Biomedical subjects

S M Havercamp

Publications and source records attributed to S M Havercamp.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Are caregivers' reports of motivation valid? Reliability and validity of the Reiss Profile MR/DD.

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity theory proposes that there are wide individual differences in what motivates people with intellectual disability. The Reiss Profile MR/DD is a rating scale that measures 15 fundamental motives. This study examined the internal consistency and interrater reliability of the 15 subscales as well as the validity of motivational profiles. METHOD: The study consisted of two distinct but related steps. First, the interrater reliability of the rating scale was established by having pairs of raters evaluate 48 individuals. Second, raters were presented with three different motivational profiles and asked to identify which one corresponded to the individual they had rated 4 weeks earlier. RESULTS: Results indicated good internal consistency (average alpha=0.84), significant variability in the interrater reliability (average intraclass correlation coefficient=0.52), and excellent validity (95% of the correct profiles were chosen). Average discrepancies between pairs of raters are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Interrater reliability is an important topic for professionals working in the field of intellectual disability and results are discussed in terms of the factors that affect it. This is the first published study to report on the interrater reliability of the Reiss Profile MR/DD.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1999

Distinguishing low levels of social support and social strain: implications for dual diagnosis.

Low social support is known to be a risk factor for mental illness in the general population. Social strain, or stressful social interaction, has also been shown to correlate highly with psychopathology but has been largely ignored for individuals with mental retardation. Results based on staff ratings of 104 adults with mental retardation are presented, highlighting the relationship among support, social strain, and psychopathology. Data suggest that social strain is more strongly associated with psychopathology than are overall low levels of social support for individuals with mental retardation.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1999

Sensitivity, functional analysis, and behavior genetics: a response to Freeman et al.

Freeman et al. (1998) asserted that sensitivity theory is circular, unsupported by empirical evidence, and represents an "either/or" decision in regard to applied behavior analysis. We reply by showing that sensitivities are objectively measured and that our theory permits testable predictions. Further, we briefly summarize the results of recent studies that support our theory, including investigations that link sensitivities to genes and challenging behavior. Finally, we reject the idea that sensitivity theory and functional analysis represent an "either/or" viewpoint and call again for research to integrate these approaches.

Behavioral Symptoms↗

PubMed1997

The Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior: confirmatory factor analysis.

We tested the factorial stability of the Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior (Reiss, 1988a, The Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior test manual). Reasonable fit was demonstrated in a geographically diverse sample of 448 individuals with mild, moderate, severe and profound mental retardation according to four measures of overall fit: RMSEA, ECVI, NNFI, and NFI. The results confirm Reiss' (1988a) factor solution of this widely used dual diagnosis (mental retardation and mental illness) screening instrument.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Sensitivity theory and mental retardation: why functional analysis is not enough.

Sensitivity theory holds that aberrant behavior is a function of aberrant contingencies (direct reinforcement of maladaptive behavior), aberrant motivation (a desire for an excessive amount of reinforcement), and aberrant environments (situations in which most people cannot satiate their fundamental desires by behaving appropriately). Applied behavior analysts are almost exclusively concerned with aberrant contingencies and, to a lesser extent, aberrant environments. Because they do not treat people for aberrant motivation, behaviorists tend to treat the same people repeatedly. When a person craves an excessive amount of attention, this desire must be reduced for a durable and generalized treatment outcome, but behaviorists do not even try to do this. Implications for communication theory, assessment, and treatment strategies were discussed.

Behavior Therapy↗

PubMed1996

Composite versus multiple-rating scales in the assessment of psychopathology in people with mental retardation.

This study tested the hypothesis that separate ratings of frequency and duration add significant information to ratings of problem severity in the assessment of psychopathology in people with mental retardation. The Reiss Screen was modified to require ratings of problem severity, frequency and duration for each of 38 maladaptive behaviours. The 171 adolescents and adults were rated by caretakers and supervisory staff on the modified Reiss Screen. The three ratings were found to be very highly intercorrelated. Moreover, multiple linear regression analyses revealed that the ratings of frequency and duration did not add significant information to that provided by ratings of problem severity in the prediction of psychiatric diagnosis in the person's case file. The results support the use of composite scaling over multiple-ratings in the assessment of psychopathology in persons with mental retardation.

Adolescent↗