PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S N Piper

Publications and source records attributed to S N Piper.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 compared with 0.4 does not further reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most frequent complications after general anaesthesia. Single-dose antiemetic prophylaxis has limited efficacy in high-risk patients. Adding a simple potential antiemetic approach, such as increasing the inspired oxygen fraction, to the antiemetic portfolio would preserve pharmacological interventions for treatment of symptoms in the postoperative period. However, the antiemetic effect of a high inspired oxygen fraction is still discussed controversially. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 decreases PONV in patients receiving the 5-HT3-antagonist dolasetron. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial we studied 377 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Induction of anaesthesia was standardized, including thiopental fentanyl and cis-atracurium. For all patients the individual risk for PONV was calculated using the Koivuranta score and all patients received 12.5 mg dolasetron i.v. before surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups: Group A (n=125) received 80% oxygen in air, Group B (n=125) 40% oxygen in air and Group C (n=127) 40% oxygen in nitrous oxide. Postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting (PV), or nausea, vomiting, or both (PONV) was assessed in the early (0-4 h) and overall postoperative period (0-24 h) by an anaesthesiologist unaware of patient allocation. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower incidence of PONV and PV in Groups A (PONV: 11.2%; PV: 3.2%) and B (PONV: 10.4%; PV: 3.2%) compared with Group C (PONV: 26.7%; PV: 13.3%), but there were no significant differences between Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: An inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 does not further decrease PONV or vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The lower incidence of PONV in Groups A and B compared with Group C is most likely caused by the omission of nitrous oxide.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

[Comparison of a propofol-based anesthesia regimen using optimated-target-controlled-infusion (OTCI) and manually-controlled infusion (MCI) technique].

BACKGROUND: Propofol anesthesia based on target-controlled-infusion (TCI) has been shown to be superior to a manually-controlled-infusion (MCI) technique. A new optimal-target-controlled-infusion (OTCI) technique enables an individual plasma-targeted adjustment by including the concentration in the effect-compartment. This study compared practicability and costs of the new system with a conventional MCI-based propofol anesthesia regimen. METHODS: In a prospective study, 50 patients scheduled for elective surgery of nose or nasal sinuses were randomly enrolled to receive BIS-controlled anaesthesia (level: 40-55) using either OTCI (n = 25) or MCI (n = 25). Hemodynamics, extubation times and time of awaking, rate and quality of propofol adjustment, total drug requirements, costs, postanaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay, Aldrete and pain scores, and adverse effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), shivering) were recorded. RESULTS: Demographics, hemodynamics, and perioperative data including extubation times were comparable for both study groups. Propofol consumption was similar within the first 60 min for both groups, thereafter, significantly less propofol in the OTCI group (5.03 mg/kg/h) than the MCI group (5.79 mg/kg/h) was used. Costs for propofol was significantly reduced with OTCI (0.2 vs. 0.23 Cent/anaesthesia minute/kg), the administration of other anaesthetics (fentanyl, remifentanil, cis-atracurium) did not differ between the groups. The number of infusion adjustments to BIS values were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The new OTCI-system is a safe and easily controllable technique. The obvious advantage of this infusion system appears to be a reduction in propofol consumption and direct drug costs for anaesthesia lasting longer than 60 min.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Early recovery, cognitive function and costs of a desflurane inhalational vs. a total intravenous anaesthesia regimen in long-term surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare time of recovery, return of cognitive function, post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay and costs of a propofol/remifentanil (TIVA) with a desflurane/fentanyl-based anaesthesia (desflurane group) in surgical procedures lasting more than 150 min. METHODS: Forty-nine patients undergoing elective abdominal prostatectomy were allocated randomly to receive bispectal index (BIS)-controlled desflurane/fentanyl (n=24) or propofol/remifentanil (n=25). Awakening, clinical recovery, direct drug acquisition and post-operative pain treatment were documented. Cognitive skills were tested using the Mini-Mental Status (MMST) test. RESULTS: Extubation was significantly faster with desflurane (6.9+/-3.5 min) than with TIVA (11.2+/-4.0 min) as well as times for stating name and date of birth (desflurane: 6.1+/-3.9 and 6.6+/-4.0 min; TIVA: 12.4+/-11.5 min and 13.4+/-11.3 min). There were no significant differences in PACU discharge times or MMS scores between the groups. Significantly more patients suffered post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the desflurane (33% vs. 0%) than the TIVA group. Overall costs were significantly higher in the TIVA (58.8+/-11.6 euro) than in the desflurane group (35.0+/-5.7 euro). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing prolonged surgical procedures showed a faster early recovery after desflurane/fentanyl than using TIVA, whereas stay in the PACU and recovery of cognitive function were similar in both groups. Costs of a TIVA regimen were significantly higher than using a desflurane-based anaesthesia technique.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗
PubMed2005

