PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S N Birrell

Publications and source records attributed to S N Birrell.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Tumour location and prognostic characteristics as determinants of survival of women with invasive breast cancer: South Australian hospital-based cancer registries, 1987-1998.

Survivals from breast cancer varied by location of lesion (P<0.001), with 10-year survivals of 61% applying for central (n=772), 73% for medial (n=350), and 72% for lateral (n=966) lesions. Univariate analyses of determinants of central locations indicated that the following were predictive: a more advanced TNM stage (P<0.001); a larger tumour diameter (P=0.002); a higher grade (P=0.032); a negative oestrogen receptor status (P=0.004); a negative progesterone receptor status (P=0.004); and histological type (P=0.011), with more of the lobular lesions being located centrally. Cox proportional hazards regression indicated that the relative risk (95% confidence limits) of case fatality for central, as opposed to other, lesions reduced from 1.46 (1.20, 1.78) to 1.16 (0.95, 1.41) when stage was added to the model, with no other factor having an additional conditioning effect. It is concluded that central lesions have worse outcomes, mostly due to their more advanced stages. Means of finding these tumours earlier should be investigated.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

Androgen receptor agonist activity of the synthetic progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate, in human breast cancer cells.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), which is frequently used as second line hormonal therapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, binds with high affinity to the progesterone receptor (PR). However, the androgenic side-effects of MPA suggest that it may also activate androgen receptor (AR) regulated pathways. Treatment of the human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-453, ZR-75-1 and T47-D with high dose (100 nM) MPA resulted in 26-30% inhibition of cell growth, which was partially reversed by co-treatment with a 10-fold excess of the synthetic antiandrogen, anandron. Scatchard analysis demonstrated specific, high affinity (non-PR) binding of [3H]MPA to cytosols prepared from the PR-/AR+ MDA-MB-453 and PR+/AR+ ZR-75-1, but not the PR-/AR- BT-20 breast cancer cell lines. Competition of [3H]MPA binding to MDA-MB-453 cytosols by equimolar concentrations of androgens (5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), R1881) and the antiandrogen, anandron was consistent with binding of MPA to the AR. In ZR-75-1 cell cytosol fractions, DHT, R1881 and anandron only partially competed out [3H]MPA binding, suggesting that androgens displace [3H]MPA binding to AR but not to PR. Induction by MPA of AR transactivation was demonstrated in MDA-MB-453 and ZR-75-1 cells, and in the CV-1 cell line transfected with a full-length AR. In these cell lines the increased activity of the androgen responsive reporter gene (MMTV-CAT) by 1 nM MPA was fully (MDA-MB-453, CV-1) or partially (ZR-75-1) inhibited by co-culture with 1 microM anandron. These findings indicate that MPA is an AR agonist and suggest that the in vivo effects of MPA in breast cancer patients may in part be mediated by the AR.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Role of the androgen receptor in human breast cancer.

Although the androgen receptor (AR)3 is often co-expressed with the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in human breast tumors, its role in breast cancer is poorly understood. Specific growth stimulatory and inhibitory actions of androgens have been described in human breast cancer cell lines. The mechanisms by which androgens exert these contrasting growth effects are unknown. A commonly utilized second line therapy for the treatment of advanced breast cancer is high dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). Although MPA, a synthetic progestin, was thought to act exclusively through the PR, the androgenic side-effects observed in women taking MPA suggest that its action may also be mediated in part by the AR. In support of this hypothesis, the level of AR measured by radioligand binding in primary breast tumors was correlated with the duration of response to MPA treatment following failure of tamoxifen therapy. Recent data suggest that the presence of structurally altered AR in breast cancers may account for unresponsiveness to MPA in some of these cases. Further studies are warranted to determine the role of AR mediated pathways in regulating breast tumor growth. In particular, identification of androgen-regulated genes may lead to new possibilities for the hormonal treatment of breast cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

Prostate-specific antigen and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 are co-expressed in androgen receptor-positive breast tumours.

