serious hematological toxicity was minimal, with grade 4 neutropenia in 2% of the patients (no neutropenic fever), grade 3 neutropenia in 28% of the patients, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 6% of the patients. Among the nonhematological toxicities, asthenia was the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine given at this dose and schedule is a well-tolerated treatment with definitive antitumor activity in pretreated MBC patients. This result warrants future exploration of the use of gemcitabine as a single agent and in combination in patients with MBC.
Oxaliplatin and paclitaxel combination in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian carcinoma: an investigator-originated compassionate-use experience.
PURPOSE: Compassionate-use oxaliplatin paclitaxel was assessed for toxicity and efficacy according to clinical platinum resistance status in cisplatin-carboplatin-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients, retrospectively grouped into four oxaliplatin-paclitaxel dose levels (mg/m2): (DL1: 100/135; DL2: 130-135/135; DL3: 100/160-175; DL4: 130-135/160-175), received oxaliplatin and paclitaxel every three to four weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-one of thirty-seven treated patients were evaluable for activity, with 1 complete and 14 partial responses, (objective response rate: 48%, 95% CI: 31-66). Of 18 platinum-resistant patients 6 responded, and of 13 platinum-sensitive patients, 9 responded. One patient (3%) had two febrile neutropenia episodes, and eight (22%) and eleven patients (30%) had grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, respectively. Six patients (16%) experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. The median response duration was 10.8 months, with a 23-month (range 8-54) median follow-up. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 9 months (95% CI: 7-12), and 25.2 months (95% CI: 12-39), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The antitumour activity of oxaliplatin-paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients accords with experimental data on the agents' lack of cross-resistance. Time-related progression parameters confirm it as a promising salvage treatment option.
Dose-finding study of docetaxel and doxorubicin in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin, and to evaluate the activity in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two women with untreated metastatic breast cancer (79% with visceral metastases; 52% with prior adjuvant anthracycline therapy) were treated with doxorubicin (40-60 mg/m2) i.v. bolus followed one hour later by docetaxel (50-85 mg/m2) one-hour i.v. infusion every three weeks, without G-CSF support. RESULTS: The MTD occurred at the dose level combining 85 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 50 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, with the DLT being neutropenic sepsis. Neutropenia and/or its complications were manageable and no grade 3-4 or severe non-hematological toxicities were observed. Fluid retention was frequent but never severe. With a median cumulative dose of doxorubicin of 392 mg/m2 (240-559 mg/m2) and a median follow-up time of 29 months (9(+)-41), no congestive heart failure was observed. High activity was observed at all dose levels, particularly the last four, with a response rate of 81% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 62.5-92.5). Median time to progression was 46 weeks (6(+)-62). Two-year survival was 66%, and median survival has not yet been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel-doxorubicin is feasible, safe and highly active. The incidence of febrile neutropenia without G-CSF requires careful monitoring but is acceptable in this setting. There does not appear to be an increase in the cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin. The recommended doses is either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 or docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, administered every three weeks.
Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics.
PURPOSE: Two phase I studies of the oxaliplatin and irinotecan combination were performed in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients to characterize the safety and pharmacokinetics of the regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a performance status (PS) of < or = 2 and normal hematologic, hepatic, and renal functions received oxaliplatin (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed 1 hour later by irinotecan administered over a 30-minute period, every 3 weeks. Dose levels that were explored ranged from 85 to 110 mg/m(2) for oxaliplatin and 150 to 250 mg/m(2) for irinotecan. Plasma pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum, irinotecan, SN-38, and its glucuronide, SN-38G, were determined. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas (24 with colorectal cancer [CRC], four with pancreas cancer, four with gastric cancer, three with hepatocarcinoma, and four with other) received 216 treatment cycles. Median age was 54 years (range, 21 to 72 years); 95% had PS of 0 to 1; all but six had failed fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. The maximum-tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) in one study and oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) in the other study. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia were dose-limiting toxicities; other toxicities included emesis and dose-cumulative neuropathy. Recommended dose for phase II studies is oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2). At this dose (12 patients, 65 cycles), grade 3 and 4 toxicities per patient included the following: emesis in 42% of patients, neutropenia in 33% (febrile episodes in 17%), peripheral neuropathy in 25%, delayed diarrhea in 17%, and thrombocytopenia in 8%. Two patients with Gilbert's syndrome experienced severe irinotecan toxicity. No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected. Seven partial responses were observed in 24 CRC patients. CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible, with activity in 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. Phase I studies that explore the every-2-weeks schedule, in addition to phase II studies of this schedule (as well as in combination with 5-FU) as second-line therapy of metastatic CRC, are ongoing.
Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin or vinorelbine.
The rationale for the development of a new drug combination is to combine optimal doses of drugs with single-agent activity that are not cross-resistant or have similar toxicities. Docetaxel, with its unique mechanism of action and its high response rates in metastatic breast cancer, provides both opportunities and challenges for the development of combination chemotherapy. Anthracyclines are widely accepted as the agents of choice for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer and they have been studied in combination with taxoids. Preliminary results with a combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin indicate an overall response rate of 74%, with the dose-limiting toxicities being neutropenia and infection. Vinorelbine also has single-agent activity against metastatic breast cancer and preclinical studies have demonstrated synergism when vinorelbine and docetaxel are combined. The dose-limiting toxicities of the vinorelbine-docetaxel combination are febrile neutropenia and mucositis. The overall response rate to treatment with this combination is 67%. We therefore conclude that docetaxel can be combined with doxorubicin or vinorelbine to provide high response rates and acceptable toxicity.
Relation between perfusion defects on stress technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT scintigraphy and the location of a subsequent acute myocardial infarction.
Although the presence of perfusion defects on stress myocardial perfusion imaging has been shown to correlate with future cardiac events, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), it is unknown whether the location of the AMI can be predicted. Therefore, for 25 patients who had an AMI following a stress technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging study and whose infarct location could be determined, the territory of infarction was correlated with the location of previous myocardial perfusion defects. A SPECT perfusion defect had been present in 24 patients (96%). The AMI occurred in territories that showed a reversible defect in 14 patients (56%), whereas 3 infarctions (12%) were in territories that revealed a fixed defect, and 8 infarctions (32%) were in territories that had not shown a defect on prior SPECT imaging. Whereas the incidence of infarction in territories with a reversible defect was highest at 14 of 26 (54%), the incidence of infarction in territories with a fixed defect was 3 of 7 (43%), and in territories with no defect was 8 of 42 (19%) (p = 0.011). Neither the time interval between SPECT imaging and infarction, nor the perfusion defect severity, was related to the correlation between perfusion defect and infarct location. Thus, although AMI occurs most often at the site of previous perfusion defects, reversible or fixed, a substantial percentage occur in territories without a perfusion defect. These findings suggest that abnormalities on SPECT perfusion imaging, although they serve as markers of significant coronary disease and increase the likelihood of infarction, do not always predict the exact location of infarction.
A comparative study of the awareness and attitude of HIV/AIDS among students living in India and migrants to the United States.
The goal of the current study was to collect preliminary data regarding HIV/AIDS awareness among Indian students who are residing in India and those who have migrated to the United States. A questionnaire was distributed to thirty-four college students in the United States and thirty-eight college students who are residing in India, between ages 18-26 years. 74% of the Indian group and 53% of the USA group felt that their knowledge of this disease is not adequate. 3% felt that this disease is completely curable. Only 13% of the Indian group and 23% of the USA group thought that tuberculosis is linked to HIV infection. Both groups felt that the newspapers and magazines are good sources of information. The majority of the Indian (71%) and USA (50%) groups felt that HIV/AIDS education should begin in high school. 90% of the Indian group and 79% of the USA group felt that people in India do not have adequate knowledge about AIDS. The majority felt that the high-risk population should be screened and there should be more governmental support.
A comparative study of the awareness and attitude of HIV / AIDS among students living in India and migrants to the United States.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.