PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S M Rodkey

Publications and source records attributed to S M Rodkey.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Does distance between home and transplantation center adversely affect patient outcomes after heart transplantation?

BACKGROUND: The emergence of heart transplantation referral centers, in an era of cost-conscious managed care programs, frequently leads to long-distance patient consultation and care. The purpose of this project was to review one center's experience regarding the effect of long distances from home to transplantation hospital on outcomes. METHODS: Three hundred twelve adult, noninternational, transplant recipients surviving at least 3 months were assessed for 10 events: rejection episodes, number of endomyocardial biopsies, emergency department visits, hospital admissions, return to full-time work or school, infections, coronary allograft vasculopathy, malignancies, retransplantation, and death. Presence of a locally involved physician was also determined. Distance from the transplantation center was analyzed in three discrete groups: 0 to 150 miles (n = 207), 151 to 300 miles (n = 69), and >300 miles (n = 36). RESULTS: There were no differences among the groups in mean length of follow-up (40.6, 36.9, 39.0 months, p = 0.27) or number of biopsies (20.5 +/- 0.16, 18.3 +/- 1.1, 18.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.07). As the distance increased from the transplantation center, there was no greater incidence of adverse outcomes. Cellular rejection was the same among the groups (45%, 45%, 36%, p = 0.58). Likewise, emergency department visits and hospital admissions also did not vary: (9.7%, 5.8%, 8.3%, p = 0.61) and (22.2%, 13.0%, 16.7%, p = 0.23, respectively). There were no differences in the incidence of coronary vasculopathy (9.2%, 11.6%, 13.9%, p = 0.63). More importantly, the three groups did not differ in death/retransplantation rates (3-year survival, 84.5, 94.0 and 86.9, p = 0.14). Patients cared for by a local physician in addition to their transplant cardiologist had better survival rates than patients without a local physician (3-year survival rate, 90.7 vs 72.6, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Long-distance management of heart transplant recipients is successful and is not associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. By itself, distance should not represent a contraindication to transplantation. Patients should be encouraged to maintain contact with a local physician, in addition to the regularly scheduled visits at the transplantation center.

Adolescent↗

Left ventricular volume calculation with integrated backscatter from echocardiography.

Integrated backscatter analysis (IB) is a new echocardiographic method for automatically differentiating tissue from blood on the basis of differences in the amplitude of reflected ultrasound. Left ventricular volume was estimated with IB by use of a modification of Pappus' theorem and a summated ellipsoid method. IB measurements correlated well with a standard biplane area-length method derived off-line from endocardial borders drawn by hand from the same echocardiographic data (y = 1.09 x - 35, r = 0.95). Integrated backscatter measurement of ventricular volume derived from six imaging planes with both the Pappus' rule and the summated ellipsoid methods correlated well with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimates (r = 0.91 and r = 0.90, respectively), whereas use of one imaging plane correlated less well (r = 0.75). Automated analysis of integrated backscatter differentiates tissue from blood sufficiently to allow accurate volume calculations compared with magnetic resonance imaging and to standard hand-drawn echo techniques. This method provides accurate measurement of left ventricular volumes that should be useful in clinical hemodynamic assessments.

Adolescent↗