Androgens regulate breast cancer cell proliferation via androgen receptor (AR)-mediated mechanisms. To investigate further the androgen-responsiveness of human breast tumours, we examined the immunohistochemical expression of the AR and two androgen-regulated proteins, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), in 72 primary breast tumours. AR immunoreactivity was present in the nuclei of breast tumour cells and was correlated with oestrogen receptor (ER; P < 0.05) and progesterone receptor (PR; P < 0.01) status. PSA and GCDFP-15 immunoreactivity was present in the cytoplasm of tumour cells but not the adjacent stromal cells. AR-positive cells were present in 85% (61/72) of breast tumours, and 98% (43/44) of PSA-positive and 92% (44/48) of GCDFP-15-positive tumours were also positive for AR. Positive immunoreactivity for both PSA and GCDFP-15 in breast tumours was highly dependent on AR status (odds ratios of 24.0 and 4.5 respectively), but unrelated to age, ER and PR status and axillary lymph node involvement. PSA immunoreactivity was more frequently observed in moderate and well-differentiated tumours and was significantly (P < 0.001) associated with GCDFP-15 immunoreactivity. In conclusion, PSA and GCDFP-15 immunoreactivity was dependent on the presence of AR, but not ER or PR in primary breast tumours.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Ward evaluations: should they be abandoned?

Even in the era of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), the predominant method of resident evaluation is the faculty ward evaluation (WE), despite many concerns about its reliability. The aim of this study was to determine the value of the WE as a measurement of clinical competence in terms of both reliability and validity. In a one-year period, surgery faculty members evaluated 72 residents. An average of 7 faculty members evaluated each resident. The evaluation form contained 10 specific performance ratings and an overall evaluation. Inter-rater reliability of the overall performance ratings was calculated by using the intraclass correlation. Validity of the WE was evaluated in four ways. Inter-rater reliability of the overall performance rating was 0.82; the reliability of a single overall rating was 0.39. (1) A discriminant function analysis indicated that residents at advanced levels of training received more positive evaluations than residents at less advanced levels (P < 0.0001). (2) The overall rating was significantly correlated (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) with the overall score of a concurrent OSCE. (3) A factor analysis showed high correlations among the items, indicating a lack of discrimination between the skills. (4) Overall ratings were insensitive to performance deficiencies. Only 1.3% of the ratings were unsatisfactory or marginal. The WE was sufficiently reliable to estimate the faculty's view of each resident. The fact that the ratings tended to differentiate residents by level of training and that ratings significantly correlated with the OSCE provides strong evidence of their validity. However, factor analysis indicated that the faculty members were making one global, undifferentiated judgment and that these ratings did not identify deficient performance skills. We conclude that ward evaluations have a place in the assessment of residents.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1996

Expression of the androgen receptor and an androgen-responsive protein, apolipoprotein D, in human breast cancer.

Little is known regarding the activity and function of the androgen receptor (AR) in human breast cancer. In the present study AR was evaluated in untreated primary breast cancers using antisera to the amino- and carboxy-termini of the receptor and quantitated using colour video image analysis. A strong correlation between tissue concentration and percentage AR-positive cells was observed for each antiserum. However, comparison of percentage positive cells using the amino- and carboxy-terminal AR antisera in individual breast cancer specimens revealed a subset of tumours with discordantly increased staining for the carboxy terminus. These findings suggest the presence of amino-terminal-truncated AR in a proportion of breast cancer cells or presence of AR mutations or associated protein alterations that affect binding of the amino-terminal AR antiserum. Immunohistochemical expression of the androgen-regulated glycoprotein, apolipoprotein D (apo-D), was also evaluated in the breast cancer specimens. Focal positivity of apo-D staining, which did not always co-localise with AR-positive cells, was observed within breast tumours. Furthermore, no correlation was evident between percentage positive cells stained for AR and apo-D in breast cancer specimens. These findings indicate that, although apo-D expression is androgen regulated in human breast cancer cell lines in vitro, its expression in primary breast cancers may be regulated by other factors. The expression of AR in primary breast cancers also suggests that the receptor may be involved in tumour responsiveness or in abnormal responses to endocrine therapies.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Androgens induce divergent proliferative responses in human breast cancer cell lines.

