Oral steroid therapy for asthma and contact dermatitis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to S L Spector.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: This multicenter study compared the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of two oral antibiotics, cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate, in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventeen patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of acute maxillary sinusitis were enrolled at nine centers and were randomly assigned to receive 10 days of treatment with cefuroxime axetil 250 mg twice daily (n = 157) or amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg three times daily (n = 160). Patients were assessed for both clinical and bacteriologic responses once during treatment (5 to 7 days) and twice after treatment (1 to 3 days and 4 weeks). Bacteriologic assessments were based on needle aspirates of the maxillary sinus obtained pretreatment and, when possible, at the first posttreatment visit. RESULTS: Organisms were isolated from the pretreatment sinus aspirates of 198 of 317 (62%) patients, with the primary isolates being Streptococcus pneumoniae (22%), Haemophilus spp. (17%), Staphylococcus aureus (13%), and Haemophilus influenzae (10%). A satisfactory clinical outcome (cure or improvement) was achieved in 85% (98 of 115) and 82% (102 of 124) of the clinically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (P = 0.446). With respect to the eradication of the bacterial pathogens, a satisfactory outcome (cure or presumed cure) was obtained in 84% (31 of 37) and 87% (34 of 39) of bacteriologically evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil or amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively (p = 0.567). Treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate was associated with a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events (13% versus 3%, p = 0.001), particularly diarrhea (8% versus 1%, p = 0.001). Two patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and three patients in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group withdrew from the study due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that cefuroxime axetil twice a day is as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate three times a day in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis but produces fewer adverse effects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Allergic sinus disease in adults has not been definitively established. On the other hand, sinusitis is more common in allergic individuals than control subjects. Nasal provocation studies with allergens produce clinical findings and radiographic evidence suggestive of allergic sinusitis. Studies that use single-photon emission computerized tomography do not confirm direct entry of pollens into the sinuses. Fungal sinusitis typically occurs in patients with allergic rhinitis and nasal obstruction for many years. Patients often have an elevated specific IgE and total IgE with positive skin tests to the fungus involved. The diagnosis is confirmed by computed tomographic scan or magnetic resonance imaging of the sinuses. There is no direct fungal invasion. Many patients who have chronic severe sinusitis, asthma, and frequently aspirin idiosyncrasy appear to have immunologic reactions in the sinuses (and bronchial tissue). Histologic findings of the sinus mucosa show infiltration with plasma cells and eosinophils. Immunofluorescent stains show IgE dispersed throughout the tissue possibly in plasma cells. An intense linear stain for IgD is found along the epithelial side of the basement membrane.
We undertook this trial to determine whether ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.03% (IB) reduced the nasal hypersecretion associated with nonallergic perennial rhinitis (NAPR) without causing excessive dryness or irritation of the nasal mucosa. We compared two drug doses of IB (21 micrograms and 42 micrograms per nostril) to a placebo, administered as two sprays to each nostril twice daily. The study design consisted of a 1-week screening period without treatment, a 1-week single-blind placebo period, a 4-week double-blind treatment comparison period, and a 1-week follow-up period without medication to evaluate nasal rebound. One hundred fifty-two patients were entered and 140 completed the trial. Both doses of IB reduced the severity and duration of rhinorrhea compared with placebo (P = .05 and .03, respectively). Treatment differences were noticeable during the first week of therapy, continued to widen during the second week, and then remained stable throughout the next 2 weeks. There was no evidence of nasal rebound observed during the week after treatment. The drug was well tolerated with side effects limited to infrequent nasal adverse events of nasal dryness, blood-tinged mucus, and epistaxis occurring in 2% to 6% of patients. We conclude that IB is a safe and effective therapy for control of rhinorrhea associated with NAPR.
Control of asthma is enhanced when careful consideration is given to underlying mechanisms. Patients can be advised of ways to avoid or minimize contact with offending allergens, and, in some cases, pharmacologic management may not be necessary. Care must be taken when treating patients with concomitant disorders, such as hyperthyroidism. Also, psychological factors may have a role in exacerbating symptoms in suggestible patients. Noncompliance, in some cases due to inability to pay for medication, may be an unrecognized cause of treatment failure.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bronchial inhalation challenges to histamine, methacholine, and at least one antigen were performed on 183 asthmatic patients who previously had received skin tests to at least 16 different antigens. Individuals with a positive skin test and a positive antigen inhalation challenge to the same antigen had lower thresholds of response to both histamine and methacholine. This pattern was statistically significant for mixed trees, mixed grasses, mixed molds, and house dust but not for mixed ragweed. For those individuals who had a negative antigen inhalation challenge, skin test reactivity (positive or negative) alone was not associated with a different threshold of response to histamine or methacholine. Also, a higher percentage of positive antigen inhalation challenges were seen in the group of individuals with a low threshold of response to both histamine and methacholine than in groups with either a moderate or high threshold of response to these chemical agents. The results imply that at least two factors are associated with a positive bronchial inhalation challenge to a specific antigen: nonspecific airways hyperreactivity, as indexed by a methacholine or histamine inhalation challenge, and a positive skin test.
