PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S M Dovey

Publications and source records attributed to S M Dovey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology, risks, and outcomes of errors in primary care are poorly understood. Malpractice claims brought for negligent adverse events offer a useful insight into errors in primary care. METHODS: Physician Insurers Association of America malpractice claims data (1985-2000) were analyzed for proportions of negligent claims by primary care specialty, setting, severity, health condition, and attributed cause. We also calculated risks of a claim for condition-specific negligent events relative to the prevalence of those conditions in primary care. RESULTS: Of 49345 primary care claims, 26126 (53%) were peer reviewed and 5921 (23%) were assessed as negligent; 68% of claims were for negligent events in outpatient settings. No single condition accounted for more than 5% of all negligent claims, but the underlying causes were more clustered with "diagnosis error" making up one third of claims. The ratios of condition-specific negligent event claims relative to the frequency of those conditions in primary care revealed a significantly disproportionate risk for a number of conditions (for example, appendicitis was 25 times more likely to generate a claim for negligence than breast cancer). CONCLUSIONS: Claims data identify conditions and processes where primary health care in the United States is prone to go awry. The burden of severe outcomes and death from malpractice claims made against primary care physicians was greater in primary care outpatient settings than in hospitals. Although these data enhance information about error related negligent events in primary care, particularly when combined with other primary care data, there are many operating limitations.

Health Services Research↗
PubMed2003

Family physicians are an important source of mental health care.

While comprising about 15 percent of the physician workforce, family physicians provided approximately 20 percent of physician office-based mental health visits in the United States between 1980 and 1999. This proportion has remained stable over the past two decades despite a decline in many other types of office visits to family physicians. Family physicians remain an important source of mental health care for Americans.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Family physicians' solutions to common medical errors.

In two U.S. studies about medical errors in 2000 and 2001, family physicians offered their ideas on how to prevent, avoid, or remedy the five most often reported medical errors. Almost all reports (94 percent) included at least one idea on how to overcome the reported error. These ideas ranged from "do not make errors" (34 percent of all solutions offered to these five error types) to more thoughtfully proposed solutions relating to improved communication mechanisms (30 percent) and ways to provide care differently (26 percent). More education (7 percent) and more resources such as time (2 percent) were other prevention ideas.

Family Practice↗
PubMed2003

Consequences of medical errors observed by family physicians.

In two studies about medical errors, family physicians reported health, time, and financial consequences in nearly 85 percent of their error reports. Health consequences occurred when the error caused pain, extended or created illness, or placed patients, their families, and others at greater risk of harm. Care consequences included delayed diagnosis and treatment (sometimes of serious health conditions such as cancer), and disruptions to care that sometimes even resulted in patients needing care in a hospital. Other important consequences were financial and time costs to patients, health care providers, and the health system generally. However, sometimes no consequence was apparent.

Family Practice↗
PubMed2003

Types of medical errors commonly reported by family physicians.

In a group of studies about medical errors in family medicine, the five error types most often observed and reported by U.S. family physicians were: (1) errors in prescribing medications; (2) errors in getting the right laboratory test done for the right patient at the right time; (3) filing system errors; (4) errors in dispensing medications; and (5) errors in responding to abnormal laboratory test results. "Errors in prescribing medications" was the only one of these five error types that was also commonly reported by family physicians in other countries.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2003

Family physicians increase provision of well-infant care despite decline in prenatal services.

Over the past 20 years, family physicians and general practitioners (FP/GPs) and pediatricians have upheld their commitment to preventive care for infants. Non-Metropolitan Statistical Areas (non-MSAs) depend on family physicians for almost one half of their well-infant care. FP/GPs have increased their overall provision of well-infant care despite a decline in delivery of prenatal services. This commitment to child health care demands continued excellence of family physician training in pediatric medicine, preventive care, and child advocacy.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed2002

Title VII funding is associated with more family physicians and more physicians serving the underserved.

Title VII funding of departments of family medicine at U.S. medical schools is significantly associated with expansion of the primary care physician workforce and increased accessibility to physicians for the residents of rural and underserved areas. Title VII has been successful in achieving its stated goals and has had an important role in addressing U.S. physician workforce policy issues.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗
PubMed2002

What physicians need to know about seniors and limited prescription benefits, and why.