Insignificant effect of desflurane-fentanyl-thiopental on hepatocellular integrity--a comparison with total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol-remifentanil.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inhalational anaesthetics have been associated with hepatotoxicity. Even desflurane, with its low solubility in blood and tissues, and its minimal hepatic biotransformation, is known to affect hepatic integrity. The effects of propofol on hepatic function are, however, a matter of controversy. Alpha-glutathione S-transferase (alpha-GST), a sensitive and specific biomarker for hepatic integrity, was measured to assess the influence of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol vs. anaesthesia with desflurane. METHODS: Forty-two patients scheduled for elective prostatectomy were randomly allocated to receive either desflurane, fentanyl and thiopental (desflurane group) or propofol and remifentanil (TIVA group). Depth of anaesthesia was guided by bispectral index. Plasma concentrations of alpha-GST and aminotransferases were measured before induction of anaesthesia (TO), at the end of surgery (T1), as well as 2 h (T2) and 24 h (T3) postoperatively. Haemodynamic parameters and bispectral index values were documented. RESULTS: alpha-GST increased significantly in the desflurane group from TO (3.0 +/- 2.2 microg L(-1)) to T1 and T2 (5.5 +/- 4.3 and 5.6 +/- 3.7 microg L(-1), respectively), whereas no changes were seen in the TIVA group. alpha-GST values above the normal upper limit (> 7.5 microg L(-1)) were seen in 24% of the patients receiving desflurane. Aminotransferases remained unchanged in both groups throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The use of propofol as part of a TIVA regimen seems to have no influence on hepatocellular function during and after surgery. In contrast, patients receiving desflurane showed a transient slight, but significant, increase of alpha-GST to above the normal upper limit after anaesthesia, although this was without further clinical relevance.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed2005

Physostigmine for the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering following general anaesthesia - a placebo-controlled comparison with nefopam.

Physostigmine was studied for its efficacy in the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering compared to nefopam and placebo. We studied 89 patients undergoing abdominal and urological surgery. The study was randomised and double-blind, the patients received physostigmine 2 mg (n = 31), nefopam 10 mg (n = 30) or saline (n = 28). Haemodynamic parameters and temperature were measured at induction of anaesthesia (T0), and 5 min (T1), 15 min (T2), 30 min (T3) and 60 min (T4) after reaching the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU). Significantly less shivering occurred following administration of physostigmine and nefopam (9.7 and 3.3%) compared to placebo (53.6%). The degree of shivering was also significantly reduced following physostigmine and nefopam (p < 0.01). Extubation time, haemodynamic parameters and tympanic temperature were found to be similar in all groups. Aldrete score, duration of PACU stay and postoperative analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups. Only nefopam significantly (p < 0.01) reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting. Physostigmine is a safe alternative to nefopam, significantly reducing the incidence and severity of postanaesthetic shivering without affecting postanaesthetic recovery.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Do we necessarily need local anaesthetics for venous cannulation? A comparison of different cannula sizes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This randomized, prospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of a subcutaneous local anaesthetic infiltration prior to venepuncture using different cannula sizes. METHODS: Three-hundred-and-one patients were included in the study, 150 received mepivacaine 1% (0.25 mL) subcutaneously, 151 were cannulated without local analgesia. Patients were further allocated to one of five cannula size groups (standard wire gauge (G)): 20-, 18-, 17-, 16- and 14-G. They were asked to quantify the pain experienced using a four-point rating scale. RESULTS: In the group without local anaesthetics, 28.8% complained about pain compared to 12% receiving local analgesia. The incidence of pain for 14-G (10%) and 16-G (12.9%) cannulae was significantly reduced in the local analgesia group (P < 0.01) compared to no local analgesia (77.4% and 45.1%). Other cannula sizes showed no difference in pain whether using local analgesia or not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients profit from a subcutaneous infiltration with mepivacaine 1% prior to intravenous cathetherization only when cannulae of size > or = 16-G are inserted.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2004

[ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the practicality of the ProSeal laryngeal mask (PS-LMA) airway during laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum compared to endotracheal intubation (ET). METHODS: Prospective, randomized study. 104 patients undergoing gynaecologic, laparoscopic surgery were allocated randomly to two groups: 1. ET-group (n = 50). 2. PS-LMA-group (n = 54). Total intravenous anaesthesia was performed by the same anaesthesiologist. MEASUREMENTS: Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, at 4 and circuit pressure at 2 measurement points, and the incidences of coughing and sore throat. Insertion of the ET and the PS-LMA was scored by using a four-point scale. Ease of placing the gastric tube was judged by measuring the number of attempts at insertion and the insertion times. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: There were no differences between PS-LMA and ET concerning circuit pressure at any measurement point. At the end of anaesthesia, mean arterial pressure (92 +/- 13 vs. 100 +/- 14 mmHg; p < 0.01) and heart rate (66 +/- 13 vs. 76 +/- 14 beats/min; p < 0.01) were lower in the PS-LMA-group compared to the ET-group. At the end of anaesthesia 25 patients of the ET-group coughed but nobody in the PS-LMA-group (p < 0.00001). There was no difference with regard to postoperative sore throat. The insertion of the PS-LMA was easier compared to ET (p < 0.05), but we found no significant difference concerning insertion times. Fewer attempts at insertion of the gastric tube were necessary in the PS-LMA-group than in the ET-group (p < 0.01), whereas insertion times did not differ. CONCLUSION: The PS-LMA is a convenient and practicable approach for anaesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A comparison of nefopam and clonidine for the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering: a comparative, double-blind and placebo-controlled dose-ranging study.

Postanaesthetic shivering is a frequent complication following general anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three doses of nefopam with clonidine and placebo in the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering. We studied 371 patients undergoing abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. Patients were allocated to one of five groups: Group A (n = 73) received 0.2 mg x kg(-1) nefopam, Group B (n = 75) 0.1 mg x kg(-1) nefopam, Group C (n = 76) 0.05 mg x kg(-1) nefopam, Group D (n = 73) 1.5 microg x kg(-1) clonidine, and Group E (n = 74) saline 0.9% as placebo. We found a significant reduction in the incidence of shivering in Group A compared to Group C and clonidine as well as to the placebo group. All active treatments reduced the incidence and the severity of shivering compared to placebo. At 5 min postoperatively clonidine-treated patients showed a significant decrease in MAP and a significantly lower Aldrete score compared to all other groups. No haemodynamic or sedative adverse events were observed in the nefopam-treated patients. The results of our study indicate that nefopam (0.2 mg x kg(-1)) is superior to clonidine (1.5 microg x kg(-1)) in the prophylaxis of postanaesthetic shivering and not accompanied by sedative or haemodynamic side-effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Randomised comparison of dolasetron versus dolasetron plus dexamethasone].

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent complications after operations. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of combined dolasetron plus dexamethasone versus dolasetron alone with respect to the incidence and severity of emetic symptoms and patients satisfaction. METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, double-blind study, 150 patients scheduled for hysterectomy or breast surgery were allocated to one of the following two groups: group A received 50 mg dolasetron orally and group B 50 mg dolasetron orally plus 8 mg dexamethasone intravenously. The follow-up was for 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: In group A PONV was significantly more frequent (28%) compared to group B (12.0%). The incidence of vomiting was significantly lower in patients receiving dolasetron plus dexamethasone (0%) in comparison to patients receiving dolasetron (8.0%). Furthermore,patients satisfaction was significantly higher in group B compared to group A. About 6 or 7 patients need to be treated with additional dexamethasone instead of a placebo for one patient to benefit from this intervention (i.e. to stay free from PONV) who otherwise would have suffered from PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Combining oral dolasetron with intravenous dexamethasone further improves the antiemetic efficacy of dolasetron. With a number-needed-to-treat of about 6 the additional benefit might be considered clinically relevant.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Prevention of propofol-induced injection pain by remifentanil: a placebo-controlled comparison with lidocaine.

In a randomised, double-blind study we compared the efficacy of continuous remifentanil infusion (0.25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) with 40 mg lidocaine and placebo in the prevention of injection pain due to intravenous propofol administration (1.5-2 mg x kg(-1)) in 155 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Pain severity was evaluated using a four-point scale. The incidence of injection pain was 62% in the placebo group and could be reduced significantly by using remifentanil (30%; p < 0.0015) or lidocaine (33%; p < 0.005). Analysis of the pain scores showed a significant difference between remifentanil and placebo (p < 0.00005) as well as between lidocaine and placebo (p < 0.0002). There was no significant difference between remifentanil and lidocaine. Remifentanil provided effective pain relief, comparable with lidocaine, and is an alternative as part of an intravenous anaesthesia regimen to using another concomitant drug.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Current status of non-invasive ventilation in German ICU's -- a postal survey].