The nasal and respiratory symptoms observed after oral challenge to aspirin (ASA), tartrazine, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory substances are best described as idiosyncratic reactions. A positive response to oral challenge, defined as a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) from baseline for up to 4 hr, occurred in 44 of 230 patients with ASA, 11 of 277 with tartrazine, 2 of 93 with sodium salicylate, and 2 of 69 with acetaminophen. No one had a positive response to tartrazine, sodium salicylate, or acetaminophen who was not also positive to ASA. The dose of ASA causing a positive response was less than 5 grains in 95% of the patients. Of 50 patients with a suspicious history studied in detail, 96% of those with ASA idiosyncrasy had sinusitis and 71% had nasal polyps. Methacholine challenges and random circulating and sputum eosinophils did not differentiate patients with a negative challenge from those with a positive challenge. However, patients with a positive history and positive challenge had significantly more random nasal eosinophils than those with negative aspirin challenges. The term "aspirin triad" has outlived its usefulness since ASA idiosyncrasy can exist in patients lacking certain components of the triad. ASA idiosyncrasy is unsuspected in many patients and possibly overdiagnosed in others.
Fenoterol, a selective beta 2-adrenergic agent, and aminophylline in the "therapeutic range" were compared with placebo for their inhibitory effect on skin test reactivity to allergens and histamine. Cardiovascular parameters were also assessed. A new, inexpensive micrometer adaptor to a tuberculin syringe was used to deliver allergens and histamine more accurately. No inhibition of skin test reactivity to antigens or histamine was found after a loading dose or after 1 wk of round-the-clock therapy with these bronchodilators. Although there was increased heart rate after 1 and 2 hr with fenoterol, there was no patient preference for one bronchodilator over the other. The results of this study point out some of the difficulties in trying to extrapolate in vitro findings to in vivo correlates since neither fenoterol nor therapeutic doses of theophylline interfere with immediate skin test reactivity.
Hypotheses about medical outcome in asthma, indexed by rates of rehospitalization within 6 months after discharge from long-term intensive care, were evaluated. Predictions for rehospitalization were based on the levels of airways hyperreactivity, indexed by inhalation challenges with histamine or methacholine, and levels of anxiety focused upon and concurrent with periods of asthmatic distress, indexed by Panic-Fear symptomatology. Results indicated that, although some prediction could be made on the basis of levels of anxiety and airways hyperreactivity alone, the best predictions resulted from the combined effects of these factors. Almost half of the patients who had highly hyperreactive airways and a tendency to disregard symptoms of breathing difficulty were rehospitalized. By comparison, none of the patients who had less hyperreactive airways and a tendency to be vigilant about their symptoms were rehospitalized. The hypotheses and results are discussed with respect to symptom-focused and general, illness-dependent types of anxiety which have different effects upon medical outcome in chronic asthma. The results have implications for the application of anxiety-reducing forms of intervention in asthma.
Levels of airways hyperreactivity, as indexed by methacholine and histamine thresholds, were determined for hospitalized asthmatic patients using the serial concentration, constant-breath method. Airways hyperreactivity was categorized into low and high based on a split of the sample of subjects tested. These categories were unrelated to pulmonary function measurements obtained throughout hospitalization. Patients having high airways hyperreactivity to histamine or methacholine were admitted for intensive inpatient care at a young age, had an earlier age of onset, and had asthma of longer duration than patients having low airways hyperreactivity. These latter results suggested that relatively greater airways hyperreacticity is more likely to be associated with early onset of the illness.
Flunisolide nasal spray was compared to its propylene and polyethylene glycol vehicle in a randomized double-blind study of 20 adult patients with perennial rhinitis. After a two-week baseline period patients received either active flunisolide 50 microgram q.i.d. or placebo for four weeks. Laboratory studies included serum 8 a.m. cortisols, nasal air-flow measurements and nasal smears for eosinophils and fungi. Patients kept daily symptom diaries. There was no difference between active and placebo groups for sneezing, runny nose or nose blowing. Although post-nasal drip showed the greatest improvement in the active group, there was a trend for improvement in both groups. By the second week the percentage of eosinophils on nasal smear significantly decreased in both groups. Nasal air-flow measurements also showed improvement in both active and placebo groups. There was no change in serum cortisol levels compared to baseline. Side effects were similar in both active and placebo groups. Although no positive fungal cultures were obtained during the double-blind study. Candida was cultured during the long-term program in one patient.