Biomedical subjects
S Kite
Publications and source records attributed to S Kite.
The level of need for palliative care: a systematic review of the literature.
Palliative care services have developed rapidly over the past 30 years, with little evaluation as to how needs have been met by these new services. As part of a systematic review of palliative care, evidence of the needs of patients and carers has been evaluated from the current literature. Of the total of 673 articles related to the 10 areas within the main review, 64 provided evidence on the need for palliative care services over the period from 1978 to 1997. A further nine articles were added in November 1998 after the end of the study of update the review with more recent research. Need can be assessed in one of two ways: either by adopting an epidemiological approach or by examining health service usage. In the former, evidence is provided on disease-specific mortality, and related to the duration of symptoms prior to the patient's death. As an example of this, it is suggested that services may need to provide pain control for 2800 patients per million (p/M) population dying from cancer each year and 3400 p/M with noncancer terminal illness. Using health service usage as an indicator of need, 700-1800 p/M with cancer and 350-1400 p/M with noncancer terminal illness would require a support team or specialist palliative home care nurse, with 400-700 cancer p/M and 200-700 noncancer p/M requiring inpatient terminal care. Studies indicate that at present usage, palliative care is being provided by 40-50 hospice beds/M. Despite this provision, there remains evidence that in certain areas of care such as pain control, there still remains a high degree of unmet need.
Specialist palliative care and patients with noncancer diagnoses: the experience of a service.
This retrospective review was undertaken to identify the pattern of noncancer referrals to a specialist palliative care service, comprising a teaching hospital support team, home care, outpatients and inpatient hospice, over a 1-year period. Of 287 hospital ward referrals, 83 patients had a noncancer diagnosis (29%); they were referred predominantly for symptom control (92%), particularly of pain (84%). Of 130 outpatient referrals, 30 had a noncancer diagnosis (23%) and were also referred mainly for the management of pain (85%). Of 196 home care referrals, 18 had a noncancer diagnosis (9%); they tended to be referred for multiprofessional care of endstage disease. Of 421 hospice inpatient admissions, 17 were for patients with a noncancer diagnosis (4%) and were predominantly for respite care. These admissions accounted for 2% of occupied bed days. It is concluded that specialist palliative care skills are perceived to be transferable to patients with noncancer diagnoses. Resource implications focus on hospital and outpatient services, where shared care with medical teams is usual practice. Defining management goals at the outset is particularly important.
Patient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature review.
This systematic literature review examined the impact of specialist models of palliative care on consumer satisfaction, opinion and preference over the past 20 years. From the literature search, 83 relevant papers were identified. Research findings from North America did not reveal any reliable or consistent trends, and this was due primarily to methodological flaws in the research. In the UK, consumers are more satisfied with all types of palliative care, whether provided by inpatient units or in the community, than with palliative care provided by general hospitals. Even though research findings consistently indicate that consumers appreciate the psychosocial climate in hospices, this research was based on small-scale local studies which were mainly focused on a single hospice. The dearth of high quality, comprehensive research was notable on the impact on consumer preference, opinion or satisfaction of hospice home care services, and other forms of palliative care in the community. It was concluded that further research is needed into consumer priorities for patients dying of noncancer diseases, and into the possible impact of patient characteristics on consumer satisfaction, opinion and preference for specialist models of palliative care.
The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature review.
This study set out to systematically review the research evidence about the impact of alternative models of specialist palliative care on the quality of life of patients. Eighty-six relevant papers were identified and reviewed, including 22 descriptive and 27 comparative studies. We found few comparative trials of reasonable quality. There was some evidence that in-patient palliative care provided better pain control than home care of conventional hospital care, but this research was dated and open to criticism. Research on palliative home care teams and co-ordinating nurses has demonstrated limited impact on quality of life over conventional care for patients dying at home. These negative findings may be due to the limitations of the assessment tools used. There is a need for larger studies to provide clear evidence as to whether specialist palliative care services provide improvements in patients' quality of life. This review does not exclude the possibility that models of care might be justifiable on other grounds such as patient preference or cost-effectiveness.