The status of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in intensive care units (ICU) in Germany was analysed by a national survey. Questionnaires consisting of multiple-choice and short-answer questions were sent to ICUs of university hospitals, hospitals with >1000 beds, with 500 - 1000 beds, and hospitals with <500 beds separated with regard to different specialties (anesthesia ICUs, surgical ICUs, cardiac surgical ICUs, neurosurgical ICUs, internal ICUs, interdiscipline ICUs). Of the 716 questionnaires sent 223 (32 %) were returned and analysed. The use of NIV in all specialties increased during the last 3 years. 14 % of ICUs in some specialties treated more than 30 % of patients with NIV. CPAP (88 %), BIPAP (45 %) and ASB/PSV (48 %) were most frequently used as NIV-strategies. 10 % of all ICUs reported to have experience with proportional assist ventilation. NIV was most frequently used for disease states like COPD (82 %), pneumonia (64 %), pulmonary oedema (50 %), bronchial asthma (35 %) and ALI/ARDS (22 %). The use of NIV was considered when clinical signs of ventilation (93 %) and oxygenation [arterial blood gas analysis (92 %) and oxygen saturation (66 %)] were inadequate. Complications observed during NIV were panic reaction (83 %), ulceration of nose (38 %) and aspiration (14 %). The reasons to reject NIV were (total 13 %): lack of ventilators (64 %), expenditure of personnel (57 %) and risk of the procedure (11 %). 38 % of the ventilators used were older than 5 years. 56 % of the ICUs were content with the equipment for NIV. 76 % of the ICUs were interested to buy new equipment of NIV. 99 % of the survey have declined NIV as an alternative method of ventilation. In summary we found NIV as an accepted additional method of ventilatory support in respiratory failure in German ICUs. We found no significant increase in frequency of NIV in the last three years.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2003

[Influence of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on the natriuretic peptides ANP and BNP. A comparison between long and short duration of CPB and off pump surgery].

OBJECTIVE: Plasma atrial and brain natriuretic peptide (ANP and BNP) are cardiac hormones secreted mainly due to cardiac overload. The study was designed to assess plasma concentrations of ANP and BNP in patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting (CABG) with long and short duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and without CPB (off-pump surgery). METHODS: We studied 45 patients scheduled for elective CABG. Patients were allocated in three groups: group A received CPB with a duration less than 60 minutes, group B more than 60 minutes and patients without CPB were allocated in group C. ANP and BNP were measured after induction of anaesthesia (T0), at the end of surgery (T1), 4 hrs. (T2), 24 hrs. (T3) and 120 hrs. postoperatively (T4). RESULTS: In all groups, ANP-levels increased from T0 to T4 (group A: from 3.7 +/- 2.1 to 8.9 +/- 8.0; group B: from 3.3 +/- 1.7 to 8.0 +/- 6.0; group C: from 3.0 +/- 1.6 to 5.3 +/- 2.3 pg/ml), but there were no significant differences between the groups. BNP-concentrations increased also from T0 to T4 (group A: from 34 +/- 18 to 234 +/- 164; group B: from 33 +/- 26 to 219 +/- 182; group C: from 33 +/- 24 to 77 +/- 55 pg/ml). Furthermore we measured significant higher BNP-levels in group B compared to group C at T3 and T4. No significant differences between group A and B were found. CONCLUSIONS: CPB influenced BNP, but not ANP plasma concentrations. An influence of the duration of CPB on ANP and BNP was not seen.

English Abstract↗
PubMed2003

[Injection pain secondary to propofol-MCT/LCT and propofol-LCT--comparison of prophylaxis with lidocaine].

OBJECTIVE: Pain on injection is one of the most described side-effects of the intravenous application of propofol. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 40 mg in preventing incidence and severity of injection pain for two different propofol solvents. METHODS: In a double-blind and prospective study 202 patients were enrolled and randomized to 4 different groups: group A receiving 2 ml NaCl 0.9 % and propofol-LCT (Disoprivan; AstraZeneca), group B 40 mg lidocaine and propofol-LCT, group C received 2 ml NaCl 0.9 % and propofol-MCT/LCT (Propofol-Lipuro, B. Braun Melsungen AG) and group D 40 mg lidocaine and propofol-MCT/LCT. According to the protocol, all patients were cannulated with a 18-G venous cannula at the dorsum of the hand and no other medicament was injected before the study drug. Time interval between test agents and propofol application in a dosage of 2 mg/kg was one minute. Severity of pain was evaluated during propofol injection over 30 seconds until loss of consciousness using a 4-point rating scale. RESULTS: The incidence of injection pain did not differ between propofol-LCT and propofol-MCT/LCT (64 % and 53 %). Propofol-MCT/LCT significantly reduced the severity of pain compared to propofol-LCT (p < 0.05). The application of lidocaine resulted in a significant reduction in incidence (Propofol-MCT/LCT: 16 %; Propofol-LCT: 31 %) and severity of injection pain compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Propofol-MCT/LCT showed a significant advantage compared to propofol-LCT considering the severity of injection pain, but not in reducing the incidence of pain. The use of lidocaine resulted in a significant reduction of incidence and severity of injection pain for both propofol solvents.

