PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

S Nadig

Publications and source records attributed to S Nadig.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

A prospective single-blind randomized-controlled trial comparing two surgical techniques for the treatment of snoring: laser palatoplasty versus uvulectomy with punctate palatal diathermy.

The aim of this study was to compare laser palatoplasty with uvulectomy with punctate palatal diathermy as treatment modalities for snoring. The study design was a prospective, single-blind, randomized-controlled trial. Eighty-three patients entered the trial. After a mean follow-up period of more than 18 months there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the patient perception of benefit from surgery or the subjective improvement in snoring. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the degree of pain in the immediate postoperative period (mean difference = 22.14, 95% CI = 7.98-36.31, P = 0.003), with the pain being worse in the laser palatoplasty group. Relative risk of complications for laser palatoplasty was 1.42 (95% CI = 0.93-2.17). The snoring scores and Glasgow Benefit Inventory scores decreased with time in both the groups but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Adult↗

Why do we have a uvula?: literature review and a new theory.

From ancient times up to the present day many different functions and conditions have been attributed to the uvula, many speculative and some with a more scientific basis. The uvula has been shown to have the ability to produce and secrete large quantities of thin saliva. A common complication of surgery involving removal of the uvula is pharyngeal dryness. We have observed that on phonation and swallowing the uvula swings back and forth in the oropharynx. We present a review of the literature on the uvula and propose a theory that the uvula bastes the throat and thereby helps keep it moist and well lubricated.

Deglutition↗

A cost-effectiveness analysis of conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The need to bring down costs while maintaining a high standard of care has led to the expansion in the role of nurses in recent years. METHODS: We present results of cost-effectiveness analysis of conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the substitution of nurse-led telephone follow-up for conventional out-patient follow-up has the potential for substantial cost reduction and decreased out-patient access times in the NHS.

Cost Savings↗

Patient satisfaction with conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery.

The need to bring down costs while maintaining a high standard of care has led to the expansion in the role of nurses in recent years. We present results of an audit of patient satisfaction with conventional and nurse-led telephone follow-up after nasal septal surgery. Our results indicate that patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up is significantly higher than conventional follow-up (p=0.001, two-tailed). More patients in the conventional follow-up group felt that a follow-up appointment with an ENT doctor was essential compared with the patients in the nurse-led telephone follow-up group (p<0.001, two-tailed). We conclude that nurse-led telephone follow-up avoids unnecessary outpatient appointments, while identifying patients who require further care. It makes more appointment slots available for patients with pressing clinical problems and has the potential to reduce outpatient access times in the NHS.

Adult↗