More and more often, seniors are faced with outpatient prescription benefits that have annual spending limits, and they may be forced to cut back on use of medications when they run out of benefits before the end of the year. Family physicians can play a valuable role by helping seniors choose the best value medications for their budgets and by checking whether or not seniors can afford their prescriptions.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a preliminary taxonomy of primary care medical errors. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis to identify categories of error reported during a randomized controlled trial of computer and paper reporting methods. SETTING: The National Network for Family Practice and Primary Care Research. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical error category, context, and consequence. RESULTS: Forty two physicians made 344 reports: 284 (82.6%) arose from healthcare systems dysfunction; 46 (13.4%) were errors due to gaps in knowledge or skills; and 14 (4.1%) were reports of adverse events, not errors. The main subcategories were: administrative failure (102; 30.9% of errors), investigation failures (82; 24.8%), treatment delivery lapses (76; 23.0%), miscommunication (19; 5.8%), payment systems problems (4; 1.2%), error in the execution of a clinical task (19; 5.8%), wrong treatment decision (14; 4.2%), and wrong diagnosis (13; 3.9%). Most reports were of errors that were recognized and occurred in reporters' practices. Affected patients ranged in age from 8 months to 100 years, were of both sexes, and represented all major US ethnic groups. Almost half the reports were of events which had adverse consequences. Ten errors resulted in patients being admitted to hospital and one patient died. CONCLUSIONS: This medical error taxonomy, developed from self-reports of errors observed by family physicians during their routine clinical practice, emphasizes problems in healthcare processes and acknowledges medical errors arising from shortfalls in clinical knowledge and skills. Patient safety strategies with most effect in primary care settings need to be broader than the current focus on medication errors.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Uncoordinated growth of the primary care work force.

Family physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants are distinctly different in their clinical training, yet they function interdependently. Together, they represent a significant portion of the primary care work force. Training capacity for these professions has increased rapidly over the physician assistant decade, but almost no collaborative work force planning has occurred.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1998

Creating a general practice national minimum data set: present possibility or future plan?

AIM: To assess the feasibility of implementing the recommendations of the New Zealand National Minimum Data Set working party in computerised general practices. METHOD: Doctors from 12 computerised general practices belonging to the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners' Dunedin Research Unit Computer Network participated in the study (five Dunedin practices, four in rural Otago and Southland, and three in Christchurch). A three-month sample of data was extracted from practice computers and evaluated for completeness and compliance to the national minimum data set structure. Rates of recording practice identifier, provider, patient identifiers, sex, ethnicity, government subsidy eligibility, consultation identifier and date, prescriptions and Read codes were calculated for each practice. RESULTS: Apart from data recorded automatically by computers, there was a wide range in the extent of missing data. Of the data requiring manual computer entry, patient demography and subsidy eligibility were most comprehensively recorded (date of birth 99.9%, sex 99.6%, eligibility to subsidies 98.5%). Data with little immediate clinical or management relevance were poorly recorded (Read codes 32.4% and ethnicity 5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to derive a common minimum data set from different computerised general practices. However some data elements will be missing unless suitable education and support are provided for the doctors and other staff members who record patient information.

Data Collection↗
PubMed1998

Continuity and change in sporting and leisure time physical activities during adolescence.

OBJECTIVES: To map the pattern of involvement in physical activities by adolescents at ages 15 and 18 years. METHODS: Data from a longitudinal cohort study were used. Participants in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study provided information about their sporting and similar physical activities during the 12 months before study assessments at ages 15 and 18 years. RESULTS: Total participation time at age 18 was 63% of that reported at age 15. Mean participation time for girls decreased from 7.5 hours a week to 4.3 hours a week (p<0.001) whereas for boys it decreased from 11.7 hours a week to 7.8 hours a week (p<0.001). At both ages, boys spent significantly more time in physical activity than girls. More time in physical activity at age 18 was reported by participants who judged their fitness higher than their peers (odds ratio (OR) 1.7: 1.2, 2.5), those who played sport for their school (OR 1.8: 1.3, 2.4), and those reporting very good self assessed health (OR 1.4: 1.0, 1.8) at age 15. The overall median number of activities decreased from seven at age 15 to three at 18. Boys were involved in more activities at age 15 but there was no sex difference at age 18 in the number of different activities reported. CONCLUSION: Although involvement in school sporting activities and high levels of fitness in mid-adolescence may protect against marked reductions in physical activity in late adolescence, social and organisational factors are also likely to be important. There is a need for innovative approaches to health promotion which will encourage adolescents to maintain higher levels of physical activity after they leave school.

Adolescent↗