English Abstract↗
PubMed2003

[Effects of esmolol- and sodium nitroprusside-induced controlled hypotension on hepatocellular integrity in patients undergoing endonasal sinus surgery].

BACKGROUND: Controlled hypotension (CH) is an established method to reduce intraoperative bleeding. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of CH induced by sodium nitroprusside (SN) or esmolol on hepatocellular integrity. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. 45 patients scheduled for elective endonasal sinus surgery were allocated to one of the following three groups: 1. SN-group (n = 15): CH induced by SN. 2. Esmolol-group: CH induced by esmolol. In both groups mean arterial pressure was kept between 50-55 mmHg. 3. Control group (n = 15): no hypotension was performed (MAP > 70 mmHg). The cytosolic liver enzyme alpha-glutathione S-transferase (alpha-GST) and standard liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase) were measured at the following timepoints: preoperative (T0), at the end of surgery (T1), 2 h (T2), 24 h (T3) and 48 h (T4) postoperatively. RESULTS: alpha-GST concentrations were significantly higher in patients receiving CH (SN: 5.9 +/- 3.4; Esmolol: 6.5 +/- 2.8 microg/L) in comparison with controls (2.5 +/- 1.4 microg/L) at T1. Already at T2 there were no significant differences between the three groups. Standard liver enzymes showed a similar course in all groups. CONCLUSION: The small but significant increase of alpha-GST in both hypotension groups suggests that hypotension induces a mild damage of hepatocellular integrity.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

Effects of sodium nitroprusside-induced controlled hypotension on pancreatic function assessed by pancreatitis-associated protein in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Controlled hypotension may alter organ blood flow and tissue oxygenation. The aim of the study was to investigate whether induced hypotension using sodium nitroprusside alters pancreatic function assessed by pancreatitis-associated protein concentrations in the blood. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing elective radical prostatectomy were allocated randomly into two groups: (a) hypotension group: sodium nitroprusside was administered to lower mean arterial pressure to approximately 50 mmHg; (b) control group: no hypotension was used, mean arterial pressure was kept > 70 mmHg. Pancreatitis-associated protein and lipase were measured in arterial blood samples: after induction of anaesthesia (T1), at the end of surgery (T2), 2 h (T3) and 24 h (T4) postoperatively. RESULTS: Pancreatitis-associated protein plasma concentrations increased significantly in patients in the hypotensive group (from 2.8 +/- 1.1 to 5.5 +/- 2.0 micrograms L-1 at T4) and pancreatitis-associated protein plasma concentrations were significantly higher in comparison with controls (5.5 +/- 2.0 versus 3.5 +/- 2.4 micrograms L-1) at T4. Lipase concentrations showed a similar course in both groups. None of the patients showed clinical signs of pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled hypotension during surgery was associated with a small but significant increase in pancreatitis-associated protein compared with controls. The absence of concomitant elevation in lipase concentrations and a lack of clinical evidence of pancreatitis damage suggest that hypotension induces mild pancreatic stress.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Dolasetron reduces pain on injection of propofol].

OBJECTIVE: Pain on injection is a well known side-effect of propofol. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of dolasetron, a 5-HT 3 -antagonist, in prophylaxis of pain on injection of propofol compared with lidocaine and placebo. METHODS: Prospective, randomised, double-blinded study including 150 patients randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A received 12.5 mg dolasetron, group B 40 mg lidocaine and group C saline 0.9 % as placebo. After occluding the venous drainage the test medication was given. The occlusion was released after 1 min and 2.0 mg/kg Propofol was administered over a period of 30 sec. The patients were asked whether they felt any pain during the administration. Pain on injection was judged by using a four-point scale. RESULTS: Incidence of pain on injection as well as the severity of pain was significantly reduced by lidocaine (62 % pain free) compared with placebo (28 %). Severity, but not incidence of pain on injection was significantly reduced by dolasetron (50 %) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between dolasetron and lidocaine. CONCLUSION: Dolasetron and lidocaine were effective in preventing pain of injection secondary to propofol.

English Abstract↗