Biomedical subjects

S M P Koch

Publications and source records attributed to S M P Koch.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Sacral neuromodulation; does it affect colonic transit time in patients with faecal incontinence?

OBJECTIVE: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been a successful treatment in urinary voiding disorders for years. A concomitant effect on bowel function was observed leading to the treatment of faecal incontinence with SNM. In this study we describe the effect of SNM on bowel frequency and (segmental) colonic transit time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with faecal incontinence who qualified for permanent SNM underwent a colon transit study before and one month after permanent implant. Patients completed a three-week bowel habits diary before and during stimulation. RESULTS: Median incontinence episodes and days per week before SNM were, 8.7 and 4.2, respectively, and both decreased significantly to 0.67 (P = 0001) and 0.5 (P = 0001) during trial screening and to 0.33 (P = 0001) and 0.33 (P = 0001) after permanent implant. The median number of bowel movements per week decreased from 14.7 (6.7-41.7) to 10.0 (3.7-22.7)(P = 0005) during trial screening and to 10.0 (6.0-24.3)(P = 0008) during permanent stimulation. Resting and squeeze pressures did not change significantly during stimulation. Segmental colonic transit time before and during stimulation for right colon, left colon and recto sigmoid were, respectively, 6 (0-25) vs 5 (0-16) hours, 2 (0-29) vs 4 (0-45) hours and 7 (28) vs 8 (0-23) hours. No significant changes were found in both segmental and total colonic transit time; 17 (1-65) vs 25 (0-67) hours. CONCLUSION: SNM in patients with fecal incontinence led to a significant decrease of bowel movements however (segmental) colonic transit time was not influenced.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Determination of therapeutic threshold in sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine the therapeutic stimulation threshold in patients with successful sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence. METHODS: Patients who had undergone successful permanent sacral nerve modulator implantation and had been followed up for a minimum of 3 months were included. The sensitivity threshold and motor threshold were determined and correlated with therapeutic response. Patients went home with the stimulator set at 0.6 V below the sensitivity threshold. Each week the voltage was increased by 0.2 V until the sensitivity threshold was reached. The effects on anorectal physiology and continence were recorded. RESULTS: Eight patients (seven women) with a median age of 58.5 years were included. The median follow-up was 6.3 months. The median sensibility threshold volume of rectal sensation was 50 ml, the median urge threshold volume was 140 ml and the median maximum tolerated rectal volume 240 ml. The median number of incontinence episodes and days per week affected by incontinence decreased from 5.0 and 3.8 before operation to 0.7 and 0.7 respectively after follow-up for 3 months. At anorectal manometry the median resting and stimulation anal canal pressures were 57 and 85 mmHg respectively, and remained constant over time. The therapeutic response threshold was significantly lower than the sensitivity threshold (median 1.6 versus 1.7 V; P = 0.042). The median motor threshold was 2.1 V, significantly higher than the sensitivity threshold (P = 0.009). The stimulation threshold for suboptimal therapeutic response was 1.4 V. In five of the eight patients the therapeutic response threshold was the same as the sensitivity threshold. CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve modulation can produce a therapeutic effect below the sensitivity threshold. A lower stimulation voltage increases the lifespan of the pulse generator.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Sphincter replacement grafts].

An anal sphincter replacement graft can be carried out when sphincter lesions occur after unsuccessful conservative or other treatment. Today, two different techniques are used to take over the function of the sphincter. The dynamic gracilis graft can be carried out if a non-atrophied,well innervated m. gracilis is present. This technique is carried out on patients whose incontinence is the result of a trauma,pudendopathy or imperforate anus. It can be extended to the construction of a neo-anus after abdominal resection. The artificial anal sphincter is used whenever the previous method fails or can not be used due to a non-vital, denervated or the lack of the m. gracilis. Older methods such as non-stimulated gracilis, glureus or Thiersch grafts are not commonly used.

Anal Canal↗