Although the majority of primary human breast cancers express the androgen receptor (AR), the role of androgens in breast cancer growth and progression is poorly understood. We have investigated the effects of the naturally occurring androgen, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and a synthetic non-metabolizable androgen, mibolerone, on the proliferation of six human breast cancer cell lines. The anti-proliferative and proliferative effects of androgens were only observed in cell lines that expressed the AR. Two of the AR-positive cell lines, T47-D and ZR-75-1 were growth inhibited in the presence of either DHT or mibolerone, while the proliferation of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-453 cells was increased by both androgens. Co-incubation of cultures with 1 nM DHT and a 100-fold excess of the androgen receptor antagonist, hydroxyflutamide, resulted in reversal of both inhibitory and stimulatory effects of DHT on T47-D, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-453 cell proliferation, indicating that DHT action is mediated by the AR in these lines. Hydroxyflutamide only partially reversed the DHT-induced growth inhibition of ZR-75-1 cultures, which suggests that growth inhibition of these cells may be mediated by non-AR pathways of DHT (or DHT metabolite) action. Mibolerone action on breast cancer cell growth was similar to that of DHT, with the exception that growth stimulation of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-453 cells was only partially reversed in the presence of a 100-fold excess of hydroxyflutamide. Anandron, another androgen receptor antagonist, was able to reverse all inhibitory and stimulatory actions of the androgens. AR antisense oligonucleotides reduced the level of immunoreactive AR expression in MDA-MB-453 and ZR-75-1 cells by more than 60%, but only reversed the growth inhibitory action of mibolerone in ZR-75-1 cultures. The results suggest that androgen action in breast cancer cell lines may not be solely mediated by binding of androgen to the AR. For example, metabolites of DHT with oestrogenic activity, or androgen binding to receptors other than the AR, may explain the divergent responses to androgens observed in different breast cancer cell lines.

Androgen Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed1995

Medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy in advanced breast cancer: the predictive value of androgen receptor expression.

PURPOSE: To determine the predictive value of androgen receptor (AR) levels in primary tumors of women who undergo medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy for advanced breast cancer after relapse on tamoxifen adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Between 1984 and 1987 at Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, 136 postmenopausal women received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for lymph node-positive breast cancer. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), and AR levels, tumor size, and degree of axillary node involvement were determined at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up period was 81 months; 89 women developed metastatic disease, 83 of whom subsequently received MPA (500 mg/d). The objective response rate ([RR] ie, complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) and progression-free interval (PFI) were assessed in response to MPA therapy. Associations between RR, PFI, and primary tumor characteristics including ER, PgR, and AR levels were examined using the Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator, and Cox proportional hazards regression, as appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 83 patients (38.6%) responded to MPA. RR was significantly associated with the presence of AR (P < .001), but not with other primary tumor characteristics or duration of tamoxifen therapy. After initiation of MPA treatment, PFI increased with increasing concentration of AR in the primary tumor. CONCLUSION: Response to MPA after adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for lymph node-positive breast cancer was positively associated with AR level in the primary tumor. This finding suggests that MPA action in breast cancer may be mediated in part by the AR.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

MDA-MB-453, an androgen-responsive human breast carcinoma cell line with high level androgen receptor expression.

The role of androgens and the androgen receptor (AR) in the development and progression of breast cancer is poorly understood. To further define a potential model for androgen action in breast cancer, MDA-MB-453 cells, which express AR in the absence of oestrogen receptors and progesterone receptors, were further characterised in terms of AR expression and androgen responsiveness. High level expression of AR was confirmed by northern blot analysis, radioligand binding and immunocytochemistry, and could not be accounted for by AR gene amplification. Three endogenous androgen-responsive genes (fatty acid synthetase, gross cystic disease fluid protein of 15 kDa and prolactin receptor) and a transfected reporter gene, containing an androgen-responsive element, were induced following androgen administration. A synthetic androgen, mibolerone, induced moderate (27% above control) stimulation of MDA-MB-453 cell proliferation, which was abrogated by the simultaneous administration of the synthetic androgen antagonist, anandron, demonstrating that the effect was AR-mediated. In summary, MDA-MB-453 cells express high levels of functional AR, and thus provide a valuable in vitro model for further studies on androgen regulation of gene expression, and perhaps cell proliferation in breast cancer.

Blotting, Southern↗