PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Mennander

Publications and source records attributed to S Mennander.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of remifentanil versus ketamine for paediatric day case adenoidectomy.

Few studies exist of using remifentanil and intravenous ketamine for anaesthetic induction in paediatric day case anaesthesia. Therefore, we studied 75 unpremedicated ASA I-II children (age 1-7 years) who were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either remifentanil (1 microgram/kg), ketamine (0.7 mg/kg) or placebo before the anaesthetic induction. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with O2-N2O-sevoflurane. Induction characteristics, recovery times and the need for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The required induction dose of propofol was lower in the groups receiving remifentanil and ketamine compared with the group receiving placebo. After tracheal intubation heart rate and blood pressure were better attenuated with remifentanil than with ketamine or placebo. In the recovery room children in the placebo group required more doses of oxycodone than the other two groups but this did not reach statistical significance. There were no differences between the groups in achieving predetermined recovery end-points, attaining full points on the Steward score or in the well being at home. In conclusion, remifentanil provides haemodynamically more stable induction of anaesthesia compared with ketamine or placebo. Ketamine with its' longer duration of action does not prolong recovery but does not have a clear opioid-sparing effect either in the immediate postoperative period.

Adenoidectomy↗

Sevoflurane mask induction of anaesthesia is associated with epileptiform EEG in children.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane inhalation induction of anaesthesia is widely used in paediatric anaesthesia. We have found that this method is frequently associated with epileptiform electroencephalogram (EEG) in adults, especially if controlled hyperventilation is used. METHODS: We assessed EEG during sevoflurane inhalation induction in 31 children, aged 2-12 yr. Anaesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane in O2 in N2O 1:2. The patients were randomized to undergo controlled ventilation (CV group), or to breathe spontaneously (SB group) for 5 min. EEG was recorded as were noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate (HR). EEG recordings were classified by a clinical neurophysiologist. RESULTS: Three different types of interictal epileptiform discharge were detected. Suppression with spikes (SSP) was found in 25% and 0% in the CV and SB groups, rhythmic polyspikes (PSR) in 44% and 20%, and periodic epileptiform discharges (PED) in 44% and 0% (P<0.01), respectively. The incidence of all different types of interictal epileptiform discharge (SSP+PSR+PED) was 88% and 20% (P<0.001), respectively. Epileptiform EEG was associated with increased heart rate and blood pressure during anaesthetic induction. CONCLUSION: Both ventilation modes produced epileptiform EEG. With controlled ventilation, epileptiform discharges were seen in 88% of children. This warrants further studies of the suitability of this induction type in general, and especially in children with epilepsy.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

Chronic post-sternotomy pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic postoperative pain is a well-recognised problem. The incidence of severe incapacitating pain is about 3-5% after various types of surgery such as thoracotomy, repair of inguinal hernias and mastectomy. Sternotomy causes considerable postoperative pain and patients with chronic post-sternotomy pain are often referred to pain clinics. Epidemiological studies on chronic post-sternotomy pain are scarce, however. The aim of this paper was to study the incidence and possible risk factors of chronic pain following sternotomy operations performed for coronary bypass grafting or thymectomy. METHODS: Two groups of patients were studied for persistent pain following sternotomy operations. A questionnaire was sent in January 1997 to 71 patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) who had undergone a thymectomy during 1985-1996 and 720 patients who had had coronary bypass grafting (CABG) in 1994 were interviewed by letter. The patients were asked about the presence of pain and other symptoms in the chest, shoulders, arms or legs that they thought were connected to surgery. They were also asked about the quality of the pain and its evolvement with time. The patients' records were checked for details about surgery, anaesthesia and the state of the coronary disease. RESULTS: The response rate was 87%. The interval between the interview and surgery varied from 6 months to 12 years in the MG group and it was 2-3 years in the CABG group. In the MG group, 27% of the patients reported chronic post-sternotomy pain, which was moderate to severe in 48% of the patients. In the CABG group, 28% of the patients still had post-sternotomy pain, which was moderate to severe in 38% of patients. Of the patients who had post-sternotomy pain, one-third reported sleep disturbances due to the pain. CONCLUSION: Chronic post-sternotomy pain is an important complication that may have a significant impact on the patient's everyday life. Future studies will show whether minimising complications, improving postoperative care and starting early adequate pain management will reduce the incidence of this problem.

Adolescent↗

Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol.

BACKGROUND: Alfentanil-propofol combination provides adequate conditions for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking drugs in most patients. Providing an option for intense opioid effect without compromising recovery after short operations, remifentanil might offer benefits over alfentanil, especially in ambulatory surgery. In this study intubating conditions after remifentanil-propofol were compared to those after alfentanil-propofol. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study 60 healthy patients were assigned to one of three groups (n=20). After intravenous atropine, remifentanil 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) (Rem3 or Rem4) or alfentanil 30 microg kg(-1) (Alf30) was injected over 30 s followed by propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1). Sixty seconds after the administration of propofol, laryngoscopy and intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of ventilation, jaw relaxation, position of the vocal cords, and patient response to intubation and slow inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff. RESULTS: Overall conditions at intubation were significantly (P<0.05) better, and the frequency of excellent conditions was significantly (P<0.05) higher in the Rem4 group compared with the Alf30 group. Intubation was judged to be impossible in 20%, 25% or 5% of the patients in the Alf30, Rem3 or Rem4 groups, respectively. No patient manifested signs of opioid-induced muscular rigidity. In terms of arterial pressures or heart rate, there were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: The best method was the combination of remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2.5 mg kg(-1). This provided satisfactory intubating conditions in 93%, and prevented cardiovascular intubation response.

Adolescent↗

Sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia induced with propofol or sevoflurane in small children: induction and recovery characteristics.

PURPOSE: To compare the induction and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia induced with either propofol or sevoflurane in pediatric outpatients. METHODS: Fifty-two children, aged 1-3 yr, presenting for ambulatory adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to receive 3 mg.kg-1 propofol i.v. or sevoflurane 8% inspired concentration for induction of anesthesia. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.2 mg.kg-1 mivacurium. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (FiO2 0.3) and sevoflurane approximately 3-5% inspired concentration with controlled ventilation. Intubation was assessed by an anesthetist blinded to the induction method. Recovery characteristics were compared using the modified Aldrete scoring system, the Pain/Discomfort scale and measuring specific recovery times. A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the children's well-being at home. RESULTS: Intubating conditions were similar in both groups. Emergence from anesthesia occurred earlier with sevoflurane for induction than with propofol (11 +/- 4 vs 17 +/- 7 min (mean +/- SD), P = 0.0002). More children in the sevoflurane group achieved full points on the modified Aldrete scoring system during the first 20 min after anesthesia (P < 0.05). However, children in the sevoflurane group scored higher in the Pain/Discomfort scale at 10 min after anesthesia (P = 0.04) and were given postoperative analgesics earlier than children in the propofol group (13 +/- 5 min vs 18 +/- 11 min, P = 0.03). The time to meet discharge criteria and recovery at home were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of sevoflurane anesthesia with propofol for day-case adenoidectomy results in longer, but more calm, early recovery but does not delay discharge or affect recovery at home.

Adenoidectomy↗