Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S L Rowland.
Limited proteolysis of the Escherichia coli cell division inhibitor MinC reveals that its dimerization function resides in a structurally autonomous C-terminal domain. We show that cytoplasmic MinC is poised near the monomer-dimer equilibrium and propose that it only becomes entirely dimeric once recruited to the membrane by MinD.
Correct positioning of the division septum in Escherichia coli depends on the coordinated action of the MinC, MinD and MinE proteins. Topological specificity is conferred on the MinCD division inhibitor by MinE, which counters MinCD activity only in the vicinity of the preferred midcell division site. Here we report the structure of the homodimeric topological specificity domain of Escherichia coli MinE and show that it forms a novel alphabeta sandwich. Structure-directed mutagenesis of conserved surface residues has enabled us to identify a spatially restricted site on the surface of the protein that is critical for the topological specificity function of MinE.
Escherichia coli cells contain potential division sites at midcell and adjacent to the cell poles. Selection of the correct division site at midcell is controlled by three proteins: MinC, MinD, and MinE. It has previously been shown (D. Raskin and P. de Boer, Cell 91:685-694, 1997) that MinE-Gfp localizes to the midcell site in an MinD-dependent manner. We use here Gfp-MinD to show that MinD associates with the membrane around the entire periphery of the cell in the absence of the other Min proteins and that MinE is capable of altering the membrane distribution pattern of Gfp-MinD. Studies with the isolated N-terminal and C-terminal MinE domains indicated different roles for the two MinE domains in the redistribution of membrane-associated MinD.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Correct placement of the division septum in Escherichia coli requires the co-ordinated action of three proteins, MinC, MinD and MinE. MinC and MinD interact to form a non-specific division inhibitor that blocks septation at all potential division sites. MinE is able to antagonize MinCD in a topologically sensitive manner, as it restricts MinCD activity to the unwanted division sites at the cell poles. Here, we show that the topological specificity function of MinE residues in a structurally autonomous, trypsin-resistant domain comprising residues 31-88. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and circular dichroic spectroscopy indicate that this domain includes both alpha and beta secondary structure, while analytical ultracentrifugation reveals that it also contains a region responsible for MinE homodimerization. While trypsin digestion indicates that the anti-MinCD domain of MinE (residues 1-22) does not form a tightly folded structural domain, NMR analysis of a peptide corresponding to MinE1-22 indicates that this region forms a nascent helix in which the peptide rapidly interconverts between disordered (random coil) and alpha-helical conformations. This suggests that the N-terminal region of MinE may be poised to adopt an alpha-helical conformation when it interacts with the target of its anti-MinCD activity, presumably MinD.
The Bacillus subtilis cell-division protein DivIB is shown to be present at an approximately 100-fold higher abundance (approximately 5000 molecules per cell) than its Escherichia coli FtsQ homologue. B. subtilis contains much more DivIB (at least 60-fold) than is needed to maintain the normal rate of cell division at moderate temperatures (up to 37 degrees C). However, a high level of DivIB is needed to achieve the normal rate of division at high temperature (47 degrees C). It is proposed that membrane-bound DivIB is involved in stabilizing or promoting the assembly of the division complex (which is intrinsically temperature sensitive) in a manner that requires more of the protein at higher temperatures. The (at least) 60-fold accumulation of DivIB and FtsZ from an undetectable level, following germination and outgrowth of spores up until the stage of the first cell division, was unaffected by blocking of initiation of the first round of replication. It is concluded that there is no major synthesis of either of these 'division initiation' proteins linked to initiation, progression or completion of the first round of replication accompanying spore outgrowth.
Sequence similarity analysis has revealed that orf2, in the cell division 135-137 degrees region of the Bacillus subtilis (Bs) chromosome, is the probable homolog of Escherichia coli murB (encoding a reductase involved in peptidoglycan synthesis). The amino-acid sequences of the two protein products show 24% identity (47% overall similarity), with several regions of higher similarity which may represent functional domains of the proteins. Attempts to insertionally inactivate orf2 were unsuccessful, strongly suggesting that it is an essential Bs gene. A small gene found in the same region as orf2, sbp (encoding the 'small basic protein'), was shown to be non-essential in Bs.
Expression of the division initiation gene, divIB, of Bacillus subtilis vegetative growth was examined. lacZ fusion studies and transcription start point mapping have established that a sigma A promoter proximal to divIB is utilized in vivo. The -10 region of this promoter, which is located 93 bp upstream of the start codon, has been defined precisely by site-directed mutagenesis that destroys the promoter. Examination of transcripts by Northern (RNA) blotting has shown that there are at least two transcripts for divIB. The established proximal promoter was found to give rise to a very minor transcript which could not be convincingly demonstrated in wild-type cells but which became apparent upon insertion of a plasmid into the chromosome just upstream of this promoter. The major transcript for divIB originated from a site several kb upstream of the gene and is probably the same as the long polycistronic message also traversing the murD-spoVE-murG genes that was identified previously by others (A.D. Henriques, H. de Lencastre, and P.J. Piggot, Biochimie 74:735-748, 1992). Transcription from the proximal promoter alone, in an upstream-deletion mutant strain, provided sufficient DivIB for normal growth and division as well as sporulation.